NATION

PASSWORD

What destroyed the Soviet Union?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What destroyed the Soviet Union?

Ronald Reagan. His aggressive foreign policy forced the Soviets to build up their military, which their economy couldn't afford. His policies ultimately resulted in Soviet collapse.
51
14%
Mikhail Gorbachev. His reforms were too radical and he gave too much power too the people. This prevented the government from changing over time, as the people simply revolted.
59
16%
Mass Media. People had become disillusioned with communism. The governments couldn't hide how backwards they were and the people rose against communism across the world.
22
6%
The system was broken. It was inherently flawed. After the post WWII economic boom the Soviet Union began a long slow period of decline it couldn't possibly have recovered from.
156
43%
Somehow it was the Jews.
79
22%
 
Total votes : 367

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:00 pm

Veceria wrote:You did it, OP. You also killed the glorious leader Kim Yong Un. And you faked the moon landing.


No, I faked the moon landing. I had to stop the Americans from mucking around with space travel before they REALLY got to the moon and discovered the secret Nazi moon base.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:07 pm

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Veceria wrote:You did it, OP. You also killed the glorious leader Kim Yong Un. And you faked the moon landing.


No, I faked the moon landing. I had to stop the Americans from mucking around with space travel before they REALLY got to the moon and discovered the secret Nazi moon base.


Always knew those Nazis were a bit luny.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:10 pm

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Veceria wrote:You did it, OP. You also killed the glorious leader Kim Yong Un. And you faked the moon landing.


No, I faked the moon landing. I had to stop the Americans from mucking around with space travel before they REALLY got to the moon and discovered the secret Nazi moon base.

No you didn't. That was why Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK, remember? The Moon Nazis hired him to take out JFK and thus thwart the Antarctic Nazis from launching an invasion of the Moon. That forced the CIA to fake it.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:12 pm

Dracoria wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
No, I faked the moon landing. I had to stop the Americans from mucking around with space travel before they REALLY got to the moon and discovered the secret Nazi moon base.


Always knew those Nazis were a bit luny.

It's not a pun if the etymology of the word actually is "lunar".

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:12 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
No, I faked the moon landing. I had to stop the Americans from mucking around with space travel before they REALLY got to the moon and discovered the secret Nazi moon base.

No you didn't. That was why Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK, remember? The Moon Nazis hired him to take out JFK and thus thwart the Antarctic Nazis from launching an invasion of the Moon. That forced the CIA to fake it.


Okay, this is just going too far out there. An Interplanetary Nazi Civil War? That wouldn't happen until they had established more hospitable living space on Earth, probably on the surface due to conflicts with the Mole Men.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:12 pm

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
No, I faked the moon landing. I had to stop the Americans from mucking around with space travel before they REALLY got to the moon and discovered the secret Nazi moon base.

No you didn't. That was why Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK, remember? The Moon Nazis hired him to take out JFK and thus thwart the Antarctic Nazis from launching an invasion of the Moon. That forced the CIA to fake it.


wut? :blink:

I almost snorted Coke on my laptop cos I was laughing so much.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:14 pm

Dracoria wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:No you didn't. That was why Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK, remember? The Moon Nazis hired him to take out JFK and thus thwart the Antarctic Nazis from launching an invasion of the Moon. That forced the CIA to fake it.


Okay, this is just going too far out there. An Interplanetary Nazi Civil War? That wouldn't happen until they had established more hospitable living space on Earth, probably on the surface due to conflicts with the Mole Men.


Nazis can't have a civil war. Civil wars go against the principles of National Socialism.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Port Victor
Attaché
 
Posts: 90
Founded: Jun 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Port Victor » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:14 pm

Because John Carr killed there leader. :lol: 8)

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:15 pm

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Dracoria wrote:
Okay, this is just going too far out there. An Interplanetary Nazi Civil War? That wouldn't happen until they had established more hospitable living space on Earth, probably on the surface due to conflicts with the Mole Men.


Nazis can't have a civil war. Civil wars go against the principles of National Socialism.


Then you agree! It wouldn't have been the Antactic Nazis and Moon Nazis coming into conflict. There must have been some third power. I'm sure the Soviets were somehow involved.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:17 pm

Dracoria wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:No you didn't. That was why Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK, remember? The Moon Nazis hired him to take out JFK and thus thwart the Antarctic Nazis from launching an invasion of the Moon. That forced the CIA to fake it.


Okay, this is just going too far out there. An Interplanetary Nazi Civil War? That wouldn't happen until they had established more hospitable living space on Earth, probably on the surface due to conflicts with the Mole Men.

They were under the Antarctic ice cap. Nothing the Mole Men could do, since they weren't technically underground.

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:No you didn't. That was why Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK, remember? The Moon Nazis hired him to take out JFK and thus thwart the Antarctic Nazis from launching an invasion of the Moon. That forced the CIA to fake it.


wut? :blink:

I almost snorted Coke on my laptop cos I was laughing so much.

Come on, man, I explained this all a long time ago.

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Dracoria wrote:
Okay, this is just going too far out there. An Interplanetary Nazi Civil War? That wouldn't happen until they had established more hospitable living space on Earth, probably on the surface due to conflicts with the Mole Men.


Nazis can't have a civil war. Civil wars go against the principles of National Socialism.

It was all orchestrated by the Illuminati, in an attempt to wipe out a faction allied with the lizardmen.

Dracoria wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Nazis can't have a civil war. Civil wars go against the principles of National Socialism.


Then you agree! It wouldn't have been the Antactic Nazis and Moon Nazis coming into conflict. There must have been some third power. I'm sure the Soviets were somehow involved.

Of course the Soviets were involved. Jack Ruby was a Russian sleeper agent. Come on, guys, this is like Secret World History 101.
Last edited by Wisconsin9 on Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Imperium Sidhicum
Senator
 
Posts: 4324
Founded: May 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperium Sidhicum » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:12 pm

Considering how much of the former Soviet states are still run mostly by the ex-Communist elite in the same corrupt, inefficient manner, I wouldn't even say Soviet Union was really destroyed even though formally that state is gone. The old Soviet ways, however, are still very much alive, made even worse by the introduction of predatory capitalism.

There's a conspiracy theory that Soviet Union never really fell apart, it was merely temporarily dismantled by the Party nomenklatura to await more suitable times for restoration. Being the only people with any grasp of how to run a state, these elites would naturally assume control over the new post-Soviet states, ensuring that nobody too independent would ever get to power while formally maintaining a facade of democracy and disawoving any ties to Communism. These elites and their lackeys would also deliberately mismanage and sell out their countries to cause suffering in the majority of the population and discredit the idea of sovereign statehood, bringing back nostalgia for the old Soviet regime, where life wasn't great, but at least not unbearable either. At an opportune moment, they would strike and restore the Soviet Union to it's former glory in a new form.

Considering the recent actions of a certain president of Russia and his background, as well as the general situation in much of former Soviet nations, I think there's a grain of truth to that theory.
Freedom doesn't mean being able to do as one please, but rather not to do as one doesn't please.

A fool sees religion as the truth. A smart man sees religion as a lie. A ruler sees religion as a useful tool.

The more God in one's mouth, the less in one's heart.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:54 pm

Estado Nacional wrote:
CTALNH wrote:And the sex slaves don't forget the sex slaves.


...you're not the guy who said you'd like humanity to conquer space civilizations so you can have alien sex slaves, are you?

I was half joking when I said that.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Syonanto
Secretary
 
Posts: 37
Founded: Sep 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Syonanto » Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:06 am

Your Mom.

Actually, I suspect all of the options in the poll played important roles (minus the Jewish option), I think declining oil production was a key factor. Empires generally don't crumble a for a single reason alone and the USSR was no different in this respect. However, the role of energy in modern states is often overlooked.
Political Views: It's Complicated

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:47 am

Syonanto wrote:Your Mom.

Actually, I suspect all of the options in the poll played important roles (minus the Jewish option), I think declining oil production was a key factor. Empires generally don't crumble a for a single reason alone and the USSR was no different in this respect. However, the role of energy in modern states is often overlooked.

Much of that was due to Reagan's policies of disurpting the Soviet Union's oil exports.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:30 pm

Imperium Sidhicum wrote:Considering how much of the former Soviet states are still run mostly by the ex-Communist elite in the same corrupt, inefficient manner, I wouldn't even say Soviet Union was really destroyed even though formally that state is gone. The old Soviet ways, however, are still very much alive, made even worse by the introduction of predatory capitalism.

There's a conspiracy theory that Soviet Union never really fell apart, it was merely temporarily dismantled by the Party nomenklatura to await more suitable times for restoration. Being the only people with any grasp of how to run a state, these elites would naturally assume control over the new post-Soviet states, ensuring that nobody too independent would ever get to power while formally maintaining a facade of democracy and disawoving any ties to Communism. These elites and their lackeys would also deliberately mismanage and sell out their countries to cause suffering in the majority of the population and discredit the idea of sovereign statehood, bringing back nostalgia for the old Soviet regime, where life wasn't great, but at least not unbearable either. At an opportune moment, they would strike and restore the Soviet Union to it's former glory in a new form.

Considering the recent actions of a certain president of Russia and his background, as well as the general situation in much of former Soviet nations, I think there's a grain of truth to that theory.


That's a really interesting theory, and while I do believe there is some molecule of truth in it, it's 99% false.

Perhaps we could call the extremely young, emerging Russian Empire (Crimea was annexed, Russia practically owns Kazahstan's Airforce and air space, they've been militarizing on the border of Belarus and the Baltic's, etc.) a right-wing USSR.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Shilya
Minister
 
Posts: 2609
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shilya » Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:34 pm

All of the above, and the upkeep of a military machine to match the larger west, and the general discontent of the people, and the uninvestedness of the people, and corruption, and the mafia, and...


Fuck it, it was the jews.
Impeach freedom, government is welfare, Ron Paul is theft, legalize 2016!

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:11 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:Considering how much of the former Soviet states are still run mostly by the ex-Communist elite in the same corrupt, inefficient manner, I wouldn't even say Soviet Union was really destroyed even though formally that state is gone. The old Soviet ways, however, are still very much alive, made even worse by the introduction of predatory capitalism.

There's a conspiracy theory that Soviet Union never really fell apart, it was merely temporarily dismantled by the Party nomenklatura to await more suitable times for restoration. Being the only people with any grasp of how to run a state, these elites would naturally assume control over the new post-Soviet states, ensuring that nobody too independent would ever get to power while formally maintaining a facade of democracy and disawoving any ties to Communism. These elites and their lackeys would also deliberately mismanage and sell out their countries to cause suffering in the majority of the population and discredit the idea of sovereign statehood, bringing back nostalgia for the old Soviet regime, where life wasn't great, but at least not unbearable either. At an opportune moment, they would strike and restore the Soviet Union to it's former glory in a new form.

Considering the recent actions of a certain president of Russia and his background, as well as the general situation in much of former Soviet nations, I think there's a grain of truth to that theory.


That's a really interesting theory, and while I do believe there is some molecule of truth in it, it's 99% false.

Perhaps we could call the extremely young, emerging Russian Empire (Crimea was annexed, Russia practically owns Kazahstan's Airforce and air space, they've been militarizing on the border of Belarus and the Baltic's, etc.) a right-wing USSR.

Why are we calling modern Russia the USSR just because it's expansive? That'd be like saying that the actual USSR was just a new Russian Empire because the tsars were expansive.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:21 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
That's a really interesting theory, and while I do believe there is some molecule of truth in it, it's 99% false.

Perhaps we could call the extremely young, emerging Russian Empire (Crimea was annexed, Russia practically owns Kazahstan's Airforce and air space, they've been militarizing on the border of Belarus and the Baltic's, etc.) a right-wing USSR.

Why are we calling modern Russia the USSR just because it's expansive? That'd be like saying that the actual USSR was just a new Russian Empire because the tsars were expansive.


Due to it's authoritarian, inefficient governemnt.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
The Zionist Nation
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 64
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zionist Nation » Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:24 pm

You seriously put "It was the Jews" as an option? They've been getting blamed for everything since the Nazis. >:(
-Prime Minister of The Zionist Nation.

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:26 pm

The Zionist Nation wrote:You seriously put "It was the Jews" as an option? They've been getting blamed for everything since the Nazis. >:(

Tis but a joke.

User avatar
Shilya
Minister
 
Posts: 2609
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shilya » Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:26 pm

The Zionist Nation wrote:You seriously put "It was the Jews" as an option? They've been getting blamed for everything since the Nazis. >:(

You mean, since the romans, at least.

Or do you mean, since and including the nazis? Now that would be an interesting conspiracy. "The jews did nazi germany!"
Impeach freedom, government is welfare, Ron Paul is theft, legalize 2016!

User avatar
OMGeverynameistaken
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12437
Founded: Jun 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby OMGeverynameistaken » Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:24 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
That's a really interesting theory, and while I do believe there is some molecule of truth in it, it's 99% false.

Perhaps we could call the extremely young, emerging Russian Empire (Crimea was annexed, Russia practically owns Kazahstan's Airforce and air space, they've been militarizing on the border of Belarus and the Baltic's, etc.) a right-wing USSR.

Why are we calling modern Russia the USSR just because it's expansive? That'd be like saying that the actual USSR was just a new Russian Empire because the tsars were expansive.

The USSR WAS basically a continuation of the Russian Empire under new management.
I AM DISAPPOINTED

User avatar
UED
Senator
 
Posts: 4889
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby UED » Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:26 pm

Somehow....

The jews were involved...
Political and religious views don't define whether you are a good or bad person, unless you want to actively hurt everyone who doesn't believe what you say.

User avatar
The Sotoan Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7140
Founded: Nov 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sotoan Union » Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:28 pm

OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
The Sotoan Union wrote:Why are we calling modern Russia the USSR just because it's expansive? That'd be like saying that the actual USSR was just a new Russian Empire because the tsars were expansive.

The USSR WAS basically a continuation of the Russian Empire under new management.

So then you would refer to these Russian governments as Russia. It doesn't make sense to call modern Russia the USSR when it gets expansive, especially since Russia has always been expansive.

User avatar
Dracoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4575
Founded: Oct 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dracoria » Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:30 pm

The Sotoan Union wrote:
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:The USSR WAS basically a continuation of the Russian Empire under new management.

So then you would refer to these Russian governments as Russia. It doesn't make sense to call modern Russia the USSR when it gets expansive, especially since Russia has always been expansive.


Just skip the middle man and call it the Russian Empire. Federation my butt.
Also, chocobos.

I show solidarity with the Tea Party by drinking more tea.
I show solidarity with Occupy Wall Street by painting my toilet as a police cruiser.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Archregimancy

Advertisement

Remove ads