Bari wrote:Firstly, how exactly are these criminals "oppressed?"
Because they are being held in confinement after having completed their sentences with little prospect at the moment of ever being freed. The federal courts are on the case, however.
Advertisement
by United States of The One Percent » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:14 pm
Bari wrote:Firstly, how exactly are these criminals "oppressed?"
by United States of The One Percent » Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:28 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Well? Has anybody reviewed the success rates of their rehabilitation program?
Anyway; if they served their punishment and made an effort to rehabilitate; aren't we supposed to let them back into society?
by Divitaen » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:04 pm
by United States of The One Percent » Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:35 pm
Divitaen wrote:Just out of curiosity, what kind of political platform are these eligible voters looking for? Because I'd assume a coalition is looking for some kind of collaborative political change and all.
by Pope Joan » Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:40 pm
by Herskerstad » Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:02 pm
by The Liberated Territories » Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:07 pm
by Scomagia » Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:12 pm
Herskerstad wrote:United States of The One Percent wrote:
Because they are being held in confinement after having completed their sentences with little prospect at the moment of ever being freed. The federal courts are on the case, however.
Oh, the poor rapists and child molesters not enjoying total non-supervision? Poor oppressed proletariat that they are.
You know what a suitable sentence for a person who fucks an infant, or rapes others in a violent fashion? I'll give you a hint, it involves never seeing the light of day again. If it is in a facility or 6 feet under I am largely indifferent towards, let alone empowering them with emancipation and allowing them to do as they want unsupervised outside of the system.
by The Sotoan Union » Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:59 pm
by Scomagia » Sun Oct 19, 2014 5:57 pm
The Sotoan Union wrote:Wonder what kind of policies they would push if elected?
But no they should still be able to vote. It's a basic right of a citizen.
by United States of The One Percent » Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:42 pm
Herskerstad wrote:Oh, the poor rapists and child molesters not enjoying total non-supervision? Poor oppressed proletariat that they are.
You know what a suitable sentence for a person who fucks an infant, or rapes others in a violent fashion? I'll give you a hint, it involves never seeing the light of day again. If it is in a facility or 6 feet under I am largely indifferent towards, let alone empowering them with emancipation and allowing them to do as they want unsupervised outside of the system.
by Ieperithem » Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:50 pm
Political Spectrum Test |
"There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all." -Theodore Roosevelt |
by Greater Weselton » Mon Oct 20, 2014 9:07 pm
by Scomagia » Mon Oct 20, 2014 9:52 pm
Ieperithem wrote:Someone who deliberately attacks the rule of law forfeits the right to its advantages. While 'accidental' or victimless crimes, such as, say, traffic violations, would obviously not warrant a loss of voting rights, high scale theft, premeditated assault, rape, or murder should certainly warrant disenfranchisement if the state decides it.
by Gauthier » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:51 pm
by Gauthier » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:53 pm
United States of The One Percent wrote:Herskerstad wrote:Oh, the poor rapists and child molesters not enjoying total non-supervision? Poor oppressed proletariat that they are.
You know what a suitable sentence for a person who fucks an infant, or rapes others in a violent fashion? I'll give you a hint, it involves never seeing the light of day again. If it is in a facility or 6 feet under I am largely indifferent towards, let alone empowering them with emancipation and allowing them to do as they want unsupervised outside of the system.
Fine; then sentence them to life without parole or death. But these inmates were sentenced to and served their terms of years. They are now being confined beyond those terms, under a "rehabilitation" regime under which no more than three have been released, because some of them might reoffend. Every day murderers, robbers and thugs are let out of confinement after completing their sentences; some of them do reoffend. What is the reason, other than a political cowardice attempting to trump the rights of individuals, to keep these people in confinement?
by Norstal » Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:59 pm
Scomagia wrote:The Sotoan Union wrote:Wonder what kind of policies they would push if elected?
But no they should still be able to vote. It's a basic right of a citizen.
They likely wouldn't vote so different from others of their respective socio-economic groups. I can see them pushing for lower sentences and reform of the sex-offender registry, which is an asinine system and, in my opinion, a travesty of justice.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Glorious Freedonia » Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:03 am
by Gauthier » Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:24 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:A pervert has nothing to say that society should allow itself to listen to. They waived their right to vote.
by Galloism » Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:26 am
by Ifreann » Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:29 am
Glorious Freedonia wrote:A pervert has nothing to say that society should allow itself to listen to. They waived their right to vote.
by United States of The One Percent » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:38 pm
by Herskerstad » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:58 pm
Scomagia wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
Oh, the poor rapists and child molesters not enjoying total non-supervision? Poor oppressed proletariat that they are.
You know what a suitable sentence for a person who fucks an infant, or rapes others in a violent fashion? I'll give you a hint, it involves never seeing the light of day again. If it is in a facility or 6 feet under I am largely indifferent towards, let alone empowering them with emancipation and allowing them to do as they want unsupervised outside of the system.
All sex-offenders are rapists and child molesters?
Herskerstad wrote:.... I will agree that the sex offender registry sometimes get ridiculous additions and that the barrier between getting into the sex offender registry, and general misdemeanors should be wider, but for the actual bad guys? The rapists, child molesters and such? Keep them and their votes in the oubliette for all I care. Scum of the earth that they are.
United States of The One Percent wrote:Herskerstad wrote:Oh, the poor rapists and child molesters not enjoying total non-supervision? Poor oppressed proletariat that they are.
You know what a suitable sentence for a person who fucks an infant, or rapes others in a violent fashion? I'll give you a hint, it involves never seeing the light of day again. If it is in a facility or 6 feet under I am largely indifferent towards, let alone empowering them with emancipation and allowing them to do as they want unsupervised outside of the system.
Fine; then sentence them to life without parole or death. But these inmates were sentenced to and served their terms of years. They are now being confined beyond those terms, under a "rehabilitation" regime under which no more than three have been released, because some of them might reoffend. Every day murderers, robbers and thugs are let out of confinement after completing their sentences; some of them do reoffend. What is the reason, other than a political cowardice attempting to trump the rights of individuals, to keep these people in confinement?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: British Arzelentaxmacone, Cretie, Delitai, Einaro, Giovanniland, Kannap, Keltionialang, Maximum Imperium Rex, The New York Nation, Trump Almighty, Uiiop
Advertisement