Men don't have to stop walking when she decides to start; walk with her.
Advertisement
by T Roosevelt » Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:00 pm
by Neutraligon » Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:04 pm
by Des-Bal » Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:06 pm
Neutraligon wrote:
Again at which point she thinks you are a jerk and walks away. There is no outright refusal there, she just walks away. (I have done so to exactly that comment). I have also ensured that I was then in an area where said person would not bother me.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Neutraligon » Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:09 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Again at which point she thinks you are a jerk and walks away. There is no outright refusal there, she just walks away. (I have done so to exactly that comment). I have also ensured that I was then in an area where said person would not bother me.
That's a potential out but you're acting like it's the only possible course of action, that's just not the case and if you're not just on the street it's not particularly attractive. I've heard of a woman getting dragged halfway out of a club by someone who mistook her for someone else because telling him not to do that might be awkward.
by Des-Bal » Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:13 pm
Neutraligon wrote:
So have I, that does not mean there is no way to rectify the situation. You said it closes down options because it is an order, I say there are plenty of options that do not involve a direct no.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by T Roosevelt » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:16 pm
Neutraligon wrote:T Roosevelt wrote:Men don't have to stop walking when she decides to start; walk with her.
Ah then she goes to whoever is controlling the place (bartender, security guard, whatever) and tells the guard that this person is not leaving her alone. At which point said male will be forced to leave said establishment. If there is no on like that around, a call to the cops is in order. Should said person continue to stalk said woman, charges will of course be filed.
by Vamtrl » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:21 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/26719319/mass-shooting-kills-mother-of-three-wounds-five-others
Men, whenever you question why we don't tell you why we aren't interested, this is why. Whenever we "lead you on", this is why.
This is why women fear men. This is why we avoid you in the street, in the club, everywhere. Because you might decide to shoot us.
I bet this woman encountered hundreds of unsolicited requests for her phone number over the years. However, it only took one pissed off guy to decide that her refusal warranted the death penalty to end her life, and leave another man without a fiancé, and 3 children without a mother.
So NSG, what say you? Is this yet another example of the way our culture believes men are entitled to women, or is this simply a tragic, crazy once-off.
by Australian rePublic » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:32 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Ultimately, telephones are to blame.
by Neutraligon » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:15 am
T Roosevelt wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Ah then she goes to whoever is controlling the place (bartender, security guard, whatever) and tells the guard that this person is not leaving her alone. At which point said male will be forced to leave said establishment. If there is no on like that around, a call to the cops is in order. Should said person continue to stalk said woman, charges will of course be filed.
Said male did nothing wrong by trying to get her to submit if she's not married or loyal to another man. A woman should carry a gun and if she's not interested in submitting to a man, she should be allowed to defend herself. If she wants absolutely nothing to do with him, she'll pull the trigger on that creep or beat him physically. The police have actual criminals to bust.
by The Joseon Dynasty » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:11 am
by Rhodisia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:47 am
Saint Jade IV wrote:
Men, whenever you question why we don't tell you why we aren't interested, this is why. Whenever we "lead you on", this is why.
This is why women fear men. This is why we avoid you in the street, in the club, everywhere. Because you might decide to shoot us.
by Greed and Death » Fri Oct 17, 2014 4:48 am
by T Roosevelt » Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:02 am
Neutraligon wrote:T Roosevelt wrote:Said male did nothing wrong by trying to get her to submit if she's not married or loyal to another man. A woman should carry a gun and if she's not interested in submitting to a man, she should be allowed to defend herself. If she wants absolutely nothing to do with him, she'll pull the trigger on that creep or beat him physically. The police have actual criminals to bust.
Said male was harassing her, which is illegal. Since she was not in immediate danger, using a gun would have put her in jail, instead of him. Also, did you just advocate murder? Considering he is committing an actual crime...
by Len Hyet » Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:30 am
Saint Jade IV wrote:http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/26719319/mass-shooting-kills-mother-of-three-wounds-five-others
Men, whenever you question why we don't tell you why we aren't interested, this is why. Whenever we "lead you on", this is why.
This is why women fear men. This is why we avoid you in the street, in the club, everywhere. Because you might decide to shoot us.
I bet this woman encountered hundreds of unsolicited requests for her phone number over the years. However, it only took one pissed off guy to decide that her refusal warranted the death penalty to end her life, and leave another man without a fiancé, and 3 children without a mother.
So NSG, what say you? Is this yet another example of the way our culture believes men are entitled to women, or is this simply a tragic, crazy once-off.
by Holyrood » Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:38 am
by Chernoslavia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:31 am
Saint Jade IV wrote:http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/26719319/mass-shooting-kills-mother-of-three-wounds-five-others
Men, whenever you question why we don't tell you why we aren't interested, this is why. Whenever we "lead you on", this is why.
This is why women fear men. This is why we avoid you in the street, in the club, everywhere. Because you might decide to shoot us.
I bet this woman encountered hundreds of unsolicited requests for her phone number over the years. However, it only took one pissed off guy to decide that her refusal warranted the death penalty to end her life, and leave another man without a fiancé, and 3 children without a mother.
So NSG, what say you? Is this yet another example of the way our culture believes men are entitled to women, or is this simply a tragic, crazy once-off.
by Chernoslavia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:33 am
by Chernoslavia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:38 pm
Laerod wrote:Faschist Deutsch Reich wrote:*Looks at title and sees Detroit*
*Thinks to himself that this is nothing new*
I think the OP is a little harsh on us men TBH. Most of us aren't going to act like this, but I could be wrong.
That's the second case of murder because of rejection that we've heard of this year. That's discounting all the unreported cases that amount to "nothing more" than verbal abuse. The OP is utterly correct in pointing out that "he might murder me if I reject him outright" is a legitimate concern because there's no way to tell if the guy asking is that one guy out of a larger statistical number that will murder her. It's like when I come across foxes; I have to treat them as though they have rabies even if none of them do because the consequences of not doing so are just too great if you end up being wrong.
by T Roosevelt » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:42 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Laerod wrote:That's the second case of murder because of rejection that we've heard of this year. That's discounting all the unreported cases that amount to "nothing more" than verbal abuse. The OP is utterly correct in pointing out that "he might murder me if I reject him outright" is a legitimate concern because there's no way to tell if the guy asking is that one guy out of a larger statistical number that will murder her. It's like when I come across foxes; I have to treat them as though they have rabies even if none of them do because the consequences of not doing so are just too great if you end up being wrong.
That's a terrible way to think. So what are you suppose to do just accept his request for your number out of fear that he might hurt you? Women should not be afraid to say no. If somebody is hitting on you and your not interested, then have the common sense to refuse. Just don't be a jerk about it and tell him how gross he looks.
by Chernoslavia » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:00 pm
T Roosevelt wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
That's a terrible way to think. So what are you suppose to do just accept his request for your number out of fear that he might hurt you? Women should not be afraid to say no. If somebody is hitting on you and your not interested, then have the common sense to refuse. Just don't be a jerk about it and tell him how gross he looks.
This is why every woman in the United States of America should have a gun.
by Linux and the X » Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:09 pm
T Roosevelt wrote:If she wants absolutely nothing to do with him, she'll pull the trigger on that creep or beat him physically.
Chernoslavia wrote:If you really think the majority of men are as crazy enough as this asshole then I don't think any guy would want to be in a relationship with you.
by Galloism » Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:05 pm
Linux and the X wrote:T Roosevelt wrote:If she wants absolutely nothing to do with him, she'll pull the trigger on that creep or beat him physically.
While I'm not exactly opposed to the "kill all men" plan, I suspect you would not actually want it implemented.Chernoslavia wrote:If you really think the majority of men are as crazy enough as this asshole then I don't think any guy would want to be in a relationship with you.
It doesn't have to be a majority. If I give you a box of biscuits and tell you one of them is poisoned, are you going to take the risk that you get the poisoned one?
by Hyfling » Fri Oct 17, 2014 6:28 pm
by Twilight Imperium » Fri Oct 17, 2014 6:32 pm
Hyfling wrote:It's funny. If someone were to replace the word 'men' with 'black people' and the word 'women' with 'white people' then this OP would have (rightfully) been considered extremely racist and have been locked with the poster warned, or even banned, long ago. But for some reason, blatant sexism and extreme generalisation of males gets a free pass? Why is that?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Ancientania, Bhadno, Giovanniland, Hidrandia, Oceasia, Reskain, Statesburg, The Huskar Social Union, United Calanworie
Advertisement