NATION

PASSWORD

Statistics Don't Support Rape Culture

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:57 am

Socialist Tera wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
..but you do :roll:

Enlighten us plebs.

I could write an essay on it but I link you a few sources:
http://www.wavaw.ca/what-is-rape-culture/
http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/03/exa ... e-culture/

I think they're understating the amount of rape men experience based on the frequency of child molestation as to make rape culture a thing more important to feminists. But that would make rape even more culturally endemic into society that the only cure is segregation of the sexes as no number of laws will stop rapists from raping women and children.
Last edited by The Serbian Empire on Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:06 am

The Serbian Empire wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:I could write an essay on it but I link you a few sources:
http://www.wavaw.ca/what-is-rape-culture/
http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/03/exa ... e-culture/

I think they're understating the amount of rape men experience based on the frequency of child molestation as to make rape culture a thing more important to feminists. But that would make rape even more culturally endemic into society that the only cure is segregation of the sexes as no number of laws will stop rapists from raping women and children.

The main problem is that a lot of portrayals of bad portrayals of women in mainstream media, too often the main part of a female character's personality is their sexuality. A lot of clothing in fantasy and science fiction movies are undesirable and don't get me started on ecchii and anime. If they done the same to males, men would probably look like this: Image
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:09 am

Socialist Tera wrote:
The Serbian Empire wrote:I think they're understating the amount of rape men experience based on the frequency of child molestation as to make rape culture a thing more important to feminists. But that would make rape even more culturally endemic into society that the only cure is segregation of the sexes as no number of laws will stop rapists from raping women and children.

The main problem is that a lot of portrayals of bad portrayals of women in mainstream media, too often the main part of a female character's personality is their sexuality. A lot of clothing in fantasy and science fiction movies are undesirable and don't get me started on ecchii and anime. If they done the same to males, men would probably look like this: Image

But we do see a lot of that... in Superhero comics. The other category is these bishounen types that girls love because they aren't He-man. I think mass media is the main culprit of all of societies woes whether it's rape, hatred, or anything else.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:13 am

Socialist Tera wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
..but you do :roll:

Enlighten us plebs.

I could write an essay on it but I link you a few sources:
http://www.wavaw.ca/what-is-rape-culture/
http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/03/exa ... e-culture/


Yeah, it's exactly what I already knew it was, and suspect most other posters here do too. Thank you captain obvious.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:56 am

Socialist Tera wrote:
The Serbian Empire wrote:I think they're understating the amount of rape men experience based on the frequency of child molestation as to make rape culture a thing more important to feminists. But that would make rape even more culturally endemic into society that the only cure is segregation of the sexes as no number of laws will stop rapists from raping women and children.

The main problem is that a lot of portrayals of bad portrayals of women in mainstream media, too often the main part of a female character's personality is their sexuality. A lot of clothing in fantasy and science fiction movies are undesirable and don't get me started on ecchii and anime. If they done the same to males, men would probably look like this: Image

:eyebrow: Walk down the romance aisle of your local bookstore. Count how many exposed and unrealistically well-defined male torsos you see. If you don't have a local bookstore, just click here.

User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Sat Oct 25, 2014 11:59 am

Tahar Joblis wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:The main problem is that a lot of portrayals of bad portrayals of women in mainstream media, too often the main part of a female character's personality is their sexuality. A lot of clothing in fantasy and science fiction movies are undesirable and don't get me started on ecchii and anime. If they done the same to males, men would probably look like this: Image

:eyebrow: Walk down the romance aisle of your local bookstore. Count how many exposed and unrealistically well-defined male torsos you see. If you don't have a local bookstore, just click here.

The males in romance actually have personality more than just their sexuality. Nice try though.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:10 pm

Susurruses wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:Feminism is more complicated and more simple than that.

Simply, feminism is about making sure that women don't get screwed over.

Yes, there are some professional feminists, and some of those professional feminists have a business model of professional victims. Some feminists seem more interested in propagating and sustaining their movement and funding engine than in actually getting things done. But overall, once you sort past the bad actors, scam artists, and occasional raging hate-filled maniac, the movement has a clear mission of trying to make sure that no woman ever gets screwed over for any reason.

The problem, of course, is that sometimes, trying to make sure all women are protected from everything has collateral effects that aren't very nice or fair.

Oh yeah, "professional victims" ; people just love being threatened with rape and murder, don't they?

When they can use it for a fundraising platform, they may in fact find something to like about it.
You do realise statistics regarding false rape reports are available and indicate that the rate of false reporting is far lower than just about any other crime, right?

I realize what all the statistics regarding false rape reports are.
If I remember rightly, it's between 1% & 3%.

That would be a figure based on the unfounding rate. That is, the rate at which rape accusations are proven to be unfounded. This rate would generally be cited as between 2 and 8% (when cited honestly). It used to be much higher, but feminists complained that the high unfounding rate for rape accusations meant that police weren't taking accusations of rape seriously.


On the whole, given the body of available evidence, the rate at which accusations of rape are in fact false is most likely somewhere between 25% (exclusion rate in cases where DNA is available) and 60%.

A relatively small percentage of accusations of rape are proven true. (Sometimes slightly higher than 10%.) A relatively small percentage of accusations of rape are proven false. (Sometimes near 10%). It is most likely that a large minority of accusations of rape are false. Low figures are inevitably based on the assumption that any accusation not proven to be false must be true.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:14 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:When they can use it for a fundraising platform, they may in fact find something to like about it.


:eyebrow:
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:22 pm

Socialist Tera wrote:The males in romance actually have personality more than just their sexuality. Nice try though.

Depends on the romance novel. In general, the male protagonists of romance novels do not have more developed personalities than the women decried as "sex objects" in male-marketed novels. I - probably unlike you - actually read novels marketed to women and novels marketed to men.

A number of male protagonists in romance novels are written spectacularly badly. They also generally have more physically unrealistic proportions (the average romance hunk is roughly 6'4" and - what with the visibly chiseled abs - a body fat percentage somewhere south of 5%), and on top of their rare physical attributes, they tend to be wealthy, politically powerful, or both. The average Romance ManTM is comfortably a member of the 1% and more often than not a member of the 0.1%.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:43 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:The males in romance actually have personality more than just their sexuality. Nice try though.

Depends on the romance novel. In general, the male protagonists of romance novels do not have more developed personalities than the women decried as "sex objects" in male-marketed novels. I - probably unlike you - actually read novels marketed to women and novels marketed to men.

A number of male protagonists in romance novels are written spectacularly badly. They also generally have more physically unrealistic proportions (the average romance hunk is roughly 6'4" and - what with the visibly chiseled abs - a body fat percentage somewhere south of 5%), and on top of their rare physical attributes, they tend to be wealthy, politically powerful, or both. The average Romance ManTM is comfortably a member of the 1% and more often than not a member of the 0.1%.


I straight burst out into laughter when I saw the "average" 6'4" figure :rofl:

:lol2: :lol2: :lol2:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:55 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:The males in romance actually have personality more than just their sexuality. Nice try though.

Depends on the romance novel. In general, the male protagonists of romance novels do not have more developed personalities than the women decried as "sex objects" in male-marketed novels. I - probably unlike you - actually read novels marketed to women and novels marketed to men.

A number of male protagonists in romance novels are written spectacularly badly. They also generally have more physically unrealistic proportions (the average romance hunk is roughly 6'4" and - what with the visibly chiseled abs - a body fat percentage somewhere south of 5%), and on top of their rare physical attributes, they tend to be wealthy, politically powerful, or both. The average Romance ManTM is comfortably a member of the 1% and more often than not a member of the 0.1%.

Yes, it is there but young children aren't exposed to it as an early age.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Spoder
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7493
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Spoder » Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:57 pm

Socialist Tera wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:Depends on the romance novel. In general, the male protagonists of romance novels do not have more developed personalities than the women decried as "sex objects" in male-marketed novels. I - probably unlike you - actually read novels marketed to women and novels marketed to men.

A number of male protagonists in romance novels are written spectacularly badly. They also generally have more physically unrealistic proportions (the average romance hunk is roughly 6'4" and - what with the visibly chiseled abs - a body fat percentage somewhere south of 5%), and on top of their rare physical attributes, they tend to be wealthy, politically powerful, or both. The average Romance ManTM is comfortably a member of the 1% and more often than not a member of the 0.1%.

Yes, it is there but young children aren't exposed to it as an early age.

Yes, but teens are.

Young children are exposed to comics and really bad superheroes.
Legalize gay weed
Time to get aesthetic.
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:59 pm

Spoder wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:Yes, it is there but young children aren't exposed to it as an early age.

Yes, but teens are.

Young children are exposed to comics and really bad superheroes.


"Really bad superheroes" what
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Spoder
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7493
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Spoder » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:02 pm

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Spoder wrote:Yes, but teens are.

Young children are exposed to comics and really bad superheroes.


"Really bad superheroes" what

Marvel heroes suck ass and only about half of the DC heroes are interesting/have depth.
Legalize gay weed
Time to get aesthetic.
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:44 pm

Spoder wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:Yes, it is there but young children aren't exposed to it as an early age.

Yes, but teens are.

Young children are exposed to comics and really bad superheroes.

Superheroes are made to mainly empower men. The typical damsel in distress.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:45 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Haktiva wrote:it's up to herself first and foremost to keep herself safe.


It's up to her to keep herself safe, but you're missing a vital component.

It's up to us men to not be pricks.

So is it our fault as a collective when one guy acts like a bastard?
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Spoder
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7493
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Spoder » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:46 pm

Haktiva wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
It's up to her to keep herself safe, but you're missing a vital component.

It's up to us men to not be pricks.

So is it our fault as a collective when one guy acts like a bastard?

No.

That has nothing to do what you said.

The whole point is nobody should have to worry about sexual predators because of what they're wearing.
Legalize gay weed
Time to get aesthetic.
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:47 pm

Spoder wrote:
Haktiva wrote:So is it our fault as a collective when one guy acts like a bastard?

No.

That has nothing to do what you said.

The whole point is nobody should have to worry about sexual predators because of what they're wearing.

Nobody in the world should have to worry about getting hit by a car either.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:50 pm

Haktiva wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
It's up to her to keep herself safe, but you're missing a vital component.

It's up to us men to not be pricks.

So is it our fault as a collective when one guy acts like a bastard?


No, but it is our fault we enable the guy by saying "well she had it coming".

"She had it coming" it's pathetically easy to say and it does nothing but alienate other people; it's basically a cop-out to not see the larger picture: that if that guy/girl wouldn't have been such an asshole none of what they went thought would have happened.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Spoder
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7493
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Spoder » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:50 pm

Haktiva wrote:
Spoder wrote:No.

That has nothing to do what you said.

The whole point is nobody should have to worry about sexual predators because of what they're wearing.

Nobody in the world should have to worry about getting hit by a car either.

Where the fuck is this bullshit coming from?

Just fucking respect women, respect men, don't be surprised when society doesn't give a fuck and then the rest of it starts complaining.

You're comparing apples and oranges.

Nobody should have to worry about getting hit by a car, but the solution is far more complicated.
Legalize gay weed
Time to get aesthetic.
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:52 pm

Spoder wrote:
Haktiva wrote:Nobody in the world should have to worry about getting hit by a car either.

Where the fuck is this bullshit coming from?

Just fucking respect women, respect men, don't be surprised when society doesn't give a fuck and then the rest of it starts complaining.

You're comparing apples and oranges.

Nobody should have to worry about getting hit by a car, but the solution is far more complicated.

It's gonna happen anyways, but there are steps a person can take to keep themselves safe. It's not my responsibility to look after anyone but myself unless I agree to a contract(shake hands and such).
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:53 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Haktiva wrote:So is it our fault as a collective when one guy acts like a bastard?


No, but it is our fault we enable the guy by saying "well she had it coming".

"She had it coming" it's pathetically easy to say and it does nothing but alienate other people; it's basically a cop-out to not see the larger picture: that if that guy/girl wouldn't have been such an asshole none of what they went thought would have happened.

Why the fuck would anyone say "they had it coming'? I do not get that logic.

I mean there's a difference between being careless or unlucky and actually deserving something like that. I can't think of anyone who deserves rape.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:54 pm

Haktiva wrote:
Spoder wrote:Where the fuck is this bullshit coming from?

Just fucking respect women, respect men, don't be surprised when society doesn't give a fuck and then the rest of it starts complaining.

You're comparing apples and oranges.

Nobody should have to worry about getting hit by a car, but the solution is far more complicated.

It's gonna happen anyways, but there are steps a person can take to keep themselves safe. It's not my responsibility to look after anyone but myself unless I agree to a contract(shake hands and such).


What if it would have been your best friend the one who got raped, would you still blame it on them?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Spoder
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7493
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Spoder » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:54 pm

Haktiva wrote:
Spoder wrote:Where the fuck is this bullshit coming from?

Just fucking respect women, respect men, don't be surprised when society doesn't give a fuck and then the rest of it starts complaining.

You're comparing apples and oranges.

Nobody should have to worry about getting hit by a car, but the solution is far more complicated.

It's gonna happen anyways, but there are steps a person can take to keep themselves safe. It's not my responsibility to look after anyone but myself unless I agree to a contract(shake hands and such).

That is fucking bullshit.

There is a simple solution to rape and sexual abuse: control your fucking urges

I do it every fucking day. So do lots of other people.
Legalize gay weed
Time to get aesthetic.
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?

User avatar
Seangoli
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6000
Founded: Sep 24, 2006
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Seangoli » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:57 pm

Socialist Tera wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:Depends on the romance novel. In general, the male protagonists of romance novels do not have more developed personalities than the women decried as "sex objects" in male-marketed novels. I - probably unlike you - actually read novels marketed to women and novels marketed to men.

A number of male protagonists in romance novels are written spectacularly badly. They also generally have more physically unrealistic proportions (the average romance hunk is roughly 6'4" and - what with the visibly chiseled abs - a body fat percentage somewhere south of 5%), and on top of their rare physical attributes, they tend to be wealthy, politically powerful, or both. The average Romance ManTM is comfortably a member of the 1% and more often than not a member of the 0.1%.

Yes, it is there but young children aren't exposed to it as an early age.


I disagree whole heartedly with this. A casual perusing of comics and cartoons, and many other media aimed at young boys will show the exact same patterning of a masculine idea being marketed to young boys. Any kid who grew up in the 80's and 90's in particular was bombarded by these conceptions.

Consider: Currently, about 1/3 of people with clinically significant eating disorders are men (20 million women to 10 million men). Equally, men are far less likely to seek treatment than women are, due to the cultural stigmatization the disease has (IEating disorders are not a man's disease, after all). In reality, the highest growing demographic of eating disorders is among young men, and they are far less likely to seek treatment as well.

Studies equally indicate that male dissatisfaction with their body image has risen dramatically in recent years, to 43% of respondents not being happy with how they look(Up from 11%. This number is in actuality comparable to the rate of women who feel the same. Between 30-60% of adolescent to college normal weight males report a desire to increase muscle mass through dieting and supplement plans. Keep in mind these are normal weight individuals.

And this is a huge problem that is often ignored or marginalized. I am not saying that men have it worse in this regard. Rather, the information available is rather clear that both sexes have it pretty much just as bad as far as how harmful popular conceptions of body ideals affect young individuals. What I have a serious problem with, however, is the marginalization towards how the issue affects young males by claiming it's not as bad. It affects young males just as poorly as it affects young females. Certain eating disorders appear in females more than males (Anorexia/Bulemia), but there is a wide range of disorders that affect males more than females as well that are just as harmful.

The point to all of this is that popular portrayals of what the physical ideal for both women and men is pretty much equally harmful to both sexes, and should be treated as such. Marginalizing one group over another is just pure and utter hypocrisy and utter trash thinking.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aperistan, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest, The Godfather Part III

Advertisement

Remove ads