NATION

PASSWORD

Detroit woman shot and killed for not giving phone number.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gigaverse
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12726
Founded: Mar 26, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Gigaverse » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:32 am

Laerod wrote:
Avaerilon wrote:Er, OP, surely you realise this is a very isolated incident? It's awful someone was killed over something so trivial as it appears, but this kind of thing is not something that happens every minute of every day. Please don't tarnish all of us (men) with the same brush; you're in danger of implying that from your post.

Is it now?

Surely, these sore losers need to stop and deal with it already. What's with killing people for the failure that can only be blamed on them?
Last edited by Gigaverse on Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Art-person(?). Japan liker. tired-ish.
Student in linguistics ???. On-and-off writer.
MAKE CAKE NOT stupidshiticanmakefunof.
born in, raised in and emigrated from vietbongistan lolol
Operating this polity based on preferences and narrative purposes
clowning incident | clowning incident | bottom text
can produce noises in (in order of grasp) vietbongistani, oldspeak
and bonjourois (learning weebspeak and hitlerian at uni)

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:33 am

Laerod wrote:
Scepez wrote:
Uh, no you didn't.
All you said was "IS TOO SO!" Providing no actual reason.

Nah. If you're really so hurt by having to find a single case from this year, find some recent cases of female on male violence due to rejection.


The media tends to not report on those kind of things, now do they?
Anyway, okay, I found nothing according to Google, but that STILL isn't an excuse for women to start doing the same thing to men.
???

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:33 am

Ravenflight wrote:
Laerod wrote:If you want me to answer your posts, please make sense.

GO.FIND.A.GRAPH.OR.SOMETHING.TO.PROVE.YOUR.POINT!

The point I'm making? That people are whining about how it's unfair that women, when faced with examples of men killing women for rejecting them, are afraid that men might kill them for rejecting them? Read the thread. It's nothing but examples of that happening.

User avatar
Greater Beggnig
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1466
Founded: Jan 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Beggnig » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:34 am

Saint Jade IV wrote:
Paixao wrote:What the hell, OP.

Making this an "men feel entitled" thing out of one idiot's decision to go on a killing spree is not acceptable.


Because of course, the trigger for his killing spree being the rejection by a woman couldn't possibly be explained by his belief that he was entitled to women. And of course, Elliott Rodger was an isolated incident, completely cut off from any societal messages. It's completely coincidental that these two men went on a killing spree specifically because they were rejected by women.


Okay, Elliott Rodger is a special case. He was fucking crazy. He talked about himself like he was a god and said he would like to commit genocide on the entire human race. Male entitlement comes into play in that situation, but it wasn't the primary factor, he clearly had issues upstairs. The fact that he was utterly bonkers PLUS our bad society was what caused the problem. Neither can be considered completely responsible. One could argue that without either of those factors, he would no have done what he would have done. If he wasn't crazy, maybe he wouldn't have gone on a killing spree, but if our society was better, he probably wouldn't have done it either. I mean, he killed just as many men as women, but I digress.
"I'm not a dictator. It's just that I have a grumpy face."
-Augusto Pinochet

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:35 am

Laerod wrote:
Ravenflight wrote:GO.FIND.A.GRAPH.OR.SOMETHING.TO.PROVE.YOUR.POINT!

The point I'm making? That people are whining about how it's unfair that women, when faced with examples of men killing women for rejecting them, are afraid that men might kill them for rejecting them? Read the thread. It's nothing but examples of that happening.


There is a difference in being afraid, and then going to preach it around on the internet as intentional slander.
???

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:36 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Harassment? No, no ofcourse not.
But here's the thing.

If I waltz up to a woman and hit on her, i'm not harassing her if I go away afterward.
Nor is the next guy.
Nor the next.

Now this might get really fucking tedious for the woman involved to get hit on by a hundred guys, but none of it is harassment, and maybe if she engaged more and went and hit on people, the rest of the men in the room wouldn't be sat there wondering.
"Hm, does she like me?"
because they'd see "Oh, she likes him."


The guy who shot the woman? That's the kind of shit that happens when you meet lots and lots of people.
One of them is going to be crazy.
So how can women get hit on less and meet less people, thus driving down the pool of crazies?
Plenty of ways.

But no, it's men who've got to change. We have to, somehow, prevent ourselves being insane.
Got forbid women do something to better their own situation in an actually possible way though, it's easier to be completely passive and demand others change.
Because men do things and women have things done to them. And they dont want to change that.


This is all spoken like someone who has never had to deal with unwanted advances.


I've dealt with unwanted advances.
And again, is that your entire argument?

Just some vague insinuation that i'm sexually unpopular?
Good job contributing to more women getting shot, guy.
Clearly, if I'm sexually unpopular that's something to be ashamed of, right?

I used to be. It changed. Now I know how fucking ridiculous feminists are being about this line of complaint, because getting hit on, while tedious, is a good thing. Yes, one or two will go crazy. That's what happens. Get over it.

Whining about how women have to deal with crazies and men don't?

It's because women ask men out far less. If they did, there'd be just as many crazy women seen in public.

So, men have to do all the work, have to put up with being shat on as a demographic when one of them fucks up, and women?
Just stand there and look pretty. That's your job. Don't bother changing it, it's the men who are the problem, right?

After all, you've spend decades complaining about how society makes you passive and all that, why change now?
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
New Celisia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 705
Founded: Apr 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Celisia » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:37 am

Saint Jade IV wrote:http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/26719319/mass-shooting-kills-mother-of-three-wounds-five-others

Men, whenever you question why we don't tell you why we aren't interested, this is why. Whenever we "lead you on", this is why.

This is why women fear men. This is why we avoid you in the street, in the club, everywhere. Because you might decide to shoot us.

I bet this woman encountered hundreds of unsolicited requests for her phone number over the years. However, it only took one pissed off guy to decide that her refusal warranted the death penalty to end her life, and leave another man without a fiancé, and 3 children without a mother.

So NSG, what say you? Is this yet another example of the way our culture believes men are entitled to women, or is this simply a tragic, crazy once-off.


You're a bit of an extremist don't you think? Not all men are out to get women. I grew up in a small town in Oregon and was always taught to respect women, and treat them as equals. I have a wife and a son on the way, and we are both incredibly happy. I've never threatened to shoot her. I'm not out to get her. This is ridiculous. :P


DEVIANTART SILENTMENAGERIE
Religion: Secular Humanist
Political: Libertarian Socialist
LIKES: Gay Marriage, LGBT Rights, Religious Freedom, Egalitarianism, Pro-Life, USA (the people), Abraham Lincoln, the Jewish peoples.
DISLIKES: Wage Slavery, Totalitarianism, Nazism, Fascism, Communism, True Capitalism, Feminism, Abortion, Trump, Clintons, US Government, the State of Israel.

User avatar
Ieperithem
Diplomat
 
Posts: 573
Founded: Feb 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ieperithem » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:37 am

This is Detroit we're talking about. There's a culture of no self control and extensive entitlement. People get government jobs where they don't work, free money when they're too lazy for that, crime is essentially unpunished by their crippled and ineffective police force, and the citizens who voted themselves into dystopia are constantly told to blame someone else for their situation by every politician that shows up there looking for their support. Quite frankly, it isn't surprising at all that a guy there attacked a girl for saying 'no' to him; it's probably the first time anyone has done so.
Political Spectrum Test
Economic Right: 69.8%
Social Libertarian: 29.3%
Foreign Policy Neoconservative: 36.0%
Cultural conservative: 22.6%
"There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all."
-Theodore Roosevelt

User avatar
Ravenflight
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9070
Founded: Jan 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ravenflight » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:38 am

Laerod wrote:
Ravenflight wrote:GO.FIND.A.GRAPH.OR.SOMETHING.TO.PROVE.YOUR.POINT!

The point I'm making? That people are whining about how it's unfair that women, when faced with examples of men killing women for rejecting them, are afraid that men might kill them for rejecting them? Read the thread. It's nothing but examples of that happening.

I have seen nothing which says that men are more likely to be rejected from a date because their men
I'm PANGENDER
ONE NATION TORIES ARE 1% SUPPORTERS
By our Ancestors, For our Children. Join the Viking Party
My Political Beliefs
Senator Daniel Björn

User avatar
Greater Beggnig
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1466
Founded: Jan 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Beggnig » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:39 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Sdaeriji wrote:
This is all spoken like someone who has never had to deal with unwanted advances.


Just some vague insinuation that i'm sexually unpopular?
Good job contributing to more women getting shot, guy.
Clearly, if I'm sexually unpopular that's something to be ashamed of, right?


"I'm not a dictator. It's just that I have a grumpy face."
-Augusto Pinochet

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:39 am

Scepez wrote:
Laerod wrote:Nah. If you're really so hurt by having to find a single case from this year, find some recent cases of female on male violence due to rejection.


The media tends to not report on those kind of things, now do they?

