Advertisement
by Duvniask » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:48 pm
Eitusian wrote:It's reproduction. That's it's meaning to me.
by Imperium Sidhicum » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:50 pm
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:52 pm
Esternial wrote:It depends on who's participating. It's only as meaningful as the relationship you have with whomever you're doing it with. It can either be a meaningful act of love or simply a means to achieve pleasure.
Both are very different kinds of sex, or at least to me they are.
by Scow Creek » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:10 pm
by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:12 pm
Scow Creek wrote:Kind of shocked as to how many of you young people are so rigidly locked in this weird paradigm that says sex is for marriage only, or sex is best fwith your true love only, or that its best to wait.
What a load of hogwash, invented by neo-puritanical religious freaks. I suspect many of you that embrace this horseshit because it's a good 'cover' for your virginity or insecurities about sex.
No one every grows old and regrets having had an active, varied, sex life. Plenty grow old and wish they weren't so damned rigid with themselves when they were young and could enjoy sex.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:13 pm
Scow Creek wrote:No one every grows old and regrets having had an active, varied, sex life.
by Scow Creek » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:28 pm
by The 502nd SS » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:29 pm
Scow Creek wrote:Kind of shocked as to how many of you young people are so rigidly locked in this weird paradigm that says sex is for marriage only, or sex is best fwith your true love only, or that its best to wait.
What a load of hogwash, invented by neo-puritanical religious freaks. I suspect many of you that embrace this horseshit because it's a good 'cover' for your virginity or insecurities about sex.
No one every grows old and regrets having had an active, varied, sex life. Plenty grow old and wish they weren't so damned rigid with themselves when they were young and could enjoy sex.
by Scow Creek » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:31 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Some people don't think it's all that great or important. That's just as valid. Stop trying to shame people for not thinking sex should be their top priority.
by Scow Creek » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:32 pm
The 502nd SS wrote:I'm a virgin and I would most likely fuck up my first time.
by Calimera II » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:33 pm
Frisiiland wrote:Fucking is fucking fun for fucks sake.
by Imperium Sidhicum » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:35 pm
Scow Creek wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:Some people don't think it's all that great or important. That's just as valid. Stop trying to shame people for not thinking sex should be their top priority.
Never said "top" priority. But the fact is sex is a strong, normal, human drive...and damned enjoyable. Most people who retreat into a more conservative mode are denying basic biological, evolutionary urges....and often do so because its a 'safe' cover for fears or insecurities. If you're not getting any, it's easier to 'protect' yourself with religious or philosophical clichés than it is to bust out and face your fears and poor self-image.
by Calimera II » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:35 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Scow Creek wrote:No one every grows old and regrets having had an active, varied, sex life.
I'm from Brazil where the average age to lose your virginity is the second lowest in the world so far as research goes and I know PLENTY, PLENTY, PLENTY of people who would have preferred to have had it later or with a romantic partner.
I agree 'marriage-only' and similar is bullshit though.
by The 502nd SS » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:36 pm
by Theorett » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:41 pm
Ask some girls to fuck you, the ugly ones are more likely to accept. Just be friendly, do it in private and respect the word no.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:41 pm
Calimera II wrote:The low age probably also has something to do with the uneducated part of the inhabitants of the slums.
by The 502nd SS » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:43 pm
by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:43 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:44 pm
The 502nd SS wrote: is it that easy?
by Calimera II » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:46 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Calimera II wrote:The low age probably als has something to do with the uneducated part of the inhabitants of the slums.
An average of 11 among the poor and 14 among the middle and upper classes is still an epidemics of excessively premature sex for all, and to a certain extent normalized abuse, so it's no joke. :|
by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:48 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Frisiiland » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:49 pm
A source please, because it seems to be rougly 16.Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Calimera II wrote:The low age probably also has something to do with the uneducated part of the inhabitants of the slums.
An average of 11 among the poor and 14 among the middle and upper classes is still an epidemics of excessively premature sex for all, and to a certain extent normalized abuse, so it's no joke. :|
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bovad, Ethel mermania, Hrstrovokia, Hurdergaryp, Hwiteard, Immoren, Ineva, Lagene, ML Library, New Temecula, Soviet Haaregrad, The Black Forrest, Tiami, Valyxias
Advertisement