Advertisement
by Emerald-Springs » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:50 am
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:51 am
Vozt Yurkova wrote:I like it a lot and generally think the people are cool except when they come to my holiday resort and get hungry and I have to deal with their rowdy kids oh god i hate the british public
by Risottia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:52 am
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:53 am
Cyrisnia wrote:Is Manisdog here yet?
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:53 am
Emerald-Springs wrote:Eh...ambivalent.
As an Irish-American whose dash of English blood goes back to Guy Fawkes' co-conspirators, and whose ancestors fought against the British Empire in at least four wars, I don't exactly come from a long line of Anglophiles. Having travelled in England and Wales and met no shortage of British expatriates here in the States, the majority of British people I've met are rude and obnoxious enough to give New Jerseyans like myself a run for their money.
On the other hand, I read British newspapers religiously and enjoy British television (not Dr. Who, mostly the old BBC comedies). I also exclusively use British spelling conventions.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:54 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Greater-London » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:54 am
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:55 am
by Emerald-Springs » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:58 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Emerald-Springs wrote:Eh...ambivalent.
As an Irish-American whose dash of English blood goes back to Guy Fawkes' co-conspirators, and whose ancestors fought against the British Empire in at least four wars, I don't exactly come from a long line of Anglophiles. Having travelled in England and Wales and met no shortage of British expatriates here in the States, the majority of British people I've met are rude and obnoxious enough to give New Jerseyans like myself a run for their money.
On the other hand, I read British newspapers religiously and enjoy British television (not Dr. Who, mostly the old BBC comedies). I also exclusively use British spelling conventions.
The Daily Mail, The Sun, The Mirror et al do not qualify as newspapers, fyi.
British expats are universally people who weren't polite enough to be allowed to stay in the UK.
by Bungle » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:04 am
Emerald-Springs wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:The Daily Mail, The Sun, The Mirror et al do not qualify as newspapers, fyi.
British expats are universally people who weren't polite enough to be allowed to stay in the UK.
The Daily Mail is trash. I was referring mainly to The Economist (it calls itself a newspaper), the Daily Telegraph, and The Times.
by Old Tyrannia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:06 am
Val Halla wrote:Laanvia wrote:1. Terrible weather: Agreed.
2. Mostly Terrible People: Disagreed. That's disrespectful.
3. Terrible Cities: Disagree. Although rather rough and industrial looking, our cities aren't terrible.
4. Nice countryside: Agreed.
I may have bias on the people; the two places I've lived has had horrible people. But most cities aren't very good. Lincoln, York and Leeds are a few exceptions.
by Emerald-Springs » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:08 am
Bungle wrote:Emerald-Springs wrote:
The Daily Mail is trash. I was referring mainly to The Economist (it calls itself a newspaper), the Daily Telegraph, and The Times.
Oh my god the Daily mail! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2z-AdzgKjY
by Calimera II » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:09 am
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:11 am
by Emerald-Springs » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:13 am
Calimera II wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Which would be what?
In 1946, several the United Nations identified a number of Territories under their administration that were not self-governing and placed them on a UN list. As a result of the decolonization process in the following decades, more than 80 colonial Territories changed their status and were removed from that list. Today, the UN follows developments in the 16 remaining Non-Self-Governing Territories, 11 of which involve the United Kingdom: 10 of those are administrated by the UK.
by Vassenor » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:14 am
Calimera II wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Which would be what?
In 1946, several the United Nations identified a number of Territories under their administration that were not self-governing and placed them on a UN list. As a result of the decolonization process in the following decades, more than 80 colonial Territories changed their status and were removed from that list. Today, the UN follows developments in the 16 remaining Non-Self-Governing Territories, 11 of which involve the United Kingdom: 10 of those are administrated by the UK.
by Nirvash Type TheEND » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:14 am
by Vassenor » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:15 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Scotland should have seceded and joined the Nordic economic bloc but I guess what's done is done.
Englishmen eat beans on bread for breakfast. You guys are weird.
by Calimera II » Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:15 am
Vassenor wrote:I assumed you meant it as "looking to take territory that isn't theirs" like Argentina is doing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Diarcesia, Eragon Island, Ineva, Juristonia, Kostane, Norwegian FOREST Cat, Orifna, Port Carverton, Rosartemis, Second Peenadian, Tungstan, Unogonduria, Vanuzgard
Advertisement