NATION

PASSWORD

British 2015 general election poll

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who would you vote for?

Labour
342
20%
Conservatives
346
20%
Ukip
394
23%
Greens
246
14%
Liberal Democrats
149
9%
SNP
77
5%
Plaid Cymru
32
2%
Respect
35
2%
Other (please state)
79
5%
 
Total votes : 1700

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:23 pm

DUP
Sinn fein
SDLP
Alliance

The Northern Ireland party political broadcasts.

User avatar
British Home Counties
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 364
Founded: Mar 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby British Home Counties » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:25 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Alyakia wrote:

What are borrowing to spend on if they've allegedly made cuts to public spending?


... to fund the slump in revenue?

they haven't made "cuts" to public spending, that's just a false myth. public spending hasn't decreased since 1960s. what has happened is that the increases to public services (f. ex. NHS) is slower than before and not going up fast enough to meet demand (nhs crisis)

Alyakia wrote:(Image)
(Image)


Don't know why you're blaming the Conservatives here, Labour has doubled the net debt during times of a financial boom. I could do better in government than them.
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.

"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)

Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:56 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Angleter wrote:The remaining public spending. You know that.

If the remaining public spending were lower, you expect the deficit and borrowing to decrease... unless tax revenues also decreased.
So either public spending has actually increased (so the "remaining" spending is more spending then was there in the first place), or taxes have decreased significantly.
Why has spending increased?


The deficit has decreased - as Alyakia's first graph shows. It's gone from ~£150bn in 2009-10 to ~£100bn (in 2013-4 - if I remember right, it's on course to be around £90bn this financial year). The deficit reduction is greater when you take into account inflation (£90bn today is equivalent to about £75bn in 2010). Overall government debt is increasing because we still have a deficit. Public spending may have 'increased' in nominal terms, but it has decreased in real terms, when one takes into account inflation and population growth (the ~£580bn spending in 2009-10, shown in Alyakia's third graph, would be worth around £700bn now).

Tax revenue, as a % of GDP, has remained more or less constant.
Last edited by Angleter on Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
British Home Counties
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 364
Founded: Mar 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby British Home Counties » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:14 pm

Angleter wrote:
Conscentia wrote:If the remaining public spending were lower, you expect the deficit and borrowing to decrease... unless tax revenues also decreased.
So either public spending has actually increased (so the "remaining" spending is more spending then was there in the first place), or taxes have decreased significantly.
Why has spending increased?



GDP has decreased. Using taxes as a % of GDP is not a reliable way to measure the deficit.

UK Total Receipts fell from 575 billion in 2009/10 to 496 billion in 2010/11. That probably contributed to the deficit, I guess.
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.

"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)

Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:18 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Angleter wrote:The remaining public spending. You know that.

If the remaining public spending were lower, you expect the deficit and borrowing to decrease... unless tax revenues also decreased.
So either public spending has actually increased (so the "remaining" spending is more spending then was there in the first place), or taxes have decreased significantly.
Why has spending increased?


The Government has raised the tax threshold several times over the course of this parliament.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:42 pm

British Home Counties wrote:
Angleter wrote:


GDP has decreased. Using taxes as a % of GDP is not a reliable way to measure the deficit.

UK Total Receipts fell from 575 billion in 2009/10 to 496 billion in 2010/11. That probably contributed to the deficit, I guess.


GDP hasn't decreased since the start of the 2009-10 financial year. As for revenue, the £575bn and £496bn figures appear to refer to the budgets for 2008-9 and 2009-10. As Alyakia's second chart and this demonstrates, the decline was much more slight.
Last edited by Angleter on Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
British Home Counties
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 364
Founded: Mar 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby British Home Counties » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:12 pm

Angleter wrote:
British Home Counties wrote:
GDP has decreased. Using taxes as a % of GDP is not a reliable way to measure the deficit.

UK Total Receipts fell from 575 billion in 2009/10 to 496 billion in 2010/11. That probably contributed to the deficit, I guess.


GDP hasn't decreased since the start of the 2009-10 financial year. As for revenue, the £575bn and £496bn figures appear to refer to the budgets for 2008-9 and 2009-10. As Alyakia's second chart and this demonstrates, the decline was much more slight.


I was talking about GDP decrease in relation to tax revenue. Generally, there's a commencement/time lag in macroeconomics.

" the decline was much more slight." - The 5.3% inflation in 2008 would explain it
Participants of Frankfurt Riots who do not pay taxes should have their welfare stripped from them for 5 years as a punishment for destroying tax-funded projects.

"Everyone wants to cut down on government, provided that those things he has an interest in are maintained."
A student from Polonia who lives in the UK. Came here in 2004 when Nigel Farage personally gave me flowers (sc). Economics: Friedmanomics. Religion: Bill Maherism. Social: Arizonian Libertarianism (but by god do not call me a liberal, that's an insult.)

Calling Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary "Eastern European" is an insult.

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:02 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:On the downside, of course, it's in Liverpool.


HAHAHAHAHA A LIVERPOOL IS A SHIT CITY JOKE!

How very original and witty! I've never heard anyone make this joke before, and it definitely isn't made 95% of the time by clueless arseholes who have never been, or if they have not come abck since the Thatcher era.

Give it a rest mate

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:03 am

DesAnges wrote:Liverpool's fine provided you don't get to Norris Green or Croxteth, really.


Ah'll get me fookhin crocky mates on you la

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:35 am

Devvo Mate wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:On the downside, of course, it's in Liverpool.


HAHAHAHAHA A LIVERPOOL IS A SHIT CITY JOKE!

How very original and witty! I've never heard anyone make this joke before, and it definitely isn't made 95% of the time by clueless arseholes who have never been, or if they have not come abck since the Thatcher era.

Give it a rest mate

I think ya need to take a deep breath there. Everyone shits on everyone else's city.

That said, I think we can all be in agreement in saying that Stevenage is the absolute fucking worst place in the UK.

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:36 am

Napkiraly wrote:I think ya need to take a deep breath there. Everyone shits on everyone else's city.

That said, I think we can all be in agreement in saying that Stevenage is the absolute fucking worst place in the UK.


Not even Scouse I'm just fucking sick of smug middle-class southern wankers shitting on Liverpool despite it being God's own city.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:39 am

Devvo Mate wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:I think ya need to take a deep breath there. Everyone shits on everyone else's city.

That said, I think we can all be in agreement in saying that Stevenage is the absolute fucking worst place in the UK.


Not even Scouse I'm just fucking sick of smug middle-class southern wankers shitting on Liverpool despite it being God's own city.

I'm pretty sure G n I lives in Lincoln. That aside I think you'll find it could not possibly be God's own city because it does not rest within God's own county ;)
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:45 am

Devvo Mate wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:I think ya need to take a deep breath there. Everyone shits on everyone else's city.

That said, I think we can all be in agreement in saying that Stevenage is the absolute fucking worst place in the UK.


Not even Scouse I'm just fucking sick of smug middle-class southern wankers shitting on Liverpool despite it being God's own city.

Actually that'd be London.

Image

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:49 am

Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:00 am

Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.

That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:00 am

Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.

UKIP tend to take more votes from the tories. If you want to keep them out, vote UKIP.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:01 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.

That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.

They literally had 13 years to do it in. Weren't very proactive, were they?
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:01 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.

That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.


They cared in 1997 too.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:02 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.

UKIP tend to take more votes from the tories. If you want to keep them out, vote UKIP.

Keep out Pepsi and Coke by drinking Shite, you mean.
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:03 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.


Thing is though I really don't like Labour, it's like people are tied whether to vote for eating a bowlful of shit, or a bowful of ebola-ridden shit. I want to eat a bowl of grapes but nobody else seems to want to, so I'm now considering voting for a bowl of undiseased shit to keep the infected shit out. I don't want to do that.

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:04 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:UKIP tend to take more votes from the tories. If you want to keep them out, vote UKIP.


UKIP are polling at 16% here so make no difference, and they're about the only party I'm less inclined to vote for than Labour in an attempt to keep the Tories out.

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:04 am

Devvo Mate wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.


Thing is though I really don't like Labour, it's like people are tied whether to vote for eating a bowlful of shit, or a bowful of ebola-ridden shit. I want to eat a bowl of grapes but nobody else seems to want to, so I'm now considering voting for a bowl of undiseased shit to keep the infected shit out. I don't want to do that.

Then have a glass of real ale.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:05 am

Devvo Mate wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:UKIP tend to take more votes from the tories. If you want to keep them out, vote UKIP.


UKIP are polling at 16% here so make no difference, and they're about the only party I'm less inclined to vote for than Labour in an attempt to keep the Tories out.

It's not about if they get in (which they won't given that polling score), it's about who their votes come from generally.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Devvo Mate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 889
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:05 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Then have a glass of real ale.


Lovely idea but I have a feeling the bloke who's selling me this pint of real ale has also laced it with lots of shit just like everybody else, he just seems better at conning people into thinking he's the real deal.

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18661
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:07 am

Devvo Mate wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Then have a glass of real ale.


Lovely idea but I have a feeling the bloke who's selling me this pint of real ale has also laced it with lots of shit just like everybody else, he just seems better at conning people into thinking he's the real deal.

No, the shit is all at the other bars. Apart from the yellow bar, where it's laced with poison.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Inner Albania, Singaporen Empire, Varsemia

Advertisement

Remove ads