Advertisement
by Vassenor » Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:55 am
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:56 am
Valaran wrote:Laanvia wrote:Yes. And yet I still support it because people were no longer oppressed by dictators.
For example, the people asked for support in Libya: they got it. Gaddafi, a tyrant, was killed. He deserved it. Gaddafi was terrible.
Also, Saddam didn't deserve it anymore than any other dictator. It was that people were oppressed who deserved freedom.
I support it when its done right. But the West hasn't had a good track record in the new millennium. And the belief we can just topple dictators and oppression will simply disappear is part of the problem.
The reason we chose Saddam was because he appeared easy. He had no backers, no actual nuclear WMDs, no powerful army. It was also done to appear strong with the US. And so Blair allowed himself to be misled. And look what happened. Is that really the war you support?
Do you feel the people have gotten freedom?
by Aelex » Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:58 am
by Caltarania » Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:59 am
by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:00 am
Valaran wrote:The reason we chose Saddam was because he appeared easy. He had no backers, no actual nuclear WMDs, no powerful army. It was also done to appear strong with the US. And so Blair allowed himself to be misled. And look what happened. Is that really the war you support?
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:03 am
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:04 am
by Bungle » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:06 am
by Valaran » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:09 am
Laanvia wrote:Valaran wrote:
I support it when its done right. But the West hasn't had a good track record in the new millennium. And the belief we can just topple dictators and oppression will simply disappear is part of the problem.
The reason we chose Saddam was because he appeared easy. He had no backers, no actual nuclear WMDs, no powerful army. It was also done to appear strong with the US. And so Blair allowed himself to be misled. And look what happened. Is that really the war you support?
Do you feel the people have gotten freedom?
Frankly, I'm beginning to agree with what you're saying.
But yes, the people had gotten freedom. At first. Then ISIS and all their lapdog groups came along. Mosul for example. I can't try and say that people their are free under the wrath of the evil, despicable Islamic State.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by Vilatania » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:10 am
by Valaran » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:14 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Valaran wrote:The reason we chose Saddam was because he appeared easy. He had no backers, no actual nuclear WMDs, no powerful army. It was also done to appear strong with the US. And so Blair allowed himself to be misled. And look what happened. Is that really the war you support?
Saddam was deposed because he was an unstable dictator. He was a threat to Israel and the Kurds and coalition military operations were ongoing between 1991 and 2003 to defend the Kurds and keep Iraq's capability low.
The west isn't Russia, we don't need to fight wars just to look tough.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire
by Devvo Mate » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:15 am
Laanvia wrote:I was born in the UK in 2001
by Calimera II » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:32 am
by Vassenor » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:33 am
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:49 am
by The United Colonies of Earth » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:54 am
by Vassenor » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:55 am
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Nice place, but as far as I know, either Cameron or Farage won the elections (if they've happened already), and while Cameron is almost okay, excepting his desire to assimilate British security theatre to the same as the US's and his economic policies...Farage is a eurosceptic (implicit) racist and generally more of the same Tory nonsense.
by Devvo Mate » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:58 am
Laanvia wrote:In what way is me being born in 2001 "scary"?
by Vassenor » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:59 am
by Devvo Mate » Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:59 am
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Nice place, but as far as I know, either Cameron or Farage won the elections (if they've happened already)
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:01 am
by Chartist Socialist Republics » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:01 am
by Laanvia » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:08 am
Val Halla wrote:Terrible weather, mostly terrible people, terrible cities, terrible policies... Nice countryside though.
by Val Halla » Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:10 am
Laanvia wrote:Val Halla wrote:Terrible weather, mostly terrible people, terrible cities, terrible policies... Nice countryside though.
1. Terrible weather: Agreed.
2. Mostly Terrible People: Disagreed. That's disrespectful.
3. Terrible Cities: Disagree. Although rather rough and industrial looking, our cities aren't terrible.
4. Nice countryside: Agreed.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Azurnailia, Cyptopir, Dumb Ideologies, Elejamie, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Kohr, Morms Empire, Statesburg, Tarsonis, Valrifall
Advertisement