Rosetta mission scientist Dr Matt Taylor persecuted by SJWs

[Createnoxia-]

These feminists have gone too far, especially since his WIFE made him that shirt. I support gender equality, but this is pure bullying.

[Tahar Joblis]

"Continual suspicion"? Could you say more, I'm not I'm getting what point you're making. (Sorry, may be slow brain day on my end. )

I think he means that male teachers are seen with suspicion they may be pedophiles of some sort.

But I'm not sure.

The lists look somewhat different to me, because taking out "maternity leave" is taking out the huge #1 factor. That the secondary factors align doesn't seem as important to me when the primary factor is that different:

1. Most (484/716) cited motherhood as the main reason... and, correspondingly...
2. Most (465/716) have not returned to working at all.

The #1 factor is parental leave / maternity leave - getting it, not feeling it is enough, men not being offered it / taking it, and women deciding to leave the workforce entirely (which is not an option men are encouraged to take). Male teachers leaving the field usually go work elsewhere.

One of the main narratives offered for the other (and it's a shame that the article doesn't break it down further) is the same, and very simple: Feeling alone / out of place due to group identity and lack of other members of that group. Highly gendered jobs tend to stay that way on their own without effort because of that factor.

[New England and The Maritimes]

These feminists have gone too far, especially since his WIFE made him that shirt. I support gender equality, but this is pure bullying.

Yeah. Posting a comment on twitter that wearing a shirt covered in objectifying images of female bodies is probably not the best course of action at an international press conference, and saying "Hey, that whole 'Women are discouraged from joining in the scientific community' problem is caused in a lot of ways, and this makes up part of it" is "bullying."

Stop defending someone after they've apologized. The argument is over at that point.

[Central Slavia]

These feminists have gone too far, especially since his WIFE made him that shirt. I support gender equality, but this is pure bullying.

Yeah. Posting a comment on twitter that wearing a shirt covered in objectifying images of female bodies is probably not the best course of action at an international press conference, and saying "Hey, that whole 'Women are discouraged from joining in the scientific community' problem is caused in a lot of ways, and this makes up part of it" is "bullying."

Stop defending someone after they've apologized. The argument is over at that point.

People can, in fact, apologize when they're not in the wrong, and calling admission of guilt a proof of guilt would mean that all those ladies burned at the stake were, in fact, witches.

[Galloism]

Yeah. Posting a comment on twitter that wearing a shirt covered in objectifying images of female bodies is probably not the best course of action at an international press conference, and saying "Hey, that whole 'Women are discouraged from joining in the scientific community' problem is caused in a lot of ways, and this makes up part of it" is "bullying."

Stop defending someone after they've apologized. The argument is over at that point.

People can, in fact, apologize when they're not in the wrong, and calling admission of guilt a proof of guilt would mean that all those ladies burned at the stake were, in fact, witches.

Someone pointing out your shirt as potentially offensive is not the same as being tortured until you confess to witchcraft.

[New England and The Maritimes]

Yeah. Posting a comment on twitter that wearing a shirt covered in objectifying images of female bodies is probably not the best course of action at an international press conference, and saying "Hey, that whole 'Women are discouraged from joining in the scientific community' problem is caused in a lot of ways, and this makes up part of it" is "bullying."

Stop defending someone after they've apologized. The argument is over at that point.

People can, in fact, apologize when they're not in the wrong, and calling admission of guilt a proof of guilt would mean that all those ladies burned at the stake were, in fact, witches.

If you're presenting this as a personal attack on Dr. Taylor, well, he doesn't agree that this is still a fight, he conceded and apologized, so you've lost the ground you were standing on. Apologizing on television of your own accord has nothing to do with being tortured.

[Central Slavia]

People can, in fact, apologize when they're not in the wrong, and calling admission of guilt a proof of guilt would mean that all those ladies burned at the stake were, in fact, witches.

Someone pointing out your shirt as potentially offensive is not the same as being tortured until you confess to witchcraft.

And you're missing the point. Which was stated right there in the first sentence. I'll repeat.
People can, in fact, apologize when they're not in the wrong,

[Lexcronica]

These feminists have gone too far, especially since his WIFE made him that shirt. I support gender equality, but this is pure bullying.

Yeah. Posting a comment on twitter that wearing a shirt covered in objectifying images of female bodies is probably not the best course of action at an international press conference, and saying "Hey, that whole 'Women are discouraged from joining in the scientific community' problem is caused in a lot of ways, and this makes up part of it" is "bullying."

Stop defending someone after they've apologized. The argument is over at that point.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q= ... 5997,d.cGU

this is the only thing i can think of now because of you two......

[Settrah]

People can, in fact, apologize when they're not in the wrong, and calling admission of guilt a proof of guilt would mean that all those ladies burned at the stake were, in fact, witches.

Someone pointing out your shirt as potentially offensive is not the same as being tortured until you confess to witchcraft.

Woah wait a minute, it's not?

Ah shit.

I have some goths I better apologize to.

[Ostroeuropa]

These feminists have gone too far, especially since his WIFE made him that shirt. I support gender equality, but this is pure bullying.

Yeah. Posting a comment on twitter that wearing a shirt covered in objectifying images of female bodies is probably not the best course of action at an international press conference, and saying "Hey, that whole 'Women are discouraged from joining in the scientific community' problem is caused in a lot of ways, and this makes up part of it" is "bullying."

Stop defending someone after they've apologized. The argument is over at that point.

There isn't anything objectifying about it. That's just an imperialistic attitude.

You rock on up to the guy, see he's got, gosh, nudity as part of his attire, call him a barbarian and hand him a set of acceptable clothing and a bible.
No no, you see, you have to be sexually repressed, like us europeans.
You aren't allowed to go around naked or anything, that's evil. You're a sinner.

This attitude pervades most of our interpretations of feminism too.
It's a racist taint.
Feminism got this problem because of white middle class women dominating it. It's an expression of their racism, and the racists who historically influenced the movement.

He wore a shirt with some nude imagery on it.
So what.

Further, couple that with the fact that this attitude is largely coming from feminists as an expression of a womens ideology, and the fact that STEM is an all male field, this is an attempt at colonialist attitudes.

You rock on up to the native, tell him he's a barbarian and his ways are unacceptable, and force him to act the way you find acceptable.
(In this case, censorship of sexually explicit material, because we're a prudish culture.)

This is why when the feminist ideology goes places, it ends up fucking over males in the long term.
Like in education.
Because males under a feminist system have exactly the same problem as natives have. It's expressed differently, and to different degrees, but it's there.
Men have had their own segregated culture for centuries.
Just up and declaring it unacceptable is imperialist in theory and in practice.

As such, you can make a decent case that feminism is inherently imperialist at this point, as well as sexist.

The way you deal with someone displaying nude imagery is with "Oh hey, that's neat. Look at the art."
You know, like if you come across a native american statue of some nude stuff.
You dont flip your shit and call them misogynists. (Code: Barbarian.)

[Lexcronica]

Yeah. Posting a comment on twitter that wearing a shirt covered in objectifying images of female bodies is probably not the best course of action at an international press conference, and saying "Hey, that whole 'Women are discouraged from joining in the scientific community' problem is caused in a lot of ways, and this makes up part of it" is "bullying."

Stop defending someone after they've apologized. The argument is over at that point.

There isn't anything objectifying about it. That's just an imperialistic attitude.

You rock on up to the guy, see he's got, gosh, nudity as part of his attire, call him a barbarian and hand him a set of acceptable clothing and a bible.
No no, you see, you have to be sexually repressed, like us europeans.
You aren't allowed to go around naked or anything, that's evil. You're a sinner.

This attitude pervades most of our interpretations of feminism too.
It's a racist taint.
Feminism got this problem because of white middle class women dominating it. It's an expression of their racism, and the racists who historically influenced the movement.

He wore a shirt with some nude imagery on it.
So what.

Further, couple that with the fact that this attitude is largely coming from feminists as an expression of a womens ideology, and the fact that STEM is an all male field, this is an attempt at colonialist attitudes.

You rock on up to the native, tell him he's a barbarian and his ways are unacceptable, and force him to act the way you find acceptable.
(In this case, censorship of sexually explicit material, because we're a prudish culture.)

This is why when the feminist ideology goes places, it ends up fucking over males in the long term.
Like in education.
Because males under a feminist system have exactly the same problem as natives have. It's expressed differently, and to different degrees, but it's there.
Men have had their own segregated culture for centuries.
Just up and declaring it unacceptable is imperialist in theory and in practice.

As such, you can make a decent case that feminism is inherently imperialist at this point, as well as sexist.

The way you deal with someone displaying nude imagery is with "Oh hey, that's neat. Look at the art."
You know, like if you come across a native american statue of some nude stuff.
You dont flip your shit and call them misogynists. (Code: Barbarian.)

I think I am in love.

[Vetalia]

This just makes me want to buy a copy of his shirt. It could be the new Three Wolf Moon.

[Untaroicht]

[Benuty]

Since when is bitching "persecution"?

[The Floating Island of the Sleeping God]

(Image)

We've been over this. Being criticized on twitter is not comparable in any meaningful way to being raped.

[Avenio]

(Image)

You're conflating objectification with criticism.

[Central Slavia]

(Image)

[/thread]

[Benuty]

(Image)

[/thread]

Incorrect, it is not over.

It has just begun.

[Tahar Joblis]

(Image)

We've been over this. Being criticized on twitter is not comparable in any meaningful way to being raped.

(Image)

You're conflating objectification with criticism.

Speaking of conflation... the image does not say "raped." The image says "objectified." Floating Island is a bit off.

[Untaroicht]

(Image)

We've been over this. Being criticized on twitter is not comparable in any meaningful way to being raped.

Bullshit. If a woman scientist was forced to apologize and was threatened to be fired for a revealing dress she wore at a press event, you hypocrites would be rioting in the streets.

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

We've been over this. Being criticized on twitter is not comparable in any meaningful way to being raped.

Bullshit. If a woman scientist was forced to apologize and was threatened to be fired for a revealing dress she wore at a press event, you hypocrites would be rioting in the streets.

Eh, not kinda the same it would make more sense if she was wearing a shirt of near naked men.

[Gauthier]

We've been over this. Being criticized on twitter is not comparable in any meaningful way to being raped.

Bullshit. If a woman scientist was forced to apologize and was threatened to be fired for a revealing dress she wore at a press event, you hypocrites would be rioting in the streets.

Wicker Man much?

[-The Unified Earth Governments-]

Bullshit. If a woman scientist was forced to apologize and was threatened to be fired for a revealing dress she wore at a press event, you hypocrites would be rioting in the streets.

Wicker Man much?

I hate that movie.

[The Floating Island of the Sleeping God]

We've been over this. Being criticized on twitter is not comparable in any meaningful way to being raped.

You're conflating objectification with criticism.

Speaking of conflation... the image does not say "raped." The image says "objectified." Floating Island is a bit off.

Read their signs.

[The Floating Island of the Sleeping God]

Wicker Man much?

I hate that movie.

Not the beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!