Dude.
Fosters.
Advertisement
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:05 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Tekania » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:08 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Tekania wrote:
It was not changed by the whims of "judicial activists" it was changed by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.
Much as how blacks no longer being 3/5ths a person was not a change by judicial activists, but by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.
You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.
by Forster Keys » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:08 pm
by Forster Keys » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:10 pm
Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.
Valid point, Australia's worst export
Worth noting that even in Scouts, one can run into this issue, my father is a strong atheist (with the exception of his acknowledgement of "Huey" and the Dark Wanderer) when he was going through the process of becoming a scout leader. They were actually shocked that he put a simple "N/A" in the religion section and they hounded him for ages about it, asking for a recognised religion to be put, even atheist didn't cut it
Though I don't think I had the same issue with the ADF, can't seem to remember any issues, they've really progressed over the past 40 years
by Dewhurst-Narculis » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:21 pm
by Stormwind-City » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:54 pm
by Tekania » Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:06 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:Tekania wrote:
It was not changed by the whims of "judicial activists" it was changed by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.
Much as how blacks no longer being 3/5ths a person was not a change by judicial activists, but by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.
I fail to understand why we need to fall back on racism and slavery every time we talk about American history. Why do we need to dispute every solid historical fact?
The 14th Amendment simply forces states to recognize the fact that Congress is not allowed to establish or respect an establishment of religion. No law or constitutional amendment says that states or localities may not establish a religion or respect an establishment thereof. That being said, your argument is invalid.
Now I almost feel bad saying that in such a harsh manner, because I see you are a veteran. So I do thank you for your service to our great Christian nation, the USA.
by California Prime » Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:24 pm
Tekania wrote:
I'm not falling back to anything. I'm noting facts of things which are altered in the text of the constitution by subsequent addendum known as "Amendments" which change the effect or applicability of previous texts. Happens all the time. We have made many of them over the years. The consideration of blacks as 3/5ths a person just an example of one of those spots that still exists in the texts, but is subsequently altered by additions.
Of course, the real application in question here has little to do with any of this, or separation or what not. The optionality of God" portion of the swear is not brought about by any amendment, but by the original text itself in the prohibition of religious tests upon those to hold public offices or trusts. That is why the term has been and remains optional as a matter of legal course in administration of oaths by the government for people taking on an office. You simply cannot require someone to meet a religious criteria (including expressed belief in a diety) for the purpose of holding an office or position in government. It's not constitutional even if you struck the first amendment.
by Salandriagado » Thu Sep 18, 2014 4:39 pm
Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.
Valid point, Australia's worst export
Worth noting that even in Scouts, one can run into this issue, my father is a strong atheist (with the exception of his acknowledgement of "Huey" and the Dark Wanderer) when he was going through the process of becoming a scout leader. They were actually shocked that he put a simple "N/A" in the religion section and they hounded him for ages about it, asking for a recognised religion to be put, even atheist didn't cut it
Though I don't think I had the same issue with the ADF, can't seem to remember any issues, they've really progressed over the past 40 years
by Dewhurst-Narculis » Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:21 am
Salandriagado wrote:Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Valid point, Australia's worst export
Worth noting that even in Scouts, one can run into this issue, my father is a strong atheist (with the exception of his acknowledgement of "Huey" and the Dark Wanderer) when he was going through the process of becoming a scout leader. They were actually shocked that he put a simple "N/A" in the religion section and they hounded him for ages about it, asking for a recognised religion to be put, even atheist didn't cut it
Though I don't think I had the same issue with the ADF, can't seem to remember any issues, they've really progressed over the past 40 years
Yeah, the BSA is basically the crazy cousin the rest of the scouting world would rather not talk about.
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:54 am
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:57 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Fartsniffage » Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:59 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
by Lemanrussland » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:01 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
by Laerod » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:12 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
by The Alma Mater » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:13 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain.
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:17 am
Fartsniffage wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
If you were in the military then you know that it is the responsibility of every member of the armed forces to disobey an illegal order.
by Tekania » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:21 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:24 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
If you believe the words of the oath you are reciting have no meaning... why bother with the oath at all.
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:32 am
Laerod wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.
In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
Haha! No.
by Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:42 am
by Tekania » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:48 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:
I remember in basic training, somebody was smart enough to shave his head planning to save money but he was forced to get his head shaved by the barber and pay $6 just like the rest of us. The drill sergeant did it to make a point that he was superior to us. That taught me that thinking is a waste of time in the army. There are plenty more examples of leaders giving out inefficient and stupid orders but lower ranking soldiers are powerless so I just followed my orders and counted my days.
This airman accepts the military way of life though. He should be used to following the idiotic orders of his superiors. He can think of the oath as another order he must follow even though he doesn't like it.
by Condunum » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:49 am
The Alma Mater wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:
its a re-iteration of the cliche - there are no atheists in foxholes.
To which of course, the answer is that we should get rid of foxholes, not atheism.
Why no. To which the answer is that atheists do not belong in foxholes - they belong in command.
Think about it. It is a good thing if the guy in the field believes there is something pleasant after death, since that can be a great comfort when he is in a life-threatening situation. It is also a good thing if the person who has to decide if the aforementioned guy in the field has to go into that dangerious situation believes this is the only life you get and should be treated with care and consideration.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, El Lazaro, Hekp, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Stonkopolis, Ravemath, Soviet kremlin empire, Statesburg, The Confederate States of America, The Lone Alliance, Vassenor
Advertisement