NATION

PASSWORD

[US Election 2016] Democratic Primary Megathread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who Do You Support In The Democratic Primaries?

Hillary Clinton
56
18%
Bernie Sanders
260
82%
 
Total votes : 316

User avatar
Hetalia Dakota 2 II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: May 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalia Dakota 2 II » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:34 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Actan wrote:I hope Biden runs, that would drain a lot of Hillary support.


It would also suck a lot of the media attention from Sanders, and he's had to fight for every second of airtime to date.

I feel Biden would be a better President.
Signatures are boring.
SQUIG: #2

User avatar
Hetalia Dakota 2 II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: May 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalia Dakota 2 II » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:35 pm

Actan wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
yeah I think the narrative would immediately become Clinton vs biden. the media wants to be able to ignore sanders.

Not to mention Clinton automatically has 1/5th of the delegates since the "Democratic" party has a fairly undemocratic way of nominating candidates.

That said, she also had them when Obama won.

Do you mean feminists?
Signatures are boring.
SQUIG: #2

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:36 pm

Actan wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
yeah I think the narrative would immediately become Clinton vs biden. the media wants to be able to ignore sanders.

Not to mention Clinton automatically has 1/5th of the delegates since the "Democratic" party has a fairly undemocratic way of nominating candidates.

That said, she also had them when Obama won.

yeah she knows the tricks now.

I think she announced the super delegate count so as to discourage biden from jumping into the race.
whatever

User avatar
Actan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Jun 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Actan » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:42 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Actan wrote:Not to mention Clinton automatically has 1/5th of the delegates since the "Democratic" party has a fairly undemocratic way of nominating candidates.

That said, she also had them when Obama won.

Do you mean feminists?

No, the "superdelegates", which are basically appointed delegates that got their position due to political or economic influence. They are all rigidly establishment so would never support someone like Sanders. One of the worst aspects of the Democratic Party.
Pro: Republicanism, Capitalism, Federalism, Parliamentary Governance, Humanism, Secularism, Constitutionalism, Gender Equality, Liberalism, Interventionism, and Moderate Nationalism.
Against: Authoritarianism, Conservatism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Totalitarianism, Fundamentalism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Imperialism, Isolationism, Lassez-faire Capitalism, Libertarianism, Anarchism and Monarchism.

User avatar
Actan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Jun 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Actan » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:42 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Actan wrote:Not to mention Clinton automatically has 1/5th of the delegates since the "Democratic" party has a fairly undemocratic way of nominating candidates.

That said, she also had them when Obama won.

yeah she knows the tricks now.

I think she announced the super delegate count so as to discourage biden from jumping into the race.

I mean I don't doubt she has them.
Pro: Republicanism, Capitalism, Federalism, Parliamentary Governance, Humanism, Secularism, Constitutionalism, Gender Equality, Liberalism, Interventionism, and Moderate Nationalism.
Against: Authoritarianism, Conservatism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Totalitarianism, Fundamentalism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Imperialism, Isolationism, Lassez-faire Capitalism, Libertarianism, Anarchism and Monarchism.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:44 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
It would also suck a lot of the media attention from Sanders, and he's had to fight for every second of airtime to date.

I feel Biden would be a better President.


Than who? Hillary? Perhaps. There's not much daylight between them, honestly. Sanders? Why?

User avatar
Hetalia Dakota 2 II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: May 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalia Dakota 2 II » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:44 pm

Actan wrote:
Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:Do you mean feminists?

No, the "superdelegates", which are basically appointed delegates that got their position due to political or economic influence. They are all rigidly establishment so would never support someone like Sanders. One of the worst aspects of the Democratic Party.

Could they go for Biden?
Signatures are boring.
SQUIG: #2

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:44 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Actan wrote:Not to mention Clinton automatically has 1/5th of the delegates since the "Democratic" party has a fairly undemocratic way of nominating candidates.

That said, she also had them when Obama won.

Do you mean feminists?


Superdelegates.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:45 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Actan wrote:No, the "superdelegates", which are basically appointed delegates that got their position due to political or economic influence. They are all rigidly establishment so would never support someone like Sanders. One of the worst aspects of the Democratic Party.

Could they go for Biden?


Easily.

User avatar
Actan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Jun 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Actan » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:46 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Actan wrote:No, the "superdelegates", which are basically appointed delegates that got their position due to political or economic influence. They are all rigidly establishment so would never support someone like Sanders. One of the worst aspects of the Democratic Party.

Could they go for Biden?

Yes. Biden is very connected to the establishment, arguably more so than Hillary. That said, they also weigh electability.
Pro: Republicanism, Capitalism, Federalism, Parliamentary Governance, Humanism, Secularism, Constitutionalism, Gender Equality, Liberalism, Interventionism, and Moderate Nationalism.
Against: Authoritarianism, Conservatism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Totalitarianism, Fundamentalism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Imperialism, Isolationism, Lassez-faire Capitalism, Libertarianism, Anarchism and Monarchism.

User avatar
Hetalia Dakota 2 II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: May 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalia Dakota 2 II » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:47 pm

Actan wrote:
Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:Could they go for Biden?

Yes. Biden is very connected to the establishment, arguably more so than Hillary. That said, they also weigh electability.

I really really want him to win.
Signatures are boring.
SQUIG: #2

User avatar
Actan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 607
Founded: Jun 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Actan » Sat Aug 29, 2015 3:48 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Actan wrote:Yes. Biden is very connected to the establishment, arguably more so than Hillary. That said, they also weigh electability.

I really really want him to win.

He won't, I don't see him winning, but I won't discount him.
Pro: Republicanism, Capitalism, Federalism, Parliamentary Governance, Humanism, Secularism, Constitutionalism, Gender Equality, Liberalism, Interventionism, and Moderate Nationalism.
Against: Authoritarianism, Conservatism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Totalitarianism, Fundamentalism, Bolshevism, Nazism, Imperialism, Isolationism, Lassez-faire Capitalism, Libertarianism, Anarchism and Monarchism.

User avatar
Marylandonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1029
Founded: Feb 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Marylandonia » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:21 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Actan wrote:Yes. Biden is very connected to the establishment, arguably more so than Hillary. That said, they also weigh electability.

I really really want him to win.


If he got in and Hillary's fade continued unabated, he'd win.
ALT is New Jerzylvania

User avatar
Marxist Nations
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Jun 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Nations » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:25 pm

FEEL THE BERN!!!!!!!!!!
FEEL THE BERN 2016!!!!!

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:32 pm

Marylandonia wrote:
Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:I really really want him to win.


If he got in and Hillary's fade continued unabated, he'd win.

I wouldn't discount Bernie's populist anti-establishment theme, especially among young people.

User avatar
Hetalia Dakota 2 II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: May 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalia Dakota 2 II » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:35 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Marylandonia wrote:
If he got in and Hillary's fade continued unabated, he'd win.

I wouldn't discount Bernie's populist anti-establishment theme, especially among young people.

I really wish the Internet would stop their obsession over him.
Signatures are boring.
SQUIG: #2

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:37 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Genivaria wrote:I wouldn't discount Bernie's populist anti-establishment theme, especially among young people.

I really wish the Internet would stop their obsession over him.

They will when the election is over.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:50 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Genivaria wrote:I wouldn't discount Bernie's populist anti-establishment theme, especially among young people.

I really wish the Internet would stop their obsession over him.


Why?

User avatar
Hetalia Dakota 2 II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18714
Founded: May 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalia Dakota 2 II » Sat Aug 29, 2015 4:52 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:I really wish the Internet would stop their obsession over him.


Why?
people like generic "Feel the bern!!!111" guy just convince me to of vote for him and to convince others to do the same. He's all over my fucking Facebook too
Signatures are boring.
SQUIG: #2

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Aug 29, 2015 5:30 pm

Hetalia Dakota 2 II wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Why?
people like generic "Feel the bern!!!111" guy just convince me to of vote for him and to convince others to do the same. He's all over my fucking Facebook too


I admit, I do wish that a different slogan had caught on, but the fact that he's raising such enthusiasm shows that his message has struck a chord with many people. I can see how this would be annoying, though. Tell you what: rather than judge an entire movement by the actions of those whose enthusiasm outweighs their common sense or tact, check out his positions and decide for yourself. If you're not into the platform, that's fine. Vote your conscience. However, if he does appeal to you, wouldn't it be a shame to refrain from supporting him due to the foolishness of a handful of True Believer types?

User avatar
Indian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2088
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Indian Empire » Sat Aug 29, 2015 5:34 pm

I decided to analyze the top 3 (official) candidates in the Democratic Presidential Race, and determine a final conclusion as to which one I feel has the best chance to allow the democrats to win.

Hillary Clinton- Biography
Age: 67
Previous Office: Secretary of State (2009-2013)
Previous Runs: 2008

Positives: Has Ran for president previously and is one of the more experienced candidates in the field. Is also a heavy supporter of the Obama administration.

Negatives: Clinton is a lady (no female has ever became president). Hillary is also a former secretary of state, the last former secretary of state to become president was James Buchanan. Clinton could also be facing criminal charges for her non-co-operation. Her Age may also be a factor in her potential presidency.

Conclusion: Clinton started high in the polls, due to being the one most closely associated to Obama, but the scandals and several other factors have led to a decline in the polls, and I think this is likely close to the end of Clinton being a viable presidential candidate. I predict Clinton will fall to 2nd place and remain there throughout the rest of the elections.

Bernard "Bernie" Sanders- Biography
Age: 73
Previous Office: Vermont Senator
Previous Runs: N/A

Positives: Sanders is a candidate who matches many democratic views- while holding a officially "Independent" Stance, allowing the republicans to agree on some issues and get things done in Washington. Bernie is a peace believing person- Much like Scandinavia. No new Wars would likely take place, allowing more problems here in the US to be solved.

Negatives: The Democrats may view him as a "Independent" candidate, and the democrats could consider running a second candidate- like Clinton, against Sanders. His Age is almost guaranteed to get in his way, if he wins a 2nd term he'd likely be in Frail health throughout.

Conclusion: Sanders is a candidate who has gained steam due to Clinton's demise, and is likely a frontrunner to become the democratic Nominee. He should be someone who would be a nice compromise guy between both parties- some of the republican states may go with the democrats in voting for Sanders. Sanders will likely serve 4 years in the White House- and in doing so bring Peaceful feelings to the United States, and alternatives to war that the democrats and maybe even some republicans will consider in the future.

Martin O'Malley- Biography
Age: 52
Previous Office: Governor of Maryland 2007-
Previous Runs: N/A

Positives: Knows how to lead and is really a under the radar potential candidate. Younger than the other 2 front runners.

Negatives: With Joe Biden considering a run, O'Malley's campaign could fall completely off a already tough attempt for him to win.

Conclusion: If Biden does not run, O'Malley will probably make some noise in the next few months before his campaign quickly falls apart.

Final Conclusion: Sanders may be the oldest, but he is likely the best chance for the democrats to win, however the democrats would likely have to run him un-opposed since otherwise will not fully side with the democrats. If such an agreement fails, the Democratic Vote will likely be split.

Final Pick: Bernie Sanders will be the democratic Nominee for President.
Internet Explorer, IE, "Preacher of Defender Ideals"

User avatar
Indian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2088
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Indian Empire » Sat Aug 29, 2015 5:36 pm

Bernie Sanders becoming president will likely mean peace and non aggression short term- but it will likely allow the US to be a greater power in the future.
Internet Explorer, IE, "Preacher of Defender Ideals"

User avatar
Indian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2088
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Indian Empire » Sat Aug 29, 2015 5:38 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:The last one of these was locked for an insufficient OP just as I hit "reply" with my own response, so I'm starting it over.

Who do you support for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Presidency? While Clinton seems a prohibitive favorite, Martin O'Malley and Jim Webb (one of whom has declared and the other of whom has expressed interest) provide experience and non-threatening moderate viewpoints to those suffering from Clinton fatigue, and Sanders has supporters who make up for in vigor and passion what they lack in numbers. I don't think that Biden is going to declare, but he's in the poll anyway, and while I like Chafee, I'm honestly confused as to what he thinks he's going to accomplish with this.

Me? I'm Sanders all the way, though if Clinton gets the nomination, I'll almost certainly vote for her against any of the GOP candidates.

What are your thoughts?


Nice to see some like minded democrats on NationStates! Not many in my current state of residence Kentucky however.
Internet Explorer, IE, "Preacher of Defender Ideals"

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Aug 29, 2015 6:07 pm

Indian Empire wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:The last one of these was locked for an insufficient OP just as I hit "reply" with my own response, so I'm starting it over.

Who do you support for the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Presidency? While Clinton seems a prohibitive favorite, Martin O'Malley and Jim Webb (one of whom has declared and the other of whom has expressed interest) provide experience and non-threatening moderate viewpoints to those suffering from Clinton fatigue, and Sanders has supporters who make up for in vigor and passion what they lack in numbers. I don't think that Biden is going to declare, but he's in the poll anyway, and while I like Chafee, I'm honestly confused as to what he thinks he's going to accomplish with this.

Me? I'm Sanders all the way, though if Clinton gets the nomination, I'll almost certainly vote for her against any of the GOP candidates.

What are your thoughts?


Nice to see some like minded democrats on NationStates! Not many in my current state of residence Kentucky however.


Network!

User avatar
Indian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2088
Founded: Mar 29, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Indian Empire » Sat Aug 29, 2015 6:39 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Indian Empire wrote:

Nice to see some like minded democrats on NationStates! Not many in my current state of residence Kentucky however.


Network!

True, but I meant we are the minority here.
Last edited by Indian Empire on Sat Aug 29, 2015 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Internet Explorer, IE, "Preacher of Defender Ideals"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Keltionialang, Philjia, Shrillland, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads