NATION

PASSWORD

2015 UK Politics Megathread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who would you _currently_ vote for?

Conservatives
73
21%
Labour
71
21%
Liberal Democrats
47
14%
UKIP
57
17%
Greens [England & Wales, Scotland, or NI]
39
11%
SNP
19
6%
Plaid Cymru
3
1%
Northern Ireland SF/SDLP
11
3%
Northern Ireland DUP/UUP
2
1%
Other (please explain)
18
5%
 
Total votes : 340

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 3:57 pm

I'm torn between backing Andy Burnham or Yvette Cooper for Labour leader.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Britanno 2
Diplomat
 
Posts: 611
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno 2 » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:08 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:I'm torn between backing Andy Burnham or Yvette Cooper for Labour leader.

One couldn't win a general election to save his life and one is utterly uncharismatic.
Centre-left Social Democrat
Admin in the NSGS Senate
Senator Huang Diem of the Labour Party

User avatar
Krytenia
Senator
 
Posts: 4551
Founded: Apr 22, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Krytenia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:47 pm

The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.
"I revel in the nonsense; it's why I'm in Anaia."
Capital: Emberton ⍟ RP Population: ~180,000,000 ⍟ Trigram: KRY ⍟ iTLD: .kt ⍟ Demonym: Krytenian, Krytie (inf.)
Languages: English (de jure), Spanish, French, Welsh (regional)

Hosts: Cup of Harmony 7, AOCAF 1, Cup of Harmony 15, World Cup 24, AOCAF 13, World Cup 29, AOCAF 17, AOCAF 23, World Cup 40, Cup of Harmony 32, Baptism of Fire 32, AOCAF 27, Baptism of Fire 36, World Cup 50, Baptism of Fire 40, Cup of Harmony 64, AOCAF 48, World Cup 75, AOCAF 40, Cup of Harmony 80, CAFA 2
Champions: AOCAF 52, Cup of Harmony 78, CAFA 6
Runner-Up: AOCAF 7, World Cup 58, Cup of Harmony 80, CAFA 1
Creator, AOCAF & Cygnus Cup - Host, VI Winter Olympics (Ashton) & VII Summer Olympics (Emberton)

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:49 pm

Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.

Thatcher tried "standing up" to the unions, it was a disaster by most accounts.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:51 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.

Thatcher tried "standing up" to the unions, it was a disaster by most accounts.

Depends on where you live. Some people lose a lot from Thatcher, but just as many people gained out if it as well.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:53 pm

Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.


Social democracy is pretty much about supporting collective bargaining and supporting a tax-funded welfare state.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:55 pm

The Nuclear Fist wrote:Not a British person (Britisher?), but what's so bad about a referendum? I support the EU I guess, and I'd hazard a guess that most actual people in the UK do too, so why not shut up the racist loony UKIP by having a referendum on it? It worked for the SNP, at least for now.

The problem with holding a referendum on the EU, is that the Pro-European side will be forced to actually *Shudder* engage with the electorate, as opposed to just calling them all racists/bigots or whatever.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:55 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Not a British person (Britisher?), but what's so bad about a referendum? I support the EU I guess, and I'd hazard a guess that most actual people in the UK do too, so why not shut up the racist loony UKIP by having a referendum on it? It worked for the SNP, at least for now.

The problem with holding a referendum on the EU, is that the Pro-European side will be forced to actually *Shudder* engage with the electorate, as opposed to just calling them all racists/bigots or whatever.

Ah, yes, I too enjoy people interrupting the thread to attempt a circlejerk using generalisations.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jun 06, 2015 4:56 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Thatcher tried "standing up" to the unions, it was a disaster by most accounts.

Depends on where you live. Some people lose a lot from Thatcher, but just as many people gained out if it as well.

By "disaster", I meant that it ruined the government's relations with unions. Cooperating with them can work, and better.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:03 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.


Social democracy is pretty much about supporting collective bargaining and supporting a tax-funded welfare state.


Krytenia wants a neoliberal pseudo-social democratic labour party.

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:03 pm

Calimera II wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:
Social democracy is pretty much about supporting collective bargaining and supporting a tax-funded welfare state.


Krytenia wants a neoliberal pseudo-social democratic labour party.

So.. what Labour is now?
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:11 pm

Steamtopia wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
Krytenia wants a neoliberal pseudo-social democratic labour party.

So.. what Labour is now?

Yea, but more neocon. :p

User avatar
Purger
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: May 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:13 pm

Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.

Being charismatic and member of a Labour is contradictory therefore impossible.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:14 pm

Calimera II wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:So.. what Labour is now?

Yea, but more neocon. :p

So... New Labour?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:19 pm

Purger wrote:
Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.

Being charismatic and member of a Labour is contradictory therefore impossible.

That explains Tony Blair leading Labour to landslide victories repeatedly.


No, wait, it doesn't. Once again, the Balkan has no clue what is going on in the UK. Just stop embarrassing yourself.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Purger
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: May 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:25 pm

Steamtopia wrote:
Purger wrote:Being charismatic and member of a Labour is contradictory therefore impossible.

That explains Tony Blair leading Labour to landslide victories repeatedly.


No, wait, it doesn't. Once again, the Balkan has no clue what is going on in the UK. Just stop embarrassing yourself.

Tony Blair is not a traditional Labourer and his ideology distance itself from that. This just prooves my point.

Neither the UK in the Balkans but it did bot prevent assholes like Paddy Ashdown to run the affairs of B&H.

User avatar
Apollinis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 741
Founded: May 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Apollinis » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:25 pm

Purger wrote:
Krytenia wrote:The last thing Labour needs is to move further left. They need a good, charismatic leader from the SD-leaning right of the party; someone not afraid to stand up to the unions (though not to the extent of the right-wing parties) but still be business-minded enough to not scare the private sector. They must also be unafraid to move away from traditional Labour tax-and-spend economic models.

Being charismatic and member of a Labour is contradictory therefore impossible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Benn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Blair
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Jarvis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mo_Mowlam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Skinner
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Corbyn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuka_Umunna

I like some of those people considerably more than others, but your claim that being a member of Labour precludes charisma is utter nonsense.
Basilîa Abolinis - a Greco-Germanic, federal, semi-stratocratic, socially libertarian, left-wing Orthodox absolute monarchy of around 568,267,000 people.
|IIWiki|Map|Language|

Economic left: -9.88
Social libertarian: -8.82
OOC - 19, Northern English, Uni student (History)
Pro: Environmentalism, self-determination, democratic socialism, social libertarianism, reform of drug laws, European federalism, LGBTQ, social equality
Anti: Imperialism, reaction, authoritarianism, sexism, racism, LGBTQ-phobia, religious fundamentalism, New Classical architecture

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:27 pm

Purger wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:That explains Tony Blair leading Labour to landslide victories repeatedly.


No, wait, it doesn't. Once again, the Balkan has no clue what is going on in the UK. Just stop embarrassing yourself.

Tony Blair is not a traditional Labourer and his ideology distance itself from that. This just prooves my point.

Neither the UK in the Balkans but it did bot prevent assholes like Paddy Ashdown to run the affairs of B&H.

Tony Blair is a Labourite, regardless of how angry that makes Labourites. This proves your statement wrong.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Purger
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: May 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:43 pm


You have to keep on mind the average Labour voter is a low class manual worker who dropped school at early age around 17 or 18, and living in economically undeveloped parts of the UK (Scotland and Northern England). Such people are easily to manipulate and do not know how the world works, they only follow messages that fits their selfish class interests (which is usually said by profressional Labour politicians). Even if the Labour candidates a monkey in their constituency, the average Labour voter would be deluded enough to vote for that monkey.

That is contrary to the Torries and UKIP memebers who are made up of educated people who attended Oxford and who are professionals in economy and international affairs. Such are the average Torry voters as well. They know how the world works.
Last edited by Purger on Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:46 pm

Purger wrote:You have to keep on mind the average Labour voter is a low class manual worker who dropped school at early age around 17 or 18, and living in economically undeveloped parts of the UK (Scotland and Northern England). Such people are easily to manipulate and do not know how the world works, they only follow messages that fits their selfish class interests (which is usually said by profressional Labour politicians). Even if the Labout candidates a monkey in their constituency, the average Labour voter would be deluded enough to vote for that monkey.

That is contrary to the Torries and UKIP memebers who are made up of educated people who attended Oxford and who are professionals in economy and international affairs. Such are the average Torry voters as well. They know how the world works.

Are you trolling, or are you just ignorant?
www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05125.pdf

UKIP has the 2nd highest level of people who left education at 16. Only the BNP has a higher ratio. The Greens are lowest, followed by the Lib Dems, not the Tories who are almost neck-and-neck with Labour.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Apollinis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 741
Founded: May 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Apollinis » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:50 pm

Purger wrote:You have to keep on mind the average Labour voter is a low class manual worker who dropped school at early age around 17 or 18, and living in economically undeveloped parts of the UK (Scotland and Northern England). Such people are easily to manipulate and do not know how the world works, they only follow messages that fits their selfish class interests (which is usually said by profressional Labour politicians). Even if the Labout candidates a monkey in their constituency, the average Labour voter would be deluded enough to vote for that monkey.

That is contrary to the Torries and UKIP memebers who are made up of educated people who attended Oxford and who are professionals in economy and international affairs. Such are the average Torry voters as well. They know how the world works.

You're embarrassing yourself by demonstrating, once again, that you know nothing about British politics.
1) The average Labour voter is not Scottish nowadays. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
2) Many, many Labour voters are Londoners, many of whom are middle-class. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
3) Your claim that Labour voters inherently don't know how the world works (pot, meet kettle) is delusional trollish shite. It does not deserve any kind of rebuttal.
4) Both Oxford East(?) and Cambridge are Labour-held constituencies. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
5) Lots of working-class people vote for the Tories and UKIP; in fact, many UKIP voters are ex-Labour voters. Hence UKIP's use of populist rhetoric and Nigel Farage's populist persona. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
6) The vast majority of Tory voters are not "professionals in economy and international affairs". Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
Basilîa Abolinis - a Greco-Germanic, federal, semi-stratocratic, socially libertarian, left-wing Orthodox absolute monarchy of around 568,267,000 people.
|IIWiki|Map|Language|

Economic left: -9.88
Social libertarian: -8.82
OOC - 19, Northern English, Uni student (History)
Pro: Environmentalism, self-determination, democratic socialism, social libertarianism, reform of drug laws, European federalism, LGBTQ, social equality
Anti: Imperialism, reaction, authoritarianism, sexism, racism, LGBTQ-phobia, religious fundamentalism, New Classical architecture

User avatar
Britanno 2
Diplomat
 
Posts: 611
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno 2 » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:58 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:Social democracy is pretty much about supporting collective bargaining and supporting a tax-funded welfare state.

True, but social democracy doesn't win British elections anymore. The left needs to understand this if it ever hopes to regain power which, for the record, I hope it does.

Here's to a 2020 Lab-Lib coalition led by David Miliband. We can only dream.
Centre-left Social Democrat
Admin in the NSGS Senate
Senator Huang Diem of the Labour Party

User avatar
Purger
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: May 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:06 pm

Steamtopia wrote:
Purger wrote:You have to keep on mind the average Labour voter is a low class manual worker who dropped school at early age around 17 or 18, and living in economically undeveloped parts of the UK (Scotland and Northern England). Such people are easily to manipulate and do not know how the world works, they only follow messages that fits their selfish class interests (which is usually said by profressional Labour politicians). Even if the Labout candidates a monkey in their constituency, the average Labour voter would be deluded enough to vote for that monkey.

That is contrary to the Torries and UKIP memebers who are made up of educated people who attended Oxford and who are professionals in economy and international affairs. Such are the average Torry voters as well. They know how the world works.

Are you trolling, or are you just ignorant?
http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05125.pdf

UKIP has the 2nd highest level of people who left education at 16. Only the BNP has a higher ratio. The Greens are lowest, followed by the Lib Dems, not the Tories who are almost neck-and-neck with Labour.

It is because the UKIP and BNP were clever enough to use the racist feeling that is present among the low class white workers and instrumentalise in their own benefits.

User avatar
Steamtopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5097
Founded: Jan 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Steamtopia » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:08 pm

Purger wrote:
Steamtopia wrote:Are you trolling, or are you just ignorant?
http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05125.pdf

UKIP has the 2nd highest level of people who left education at 16. Only the BNP has a higher ratio. The Greens are lowest, followed by the Lib Dems, not the Tories who are almost neck-and-neck with Labour.

It is because the UKIP and BNP were clever enough to use the racist feeling that is present among the low class white workers and instrumentalise in their own benefits.

Okay, so you're just trolling. Good to know.
TG me. Just do it.

User avatar
Purger
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: May 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Purger » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:12 pm

Apollinis wrote:You're embarrassing yourself by demonstrating, once again, that you know nothing about British politics.
1) The average Labour voter is not Scottish nowadays. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
2) Many, many Labour voters are Londoners, many of whom are middle-class. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
3) Your claim that Labour voters inherently don't know how the world works (pot, meet kettle) is delusional trollish shite. It does not deserve any kind of rebuttal.
4) Both Oxford East(?) and Cambridge are Labour-held constituencies. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
5) Lots of working-class people vote for the Tories and UKIP; in fact, many UKIP voters are ex-Labour voters. Hence UKIP's use of populist rhetoric and Nigel Farage's populist persona. Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.
6) The vast majority of Tory voters are not "professionals in economy and international affairs". Which you'd know if you knew anything about British politics.

1) True but the SNP is till left-wing and shares a lot in common with Labout
2) It is because many immigrants and low class workforce migrated in London, it is not nothing unusuall. There are a lot Islamists living in London and most likely vote for Labour.
3) the tranlation of your point: "I have no argument therefore I ignore facts"
4) I am not speaking about people who live there but who studied college there
5) See my previous post. Basically UKIP aplies to the racist feeling of the white workforce and convince them that foreigner is taking their jobs.
6) They are not but they are certainly educated enought to know that government depency is bad.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Einaro, Floofybit, Kannap, Skorpiii-Antares, So uh lab here, Stellar Colonies, Trump Almighty

Advertisement

Remove ads