Estva wrote:Servica wrote:I think you fail to realize one thing: anarchy is merely progressive unorthodoxy taken to the radical extreme.
It's any realization that blind orthodoxy does not produce progress and that there should always be independence and spontaneity to ensure that mankind does not stagnate.
How is anarchism "unorthodox" compared to, say, any unpopular ideology in a state? Your use of the word unorthodox is meaningless because all it means is different from the standard line.Servica wrote:The ultimate goal of anarchism is not to waste effort on establishing places to be conquered, but establishing a core of reasonable individuals within the pillars of society, from which everything stems, and establishing in many ways points in history from which the future generations can learn from.
This can be said of almost every ideology.Servica wrote:Any disillusioned veteran of anarchist Catalonia would agree to this notion, since it's an inevitable realization among them that defeat can come at any moment.
Defeat is almost certain, in fact.
I know that defeat is certain. But, I also know that change occurs at the global scale. It's evident in the change of culture, hence ways, that have occurred during the 200,000 year-history of modern humans. We overcame our fear of fire, developed agriculture, mathematics, construction, sought new continents, developed steel, created things that are not solid (the internet), traced our origins to the molecular and cosmic scale, and still we've always looked at the past and realized how stupid we've been. That's the important thing - and luckily for us: it's a party that never ends. New hosts, new comers, and an endless stream of shenanigans to be played. I don't see a reason for it to end, just as there is no reason for it to even have begun.
To quote a certain english band:
Come and join the party, leave anxieties behind
When the weight of all the world is pushing down
Just push right back!