Why not? If it bleeds, it ledes. Hell, I remember at least two stories where women went to extreme lengths to screw over their "competition"; the astronaut Lisa Nowak and Paula Broadwell. I have no doubts that the media would report on these things.
Anyway, okay, I found nothing according to Google,

And you would have to to maintain your point.
but that STILL isn't an excuse for women to start doing the same thing to men.

No shit Sherlock. That's probably why nobody's claiming that.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:40 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:I've dealt with unwanted advances.
And again, is that your entire argument?

Just some vague insinuation that i'm sexually unpopular?
Good job contributing to more women getting shot, guy.
Clearly, if I'm sexually unpopular that's something to be ashamed of, right?

I used to be. It changed. Now I know how fucking ridiculous feminists are being about this line of complaint, because getting hit on, while tedious, is a good thing.


God, get off your fucking cross. I made no implications about your sexual popularity in my statement. If you read into my post and got that, that's your own insecurities, not anything I did. Stop projecting.

I find it hard to believe you've actually been sexually harassed. I have, by a woman much more powerful than me. It is an incredibly uncomfortable experience, to have your agency taken away from you like that. Only someone who has never experienced that feeling would call it a "privilege".
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:41 am

Greater Beggnig wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Just some vague insinuation that i'm sexually unpopular?
Good job contributing to more women getting shot, guy.
Clearly, if I'm sexually unpopular that's something to be ashamed of, right?





You honestly don't see the connection by these kind of implications, and people getting shot for rejecting people?
I can't be the only one.

"How fucking dare you condemn me to second class citizen status!" *BANG!*
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:41 am

Laerod wrote:No shit Sherlock. That's probably why nobody's claiming that.


And yet you constantly pestered for reports on those things.
If you really thought that, you wouldn't have demanded them so bad in the first place.
???

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:43 am

Scepez wrote:
Laerod wrote:The point I'm making? That people are whining about how it's unfair that women, when faced with examples of men killing women for rejecting them, are afraid that men might kill them for rejecting them? Read the thread. It's nothing but examples of that happening.


There is a difference in being afraid, and then going to preach it around on the internet as intentional slander.

Oh man. This is just stupid. Saint Jade is explaining why she's afraid and suddenly it's slander.

This bears repeating:
Laerod wrote:We must remember who the real victims in a shooting of a woman that rejected the advances of a man are: Men who might have a harder time to get a date because of it.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:43 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:I've dealt with unwanted advances.
And again, is that your entire argument?

Just some vague insinuation that i'm sexually unpopular?
Good job contributing to more women getting shot, guy.
Clearly, if I'm sexually unpopular that's something to be ashamed of, right?

I used to be. It changed. Now I know how fucking ridiculous feminists are being about this line of complaint, because getting hit on, while tedious, is a good thing.


God, get off your fucking cross. I made no implications about your sexual popularity in my statement. If you read into my post and got that, that's your own insecurities, not anything I did. Stop projecting.

I find it hard to believe you've actually been sexually harassed. I have, by a woman much more powerful than me. It is an incredibly uncomfortable experience, to have your agency taken away from you like that. Only someone who has never experienced that feeling would call it a "privilege".


An actual harassment is something society shouldn't tolerate, I agree.
Physical contact without consent, or repeated verbal engagement on the subject when told to stop. And yes, I've experienced it.
Albeit, it didn't bother me too much. That happens sometimes you know. Some people just dont care as much about some shit.
I'm not devaluing someones experience if I say
"Well, I had my ass groped and it didn't particularly bother me, though I didn't want them to do it. It was annoying. But that's me."
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:44 am

New Celisia wrote:You're a bit of an extremist don't you think? Not all men are out to get women. I grew up in a small town in Oregon and was always taught to respect women, and treat them as equals. I have a wife and a son on the way, and we are both incredibly happy. I've never threatened to shoot her. I'm not out to get her. This is ridiculous. :P

Not all smokers are likely to kill me for asking them to put out their cigarettes in a nonsmoking area but you're nuts if you think I'll risk my life to find out.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:44 am

Laerod wrote:
Scepez wrote:
There is a difference in being afraid, and then going to preach it around on the internet as intentional slander.

Oh man. This is just stupid. Saint Jade is explaining why she's afraid and suddenly it's slander.

This bears repeating:
Laerod wrote:We must remember who the real victims in a shooting of a woman that rejected the advances of a man are: Men who might have a harder time to get a date because of it.


Afraid of MEN as a demographic.
Because of something one did.

"I'm afraid of arabs."
Is that ok?
Or is that racist?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:45 am

Scepez wrote:
Laerod wrote:No shit Sherlock. That's probably why nobody's claiming that.


And yet you constantly pestered for reports on those things.
If you really thought that, you wouldn't have demanded them so bad in the first place.

Asking you if it happens to any significant degree is most definitely not the same thing as approving of such behavior.

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:47 am

Laerod wrote:
Oh man. This is just stupid. Saint Jade is explaining why she's afraid and suddenly it's slander.


Yes, there was totally no intentional intent to show that men are evil pricks *nod*


Laerod wrote:We must remember who the real victims in a shooting of a woman that rejected the advances of a man are: Men who might have a harder time to get a date because of it.


At which point did people say that?
You are completely trying to steer the topic off.
What I don't like is the accusation of a bigger group due to a few bad eggs.
Replace men and woman with let's say French and African, and you got racism.
Last edited by Scepez on Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
???

User avatar
Scepez
Diplomat
 
Posts: 928
Founded: Jan 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scepez » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:49 am

Laerod wrote:
Scepez wrote:
And yet you constantly pestered for reports on those things.
If you really thought that, you wouldn't have demanded them so bad in the first place.

Asking you if it happens to any significant degree is most definitely not the same thing as approving of such behavior.


I already said before that "Okay, one does happen a little more than the other".
But if we are going to try and stamp out one, might as well work on the other too.
???

User avatar
Floramara
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Floramara » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:49 am

This is so ridiculous, I'm not even going to debate you on it.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:50 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:I've dealt with unwanted advances.
And again, is that your entire argument?

Just some vague insinuation that i'm sexually unpopular?
Good job contributing to more women getting shot, guy.
Clearly, if I'm sexually unpopular that's something to be ashamed of, right?

I used to be. It changed. Now I know how fucking ridiculous feminists are being about this line of complaint, because getting hit on, while tedious, is a good thing.


God, get off your fucking cross. I made no implications about your sexual popularity in my statement. If you read into my post and got that, that's your own insecurities, not anything I did. Stop projecting.

I find it hard to believe you've actually been sexually harassed. I have, by a woman much more powerful than me. It is an incredibly uncomfortable experience, to have your agency taken away from you like that. Only someone who has never experienced that feeling would call it a "privilege".


You did imply it. You implied that such an argument couldn't be made by someone who gets hit on.
You associated my politics with my sexual popularity.
And then acted as though this was sufficient dismissal of my argument.
It's because of people like you that guys like this went crazy you know. You should stop doing that shit.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Caraani
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1606
Founded: Oct 26, 2012
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Caraani » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:51 am

Oh, a feminazi, great, adding that to my zoo list.
For: Things I say
Against: Things YOU say
Future writer and publisher of Fifty Shades of Empire
I support insanely high tax rates, do you?
"Have you ever noticed when you're driving that anyone who's driving slower than you is an idiot and anyone driving faster than you is a maniac?!" - George Carlin

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:53 am

Scepez wrote:
Laerod wrote:
Oh man. This is just stupid. Saint Jade is explaining why she's afraid and suddenly it's slander.


Yes, there was totally no intentional intent to show that men are evil pricks *nod*

There isn't:
Saint Jade IV wrote:http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/26719319/mass-shooting-kills-mother-of-three-wounds-five-others

Men, whenever you question why we don't tell you why we aren't interested, this is why. Whenever we "lead you on", this is why.

This is why women fear men. This is why we avoid you in the street, in the club, everywhere. Because you might decide to shoot us.

I bet this woman encountered hundreds of unsolicited requests for her phone number over the years. However, it only took one pissed off guy to decide that her refusal warranted the death penalty to end her life, and leave another man without a fiancé, and 3 children without a mother.

Scepez wrote:
Laerod wrote:We must remember who the real victims in a shooting of a woman that rejected the advances of a man are: Men who might have a harder time to get a date because of it.


At which point did people say that?
You are completely trying to steer the topic off.
What I don't like is the accusation of a bigger group due to a few bad eggs.
Replace men and woman with let's say French and African, and you got racism.

The vast majority of the posts in this thread are "How dare you suggest it's ok to be afraid of men?!"
The attitude that the only thing that truly matters is how men are being "insulted" or "tarred with a broad brush" when what really matters is that a guy was so convinced he deserved attention from a woman that he shot her. And that's the second time this year alone. And that doesn't include the vast amount of nonlethal harassment and assault that women put up with.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Daphomir, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Fartsniffage, Greater Kastovia, Inner Albania, Lothria, Nioya, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Takiv, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads