NATION

PASSWORD

British 2015 general election poll

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who would you vote for?

Labour
342
20%
Conservatives
346
20%
Ukip
394
23%
Greens
246
14%
Liberal Democrats
149
9%
SNP
77
5%
Plaid Cymru
32
2%
Respect
35
2%
Other (please state)
79
5%
 
Total votes : 1700

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Fri Oct 24, 2014 8:04 pm

Edward Scissorhands wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:You haven't seen nothing yet.


What do you mean?

If UKIP gets a large portion of the seats and apathy grows, you're going to see bullshit on levels not seen since the 2010 midterms here.

Of course, that's unlikely, but it's still worrying.
Last edited by Kelinfort on Fri Oct 24, 2014 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Oct 24, 2014 8:04 pm

Edward Scissorhands wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:You haven't seen nothing yet.


What do you mean?

You have more than two viable options. A vote for UKIP or the Lib Dems isn't completely worthless, at least it means something and there are constituencies those parties will carry.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Oct 24, 2014 8:05 pm

Kelinfort wrote:
Edward Scissorhands wrote:
What do you mean?

If UKIP gets a large portion of the seats and apathy grow, you're going to see bullshit on levels not seen since the 2010 midterms here.

UKIP - the British Tea Party. :p
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:45 pm

Svatantra Mulukama wrote:
Beta Test wrote:Honestly at this point I think UKIP is the better option.


I always thought you were a centrist with fairly liberal positions...

I am, but I find myself heavily dissatisfied with the Liberal Democrats, the party I'd usually support.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
Marcurix
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Nov 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Marcurix » Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:52 pm

The UKIP has at best populists with bad ideas, so i certainly wont be voting for them in the coming election.
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
-Voltaire

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
-Winston Churchill

Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
-Winston Churchill

User avatar
Empire of Vlissingen
Minister
 
Posts: 2354
Founded: Jul 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Empire of Vlissingen » Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:32 pm

Marcurix wrote:The UKIP has at best populists with bad ideas, so i certainly wont be voting for them in the coming election.

This is how the main stream always talks about parties like UKIP that they are populisit and/or racist without any arguments.
I live in The Netherlands.
Economic Left/Right: 4.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31

User avatar
Marcurix
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Nov 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Marcurix » Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:59 pm

Empire of Vlissingen wrote:
Marcurix wrote:The UKIP has at best populists with bad ideas, so i certainly wont be voting for them in the coming election.

This is how the main stream always talks about parties like UKIP that they are populisit and/or racist without any arguments.


No arguments huh?

Wants to leave the EU, but keep the free trade.
UKIP proposes "tens of billions" of cuts to taxation, along with a further £77 billion of cuts to the public sector in order to reduce the deficit.
Supports abolishing the Department of Energy and Climate Change
Wants to initiate an unspecified drive to remove illegal immigrants
Opposes legalization allowing same-sex marriages, Farage himself not ruling out overturning the law if elected.
Currently the UKIP are sceptical of man-made climate change and oppose the creation of wind farms and investment in other renewable energy sources.

So, yes. Populist, unspecified policies in key areas, and generally undesirable ones in others.
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
-Voltaire

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
-Winston Churchill

Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
-Winston Churchill

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:31 am

Empire of Vlissingen wrote:
Marcurix wrote:The UKIP has at best populists with bad ideas, so i certainly wont be voting for them in the coming election.

This is how the main stream always talks about parties like UKIP that they are populist and/or racist without any arguments.


well they are populist......
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Dejanic
Senator
 
Posts: 4677
Founded: Nov 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Dejanic » Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:34 am

Empire of Vlissingen wrote:
Marcurix wrote:The UKIP has at best populists with bad ideas, so i certainly wont be voting for them in the coming election.

This is how the main stream always talks about parties like UKIP that they are populisit and/or racist without any arguments.

UKIP are extremely populist, they're trying to appeal to social conservatives/traditionalists, libertarians, and left leaning workers from the north at the same time! The party has no set ideology at this point excluding it's irrational fear of all things European.
Post-Post Leftist | Anarcho-Blairite | Pol Pot Sympathiser

Jesus was a Socialist | Satan is a Capitalist

Dumb Ideologies wrote:Generic committed leftist with the opinion that anyone even slightly to the right of him is Hitler.

Master Shake wrote:multicultural loving imbecile.

Quintium wrote:Have you even been alive at all, toddler anarcho-collectivist?

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:09 am

Empire of Vlissingen wrote:
Marcurix wrote:The UKIP has at best populists with bad ideas, so i certainly wont be voting for them in the coming election.

This is how the main stream always talks about parties like UKIP that they are populisit and/or racist without any arguments.

It's easy to imagine that there are no arguments when you close your ears and go "LALALALALALALA CAN'T HEAR YOU"
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Southern Hampshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 819
Founded: May 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Hampshire » Sat Oct 25, 2014 3:02 am

After my MPs and adjacent MPs idiotic comments (the only two Labour MPs south of London) against his main supporters (Polish immigrants) they will probably not get elected again (Providing they understand English..?)

Looks like it's going to be a 2008 Liberal Democrat / Conservatives battleground again.
#standwithisrael
Pro: America, Israel, Kosovo, South Korea, Federalized Europe, Laissez-faire Capitalism, Opportunities, Secondary Monopoly, Intergratory Immigration, Privatization, Municipalization, Mass Militarization, Nuclear weapons, NATO, South East England + London independence from UK
Anti: Russia, North Korea, Argentina, Mediterranean & Red Sea Arabic countries, Liberal Europe, Socialism, Third Way, Elitism, Nationalization, CIS, Defence cuts, Hippie Bastards, Welfare, NHS, Anything north of London - Oxford - Bristol line,

User avatar
Mollary
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1616
Founded: Nov 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mollary » Sat Oct 25, 2014 3:13 am

Britanno wrote:
Svatantra Mulukama wrote:I'm aware of that. But, polls can change between now and May.

Yes, they will, in the Tories' favour.

Think about it, what are Labour's actual policies? The leadership wants a mansion tax, but many of their donors and MPs are against it, so it wouldn't get through Parliament. They want to increase NHS spending by £2.5 billion, but that is nowhere near the £8 billion that is required, so they may as well have pledged a middle finger. They want to eliminate the deficit by 2020, but so far they have voted against every lot of spending cuts made by the Cameron government. What else?

Could a Labour supporter kindly explain to me why anyone should vote Labour other than to stop the big old mean Tories getting into power again?

No, basically I'm campaigning for Labour because I'm Keynesian and they're pledging to make less cuts and, therefore, from my point of view, will be inflicting less damage. The energy price freeze might pass, which would be good, and maybe even the trains too, but otherwise there is no reason to vote Labour other than for the fact that they are the lesser of many evils that can actually get elected if you are centre-left. Well, that and all that is listed below, although I still feel it isn't quite enough.
Last edited by Mollary on Sat Oct 25, 2014 4:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Good stuff
Apathy
Bad things

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Sat Oct 25, 2014 3:22 am

Britanno wrote:
Svatantra Mulukama wrote:I'm aware of that. But, polls can change between now and May.

Yes, they will, in the Tories' favour.

Think about it, what are Labour's actual policies? The leadership wants a mansion tax, but many of their donors and MPs are against it, so it wouldn't get through Parliament. They want to increase NHS spending by £2.5 billion, but that is nowhere near the £8 billion that is required, so they may as well have pledged a middle finger. They want to eliminate the deficit by 2020, but so far they have voted against every lot of spending cuts made by the Cameron government. What else?

Could a Labour supporter kindly explain to me why anyone should vote Labour other than to stop the big old mean Tories getting into power again?


"what are labour's policies? I can name them, but they don't count. for some reason. "

did you try googling it?

http://press.labour.org.uk/post/8435229 ... with-rents
- 200,000 more homes a year
- legislate to make three year tenancies the standard in the British private rented sector

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26506522
- 18 to 24-year-olds out of work for a year will be offered a taxpayer-funded job for six months - with those who refuse losing benefits.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29367645
- increase in the minimum wage from £6.50-an-hour to £8-an-hour by 2020.
- Zero hours contracts to be banned.
- Parents of primary school children would be guaranteed childcare from 8am to 6pm.
- The amount of free childcare for three and four year olds would be increased from 15 to 25 hours a week.
Last edited by The UK in Exile on Sat Oct 25, 2014 3:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Lerodan Chinamerica
Minister
 
Posts: 3252
Founded: Dec 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lerodan Chinamerica » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:38 am

Dejanic wrote:
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:Yes, which is why they shouldn't be taxed.

Somalia has no taxes.

Don't be ridiculous.

User avatar
Lerodan Chinamerica
Minister
 
Posts: 3252
Founded: Dec 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lerodan Chinamerica » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:40 am

Britanno wrote:
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:At the end of the day, commerce and markets are the best means of bringing people out of poverty.

Have you ever read An Inspector Calls?

Yes, unfortunately. It's a ridiculous caricature of ebul rich people.

But if you question my claim that capitalism brings people out of poverty, there is a wealth of evidence to support this. Watch this video. It's clearly biased, but well-sourced.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58552
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:41 am

Greens or Plaid, whoever has a better showing in my area.
It's looking like it could be a 3 way between Lab, Plaid and Green, with no clear front of the pack.

If forced to bite the bullet and choose, I'll vote green.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:44 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:Greens or Plaid, whoever has a better showing in my area.
It's looking like it could be a 3 way between Lab, Plaid and Green, with no clear front of the pack.

If forced to bite the bullet and choose, I'll vote green.

I never thought I'd see the day when you would EVEN consider voting for Plaid.
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58552
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:45 am

Arglorand wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Greens or Plaid, whoever has a better showing in my area.
It's looking like it could be a 3 way between Lab, Plaid and Green, with no clear front of the pack.

If forced to bite the bullet and choose, I'll vote green.

I never thought I'd see the day when you would EVEN consider voting for Plaid.


I'll be firmly against independence. As will most of their voters. More devolution is ok though.
I'm only considering it because Labour needs a kick up the backside. My heart is with the greens, but Plaid can be trusted to push left too.

I'm hoping we end up with a coalition government of Lab, Green, SNP, and Plaid.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Lerodan Chinamerica
Minister
 
Posts: 3252
Founded: Dec 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lerodan Chinamerica » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:46 am

Lunas Legion wrote:
Arglorand wrote:This is Lerodan. He thinks they shouldn't exist to begin with.


I'm guessing he'd privatise everything? Including the military, police, judiciary system, etc?

I am not an anarcho-capitalist. Although I believe that a private police force would be held to public account much better than a nationalised one.

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:48 am

Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:
Lunas Legion wrote:
I'm guessing he'd privatise everything? Including the military, police, judiciary system, etc?

I am not an anarcho-capitalist. Although I believe that a private police force would be held to public account much better than a nationalised one.




The parable of G4s comes to mind there. Neither way is perfect, and the current one needs reform, but the police-force we have now is usually quite good.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Lerodan Chinamerica
Minister
 
Posts: 3252
Founded: Dec 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lerodan Chinamerica » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:49 am

Alyakia wrote:
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:As somebody who'll be voting in the upcoming election, I'm sad to say that we'll be getting a pretty raw deal. Lib Dems are ideologically inconsistent cowards, the Labour Party wants to turn Britain into Greece and the Greens are, needless to say, insane. The two less undesirable choices are the Conservatives and UKIP, although both are pretty bad. Cameron has done some good, but much like the US Congress, he has not cut spending nearly as much as he should be doing, as he's already allowed the debt to increase by £600 billion. He also has no balls, refusing to seriously reform the NHS, railways and energy, and has decided to keep the disastrous minimum wage and Bank of England corporatisation that Blair introduced. He also has a frustratingly mixed record on civil liberties.

UKIP is an extremely disappointing party, deciding to go the way of an ultra-conservative protectionist party that appeals to Britain's xenophobes rather than the growing libertarian-leaning youth. Being an immigrant to Britain, I'm appalled by its immigration policies, and I'm disappointed by their mediocre tax proposals. However, I'll be swallowing my pride and voting for them because they at least want some beneficial reforms to the UK, as opposed to the other parties. Repeal of the gun ban, withdrawal from the EU, deregulation and deeper spending cuts are all good things in my mind.


let me guess. when you say reform the NHS, railways and energy you mean you want him to privatize them harder, don't you?

"Harder"? None of them are privatised. NHS is state-owned and uses some private services to cut costs, and the other two have been corporatised with perverse incentives built into their infrastructures to encourage monopoly organisation and pricing structures subservient to the government. If prices are to come down and competition is to be reintroduced, substantial deregulation of these sectors must occur.

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:50 am

Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
let me guess. when you say reform the NHS, railways and energy you mean you want him to privatize them harder, don't you?

"Harder"? None of them are privatised. NHS is state-owned and uses some private services to cut costs, and the other two have been corporatised with perverse incentives built into their infrastructures to encourage monopoly organisation and pricing structures subservient to the government. If prices are to come down and competition is to be reintroduced, substantial deregulation of these sectors must occur.

Translation provided for Alyakia: "Yeah."
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Lerodan Chinamerica
Minister
 
Posts: 3252
Founded: Dec 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lerodan Chinamerica » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:54 am

New Aerios wrote:
Insaeldor wrote:So I did the I Side With quiz for the UK parties and here's what I got.

Liberal Democrats 66%
Labour 61%
Conservatives 58%
Green 54%
British Nationals 33%
Scottish Nationals 27%
UK Independence 20%
Plaid Cymru 12%


I'd say this is fairly accurate since I feel that if I was a British citizen I would vote for the Lib Dems although I'm pretty surprised on how I got 33% for the BNP seeing as I think they are god awful. Many it has to do with my support for an English Devolved Legislature but maybe not.


What are your economic views? The BNP are fairly leftist on economics, and if the general attitudes of NS are anything to go by, the 33% will be from that.

Fairly leftist? Their views on fiscal policy are further left than Old Labour.

User avatar
Martean
Minister
 
Posts: 2017
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Martean » Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:58 am

Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
let me guess. when you say reform the NHS, railways and energy you mean you want him to privatize them harder, don't you?

"Harder"? None of them are privatised. NHS is state-owned and uses some private services to cut costs, and the other two have been corporatised with perverse incentives built into their infrastructures to encourage monopoly organisation and pricing structures subservient to the government. If prices are to come down and competition is to be reintroduced, substantial deregulation of these sectors must occur.


This happened when spain privatized the energetic sector and competition started

Image
Last edited by Martean on Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Compass:
Left/Right: -9.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.03
Spanish, communist
Pro: Democracy, Nationalized economy, socialism, LGTB Rights, Free Speech, Atheism, Inmigration, Direct Democracy
Anti: Dictatorship, Fascism, Social-democracy, Social Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Nationalism, Racism, Xenophobia, Homophobia.
''When you have an imaginary friend, you're crazy, but when many people have the same imaginary friend, it's called religion''

User avatar
Lerodan Chinamerica
Minister
 
Posts: 3252
Founded: Dec 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lerodan Chinamerica » Sat Oct 25, 2014 6:12 am

Martean wrote:
Lerodan Chinamerica wrote:"Harder"? None of them are privatised. NHS is state-owned and uses some private services to cut costs, and the other two have been corporatised with perverse incentives built into their infrastructures to encourage monopoly organisation and pricing structures subservient to the government. If prices are to come down and competition is to be reintroduced, substantial deregulation of these sectors must occur.


This happened when spain privatized the energetic sector and competition started

Image

Is this the price of electricity? And could you provide a source for that?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eragon Island, Herador, Hurtful Thoughts, Infected Mushroom, Jibjibistan, Luziyca, Peoplestasine, Port Carverton, Statesburg, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, The Lone Alliance, The Vooperian Union, Welskerland

Advertisement

Remove ads