Free the nipple:should women be able to go topless in public

by **Furry Alairia and Algeria** » Wed Apr 15, 2015 7:20 am

Liberonscien wrote:Depends. Are they hot?

Seriously, though, I'm torn, I wouldn't care if they did but on the other hand, guy nipples are...

Sexi bbe.

Depends on the person.

by **The Emerald Legion** » Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:59 pm

SaintB wrote:Yes women should be allowed to go topless, we shouldn't be needlessly sexualizing their bodies. If that is too much for people to handle then we need to start needlessly sexualizing male toplessness.

Already done. Or didn't you see the neverending commercials of twilight movies?

I voted yes, but I also think that men should cover up as well. Noone needs to see any of your skin. Ever.

by **Wisconsin9** » Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:02 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
SaintB wrote:Yes women should be allowed to go topless, we shouldn't be needlessly sexualizing their bodies. If that is too much for people to handle then we need to start needlessly sexualizing male toplessness.

Already done. Or didn't you see the neverending commercials of twilight movies?

I voted yes, but I also think that men should cover up as well. Noone needs to see any of your skin. Ever.

*puts on long pants, shirt, gloves, and ski mask, all the time, even if it hits 100 degrees*

by **Furry Alairia and Algeria** » Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:02 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
SaintB wrote:Yes women should be allowed to go topless, we shouldn't be needlessly sexualizing their bodies. If that is too much for people to handle then we need to start needlessly sexualizing male toplessness.

Already done. Or didn't you see the neverending commercials of twilight movies?

I voted yes, but I also think that men should cover up as well. Noone needs to see any of your skin. Ever.

What commercials?

by **The Emerald Legion** » Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:09 pm

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Already done. Or didn't you see the neverending commercials of twilight movies?

I voted yes, but I also think that men should cover up as well. Noone needs to see any of your skin. Ever.

What commercials?

Go to google. Type in "Twilight Jacob" in the image search.

Wisconsin9 wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Already done. Or didn't you see the neverending commercials of twilight movies?

I voted yes, but I also think that men should cover up as well. Noone needs to see any of your skin. Ever.

*puts on long pants, shirt, gloves, and ski mask, all the time, even if it hits 100 degrees*

*Gives a thumbs up. TOTAL APPROVAL.*

If those women in those countries can do it, so can we.

by **Novorobo** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:48 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Already done. Or didn't you see the neverending commercials of twilight movies?

I voted yes, but I also think that men should cover up as well. Noone needs to see any of your skin. Ever.

*puts on long pants, shirt, gloves, and ski mask, all the time, even if it hits 100 degrees*

Why not have the local laws/dress code depend on the temperature, then?

by **New Skaaneland** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:09 am

I do not disagree with tits being objected to sexual desire, but I also don't think that satisfaction of such desires would be a bad thing.

by **Lyrian Oligarchic Royal Empire** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:21 am

New Skaaneland wrote:I do not disagree with tits being objected to sexual desire, but I also don't think that satisfaction of such desires would be a bad thing.

Thought policing is bad.

I enjoy tits. I enjoy seeing tits. If a woman puts her tits out for display, I will enjoy the sight of them. I do not stare at people, not just women, but people because I don't want to be rude.

You can sexualize something without being a twat, and anybody who tells you to stop sexualizing something (except for the illegal) is likely being prudish.

by **New Skaaneland** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:41 am

Yes? That is my point. Why are you answering like this?

by **Lyrian Oligarchic Royal Empire** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:50 am

New Skaaneland wrote:Yes? That is my point. Why are you answering like this?

Because "satisfaction of such desires" can be interpreted two ways.

by **Liberonscien** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 11:55 am

Lyrian Oligarchic Royal Empire wrote:
New Skaaneland wrote:Yes? That is my point. Why are you answering like this?

Because "satisfaction of such desires" can be interpreted two ways.

Agreed.

by **New Skaaneland** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:19 pm

No? How could it?

by **Natapoc** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:26 pm

One of the things that makes rampant sexism so clear is the fact that showing a female breast for purposes of selling products is perfectly fine. The breasts of women are plastered on magazine stands, billboards, etc...

And yet somehow if an actual woman has an uncovered breast (to feed her baby for example) people freak out.

It is socially acceptable for women's bodies to be shown except when the woman is solely deciding the conditions in which it is shown.

It is only acceptable, in our society, when that body is being commodified or controlled.

by **New Skaaneland** » Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:31 pm

Are you saying there's a correlation between accepting bare breasts in commercials and not accepting bare breasts elsewhere?

by **Tholtia** » Sat Feb 06, 2016 8:27 am

Wait... Can't someone go topless if they want... And whoever doesn't want to see it can just... Look away?

by **Ifreann** » Sat Feb 06, 2016 8:44 am

Tholtia wrote:Wait... Can't someone go topless if they want... And whoever doesn't want to see it can just... Look away?

You posted in an almost year old thread to ask this.

by **Galloism** » Sat Feb 06, 2016 8:47 am

Ifreann wrote:
Tholtia wrote:Wait... Can't someone go topless if they want... And whoever doesn't want to see it can just... Look away?

You posted in an almost year old thread to ask this.

Free the Zombie boobs.

Free the nipple:should women be able to go topless in public

Should women be allowed to 'go topless' in areas where men are allowed the same privilege?

Who is online