NATION

PASSWORD

RESOLVED: Atheist Airman Allowed To Modify Oath

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54873
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:05 pm

Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.


Valid point, Australia's worst export

Dude.

Fosters.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:08 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Tekania wrote:
It was not changed by the whims of "judicial activists" it was changed by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.

Much as how blacks no longer being 3/5ths a person was not a change by judicial activists, but by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.

You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.


No I'm not, I'm stating facts back to a poster with Ken Ham in his flag. I've no interest in attempting to persuade them of anything, as they have Ken Ham in their flag. Merely stuff for the record. I've no interest in taking up the hobby of bashing my head into brick walls.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Forster Keys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19584
Founded: Mar 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Forster Keys » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:08 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Valid point, Australia's worst export

Dude.

Fosters.


Never drank Foster's and I barely even see it. We have to get rid of our faulty batches somehow I suppose.
The blue sky above beckons us to take our freedom, to paint our path across its vastness. Across a million blades of grass, through the roars of our elation and a thousand thundering hooves, we begin our reply.

User avatar
Forster Keys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19584
Founded: Mar 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Forster Keys » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:10 pm

Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.


Valid point, Australia's worst export

Worth noting that even in Scouts, one can run into this issue, my father is a strong atheist (with the exception of his acknowledgement of "Huey" and the Dark Wanderer) when he was going through the process of becoming a scout leader. They were actually shocked that he put a simple "N/A" in the religion section and they hounded him for ages about it, asking for a recognised religion to be put, even atheist didn't cut it

Though I don't think I had the same issue with the ADF, can't seem to remember any issues, they've really progressed over the past 40 years


The ADF tends to be surprisingly progressive in some parts.
The blue sky above beckons us to take our freedom, to paint our path across its vastness. Across a million blades of grass, through the roars of our elation and a thousand thundering hooves, we begin our reply.

User avatar
Dewhurst-Narculis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5053
Founded: Jun 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Dewhurst-Narculis » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:21 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Valid point, Australia's worst export

Dude.

Fosters.


Hopefully James Squire beer makes it way overseas to make up for both bad products
PT/MT Nation
Death is the only Absolute
The Grand Duchy of Dewhurst-Narculis
|Monarchist Nation| DEFCON [3] [2][1]
Coveton Crisis 1828-Mutual victory
Quendisphere War 2010-Resolved

1st Great Southern War 1898
2nd Great Southern War 1925
3rd Great Southern War 1942-1944
4th Great Southern War 1983
Dewhurst-Narculian- Theaman War 2010
Okhotsk Conflict 2012-2013
2nd Cedorian-Gilnean War-2014 ^All Won

North Vasangal Uprising-2014-(Ongoing)
Dervistonian War-2014-(Ongoing)
One of the the original founders of: SEC, Axis, SACTO and the Great Southern Ocean Region| Nine Years and no Condemnation/Commendation, what is this?

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:37 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.


I'm not intimidated in the slightest.


Who is trying to intimidate you?

User avatar
Stormwind-City
Minister
 
Posts: 2481
Founded: Dec 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Stormwind-City » Thu Sep 18, 2014 2:54 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
I'm not intimidated in the slightest.


Who is trying to intimidate you?

Bill Nye.
I am a woman.
Ambassador Alyssa Brightspark(Yes, a gnome)
Extra!Extra!: King dead at 89! Prince abdicates! Adopted Vanessa heir presumptive! (See FB)
Now Officially a funny poster:
If you have any questions/comments, or just need someone to talk to and a shoulder to cry on, TG me. I'll be happy to help.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:06 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:
Tekania wrote:
It was not changed by the whims of "judicial activists" it was changed by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.

Much as how blacks no longer being 3/5ths a person was not a change by judicial activists, but by the addition of the 14th amendment and the application and effect of that upon laws.


I fail to understand why we need to fall back on racism and slavery every time we talk about American history. Why do we need to dispute every solid historical fact?

The 14th Amendment simply forces states to recognize the fact that Congress is not allowed to establish or respect an establishment of religion. No law or constitutional amendment says that states or localities may not establish a religion or respect an establishment thereof. That being said, your argument is invalid.

Now I almost feel bad saying that in such a harsh manner, because I see you are a veteran. So I do thank you for your service to our great Christian nation, the USA.


I'm not falling back to anything. I'm noting facts of things which are altered in the text of the constitution by subsequent addendum known as "Amendments" which change the effect or applicability of previous texts. Happens all the time. We have made many of them over the years. The consideration of blacks as 3/5ths a person just an example of one of those spots that still exists in the texts, but is subsequently altered by additions.

Of course, the real application in question here has little to do with any of this, or separation or what not. The optionality of God" portion of the swear is not brought about by any amendment, but by the original text itself in the prohibition of religious tests upon those to hold public offices or trusts. That is why the term has been and remains optional as a matter of legal course in administration of oaths by the government for people taking on an office. You simply cannot require someone to meet a religious criteria (including expressed belief in a diety) for the purpose of holding an office or position in government. It's not constitutional even if you struck the first amendment.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
California Prime
Envoy
 
Posts: 241
Founded: Jun 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby California Prime » Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:24 pm

Tekania wrote:
I'm not falling back to anything. I'm noting facts of things which are altered in the text of the constitution by subsequent addendum known as "Amendments" which change the effect or applicability of previous texts. Happens all the time. We have made many of them over the years. The consideration of blacks as 3/5ths a person just an example of one of those spots that still exists in the texts, but is subsequently altered by additions.

Of course, the real application in question here has little to do with any of this, or separation or what not. The optionality of God" portion of the swear is not brought about by any amendment, but by the original text itself in the prohibition of religious tests upon those to hold public offices or trusts. That is why the term has been and remains optional as a matter of legal course in administration of oaths by the government for people taking on an office. You simply cannot require someone to meet a religious criteria (including expressed belief in a diety) for the purpose of holding an office or position in government. It's not constitutional even if you struck the first amendment.

This is exactly 100% true, outstanding post.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Thu Sep 18, 2014 4:39 pm

Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:You're arguing with a poster with Ken Ham as his flag.


Valid point, Australia's worst export

Worth noting that even in Scouts, one can run into this issue, my father is a strong atheist (with the exception of his acknowledgement of "Huey" and the Dark Wanderer) when he was going through the process of becoming a scout leader. They were actually shocked that he put a simple "N/A" in the religion section and they hounded him for ages about it, asking for a recognised religion to be put, even atheist didn't cut it

Though I don't think I had the same issue with the ADF, can't seem to remember any issues, they've really progressed over the past 40 years


Yeah, the BSA is basically the crazy cousin the rest of the scouting world would rather not talk about.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Dewhurst-Narculis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5053
Founded: Jun 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Dewhurst-Narculis » Fri Sep 19, 2014 12:21 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Dewhurst-Narculis wrote:
Valid point, Australia's worst export

Worth noting that even in Scouts, one can run into this issue, my father is a strong atheist (with the exception of his acknowledgement of "Huey" and the Dark Wanderer) when he was going through the process of becoming a scout leader. They were actually shocked that he put a simple "N/A" in the religion section and they hounded him for ages about it, asking for a recognised religion to be put, even atheist didn't cut it

Though I don't think I had the same issue with the ADF, can't seem to remember any issues, they've really progressed over the past 40 years


Yeah, the BSA is basically the crazy cousin the rest of the scouting world would rather not talk about.


Oh no, I was talking about the Australian scouts, despite trying to be progressive, there are some little corners of the organisation that even the BSA would find backwards
PT/MT Nation
Death is the only Absolute
The Grand Duchy of Dewhurst-Narculis
|Monarchist Nation| DEFCON [3] [2][1]
Coveton Crisis 1828-Mutual victory
Quendisphere War 2010-Resolved

1st Great Southern War 1898
2nd Great Southern War 1925
3rd Great Southern War 1942-1944
4th Great Southern War 1983
Dewhurst-Narculian- Theaman War 2010
Okhotsk Conflict 2012-2013
2nd Cedorian-Gilnean War-2014 ^All Won

North Vasangal Uprising-2014-(Ongoing)
Dervistonian War-2014-(Ongoing)
One of the the original founders of: SEC, Axis, SACTO and the Great Southern Ocean Region| Nine Years and no Condemnation/Commendation, what is this?

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:54 am

Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54873
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Corporate Police State

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:57 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!

If you believe the words of the oath you are reciting have no meaning... why bother with the oath at all.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42059
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Sep 19, 2014 7:59 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!


If you were in the military then you know that it is the responsibility of every member of the armed forces to disobey an illegal order.

User avatar
Lemanrussland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5078
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemanrussland » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:01 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!

This kind of attitude leads to all sorts of problems.

First, enlisted do have to think, they need to understand their mission, their role in the mission, have to be able to work as a team and so on (yes, even if they are a non-combat MOS) in order to be effective. They're not brainless meatshields under the remote control of a couple of 2nd Lieutenants straight out of college.

Second, the role of the enlisted in the military vis-a-vis officers really has no bearing on the legality of what the Air Force did. We're a nation of laws, the government and the military are bound to it just as much as citizens are other legal personalities are.
Last edited by Lemanrussland on Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:04 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:12 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!

Haha! No.

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:13 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain.


He is making a big stink of being forced to defile the thing he is supposed to protect.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:17 am

Fartsniffage wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!


If you were in the military then you know that it is the responsibility of every member of the armed forces to disobey an illegal order.


Yes, they tell you that but this oath is not an illegal order. It is very rare that an order is illegal.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:21 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!


Issue has been resolved, USAF talked to DoD General Counsel and the USAF has put their policy in line with the rest of the branches in the DoD, with the "God" part being optional again (like it was before last year, anyway). So, since his enlistment isn't up to November anyway, he can take the oath without swearing to God, and re-enlist now. Veterans on NSG 1... assholes 0.

And enlisted people are paid to think, not just follow orders. My Weps would have tore you a new one.
Last edited by Tekania on Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:38 am, edited 4 times in total.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:24 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!

If you believe the words of the oath you are reciting have no meaning... why bother with the oath at all.


You say it so you can keep your job. I said things I didn't believe all the time in the military to fit in and keep the superiors happy. Including motivational chants like 'guts, guts, guts, makes the green grass green.' Just say the words, I am sure he has said things he doesn't mean before such as 'no honey, that dress doesn't make you look fat at all' or 'I can run to Texas just like this....all by myself.' Do you really think he meant those things also??
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:32 am

Laerod wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain. I would say the words because they are meaningless to me.

In the military, enlisted men are paid to do, not think. Officers are paid to think. That is a reason I had low respect for my job in the military and got out. He wants to reenlist so he should understand by now his role is to obey orders, even when they are stupid. Say the words and stop being a baby!

Haha! No.


I remember in basic training, somebody was smart enough to shave his head planning to save money but he was forced to get his head shaved by the barber and pay $6 just like the rest of us. The drill sergeant did it to make a point that he was superior to us. That taught me that thinking is a waste of time in the army. There are plenty more examples of leaders giving out inefficient and stupid orders but lower ranking soldiers are powerless so I just followed my orders and counted my days.

This airman accepts the military way of life though. He should be used to following the idiotic orders of his superiors. He can think of the oath as another order he must follow even though he doesn't like it.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:40 am

Yumyum should probably update the title.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:42 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:Stop making a stand and say God's name. He is making a big stink over the fact he just has to endure 2 seconds of mental pain.


He is making a big stink of being forced to defile the thing he is supposed to protect.


The military is no longer an organization to be respected. The immoral Iraqi invasion shows that the military is just the arm of corrupt leaders. I am not blaming the soldiers too much, they are just following corrupt orders from powerful men in Washington as the oath tells them to. The oath is meaningless whether it says God or not, he should know this by now. He is willing to obey orders to invade a country that didn't attack the USA but he can't say a few words?!
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:48 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Laerod wrote:Haha! No.


I remember in basic training, somebody was smart enough to shave his head planning to save money but he was forced to get his head shaved by the barber and pay $6 just like the rest of us. The drill sergeant did it to make a point that he was superior to us. That taught me that thinking is a waste of time in the army. There are plenty more examples of leaders giving out inefficient and stupid orders but lower ranking soldiers are powerless so I just followed my orders and counted my days.

This airman accepts the military way of life though. He should be used to following the idiotic orders of his superiors. He can think of the oath as another order he must follow even though he doesn't like it.


The difference here being that an order to pay $6 for a haircut is not an illegal order. An order requiring you to state God in an enlistment oath is an illegal order. When you are subject to an illegal order you do not follow it and issue immediate response as to why and move our complain up the chain. The issue will be corrected, as it has here, with the superiors having made the order being corrected by their superiors. All is good, as this Airman has assisted and done good service to his fellow Airmen to correct this problem.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Fri Sep 19, 2014 8:49 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
its a re-iteration of the cliche - there are no atheists in foxholes.

To which of course, the answer is that we should get rid of foxholes, not atheism.


Why no. To which the answer is that atheists do not belong in foxholes - they belong in command.

Think about it. It is a good thing if the guy in the field believes there is something pleasant after death, since that can be a great comfort when he is in a life-threatening situation. It is also a good thing if the person who has to decide if the aforementioned guy in the field has to go into that dangerious situation believes this is the only life you get and should be treated with care and consideration.

This is great.
password scrambled

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, El Lazaro, Hekp, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Stonkopolis, Ravemath, Soviet kremlin empire, Statesburg, The Confederate States of America, The Lone Alliance, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads