Advertisement
by Faiv » Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:45 am
by The Rich Port » Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:59 am
by The Sotoan Union » Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:11 am
by Conserative Morality » Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:12 am
The Sotoan Union wrote:Japanese society asked samurai to kill themselves after a defeat. American society asks you not to wear socks and sandals. Those are pretty far from each other but they are on the same scale.
by The Sotoan Union » Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:14 am
by Conserative Morality » Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:16 am
The Sotoan Union wrote:Maybe they aren't.
But what is honor in regards to this post? Is it chivalry? Your society's form of honor isn't the same as other forms of honor, and if you version dies out then that doesn't mean that all honor is gone.
by The Nuclear Fist » Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:36 am
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
by The Conez Imperium » Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:37 am
by Simply Tyrone » Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:53 am
by The Sotoan Union » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:08 am
Conserative Morality wrote:The Sotoan Union wrote:Maybe they aren't.
But what is honor in regards to this post? Is it chivalry? Your society's form of honor isn't the same as other forms of honor, and if you version dies out then that doesn't mean that all honor is gone.
I'm not sure that I have much honor, if any at all, and I'm fine with that. I'm more interested in discussing the concept and its change and/or survival now.
by Conserative Morality » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:09 am
The Sotoan Union wrote:Well just because someone's version of honor is disappearing doesn't mean that honor in general is disappearing is what I'm saying.
by Servica » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:11 am
by Conserative Morality » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:11 am
Servica wrote:HONOR IS DEFENDING THY MOTHERLAND FROM ALL EVIL WHO SEEK TO CLAIM IT. FOR GREAT JUSTICE AND PRIDE IN YOUR RACE, YOU MUST HAVE HONOR!
by The Sotoan Union » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:11 am
Conserative Morality wrote:The Sotoan Union wrote:Well just because someone's version of honor is disappearing doesn't mean that honor in general is disappearing is what I'm saying.
At which point, then, is it no longer honor? Certainly the dilution can't last forever; honor must have some definition, however loose.
by Conserative Morality » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:13 am
The Sotoan Union wrote:It's a subjective creation of society. Everyone will have different versions and different cultures have different versions, and no version is any more right than another. Different cultures can value different things and you can't try to take them all and pick one over all the others.
by Servica » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:14 am
by Conserative Morality » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:19 am
Servica wrote:What is this infantile bleakness of thine understanding? Do you not have pride in your race? You must be ashamed...
by Servica » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:21 am
by Jumalariik » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:22 am
by The Holy Therns » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:24 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Blasted Craigs » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:26 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Does honor still exist in the modern world? If it does, in what form does it exist? Is honor a good thing or a bad thing? What is honor? Discuss etc etc.
Honor I've heard used in several different ways. I suppose I've a taste for honor when the word represents loyalty to personal ideas, but without any of the baggage of traditional honor's (Vaguely defined, because the concept of honor is of course ever-changing) adherence to internal rules.
I don't think traditional senses of honor will last - ideas of truthfulness, loyalty, righteous vengeance, etc.
What say you? Is honor living on borrowed time? Or is it a fixture of humanity, here to stay? And so on.
by The Holy Therns » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:26 am
Jumalariik wrote:I wish, but no.
Sadly, the whole Beowulf warrior is over, with social justice warriors taking his place. I still think folks should try to emulate the old heroes, but too bad I suppose.
Imagine Beowulf v. Tumblr.
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by The Sotoan Union » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:27 am
Conserative Morality wrote:The Sotoan Union wrote:It's a subjective creation of society. Everyone will have different versions and different cultures have different versions, and no version is any more right than another. Different cultures can value different things and you can't try to take them all and pick one over all the others.
I'm not looking to say 'this specific code is the only honor', I'm asking 'what is honor?', full stop. Honor is not a plant. It's not a heart, and it's not hunger. If honor is so fluid, what's the container keeping it shaped like?
by Pandeeria » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:29 am
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Big Eyed Animation, Dumb Ideologies, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, Kostane, Port Carverton
Advertisement