oh
hahaha
now i get the joke
yeah, it might just get them to heroically overthrow their oppressors
Advertisement
by Kubra » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:13 pm
oh
by Vilatania » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:13 pm
by Earl of Sandwich IV » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:14 pm
Kubra wrote:The instances listed were genuinely unpopular regimes in the process of collapsing in the first place. Anyone who would bother to know the history would know such. This guy, on the other hand, just goes "well it worked these times so it'll work for us, right?" That ain't how you decide foreign policy.Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:As he mentioned military defeat has undermined the support of regimes in the past. No one knows what the effects might be. There is no leap of logic here.
by Kubra » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:17 pm
If he was saying it was unpredictable, he would have given counter-examples. But this ain't an article about the unpredictability of the outcomes of foreign policy decisions. It's about invading Iran. Seems he's pretty geared towards the hope on THE PEOPLE!Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:Kubra wrote: The instances listed were genuinely unpopular regimes in the process of collapsing in the first place. Anyone who would bother to know the history would know such. This guy, on the other hand, just goes "well it worked these times so it'll work for us, right?" That ain't how you decide foreign policy.
No, that's not what he said. Anyone who can read would know such. He said it's unpredictable.
by Reddogkeno101 » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:18 pm
Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:Kubra wrote: The instances listed were genuinely unpopular regimes in the process of collapsing in the first place. Anyone who would bother to know the history would know such. This guy, on the other hand, just goes "well it worked these times so it'll work for us, right?" That ain't how you decide foreign policy.
No, that's not what he said. Anyone who can read would know such. He said it's unpredictable.
by Earl of Sandwich IV » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:18 pm
Kubra wrote:If he was saying it was unpredictable, he would have given counter-examples. But this ain't an article about the unpredictability of the outcomes of foreign policy decisions. It's about invading Iran. Seems he's pretty geared towards the hope on THE PEOPLE!Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:No, that's not what he said. Anyone who can read would know such. He said it's unpredictable.
by Stormwind-City » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:18 pm
Kubra wrote:If he was saying it was unpredictable, he would have given counter-examples. But this ain't an article about the unpredictability of the outcomes of foreign policy decisions. It's about invading Iran. Seems he's pretty geared towards the hope on THE PEOPLE!Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:No, that's not what he said. Anyone who can read would know such. He said it's unpredictable.
by New Neros » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:19 pm
Stormwind-City wrote:Kubra wrote: If he was saying it was unpredictable, he would have given counter-examples. But this ain't an article about the unpredictability of the outcomes of foreign policy decisions. It's about invading Iran. Seems he's pretty geared towards the hope on THE PEOPLE!
THE PEOPLE! needs to become a NS meme.
Reploid Productions wrote:I have had to read a lot of erotic RP telegrams in the past four months and it does all start to run together into one giant mass of penises, vaginas, breasts, tentacles, dildos, bodily fluids and so on.
by Stormwind-City » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:20 pm
Earl of Sandwich IV wrote:Kubra wrote: If he was saying it was unpredictable, he would have given counter-examples. But this ain't an article about the unpredictability of the outcomes of foreign policy decisions. It's about invading Iran. Seems he's pretty geared towards the hope on THE PEOPLE!
What don't you understand? Is the word 'perhaps' hard for you to understand? Seems pretty clear to me.
by Stormwind-City » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:21 pm
by Kubra » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:21 pm
Pretty sure I've taken it from somewhere else in the first place
by Stormwind-City » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:22 pm
by New Neros » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:22 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:I have had to read a lot of erotic RP telegrams in the past four months and it does all start to run together into one giant mass of penises, vaginas, breasts, tentacles, dildos, bodily fluids and so on.
by Stormwind-City » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:24 pm
by RSU Helping Hand » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:24 pm
by Reddogkeno101 » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:25 pm
by Earl of Sandwich IV » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:25 pm
by Kubra » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:26 pm
and if i recall correctly the thought process listed earlier resulted in a good few defeats for the red army and the french national guard.
by Saiwania » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:27 pm
Benian Republic wrote:No the US should not go to war with Iran for countless reasons, one is that they are still helping HAMAS.
by Crezilivion » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:29 pm
by Myrensis » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:31 pm
Saiwania wrote:Benian Republic wrote:No the US should not go to war with Iran for countless reasons, one is that they are still helping HAMAS.
Stellar reason you've got there, as if it is in the US national interests to side with or give a shit about Hamas, and not because Iran would have Russia on its side that would escalate the situation towards disaster if an invasion of Iran was attempted.
by Reddogkeno101 » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:31 pm
Crezilivion wrote:How is invading Iran going to help us at all unless we discover they have some plot to attack us? I don't think Iran is stupid enough to attack us or our allies. I also don't think any President has the desire to invade it because the hate quite frankly could get him/her impeached easily. The majority of the people from all sides don't want another war, if another one occurred there would likely be an outrage.War on Iran is definitely not a good idea unless we are provoked.
by Land and Freedom » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:38 pm
by Land and Freedom » Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:38 pm
Republic of Coldwater wrote:Fuck no.
We would be much better allowing free trade with Iran, and just see Iran completely falter as their populace changes their opinion on the west.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: ImperialRussia, Likhinia, New Temecula
Advertisement