NATION

PASSWORD

What Does Sex Mean to You?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Firsthome
Senator
 
Posts: 3975
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Firsthome » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:10 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I might be polyamorous, I dunno :p

I just think polygamy is great, but I'm not sure if I'm into polyamory.


Then you're ok with your partner having others but not yourself?


Share harems :3

Mix and match the guys and the girls

MASS ORGY :3
Last edited by Firsthome on Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I have a heart of a five year-old...
it's in a jar in my basement

Springer:"I've got better things to do tonight than die"

DYK:Breathing lowers your life expectancy by 50%.

Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
Left: 8.06, Libertarian: 0.6,7 foreign policy: -5.76, culture: -6.26
GENERATION 4: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:11 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Calimera II wrote:Sure it was because of the wine? And how many glasses did you drink?

250ml diluted in water, with sugar.

My liver is very fragile from past antibiotics overuse.


That's nothing really. But if you had liver problems, it is best not to drink I guess.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:11 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I might be polyamorous, I dunno :p

I just think polygamy is great, but I'm not sure if I'm into polyamory.


Then you're ok with your partner having others but not yourself?


No I mean, I'm okay if me and my partner have casual flings and even bring someone into a threesome/orgy and a casual sexual relationship.

I'm not sure if I am okay with the idea of me and my partner being in romantic relationships with other people.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203957
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:11 pm

Firsthome wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Then you're ok with your partner having others but not yourself?


Share harems :3


How old are you? :?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:11 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:I find instinctual response hotter.

If my partner is into it and we don't have to speak our minds out I find it much better than speaking. Then again it requires for both partners to look at each other as people and pay attention to one another.

Not only that, you know what you and your partner like and are okay with.

The standard for strangers, though, is to not be threatening neither with their flirting nor with their sex.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:12 pm

Scow Creek wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:No, it works the same both ways.

Consent for sex is voluntary, sober, enthusiastic, verbal, non-coerced, continual, active, honest and isn't taking in the place of an important power relationship (especially so when there's a significant, inherent cognitive difference: people shift from adolescent to adult brains at the 18-25 age bracket).

Lack of consent is sexual abuse.

Simples.


Spoken like a feminist-indoctrinated 21 year old spewing the party line.

Let me let you in on a secret, oh ye of little sexual experience: when people engage in sex, they don't play "Mother May I? They don't ask a series of questions:
"May I touch your boob?
May I suck on your nipple?
May I touch your twat?
May I pull out my dick?"
May I rub against you?
May I insert this into your wide open legs?"

No, they simply progress from one act to another as they respond to each other's physicality. Consent is RARELY, IF EVER, "Verbal." That is a legal FANTASY created by feminists which slam-dunk convict young men who have done nothing wrong.

No, unless you have extensive experience with that person, are familiar with their comfort zones, have been given explicit permission that such actions are okay, the individual responds positively during the entire experience, and the individual is sober and conscious of what they are doing, you may not simply act without permission. If you are initiating these things, you better ask. Yes, these things do happen. Yes, every play party I have been to ensured people asked these things or else they were made to leave. It isn't hard to ask, and only given the above criteria would it be even remotely appropriate to make such presumptions. A "yes" at one occassion is not a permanent pass. It is not hard to check for consent, and any individual with the clear mind to be aware of their actions is obligated to make sure anyone they interact with consents to their actions. This extends from hugs to intercourse.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203957
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:12 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Then you're ok with your partner having others but not yourself?


No I mean, I'm okay if me and my partner have casual flings and even bring someone into a threesome/orgy and a casual sexual relationship.

I'm not sure if I am okay with the idea of me and my partner being in romantic relationships with other people.


Ok, strictly sex but no romance. Am I right?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:12 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
No I mean, I'm okay if me and my partner have casual flings and even bring someone into a threesome/orgy and a casual sexual relationship.

I'm not sure if I am okay with the idea of me and my partner being in romantic relationships with other people.


Ok, strictly sex but no romance. Am I right?


Yep, that's right :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:13 pm

Calimera II wrote:That's nothing really.

My headaches back then felt like I contracted a serious viral infection like dengue fever.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37335
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:13 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Yet another thread that turns into a match between non-feminists and feminists. Should I start keeping score?

New idea discussion about how Joseph Smith was the first to reject his new religion of endless celestial sex.

Also scottish catamites.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:13 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Firsthome wrote:
Share harems :3


How old are you? :?


I guess 13.

User avatar
Insaeldor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5385
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Insaeldor » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:13 pm

Sex is just the physical embodiment of a basic human desire. It doesn't have to mean anything but yet it can mean everything it depends on who you are and how you view things really. I personally just view sex as a physical embodiment of pleasure which all are looking for and that it isn't something that needs the requirement of love or affection but is no doubt amplified by such feelings.
Time is a prismatic uniform polyhedron

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203957
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:13 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Ok, strictly sex but no romance. Am I right?


Yep, that's right :p


Got it. So you're poly frisky. :p
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203957
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:14 pm

Benuty wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Yet another thread that turns into a match between non-feminists and feminists. Should I start keeping score?

New idea discussion about how Joseph Smith was the first to reject his new religion of endless celestial sex.

Also scottish catamites.


Make a thread then. :3
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37335
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:15 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Benuty wrote:New idea discussion about how Joseph Smith was the first to reject his new religion of endless celestial sex.

Also scottish catamites.


Make a thread then. :3

Well this is a thread about sex :P.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:16 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Yep, that's right :p


Got it. So you're poly frisky. :p


Poly Frisky is best kind of frisky :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203957
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:16 pm

Benuty wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Make a thread then. :3

Well this is a thread about sex :P.


Then... Go! :p
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203957
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:17 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Got it. So you're poly frisky. :p


Poly Frisky is best kind of frisky :p


Aye aye. :3
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:17 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Then you're ok with your partner having others but not yourself?


No I mean, I'm okay if me and my partner have casual flings and even bring someone into a threesome/orgy and a casual sexual relationship.

I'm not sure if I am okay with the idea of me and my partner being in romantic relationships with other people.

I've never been in a truly polyamorous relationship, so I can't give perfect advice on the matter, but generally I'd recommend that you and your partner discuss the issue to see what you are comfortable with, and otherwise allow the relationship to develop naturally. If you find yourself desiring a romantic relationship with someone else, you can act on it then, but otherwise you don't need to worry about it.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Firsthome
Senator
 
Posts: 3975
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Firsthome » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:20 pm

Calimera II wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
How old are you? :?


I guess 13.



XD I'm 15

Don't even know why I'm on this thread since I'm a virgin
I have a heart of a five year-old...
it's in a jar in my basement

Springer:"I've got better things to do tonight than die"

DYK:Breathing lowers your life expectancy by 50%.

Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.
Left: 8.06, Libertarian: 0.6,7 foreign policy: -5.76, culture: -6.26
GENERATION 4: Social experiment. When you see this, add one to the generation and copy this into your signature.

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:21 pm

Firsthome wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
I guess 13.



XD I'm 15

Don't even know why I'm on this thread since I'm a virgin


Yea I was kidding.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:23 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Poly Frisky is best kind of frisky :p


Aye aye. :3


It's a good thing that I'm open minded about it than, say, years back.

Years back I was strictly monogamous and mono-amorous. Nowadays I'm open to polygamy but somewhat hesitant about polyamory.

Of course, I'm also considerate and I talk about it with my partner before doing anything. :p

If she wants a monogamous relationship I am okay with it and if she wants polygamy I am okay with it too.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The 502nd SS
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1159
Founded: Apr 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The 502nd SS » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:24 pm

Firsthome wrote:
Calimera II wrote:
I guess 13.



XD I'm 15

Don't even know why I'm on this thread since I'm a virgin

All aboard the virgin train!
I'm 18, a Conservative/constitutionalist, a future soldier. I'm a Patriot and not nationalist, learn the difference
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Sig
    Pro- Capitalism, Military, guns, pro life, death penalty, nuclear energy, military right-sizing
    Anti- Gun control,LGBT , military downsizing, NSA, communism, socialism, welfare
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."-George S. Patton

I swear something is in the water

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:25 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
No I mean, I'm okay if me and my partner have casual flings and even bring someone into a threesome/orgy and a casual sexual relationship.

I'm not sure if I am okay with the idea of me and my partner being in romantic relationships with other people.

I've never been in a truly polyamorous relationship, so I can't give perfect advice on the matter, but generally I'd recommend that you and your partner discuss the issue to see what you are comfortable with, and otherwise allow the relationship to develop naturally. If you find yourself desiring a romantic relationship with someone else, you can act on it then, but otherwise you don't need to worry about it.


Yea, that's one of the things I require in my relationships; high levels of communication.

Everything, and by that I mean everything has to be discussed once and mulled over before doing anything. I prefer committed answers. Not because I like permanence, but because I like closure. If the issue comes up again I am not as bothered as never having had a proper closure to the previous issue to begin with.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Frisiiland
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 56
Founded: Oct 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisiiland » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:44 pm

When me and my wife were younger we even reached 1000 times a year, it's down to a little more than 600 per annum. We brag about it to other couples and tell people this fact when they ask why we have so many children. I don't get why people think we're weird, it's simply a little less than twice per day on average.
Last edited by Frisiiland on Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:04 pm, edited 6 times in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atrito, BEEstreetz, Bienenhalde, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, Hurdergaryp, New Temecula, Republics of the Solar Union, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, Stratonesia, The Black Forrest, The Huskar Social Union, Tiami, Vassenor, X3-U, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads