NATION

PASSWORD

Free the nipple:should women be able to go topless in public

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should women be allowed to 'go topless' in areas where men are allowed the same privilege?

Yes
437
69%
No
192
31%
 
Total votes : 629

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby SaintB » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:07 pm

Greater Soviet Ukraine wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:The way to remove the stigma is to allow it, the stigma will eventually disappear.

Along with the rule, which is pointless.

What rule? You make zero sense.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Talvezout
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5381
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Talvezout » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:09 pm

Greater Soviet Ukraine wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:The way to remove the stigma is to allow it, the stigma will eventually disappear.

Along with the rule, which is pointless.


Fair enough.

That being said, I can see why it won't catch on in some places. (Namely, enviormental conditions.)
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
talveziobiblio.org.tz


User avatar
Greater Soviet Ukraine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1128
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Soviet Ukraine » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:09 pm

SaintB wrote:
Greater Soviet Ukraine wrote:Along with the rule, which is pointless.

What rule? You make zero sense.

The legalization of public toplessness. Where have you been man?

User avatar
Escape From California
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Apr 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Escape From California » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:11 pm

Scomagia wrote:Yes. If men are allowed to go topless, women ought to be as well.


Too bad men and women aren't the same.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:17 pm

Escape From California wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Yes. If men are allowed to go topless, women ought to be as well.


Too bad men and women aren't the same.

Female breasts aren't inherently more sexual than male breasts.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Greater Soviet Ukraine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1128
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Soviet Ukraine » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:20 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Escape From California wrote:
Too bad men and women aren't the same.

Female breasts aren't inherently more sexual than male breasts.

Unless you have a strange unerving fetish for female breasts, god banish the thought.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:22 pm

Escape From California wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Yes. If men are allowed to go topless, women ought to be as well.


Too bad men and women aren't the same.

Yes. For instance the one has a penis, whereas the other has a vagina.

Nipples, however, are universal.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Greater Soviet Ukraine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1128
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Soviet Ukraine » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:24 pm

WORSHIP NIPPLE BEAST! HE WILL LIBERATE OUR OPRESSED NIPPLES!!!!

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:27 pm

Topless women? I can already see their vaginas, it'll only add to today's skank

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:29 pm

Arkhane wrote:Topless women? I can already see their vaginas, it'll only add to today's skank

No, not really.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:29 pm

Arkhane wrote:Topless women? I can already see their vaginas, it'll only add to today's skank

Right, because women who dare bare more skin than society deems appropriate are totally skanks. :roll:
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:30 pm

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Arkhane wrote:Topless women? I can already see their vaginas, it'll only add to today's skank

No, not really.


I don't see a guy walking down the street with a mini-skirt so high, his balls are sticking out, and for those who are in it just to see some boobs, I'll give you one word

Elderly.

User avatar
Greater Soviet Ukraine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1128
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Soviet Ukraine » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:31 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Arkhane wrote:Topless women? I can already see their vaginas, it'll only add to today's skank

Right, because women who dare bare more skin than society deems appropriate are totally skanks. :roll:

SLUTS! WHORES! HARLOTS! '
Yeah.... totally skanks.

User avatar
Greater Soviet Ukraine
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1128
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Soviet Ukraine » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:32 pm

Arkhane wrote:
Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:No, not really.


I don't see a guy walking down the street with a mini-skirt so high, his balls are sticking out, and for those who are in it just to see some boobs, I'll give you one word

Elderly.

Or scottish.

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:32 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Arkhane wrote:Topless women? I can already see their vaginas, it'll only add to today's skank

Right, because women who dare bare more skin than society deems appropriate are totally skanks. :roll:


Yes, they are, find me a decent woman that dresses like a slut in public.

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:33 pm

Greater Soviet Ukraine wrote:
Arkhane wrote:
I don't see a guy walking down the street with a mini-skirt so high, his balls are sticking out, and for those who are in it just to see some boobs, I'll give you one word

Elderly.

Or scottish.


Scottish men don't wear mini-skirts, they wear kilts

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:35 pm

Arkhane wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Right, because women who dare bare more skin than society deems appropriate are totally skanks. :roll:


Yes, they are, find me a decent woman that dresses like a slut in public.

How do you define decent? Compliant to male authority and sexually submissive?
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Escape From California
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Apr 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Escape From California » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:39 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
Escape From California wrote:
Too bad men and women aren't the same.

Yes. For instance the one has a penis, whereas the other has a vagina.

Nipples, however, are universal.

What's behind em aint.

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:39 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Arkhane wrote:
Yes, they are, find me a decent woman that dresses like a slut in public.

How do you define decent? Compliant to male authority and sexually submissive?


more like less-attention seeking and respectable. I don't see why a woman with these qualities would go to a place where there are shirtless men and walk in with her juggies open.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:40 pm

Arkhane wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Right, because women who dare bare more skin than society deems appropriate are totally skanks. :roll:


Yes, they are, find me a decent woman that dresses like a slut in public.

Cosplay girls.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby SaintB » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:42 pm

The only real objections anyone brings up are the pointless sexualization of the female body, and some go so far as to shame women for having breasts and making them all horny and stuff. Its the ones who are doing that that have the problem and I am getting pretty tired of them projecting that onto all the other men in this thread. You're being pigs, all of you.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:42 pm

Arkhane wrote:
Scomagia wrote:How do you define decent? Compliant to male authority and sexually submissive?


more like less-attention seeking and respectable. I don't see why a woman with these qualities would go to a place where there are shirtless men and walk in with her juggies open.

So you automatically associate a woman acting with free agency to be seeking attention and, therefore, not to be respected. That's very, very telling.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:42 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
Arkhane wrote:
Yes, they are, find me a decent woman that dresses like a slut in public.

Cosplay girls.


Not all cosplay girls wear skimpy, leathery, tight strings.

User avatar
Arkhane
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Libertarian Police State

Postby Arkhane » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:43 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Arkhane wrote:
more like less-attention seeking and respectable. I don't see why a woman with these qualities would go to a place where there are shirtless men and walk in with her juggies open.

So you automatically associate a woman acting with free agency to be seeking attention and, therefore, not to be respected. That's very, very telling.


Look at facebook.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:43 pm

Escape From California wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:Yes. For instance the one has a penis, whereas the other has a vagina.

Nipples, however, are universal.

What's behind em aint.

Fat?
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Corrian, Northern Socialist Council Republics, The Foxes Swamp

Advertisement

Remove ads