http://gawker.com/forbes-columnist-drun ... 1638518934
Ok the above is my attempt to do a link. It is my first attempt and I hope it worked.
So this guy named Frizza is like the grand poobah of a college fraternity. He wrote this article that advised college fraternities to turn away girls who show up drunk to frat parties. His reasoning is that they cause problems like accusations of assault and stuff like that.
He also advised frat bros to not have sex with drunk girls or even let them into their rooms as this causes problems for themselves and their feats. He praised law courts for their ability to protect the falsely accused but slammed school disciplinary processes as kangaroo courts.
Apparently, Forbes had a problem with this article and yanked it and fired Mr. Frizza. They took yer job! I am not sure what the problem is, it was called sexist and mysoginistic but this was conclusory. I suppose that the problem was that only drunk women should be turned away and nothing was mentioned about drunk male guests.
My opinion is that there is rape madness at colleges. In some American colleges like Bucknell University, self reporting rape surveys apparently indicate that a majority of college women are raped. If that is true then colleges are too rapey to be allowed to have any mixing of the sexes. If as I suspect, these rape surveys somehow over exaggerate the problem, there are obviously a lot of false beliefs about rape or something. I am not sure what the deal is with this everybody getting the rape thing but obviously college kids need to be careful to protect themselves from rape accusations.
Am I way off here or does Mr. Frizza have a point that drunk girls can get frat boys into trouble even if the frat boys don't rape anyone? Do you have any thoughts as to why Forbes and the Feminists did not like this article?
