Advertisement
by Atlanticatia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 3:57 pm
by Britanno 2 » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:08 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:I'm torn between backing Andy Burnham or Yvette Cooper for Labour leader.
by Krytenia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:47 pm
by Geilinor » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:49 pm
Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
by The Matthew Islands » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:51 pm
Geilinor wrote:Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
Thatcher tried "standing up" to the unions, it was a disaster by most accounts.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1
by Atlanticatia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:53 pm
Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
by The Matthew Islands » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:55 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Not a British person (Britisher?), but what's so bad about a referendum? I support the EU I guess, and I'd hazard a guess that most actual people in the UK do too, so why not shut up the racist loony UKIP by having a referendum on it? It worked for the SNP, at least for now.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1
by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:55 pm
The Matthew Islands wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:Not a British person (Britisher?), but what's so bad about a referendum? I support the EU I guess, and I'd hazard a guess that most actual people in the UK do too, so why not shut up the racist loony UKIP by having a referendum on it? It worked for the SNP, at least for now.
The problem with holding a referendum on the EU, is that the Pro-European side will be forced to actually *Shudder* engage with the electorate, as opposed to just calling them all racists/bigots or whatever.
by Geilinor » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:56 pm
by Calimera II » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:03 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
Social democracy is pretty much about supporting collective bargaining and supporting a tax-funded welfare state.
by Calimera II » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:11 pm
by Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:13 pm
Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
by Geilinor » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:14 pm
by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:19 pm
Purger wrote:Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
Being charismatic and member of a Labour is contradictory therefore impossible.
by Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:25 pm
Steamtopia wrote:Purger wrote:Being charismatic and member of a Labour is contradictory therefore impossible.
That explains Tony Blair leading Labour to landslide victories repeatedly.
No, wait, it doesn't. Once again, the Balkan has no clue what is going on in the UK. Just stop embarrassing yourself.
by Apollinis » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:25 pm
Purger wrote:Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
Being charismatic and member of a Labour is contradictory therefore impossible.
by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:27 pm
Purger wrote:Steamtopia wrote:That explains Tony Blair leading Labour to landslide victories repeatedly.
No, wait, it doesn't. Once again, the Balkan has no clue what is going on in the UK. Just stop embarrassing yourself.
Tony Blair is not a traditional Labourer and his ideology distance itself from that. This just prooves my point.
Neither the UK in the Balkans but it did bot prevent assholes like Paddy Ashdown to run the affairs of B&H.
by Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:43 pm
Apollinis wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Benn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Blair
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Jarvis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mo_Mowlam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Skinner
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Corbyn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuka_Umunna
I like some of those people considerably more than others, but your claim that being a member of Labour precludes charisma is utter nonsense.
by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:46 pm
Purger wrote:You have to keep on mind the average Labour voter is a low class manual worker who dropped school at early age around 17 or 18, and living in economically undeveloped parts of the UK (Scotland and Northern England). Such people are easily to manipulate and do not know how the world works, they only follow messages that fits their selfish class interests (which is usually said by profressional Labour politicians). Even if the Labout candidates a monkey in their constituency, the average Labour voter would be deluded enough to vote for that monkey.
That is contrary to the Torries and UKIP memebers who are made up of educated people who attended Oxford and who are professionals in economy and international affairs. Such are the average Torry voters as well. They know how the world works.
by Apollinis » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:50 pm
Purger wrote:You have to keep on mind the average Labour voter is a low class manual worker who dropped school at early age around 17 or 18, and living in economically undeveloped parts of the UK (Scotland and Northern England). Such people are easily to manipulate and do not know how the world works, they only follow messages that fits their selfish class interests (which is usually said by profressional Labour politicians). Even if the Labout candidates a monkey in their constituency, the average Labour voter would be deluded enough to vote for that monkey.
That is contrary to the Torries and UKIP memebers who are made up of educated people who attended Oxford and who are professionals in economy and international affairs. Such are the average Torry voters as well. They know how the world works.
by Britanno 2 » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:58 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:Social democracy is pretty much about supporting collective bargaining and supporting a tax-funded welfare state.
by Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:06 pm
Steamtopia wrote:Purger wrote:You have to keep on mind the average Labour voter is a low class manual worker who dropped school at early age around 17 or 18, and living in economically undeveloped parts of the UK (Scotland and Northern England). Such people are easily to manipulate and do not know how the world works, they only follow messages that fits their selfish class interests (which is usually said by profressional Labour politicians). Even if the Labout candidates a monkey in their constituency, the average Labour voter would be deluded enough to vote for that monkey.
That is contrary to the Torries and UKIP memebers who are made up of educated people who attended Oxford and who are professionals in economy and international affairs. Such are the average Torry voters as well. They know how the world works.
Are you trolling, or are you just ignorant?
http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05125.pdf
UKIP has the 2nd highest level of people who left education at 16. Only the BNP has a higher ratio. The Greens are lowest, followed by the Lib Dems, not the Tories who are almost neck-and-neck with Labour.
by Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:08 pm
Purger wrote:Steamtopia wrote:Are you trolling, or are you just ignorant?
http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05125.pdf
UKIP has the 2nd highest level of people who left education at 16. Only the BNP has a higher ratio. The Greens are lowest, followed by the Lib Dems, not the Tories who are almost neck-and-neck with Labour.
It is because the UKIP and BNP were clever enough to use the racist feeling that is present among the low class white workers and instrumentalise in their own benefits.
by Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:12 pm
Apollinis wrote:You're embarrassing yourself by demonstrating, once again, that you know nothing about British politics.
1) The average Labour voter is not Scottish nowadays. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
2) Many, many Labour voters are Londoners, many of whom are middle-class. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
3) Your claim that Labour voters inherently don't know how the world works (pot, meet kettle) is delusional trollish shite. It does not deserve any kind of rebuttal.
4) Both Oxford East(?) and Cambridge are Labour-held constituencies. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
5) Lots of working-class people vote for the Tories and UKIP; in fact, many UKIP voters are ex-Labour voters. Hence UKIP's use of populist rhetoric and Nigel Farage's populist persona. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
6) The vast majority of Tory voters are not "professionals in economy and international affairs". Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Einaro, Floofybit, Kannap, Skorpiii-Antares, So uh lab here, Stellar Colonies, Trump Almighty
Advertisement