Is Marriage an out dated institution?

[Mavorpen]

If there ever was evidence that he isn't paying that much attention...this would be it.

I was. The benefits listed.. they.. well.. benefit the married basically, not society as a whole.

Because married couples live in a vacuum and have no effect on society as a whole.

Yeah seems legit.

Edit: damn cats ninja-ing me.

[DnalweN acilbupeR]

Marriage as it is commonly seen has no place in society anymore, but that's not to deny its application. The creation of family units, is remarkably useful but in many cases due to economic situations, the state provides where the family cannot, thereby increasing efficiency but declining quality.

The largest rise in married couples is actually from the homosexual/other community, which is a sign of how marriage and family units are evolving. One man and One woman is required to create children, but not to look after or raise children and slowly society will come to accept that.

Marriage as it was previously known then, will become extinguished but it will evolve in what we understand as a social contract, where relationships are brought together to create stable and productive atmospheres for children and other family members to develop regardless if they are male or female or even blood related. That is a fantastic thing and should be applauded that the Human Race adapts to cater for the human race as a whole rather than individual lines of genes and therefore promotes faster evolution.

Gay marriage, even though technically a dead end is paradoxically the way forwards for human evolution a stepping stone to the next phase of our development as a race.

w h a t

that guy knows lel

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Marriage as it is commonly seen has no place in society anymore, but that's not to deny its application. The creation of family units, is remarkably useful but in many cases due to economic situations, the state provides where the family cannot, thereby increasing efficiency but declining quality.

The largest rise in married couples is actually from the homosexual/other community, which is a sign of how marriage and family units are evolving. One man and One woman is required to create children, but not to look after or raise children and slowly society will come to accept that.

Marriage as it was previously known then, will become extinguished but it will evolve in what we understand as a social contract, where relationships are brought together to create stable and productive atmospheres for children and other family members to develop regardless if they are male or female or even blood related. That is a fantastic thing and should be applauded that the Human Race adapts to cater for the human race as a whole rather than individual lines of genes and therefore promotes faster evolution.

Gay marriage, even though technically a dead end is paradoxically the way forwards for human evolution a stepping stone to the next phase of our development as a race.

w h a t

I laughed because I have the same reaction.

Gay marriage is the next step of human evolution... seriously?!

[Stagnant Axon Terminal]

w h a t

I laughed because I have the same reaction.

Gay marriage is the next step of human evolution... seriously?!

Like all I can think of is like a family factory right now

[Mavorpen]

w h a t

I laughed because I have the same reaction.

Gay marriage is the next step of human evolution... seriously?!

He's like the Magneto of the real world...but for gay people.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

I was. The benefits listed.. they.. well.. benefit the married basically, not society as a whole.

Sure, because a marriage exists in a vacuum. There's no way the marriage can, with these benefits and protections under law, benefit society. Not at all.

Don't you know, married people exist in their own extravagant societies. What with their fancy cars, and houses, you guys are making us look like poor people!

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I was. The benefits listed.. they.. well.. benefit the married basically, not society as a whole.

Because married couples live in a vacuum and have no effect on society as a whole.

Yeah seems legit.

Edit: damn cats ninja-ing me.

Mind meld. Jo!

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Sure, because a marriage exists in a vacuum. There's no way the marriage can, with these benefits and protections under law, benefit society. Not at all.

Don't you know, married people exist in their own extravagant societies. What with their fancy cars, and houses, you guys are making us look like poor people!

It seems we exist in Looking Glass country. Seriously. Our contributions, monetarily and through the work force, do not benefit society. Like, cha.

[DnalweN acilbupeR]

well if we can't get rid of it then perhaps we can at least democratize it even more. if you can't beat them, join them

perhaps the next step is legalizing polygamous marriages where they're not yet legal

[Mavorpen]

Because married couples live in a vacuum and have no effect on society as a whole.

Yeah seems legit.

Edit: damn cats ninja-ing me.

Mind meld. Jo!

Let's do that as sparingly as possible. I don't think I want to know what you're thinking all the time.

[Stagnant Axon Terminal]

well if we can't get rid of it then perhaps we can at least democratize it even more. if you can't beat them, join them

perhaps the next step is legalizing polygamous marriages where they're not yet legal

Polyamorous marriages should definitely be legal

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Mind meld. Jo!

Let's do that as sparingly as possible. I don't think I want to know what you're thinking all the time.

Cats, books, cats, music, cats, husband, cats, husband, cats, sleep, and did I mention cats? Yes. Cats.

[Neutraligon]

well if we can't get rid of it then perhaps we can at least democratize it even more. if you can't beat them, join them

perhaps the next step is legalizing polygamous marriages where they're not yet legal

I have no issue legalizing polyamorous marriage. The thing is marriage right now is set up as a union between two people, and there would need to be drastic changes to allow for marriage between more people. For instance in a polygamous marriage, is everyone married to everyone else? how are assets shared? who has custody rights over the children? how does inheritance work? And so on.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

well if we can't get rid of it then perhaps we can at least democratize it even more. if you can't beat them, join them

perhaps the next step is legalizing polygamous marriages where they're not yet legal

Why not?

[Stagnant Axon Terminal]

Let's do that as sparingly as possible. I don't think I want to know what you're thinking all the time.

Cats, books, cats, music, cats, husband, cats, husband, cats, sleep, and did I mention cats? Yes. Cats.

Damn, Nana, stop thinking about pussy so much

[Neutraligon]

Cats, books, cats, music, cats, husband, cats, husband, cats, sleep, and did I mention cats? Yes. Cats.

Damn, Nana, stop thinking about pussy so much

I hate you, you made me spit out my chai.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Damn, Nana, stop thinking about pussy so much

I hate you, you made me spit out my chai.

[Mavorpen]

Let's do that as sparingly as possible. I don't think I want to know what you're thinking all the time.

Cats, books, cats, music, cats, husband, cats, husband, cats, sleep, and did I mention cats? Yes. Cats.

Damn, poor Gallo.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

well if we can't get rid of it then perhaps we can at least democratize it even more. if you can't beat them, join them

perhaps the next step is legalizing polygamous marriages where they're not yet legal

I have no issue legalizing polygamous marriage. The thing is marriage right now is set up as a union between two people, and there would need to be drastic changes to allow for marriage between more people. For instance in a polygamous marriage, is everyone married to everyone else? how are assets shared? who has custody rights over the children? how does inheritance work? And so on.

It can be done. But we would need to rewrite several laws and rewrite our tax codes. As of now, I don't know how to exactly go about it. I've seen the suggestion of making these unions similar to a corporation.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

I have no issue legalizing polygamous marriage. The thing is marriage right now is set up as a union between two people, and there would need to be drastic changes to allow for marriage between more people. For instance in a polygamous marriage, is everyone married to everyone else? how are assets shared? who has custody rights over the children? how does inheritance work? And so on.

It can be done. But we would need to rewrite several laws and rewrite our tax codes. As of now, I don't know how to exactly go about it. I've seen the suggestion of making these unions similar to a corporation.

And have them do quarterly tax returns?

Gallo would have a field trip with that.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Cats, books, cats, music, cats, husband, cats, husband, cats, sleep, and did I mention cats? Yes. Cats.

Damn, Nana, stop thinking about pussy so much

You made me laugh and that made my sore throat more scratchy. Evil woman!

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

It can be done. But we would need to rewrite several laws and rewrite our tax codes. As of now, I don't know how to exactly go about it. I've seen the suggestion of making these unions similar to a corporation.

And have them do quarterly tax returns?

Gallo would have a field trip with that.

Honestly, I wouldn't know how that would work. I've just seen it suggested as a guide for polygamous marriages.

[Stagnant Axon Terminal]

Damn, Nana, stop thinking about pussy so much

I hate you, you made me spit out my chai.

Blame that perverse woman over there. I mean first of all she clearly not a virgin. She's married for god's sake. And her avatar is a SEXUAL WOMAN in LATEX with CAT EARS... And her username! Nanat-you go TouchMe. And you want to blame ME!

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Cats, books, cats, music, cats, husband, cats, husband, cats, sleep, and did I mention cats? Yes. Cats.

Damn, poor Gallo.

Order changes depending on day and mood. But I digress.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I hate you, you made me spit out my chai.

Blame that perverse woman over there. I mean first of all she clearly not a virgin. She's married for god's sake. And her avatar is a SEXUAL WOMAN in LATEX with CAT EARS... And her username! Nanat-you go TouchMe. And you want to blame ME!

And proud of it.