NATION

PASSWORD

Should Women Have to Sign Up For Selective Service Too?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Waffle-munching Robots
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Jan 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Waffle-munching Robots » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:36 am

Frazers wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
do you think women should have the right to vote, period? what are you actually saying here?


Women should have the right to vote. Women shouldn't have to sign up for potential conscription to do so. Ta da.


So you're saying women are too weak to go in the army? Is that what you're saying?

User avatar
Waffle-munching Robots
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Jan 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Waffle-munching Robots » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:37 am

I do think the idea of conscription is stupid though

User avatar
Zaldakki
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Oct 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaldakki » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:43 am

Of course they should have to sign up.
Haktiva wrote:Then again, women are often considered too precious to put at risk, thanks to our gynocentric instinct.

I wouldn't say it's gynocentric—more like androcentric. It's a bit patronizing to women to say that only men should risk their lives for them, as if women can't defend themselves.

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:48 am

I don't even understand why a state like the US even has Selective Service. It screams no, we're a civilized nation, we don't use conscripts... oops, a war, we kinda sorta do. Having a huge professional military kinda negates the need.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
The 502nd SS
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1159
Founded: Apr 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The 502nd SS » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:51 am

We haven't drafted anyone for a long time.

I was so happy when I got my selective service number a month ago, I think everyone should sign up for it.
I'm 18, a Conservative/constitutionalist, a future soldier. I'm a Patriot and not nationalist, learn the difference
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Sig
    Pro- Capitalism, Military, guns, pro life, death penalty, nuclear energy, military right-sizing
    Anti- Gun control,LGBT , military downsizing, NSA, communism, socialism, welfare
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."-George S. Patton

I swear something is in the water

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164243
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:53 am

The 502nd SS wrote:We haven't drafted anyone for a long time.

I was so happy when I got my selective service number a month ago, I think everyone should sign up for it.

That is a strange thing to be happy about.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Czeckolutania
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 446
Founded: Oct 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Czeckolutania » Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:57 am

Ifreann wrote:
The 502nd SS wrote:We haven't drafted anyone for a long time.

I was so happy when I got my selective service number a month ago, I think everyone should sign up for it.

That is a strange thing to be happy about.


I found it slightly ridiculous that I had to register for selective service even though I'm already enlisted (but not yet deployed). Regardless I still felt a great deal of satisfaction and pride when I registered.
How's my driving? Let me know what you think, or how I can improve me IC posts, TGs are my preferred form of feedback but any will do.

User avatar
West Pacific
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Dec 23, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby West Pacific » Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:23 am

Folks, this is not conscription in the sense that most Europeans understand it. America has never used conscription in the manner European nations used it, which likely creates some confusion. Believe it or not, throughout most of American history a standing army was considered tyrannical, a symbol of all that was wrong with European monarchies, and the draft was used only as an emergency procedure to augment the armed forces in time of war. WWII marked the first time that America did not demilitarize completely following an armed conflict. The only exception to this came in 1940 when the government initiated the draft prior to America's involvement but still after the beginning of WWII. A person registering for Selective Service does not constitute being drafted and the reason the Selective Service remains around is that privacy laws prevent one department of government from sharing most information with other departments.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164243
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:41 am

Czeckolutania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:That is a strange thing to be happy about.


I found it slightly ridiculous that I had to register for selective service even though I'm already enlisted (but not yet deployed). Regardless I still felt a great deal of satisfaction and pride when I registered.

Don't get that at all.


West Pacific wrote:Folks, this is not conscription in the sense that most Europeans understand it. America has never used conscription in the manner European nations used it, which likely creates some confusion.

No, it doesn't. We all understand that signing up for the SSS does not actually involve serving in the armed forces unless the federal government decides to institute a draft.
A person registering for Selective Service does not constitute being drafted and the reason the Selective Service remains around is that privacy laws prevent one department of government from sharing most information with other departments.

The SSS is still around because there isn't the political will to remove it despite it being largely pointless.
Last edited by Ifreann on Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Kratu
Senator
 
Posts: 3963
Founded: Dec 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kratu » Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:52 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:No, how about getting rid of the Selective service system instead.

This but if we can't do that then yes the women should have to sign up for the draft too.
Revolutionary Socialist

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54873
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:40 am

Ayreonia wrote:I don't even understand why a state like the US even has Selective Service. It screams no, we're a civilized nation, we don't use conscripts... oops, a war, we kinda sorta do. Having a huge professional military kinda negates the need.

It's not needed until European Scuffle III or the accompanying strategic nuclear exchange, no.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:52 am

Nobody should.

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:56 am

Zaldakki wrote:Of course they should have to sign up.
Haktiva wrote:Then again, women are often considered too precious to put at risk, thanks to our gynocentric instinct.

I wouldn't say it's gynocentric—more like androcentric. It's a bit patronizing to women to say that only men should risk their lives for them, as if women can't defend themselves.

gynocentrism is a the instinct that women deserve protection above others because they're the limiting factor in reproduction. We've certainly reached a point where our population is well above replacement(as a species, not going by various countries with falling birth rates) and have the technology where a woman can defend herself without men, hell, the can technically get pregnant without men and marriage via in vitro fertilization(though you still need men to provide the semen, of course).

honestly women don't need men anymore for a lot of things and men don't need women for much of the same reasons. gynocentrism is an outdated instinct that needs to die. Women can defend themselves and provide for themselves, provided technology and industry allows them to negate sexual dimorphism.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Coreyea
Envoy
 
Posts: 314
Founded: Sep 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Coreyea » Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:57 am

No, not the job of women to fight wars. They shouldn't even be working, should just stay home to cook and clean.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54873
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:59 am

Coreyea wrote:No, not the job of women to fight wars. They shouldn't even be working, should just stay home to cook and clean.

Wow, so edgy. You might even be funny.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:11 am

Coreyea wrote:No, not the job of women to fight wars. They shouldn't even be working, should just stay home to cook and clean.

Most of them can't even do that properly anymore.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164243
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:15 am

Haktiva wrote:
Coreyea wrote:No, not the job of women to fight wars. They shouldn't even be working, should just stay home to cook and clean.

Most of them can't even do that properly anymore.

And people wonder why there are so few women on this forum.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:16 am

Ifreann wrote:
Haktiva wrote:Most of them can't even do that properly anymore.

And people wonder why there are so few women on this forum.

*Statement about women's lack of interest and lack of backbone that will get me banned*
Last edited by Haktiva on Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
The 502nd SS
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1159
Founded: Apr 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The 502nd SS » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:18 am

Coreyea wrote:No, not the job of women to fight wars. They shouldn't even be working, should just stay home to cook and clean.
I agree with part of this opinion
I'm 18, a Conservative/constitutionalist, a future soldier. I'm a Patriot and not nationalist, learn the difference
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Sig
    Pro- Capitalism, Military, guns, pro life, death penalty, nuclear energy, military right-sizing
    Anti- Gun control,LGBT , military downsizing, NSA, communism, socialism, welfare
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."-George S. Patton

I swear something is in the water

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39358
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:19 am

Haktiva wrote:The way I see it, men in the US have to earn their right to vote by signing up to get drafted, while women don't. If women are in favor of equality under the law, then they should have to do the same.

By all accounts nobody should be forced into conscription as far as I'm concerned. But as it stands, women in the US aren't doing what men have to do in order to earn their right to vote. As it stands, men are forced to serve their country while women have the option to.

Then again, women are often considered too precious to put at risk, thanks to our gynocentric instinct. If we aren't gonna let women risk getting themselves blown up, then we may as well ban them from driving as well, like in Saudi Arabia. But at least there they get their own ATMs, which men are forbidden from using. Some patriarchy eh?


Yes. Women should also be drafted, if they want the benefits of equality, they are going to need to bear the costs and risks too. Its only fair.
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:21 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Haktiva wrote:The way I see it, men in the US have to earn their right to vote by signing up to get drafted, while women don't. If women are in favor of equality under the law, then they should have to do the same.

By all accounts nobody should be forced into conscription as far as I'm concerned. But as it stands, women in the US aren't doing what men have to do in order to earn their right to vote. As it stands, men are forced to serve their country while women have the option to.

Then again, women are often considered too precious to put at risk, thanks to our gynocentric instinct. If we aren't gonna let women risk getting themselves blown up, then we may as well ban them from driving as well, like in Saudi Arabia. But at least there they get their own ATMs, which men are forbidden from using. Some patriarchy eh?


Yes. Women should also be drafted, if they want the benefits of equality, they are going to need to bear the costs and risks too. Its only fair.

women can be meat shields too! :p
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:22 am

Haktiva wrote:
Ifreann wrote:And people wonder why there are so few women on this forum.

*Statement about women's lack of interest and lack of backbone that will get me banned*


I'm pretty sure you and everyone else who thinks that way would agree.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54873
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:23 am

The 502nd SS wrote:
Coreyea wrote:No, not the job of women to fight wars. They shouldn't even be working, should just stay home to cook and clean.
I agree with part of this opinion

Why is it not?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:25 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Haktiva wrote:*Statement about women's lack of interest and lack of backbone that will get me banned*


I'm pretty sure you and everyone else who thinks that way would agree.

here's a question, is it a problem that women aren't on this forum that much?
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:25 am

Ifreann wrote:
The 502nd SS wrote:We haven't drafted anyone for a long time.

I was so happy when I got my selective service number a month ago, I think everyone should sign up for it.

That is a strange thing to be happy about.


Well, it's because it's the Selective Service! It is... selective
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Ifreann, Pridelantic people, Rosartemis, Slembana, Tungstan, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads