NATION

PASSWORD

Transgender woman correctly buried as man?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gallifrey Secundaria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gallifrey Secundaria » Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:32 pm

Eleanor Ritas wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Even though its entirely obvious that 90% of the time a government form asks you to put your "sex", they actually want your gender, which they insist is also your sex. To say nothing of the government documents that actually ask for "gender".


Well, with the GOP coming back to power, they'll probably just standardize all of them to say "white Protestant straight male" or "other" for every question.

:rofl:
Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.90

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 22%
Secular – 86%
Visionary – 50%
Anarchistic – 47%
Communistic – 60%
Pacifist – 21%
Anthropocentric– 41%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result

[/color]
Senator Alan Upchurch of the Liberal Democrats


Last edited by Gallifrey Secundaria on Sat Mar 7, 2015 4:53 PM, edited 44 times in total.
This nation DOES represent my real life views!

This is a puppet nation belonging to Lamaredia!

Add 1333 posts to post counter.
Add 2847 to total counter, including Forum 7.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:28 pm

WestRedMaple wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
1. Fair enough.

2. Logic and common sense. 90% of the time they ask, they don't need to know if you have a dangly meat sausage between your legs or a meat cave (last I checked, you don't drive a car with your dick or your pussy, for one example). Given the popular misconception that sex=gender, it is therefore not at all unreasonable to assume that they want to know what your gender is.

3. How the fuck did I create the assertion when you posted the assertion first?

4. I already fucking told you, I didn't change any words in your post that I quoted. That is all YOUR words, not mine.

5. Its mental gymnastics because you're blatantly lying (in open contradiction of evidence proving you're lying), saying that you didn't say something you literally said, and claiming that I'm putting words in your mouth when I give proof, despite the fact that your post is still fucking there, untouched. I've got the fucking screenshot to prove your post was unaltered.

Image


You are not being honest. Seriously, instead of continuing to dig your hole, maybe you should actually read my post.

The FACT is that the assertion you claimed is not an assertion I have made. There is no honestly denying that fact. It is found right there in my quote of what you posted.


Then what the fuck were you claiming? You seem to have this habit of saying one thing, and then when you get called out on it, trying (and utterly failing) to backtrack, saying that the people who are calling you out are "strawmanning", and "manipulating" your words, and other such bullshit. This is literally the second time I've seen you do this. Maybe instead of blaming us, you should blame your shitty word choice.

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Murkwood wrote:You have to feel sorry for people who are so confused in life that they mix up their sex. It's sad, really. If this person was a he at birth, they are a he at death.

Murkwood, fucking please mate.


Yeah, like, what the fuck. Gallup, maybe instead of spouting ignorant bullshit, you should try walking a few miles in our shoes, first.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:57 am

Grenartia wrote:
WestRedMaple wrote:
You are not being honest. Seriously, instead of continuing to dig your hole, maybe you should actually read my post.

The FACT is that the assertion you claimed is not an assertion I have made. There is no honestly denying that fact. It is found right there in my quote of what you posted.


Then what the fuck were you claiming? You seem to have this habit of saying one thing, and then when you get called out on it, trying (and utterly failing) to backtrack, saying that the people who are calling you out are "strawmanning", and "manipulating" your words, and other such bullshit. This is literally the second time I've seen you do this. Maybe instead of blaming us, you should blame your shitty word choice.

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:Murkwood, fucking please mate.


Yeah, like, what the fuck. Gallup, maybe instead of spouting ignorant bullshit, you should try walking a few miles in our shoes, first.

First off, I'm Murkwood. Secondly, you don't think I haven't thought long and hard about my opinion on this issue? Because I have.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Gallifrey Secundaria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gallifrey Secundaria » Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:58 am

Murkwood wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Then what the fuck were you claiming? You seem to have this habit of saying one thing, and then when you get called out on it, trying (and utterly failing) to backtrack, saying that the people who are calling you out are "strawmanning", and "manipulating" your words, and other such bullshit. This is literally the second time I've seen you do this. Maybe instead of blaming us, you should blame your shitty word choice.



Yeah, like, what the fuck. Gallup, maybe instead of spouting ignorant bullshit, you should try walking a few miles in our shoes, first.

First off, I'm Murkwood. Secondly, you don't think I haven't thought long and hard about my opinion on this issue? Because I have.

I've thought long and hard about what 2+2 is and concluded that it was 5.

That's basically your argument.
Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.90

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 22%
Secular – 86%
Visionary – 50%
Anarchistic – 47%
Communistic – 60%
Pacifist – 21%
Anthropocentric– 41%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result

[/color]
Senator Alan Upchurch of the Liberal Democrats


Last edited by Gallifrey Secundaria on Sat Mar 7, 2015 4:53 PM, edited 44 times in total.
This nation DOES represent my real life views!

This is a puppet nation belonging to Lamaredia!

Add 1333 posts to post counter.
Add 2847 to total counter, including Forum 7.

User avatar
WestRedMaple
Minister
 
Posts: 3068
Founded: Aug 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby WestRedMaple » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:01 am

Grenartia wrote:
WestRedMaple wrote:
You are not being honest. Seriously, instead of continuing to dig your hole, maybe you should actually read my post.

The FACT is that the assertion you claimed is not an assertion I have made. There is no honestly denying that fact. It is found right there in my quote of what you posted.


Then what the fuck were you claiming? You seem to have this habit of saying one thing, and then when you get called out on it, trying (and utterly failing) to backtrack, saying that the people who are calling you out are "strawmanning", and "manipulating" your words, and other such bullshit. This is literally the second time I've seen you do this. Maybe instead of blaming us, you should blame your shitty word choice.

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:Murkwood, fucking please mate.


Yeah, like, what the fuck. Gallup, maybe instead of spouting ignorant bullshit, you should try walking a few miles in our shoes, first.



There you go again, blaming the victim rather than the person responsible. You falsely attributing things to me is your fault, not mine.

User avatar
Simply Tyrone
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Nov 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Simply Tyrone » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:03 am

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Murkwood wrote:You have to feel sorry for people who are so confused in life that they mix up their sex. It's sad, really. If this person was a he at birth, they are a he at death.

Murkwood, fucking please mate.


genomes genomes

nobody really cares

genomes genomes

they only attention

genomes genomes

dress as girls for mama's love
▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ *** Warned for Being Sentient Fat ***▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

Simply Tyrone
Slop Slop.
Slopulator. Let's slop it up. It's sloppin' time. Come on down in my sloppin' van. Transslopual. Are you a slopsexual? Slopulation. Slopathematics. Slopience. Slopigion. Slopistory. Slopology. Slop philosophy. Slopitics. Slopime. Slop.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:04 am

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Murkwood wrote:First off, I'm Murkwood. Secondly, you don't think I haven't thought long and hard about my opinion on this issue? Because I have.

I've thought long and hard about what 2+2 is and concluded that it was 5.

That's basically your argument.

This is an opinionated question: there is no real right or wrong.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Simply Tyrone
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Nov 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Simply Tyrone » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:05 am

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Murkwood wrote:First off, I'm Murkwood. Secondly, you don't think I haven't thought long and hard about my opinion on this issue? Because I have.

I've thought long and hard about what 2+2 is and concluded that it was 5.

That's basically your argument.


No argument is direct.
▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ *** Warned for Being Sentient Fat ***▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

Simply Tyrone
Slop Slop.
Slopulator. Let's slop it up. It's sloppin' time. Come on down in my sloppin' van. Transslopual. Are you a slopsexual? Slopulation. Slopathematics. Slopience. Slopigion. Slopistory. Slopology. Slop philosophy. Slopitics. Slopime. Slop.

User avatar
Gallifrey Secundaria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gallifrey Secundaria » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:26 am

Murkwood wrote:
Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:I've thought long and hard about what 2+2 is and concluded that it was 5.

That's basically your argument.

This is an opinionated question: there is no real right or wrong.

Since science says that you are wrong, you're wrong. This is not an opinionated question, as facts show that you aren't necessarily the same gender as sex.
Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.90

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 22%
Secular – 86%
Visionary – 50%
Anarchistic – 47%
Communistic – 60%
Pacifist – 21%
Anthropocentric– 41%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result

[/color]
Senator Alan Upchurch of the Liberal Democrats


Last edited by Gallifrey Secundaria on Sat Mar 7, 2015 4:53 PM, edited 44 times in total.
This nation DOES represent my real life views!

This is a puppet nation belonging to Lamaredia!

Add 1333 posts to post counter.
Add 2847 to total counter, including Forum 7.

User avatar
Simply Tyrone
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Nov 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Simply Tyrone » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:38 am

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Murkwood wrote:This is an opinionated question: there is no real right or wrong.

Since science says that you are wrong, you're wrong. This is not an opinionated question, as facts show that you aren't necessarily the same gender as sex.


Science also says that the construct of society is doomed, but you don't see people running around praising anarchism.

Oh, wait.
▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ *** Warned for Being Sentient Fat ***▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

Simply Tyrone
Slop Slop.
Slopulator. Let's slop it up. It's sloppin' time. Come on down in my sloppin' van. Transslopual. Are you a slopsexual? Slopulation. Slopathematics. Slopience. Slopigion. Slopistory. Slopology. Slop philosophy. Slopitics. Slopime. Slop.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:56 am

Murkwood wrote:You have to feel sorry for people who are so confused in life that they mix up their sex. It's sad, really. If this person was a he at birth, they are a he at death.

No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Insensitive People
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Insensitive People » Tue Nov 25, 2014 7:41 am

Euroslavia wrote:
Insensitive People wrote:She has every legal right to do this.

Moral right? Who cares- I don't care what your opinion of my views is, nor do I care about yours.

Hence my name and motto

And that's not going to get you very far on this site. I'd strongly suggest you re-think why you joined a debate site when you have zero care about anyone elses opinion.


I didn't really make a nation on here to debate others, moreso to play around with the issues. Whilst I am here I like to look in on the threads and read passively and occasionally comment.

Don't like it? That's fine.

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Tue Nov 25, 2014 7:50 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Murkwood wrote:You have to feel sorry for people who are so confused in life that they mix up their sex. It's sad, really. If this person was a he at birth, they are a he at death.

No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.


What is Murkwood even saying? People are forced into gender roles because of social conformity and pre-conceived social ideas about what people ought to be based on their biological sex. There are people who feel out of place and that their biologically assigned sex contradicts with what they want to be, and if that is the way they feel why should they be denied the right to change their sex? Besides, the presence of XXY or Y people suggests that sex and gender are not binaries and we should stop thinking of sex as "follow whatever you are assigned". It's not as simple as that.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Nei Pennsilfaani
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Apr 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nei Pennsilfaani » Tue Nov 25, 2014 7:58 am

Divitaen wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.


Besides, the presence of XXY or Y people suggests that sex and gender are not binaries and we should stop thinking of sex as "follow whatever you are assigned". It's not as simple as that.


Point of order: Monosomy Y is invariably lethal.

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:02 am

Nei Pennsilfaani wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
Besides, the presence of XXY or Y people suggests that sex and gender are not binaries and we should stop thinking of sex as "follow whatever you are assigned". It's not as simple as that.


Point of order: Monosomy Y is invariably lethal.


My mistake. I was referring to Turner's syndrome, which is monosomy X, not Y.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54394
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am

Insensitive People wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:And that's not going to get you very far on this site. I'd strongly suggest you re-think why you joined a debate site when you have zero care about anyone elses opinion.


I didn't really make a nation on here to debate others, moreso to play around with the issues. Whilst I am here I like to look in on the threads and read passively and occasionally comment.

Don't like it? That's fine.

Edgy as a Googolgon.

User avatar
Gallifrey Secundaria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gallifrey Secundaria » Tue Nov 25, 2014 9:29 am

Esternial wrote:
Insensitive People wrote:
I didn't really make a nation on here to debate others, moreso to play around with the issues. Whilst I am here I like to look in on the threads and read passively and occasionally comment.

Don't like it? That's fine.

Edgy as a Googolgon.

Image


So..... edgy.
Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.90

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 22%
Secular – 86%
Visionary – 50%
Anarchistic – 47%
Communistic – 60%
Pacifist – 21%
Anthropocentric– 41%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result

[/color]
Senator Alan Upchurch of the Liberal Democrats


Last edited by Gallifrey Secundaria on Sat Mar 7, 2015 4:53 PM, edited 44 times in total.
This nation DOES represent my real life views!

This is a puppet nation belonging to Lamaredia!

Add 1333 posts to post counter.
Add 2847 to total counter, including Forum 7.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:30 pm

Murkwood wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Then what the fuck were you claiming? You seem to have this habit of saying one thing, and then when you get called out on it, trying (and utterly failing) to backtrack, saying that the people who are calling you out are "strawmanning", and "manipulating" your words, and other such bullshit. This is literally the second time I've seen you do this. Maybe instead of blaming us, you should blame your shitty word choice.



Yeah, like, what the fuck. Gallup, maybe instead of spouting ignorant bullshit, you should try walking a few miles in our shoes, first.

1. First off, I'm Murkwood. 2. Secondly, you don't think I haven't thought long and hard about my opinion on this issue? Because I have.


1. So, what you're saying is, you don't like being called Gallup, despite the fact that we all know you were Gallup? I cannot possibly see any relation this has to the topic at hand... :roll:

2. If you had, you'd have arrived at the same conclusions I and others have.

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Murkwood wrote:First off, I'm Murkwood. Secondly, you don't think I haven't thought long and hard about my opinion on this issue? Because I have.

I've thought long and hard about what 2+2 is and concluded that it was 5.

That's basically your argument.


Exactly.

WestRedMaple wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Then what the fuck were you claiming? You seem to have this habit of saying one thing, and then when you get called out on it, trying (and utterly failing) to backtrack, saying that the people who are calling you out are "strawmanning", and "manipulating" your words, and other such bullshit. This is literally the second time I've seen you do this. Maybe instead of blaming us, you should blame your shitty word choice.



Yeah, like, what the fuck. Gallup, maybe instead of spouting ignorant bullshit, you should try walking a few miles in our shoes, first.



There you go again, blaming the victim rather than the person responsible. You falsely attributing things to me is your fault, not mine.


Get back to me when you can actually tell me what you were trying to say without trollbaiting me.

Murkwood wrote:
Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:I've thought long and hard about what 2+2 is and concluded that it was 5.

That's basically your argument.

This is an opinionated question: there is no real right or wrong.


Except there is. Right is what maximizes happiness and freedom and empowers and respects human life. Wrong minimizes happiness and freedom and belittles and threatens human life.

Your opinion is wrong, like it or not.

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Murkwood wrote:This is an opinionated question: there is no real right or wrong.

Since science says that you are wrong, you're wrong. This is not an opinionated question, as facts show that you aren't necessarily the same gender as sex.


This as well. This is about as "opinionated" a question as asking if the Earth is flat.

Insensitive People wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:And that's not going to get you very far on this site. I'd strongly suggest you re-think why you joined a debate site when you have zero care about anyone elses opinion.


I didn't really make a nation on here to debate others, moreso to play around with the issues. Whilst I am here I like to look in on the threads and read passively and occasionally comment.

Don't like it? That's fine.


Speaking purely as a player (as opposed to how Euro was a mod giving you advice), this is a debate forum. If you're not here to debate, then you probably should get off NSG (or at least stick to TET).

Gallifrey Secundaria wrote:
Esternial wrote:Edgy as a Googolgon.

Image


So..... edgy.


Indeed.

Wow. Such edge. So round. Many pointless.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Papait
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1302
Founded: Jun 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Papait » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:30 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Murkwood wrote:You have to feel sorry for people who are so confused in life that they mix up their sex. It's sad, really. If this person was a he at birth, they are a he at death.

No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.


and they can act the way they feel, but have no right to alter the body God gave them
Positive: EU, Catalan Independence, Scottish Independence, Brabant Autonomy, Hezbollah, Fatah, Iran, Lebanon, LGB-Rights, Religion, Secularism, Kemalism, Facism
Neutral: The rights of T's, UN, Hamas, Capitalism, Socialism, Assad
Negative: USA, Israel, India, Saudi Arabia, Abortion, Theocracy, Tenchnocracy, Nazism, Racism, IS

Embassy: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=294523

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:31 pm

Papait wrote:and they can act the way they feel, but have no right to alter the body God gave them

You do realize lots of cis people are free to do as they please in endless plastic surgeries but we are the sole ones pathologized for wanting similar augmentation, right?
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65565
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:33 pm

Papait wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.


and they can act the way they feel, but have no right to alter the body God gave them


Eris doesnt cre.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:35 pm

Papait wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.


and they can act the way they feel, but have no right to alter the body God gave them


1. This isn't a theocracy.
2. Who are you to speak for God?
3. If what you say is true, then God is a sadistic, hate-filled prick who should be actively opposed instead of worshipped. Why should I give two shits about the wishes of said God?
4. Everything I know about God tells me what you say is not true.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45993
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:36 pm

Papait wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.


and they can act the way they feel, but have no right to alter the body God gave them


Maybe God should come down here and explain why I don't have the right to do what I want with my own body.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Euroslavia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 7781
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Euroslavia » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:38 pm

Insensitive People wrote:
Euroslavia wrote:And that's not going to get you very far on this site. I'd strongly suggest you re-think why you joined a debate site when you have zero care about anyone elses opinion.


I didn't really make a nation on here to debate others, moreso to play around with the issues. Whilst I am here I like to look in on the threads and read passively and occasionally comment.

Don't like it? That's fine.

What I like or don't like is irrelevant. You started off on the wrong foot and I notified you of such. Take the advice as you will (or don't).
BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

BRAVE ENOUGH

User avatar
Fortschritte
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1693
Founded: Nov 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fortschritte » Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:39 pm

Papait wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:No such thing as a he at birth. People instruct all of them to behave like the older ones, but that only really seduces the majority. Trying to further make this mandatory manages to gather nothing but traumas.

Saying people should be X or Y because of reproductive organs makes as sense as saying people should be X or Y because of other differences in body type.

Yes, some people have psyches that don't match gender role expectations. That is absolutely normal and people will have to get used to that.


and they can act the way they feel, but have no right to alter the body God gave them


Who gave you the authority to determine what rights we have under "God?"
Last edited by Fortschritte on Tue Nov 25, 2014 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fortschritte IIWiki |The Player Behind Fort
Moderate Centre Rightist, Ordoliberal, Pro LGBT, Social Liberal
OOC Pros & Cons | Fort's Political Party Rankings(Updated)
Political Things I've Written
Japan: Land of the Rising Debt | Explaining the West German Economic Miracle
Economic Left/Right: 1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cerespasia, Dakran, Fort Viorlia, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Juristonia, Lagene, Nurvania, Simonia, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, The Vooperian Union, Turenia

Advertisement

Remove ads