Advertisement
by British Home Counties » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:25 pm
by Angleter » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:56 pm
Conscentia wrote:Angleter wrote:The remaining public spending. You know that.
If the remaining public spending were lower, you expect the deficit and borrowing to decrease... unless tax revenues also decreased.
So either public spending has actually increased (so the "remaining" spending is more spending then was there in the first place), or taxes have decreased significantly.
Why has spending increased?
by British Home Counties » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:14 pm
Angleter wrote:Conscentia wrote:If the remaining public spending were lower, you expect the deficit and borrowing to decrease... unless tax revenues also decreased.
So either public spending has actually increased (so the "remaining" spending is more spending then was there in the first place), or taxes have decreased significantly.
Why has spending increased?
by The UK in Exile » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:18 pm
Conscentia wrote:Angleter wrote:The remaining public spending. You know that.
If the remaining public spending were lower, you expect the deficit and borrowing to decrease... unless tax revenues also decreased.
So either public spending has actually increased (so the "remaining" spending is more spending then was there in the first place), or taxes have decreased significantly.
Why has spending increased?
by Angleter » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:42 pm
by British Home Counties » Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:12 pm
Angleter wrote:British Home Counties wrote:
GDP has decreased. Using taxes as a % of GDP is not a reliable way to measure the deficit.
UK Total Receipts fell from 575 billion in 2009/10 to 496 billion in 2010/11. That probably contributed to the deficit, I guess.
GDP hasn't decreased since the start of the 2009-10 financial year. As for revenue, the £575bn and £496bn figures appear to refer to the budgets for 2008-9 and 2009-10. As Alyakia's second chart and this demonstrates, the decline was much more slight.
by Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:02 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:On the downside, of course, it's in Liverpool.
by Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:03 am
DesAnges wrote:Liverpool's fine provided you don't get to Norris Green or Croxteth, really.
by Napkiraly » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:35 am
Devvo Mate wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:On the downside, of course, it's in Liverpool.
HAHAHAHAHA A LIVERPOOL IS A SHIT CITY JOKE!
How very original and witty! I've never heard anyone make this joke before, and it definitely isn't made 95% of the time by clueless arseholes who have never been, or if they have not come abck since the Thatcher era.
Give it a rest mate
by Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:36 am
Napkiraly wrote:I think ya need to take a deep breath there. Everyone shits on everyone else's city.
That said, I think we can all be in agreement in saying that Stevenage is the absolute fucking worst place in the UK.
by Olivaero » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:39 am
Devvo Mate wrote:Napkiraly wrote:I think ya need to take a deep breath there. Everyone shits on everyone else's city.
That said, I think we can all be in agreement in saying that Stevenage is the absolute fucking worst place in the UK.
Not even Scouse I'm just fucking sick of smug middle-class southern wankers shitting on Liverpool despite it being God's own city.
by Napkiraly » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:45 am
Devvo Mate wrote:Napkiraly wrote:I think ya need to take a deep breath there. Everyone shits on everyone else's city.
That said, I think we can all be in agreement in saying that Stevenage is the absolute fucking worst place in the UK.
Not even Scouse I'm just fucking sick of smug middle-class southern wankers shitting on Liverpool despite it being God's own city.
by Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:49 am
by Imperializt Russia » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:00 am
Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:00 am
Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:01 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.
That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.
by Angleter » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:01 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.
That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.
by Arglorand » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:02 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Devvo Mate wrote:Keeping this thread on topic though I am at my wit's end over who to vote for. I have only ever voted for minor parties and independents because I have no time for the big names, but I'm voting in Bristol North West and it's marginal as fuck, last poll had Tories and Labour tied 32% each, so I'm now considering doing what I'd always sworn I'd never do, which is voting Labour to keep the Tories out. I really don't want to do it, and I don't know if i will, but if I vote TUSC or spoil my ballot or whatever and the Tories get in I'll hate myself.
UKIP tend to take more votes from the tories. If you want to keep them out, vote UKIP.
by Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:03 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.
by Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:04 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:UKIP tend to take more votes from the tories. If you want to keep them out, vote UKIP.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:04 am
Devvo Mate wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:That's FPTP for you.
Vote Labour, because they're the only large party that still cares about voting reform and might give you it in the next election.
Then in 2020, you can vote TUSC and that vote will actually matter.
Thing is though I really don't like Labour, it's like people are tied whether to vote for eating a bowlful of shit, or a bowful of ebola-ridden shit. I want to eat a bowl of grapes but nobody else seems to want to, so I'm now considering voting for a bowl of undiseased shit to keep the infected shit out. I don't want to do that.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:05 am
by Devvo Mate » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:05 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Then have a glass of real ale.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:07 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Inner Albania, Singaporen Empire, Varsemia
Advertisement