NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you support an individual's right to have an abortion?

Yes, absolutely!
1064
55%
Yes, but only in certain circumstances (please specify in a post)
509
26%
No, never!
365
19%
 
Total votes : 1938

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204087
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:38 pm

Ifreann wrote:It's uter-us, not uter-you.


:clap:
Well said.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:40 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:are you suggesting that only MEN have true bodily integrity?

I am just saying that if your actions cause your body to be shared with someone else, you have to accept that you shouldn't do something with your body that kills them.


easy for you to say.
whatever

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:47 pm

Butballs wrote:From the moment of conception, towards the end of life, they are humans. The fetus, and babies are the most innocent members of society. It puts me in tears that some ass would kill the poor citizens. However, in special cases, such as rape THAT CANT BE PREVENTED, and maternal health, is when the human can be murded.

So how much time should the woman do for the "murders" that don't fit with your exemptions?

Let's use a common example: A woman gets an abortion because she can't afford another baby. What's her sentence? 20 years? Life? Could she perhaps become eligible for parole after menopause?
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:51 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Old Hope wrote:Ask yourself: Why is there any unborn inside the mother, needing her body?
Because the mother had chosen to perform an act potentially resulting in exactly that. She is responsible for the child.
And bodily integrity is not really a strong argument- because it has ceased to be exclusively the womans body.

Ask yourself:why is here a penis inside of the woman?
Because the woman had chosen to consent to to an act leading to exactly that. She is responsible for pleasing the man to the end. What a fantastic argument for rape you have there.

The man can go away. The unborn can't. The man doesn't have to do that(and shouldn't, ofc). The unborn cannot do anything else. The man is also responsible for not harming the woman. The unborn... well, it isn't able to do anything else.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
Hebalobia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Dec 06, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Hebalobia » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:54 pm

There are times when an abortion is a health issue. Who gets to decide when that's the case? Certainly not politicians or priests. I see no other rational option other than allowing abortion access on demand.

As for abortions that are not the result of health issues but financial or other issues, we should strive to limit their occurrence not by restricting access to abortion but by preventing unwanted pregnancies through comprehensive sex education and access to contraception including the so-called morning after pill.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:56 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Ask yourself:why is here a penis inside of the woman?
Because the woman had chosen to consent to to an act leading to exactly that. She is responsible for pleasing the man to the end. What a fantastic argument for rape you have there.

The man can go away. The unborn can't.

He apparently doesn't have to.
Old Hope wrote: The man doesn't have to do that(and shouldn't, ofc). The unborn cannot do anything else.

The man doesn't have to stop raping her?
Old Hope wrote: The man is also responsible for not harming the woman. The unborn... well, it isn't able to do anything else.

She consented. He has no responsibility to do anything. According to you if you consent to sex you consent to any consequences, including pregnancy and being beaten by the man. Why the magical exception for the latter?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:57 pm

So women have to put up with shared bodily integrity, whether they agree to it or not, but men don't?

After birth, you mean? Men have to, if they share the body with someone else... but that is just rare, that is all....
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:59 pm

Old Hope wrote:
So women have to put up with shared bodily integrity, whether they agree to it or not, but men don't?

After birth, you mean? Men have to, if they share the body with someone else... but that is just rare, that is all....

what did YOU mean?

men never share their body with someone else.

and its not really SHARING its one person making another person from scratch.
whatever

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204087
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:02 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Old Hope wrote:After birth, you mean? Men have to, if they share the body with someone else... but that is just rare, that is all....

what did YOU mean?

men never share their body with someone else.

and its not really SHARING its one person making another person from scratch.


Besides, other than sperm, what else does a man brings to a pregnancy? His body isn't the one doing the job of feeding and incubating a fetus. His body isn't the one deforming for 9 months. His life is not the one that could be in peril if the pregnancy and labor become complicated.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Betoni
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1287
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Betoni » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:05 pm

The pro-lifers tend to argue that life begins prenatal. Does parenthood begin prenatal also? How does this work with the father? Heck, how does it work with regards to the mother? There is no direct input that the father can have in that stage, how can they be considered a father then? The mother has a physical connection to the fetus or embryo through the placenta and the umbilical cord, of course, but no other real way of parenting this "life", before it is born. Who is responsible of parenting this prenatal "child" and why?

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:19 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Old Hope wrote:The man can go away. The unborn can't.

He apparently doesn't have to.
Old Hope wrote: The man doesn't have to do that(and shouldn't, ofc). The unborn cannot do anything else.

The man doesn't have to stop raping her?
Old Hope wrote: The man is also responsible for not harming the woman. The unborn... well, it isn't able to do anything else.

She consented. He has no responsibility to do anything. According to you if you consent to sex you consent to any consequences, including pregnancy and being beaten by the man. Why the magical exception for the latter?

No. You don't consent! You just have to take the responsibility if you cause something unavoidable by others.
The woman can tell the man "Please stop" and the man can do it, and live on. The man can avoid that...
The woman can say to the unborn" Please go away"... but the unborn isn't able to go away.
Last edited by Old Hope on Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:25 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:what did YOU mean?

men never share their body with someone else.

and its not really SHARING its one person making another person from scratch.


Besides, other than sperm, what else does a man brings to a pregnancy? His body isn't the one doing the job of feeding and incubating a fetus. His body isn't the one deforming for 9 months. His life is not the one that could be in peril if the pregnancy and labor become complicated.

You never heard of conjoined twins, did you, Ashmoria?
And Nanatsu- that is a strawman.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:28 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:He apparently doesn't have to.

The man doesn't have to stop raping her?

She consented. He has no responsibility to do anything. According to you if you consent to sex you consent to any consequences, including pregnancy and being beaten by the man. Why the magical exception for the latter?

No. You don't consent! You just have to take the responsibility if you cause something unavoidable by others.
The woman can tell the man "Please stop" and the man can do it, and live on. The man can avoid that...
The woman can say to the unborn" Please go away"... but the unborn isn't able to go away.

And she takes responsibility and makes the fetus go away by getting an abortion, just as I would do the same for a parasitic worm residing in my intestines.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204087
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:30 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Besides, other than sperm, what else does a man brings to a pregnancy? His body isn't the one doing the job of feeding and incubating a fetus. His body isn't the one deforming for 9 months. His life is not the one that could be in peril if the pregnancy and labor become complicated.

You never heard of conjoined twins, did you, Ashmoria?
And Nanatsu- that is a strawman.


Nope. It's very much in point.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bottle » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:31 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Besides, other than sperm, what else does a man brings to a pregnancy? His body isn't the one doing the job of feeding and incubating a fetus. His body isn't the one deforming for 9 months. His life is not the one that could be in peril if the pregnancy and labor become complicated.

You never heard of conjoined twins, did you, Ashmoria?
And Nanatsu- that is a strawman.

FYI, a strawman argument is a sham argument that is set up purely to be defeated. Nothing in the post you quoted constitutes a strawman.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:40 pm

Bottle wrote:
Old Hope wrote:You never heard of conjoined twins, did you, Ashmoria?
And Nanatsu- that is a strawman.

FYI, a strawman argument is a sham argument that is set up purely to be defeated. Nothing in the post you quoted constitutes a strawman.

No, a strawman argument is an argument against something else, but not against that what it is directed at.
Like, what does have the fact that men have far less to suffer to do with the matter of shared bodies?
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:00 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Old Hope wrote:No. You don't consent! You just have to take the responsibility if you cause something unavoidable by others.
The woman can tell the man "Please stop" and the man can do it, and live on. The man can avoid that...
The woman can say to the unborn" Please go away"... but the unborn isn't able to go away.

And she takes responsibility and makes the fetus go away by getting an abortion, just as I would do the same for a parasitic worm residing in my intestines.

But that means that the unborn is killed. And that would be entirely the mothers' responsibility. And because there is another possibility to end this with both living...
And that worm is a not a human. The fetus is.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164177
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:02 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:are you suggesting that only MEN have true bodily integrity?

I am just saying that if your actions cause your body to be shared with someone else, you have to accept that you shouldn't do something with your body that kills them.

No, I don't think women should have to accept that at all.


Farnhamia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:No, I'm pointing out a situation in which one can end a pregnancy without killing the foetus.



It's uter-us, not uter-you.

:palm: I set myself up for that one, didn't I?

And I stole it from the Simpsons :)
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:04 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And she takes responsibility and makes the fetus go away by getting an abortion, just as I would do the same for a parasitic worm residing in my intestines.

But that means that the unborn is killed. And that would be entirely the mothers' responsibility.

Which is why she has an abortion, because it's taking responsibility.
Old Hope wrote: And because there is another possibility to end this with both living...

Just like if a woman is being raped she can just allow the man to rape her rather than use lethal force, right?
Old Hope wrote: And that worm is a not a human. The fetus is.

Fetuses aren't humans. They have human cells, but they aren't individual humans until around 30 weeks at the earliest.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:19 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Old Hope wrote:And because there is another possibility to end this with both living...
Just like if a woman is being raped she can just allow the man to rape her rather than use lethal force, right?

The man had the ability not to do that in the first place. He chose to get into that situation.
It is the combination:To cause the fetus to exist in the body, dependant, without being able to go elsewhere living for a period of time, without choosing that situation, and to kill it for your own personal gain,
Last edited by Old Hope on Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:24 pm

Old Hope wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Just like if a woman is being raped she can just allow the man to rape her rather than use lethal force, right?

The man had the ability not to do that in the first place. He chose to get into that situation.
It is the combination:To cause the fetus to exist in the body, dependant, without being able to go elsewhere living for a period of time, without choosing that situation, and to kill it for your own personal gain,

Just like I would do the same for a parasitic worm. Women aren't property and they have every right to make personal medical decisions. It's between their doctor and them. No one else.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Novsvacro
Diplomat
 
Posts: 981
Founded: Nov 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Novsvacro » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:28 pm

I think if it's before the third trimester, it's rape, or it's incest, abortion is acceptable.
Cuando el amor llega así, de esta manera,
uno no tiene la culpa
quererse no tiene horario
ni fecha en el calendario

Genetics undergrad. Basketball analytics nerd.

User avatar
Russels Orbiting Teapot
Senator
 
Posts: 4024
Founded: Jan 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Russels Orbiting Teapot » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:30 pm

Novsvacro wrote:I think if it's before the third trimester, it's rape, or it's incest, abortion is acceptable.

I assume also if the mother's life is in significant danger, or if the baby is unlikely to survive long after birth?

User avatar
Old Hope
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1332
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Hope » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:34 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Old Hope wrote:The man had the ability not to do that in the first place. He chose to get into that situation.
It is the combination:To cause the fetus to exist in the body, dependant, without being able to go elsewhere living for a period of time, without choosing that situation, and to kill it for your own personal gain,

Just like I would do the same for a parasitic worm. Women aren't property and they have every right to make personal medical decisions. It's between their doctor and them. No one else.

Women aren't property.
The fetus isn't, either.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.

User avatar
The Five Galaxies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1742
Founded: Mar 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Five Galaxies » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:35 pm

Novsvacro wrote:I think if it's before the third trimester, it's rape, or it's incest, abortion is acceptable.


Why are only those two acceptable to you?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: British Arzelentaxmacone, Nova Universo Headquarters, Port Carverton, Quartzinne, Raskana

Advertisement

Remove ads