NATION

PASSWORD

Entrapment

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What do you think should be done?

Terminations and/or fines acceptable, confiscate IDs for training purposes
5
20%
Terminations and/or fines not acceptable, confiscate IDs for training purposes
15
60%
The gas station had every right to terminate them and the orientation is good enough as is
2
8%
Other (please explain in a post)
3
12%
 
Total votes : 25

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:42 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
There are some people who look old for there age. Maybe he reached full height and was dressed like an adult and he might have even been wearing makeup, a fake beard and sun glasses. You can look much older if you want to.



To be perfectly honest, there is absolutely 0% chance of us ever being able to believe OP's story without a photo of the ID card and minor in question.


Good point. If it is true than it is great the OP lives in a place where cops don't need to worry about rapes, murders, thefts, assaults, drunk drivers, drug dealers, etc. He must live in Mayberry since cops have so much time to focus on victimless crimes.

Hey OP: can you tell us your town location? Some people might enjoy living in such a safe place (even if it is totalitarian).
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:00 pm

Entmonton wrote:She intends to. Needless to say, she is FURIOUS over the actions the stores have taken.


She may have one against the police for the misdemeanor portion of the charge...... as for her termination...... that would depend on if you live in an at-will-employment state..... cause if you do.... there will be little legal recourse in the context of the termination.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Obsidius
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Aug 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Obsidius » Fri Aug 29, 2014 1:43 am

Arkolon wrote:Abolish the drinking age. It's a parent's responsibility, and it only perpetuates the actions within youth groups. It's only fun because it's illegal. Speaking as someone who has been there, done that, by the way.
Just your everyday, run of the mill, plain ol' Ⓐnarchist.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:13 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:I am against these operations. Another sign that the USA is a police state. It is immoral for the police to do this but not a shocker.

What's immoral about it?

Besides, a 16 year old should be allowed to drink alcohol. After all, he can be charged as an adult in a criminal court so the state considers him an adult (but only when it is convenient for them it seems). If you are old enough to be convicted as an adult than you are old enough to smoke and drink alcohol.

Being tried as an adult is a misleading term. It's a retronym, a new name for some existing thing coined to distinguish it from a new version of that thing. They used to just be guitars, but then we invented electric guitars, so now we call them acoustic guitars. Being tried as an adult is just being tried, and relatively recently we came up with the concept of trying people as juveniles.


Freiheit Reich wrote:
Keyboard Warriors wrote:There is no point in having laws regarding the sale of alcohol to minors if there will be no follow-up to ensure that the laws are being followed by retailers; preventing police from testing retailers in this way makes it very difficult for the state to bring cases against sellers who break the law and undermines the law to the point where it's just some words on paper. And we do need these laws; regardless of what many of the teenagers on this site will say, teenagers are not fully brain-developed and are not overly good at considering factors of risk when making decisions. They do not have the capacity to determine how much alcohol they should have and as such, they should not be allowed to buy it for themselves, most particularly those under 18.


Police can check bars and arrest the people drinking underage, they are the ones that know they are breaking the law. Punish the offender, not the seller. Also, it should be legal to buy alcohol if you are under 21 if you are not drinking it. You might be buying it for your parents. Buying it doesn't harm you, drinking it does.

The retailer is an offender. It is against the law to sell alcohol to minors. This is a law that alcohol retailers would have explicitly agreed to when they applied for their license to sell alcohol.
Last edited by Ifreann on Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:33 am

Ifreann wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:I am against these operations. Another sign that the USA is a police state. It is immoral for the police to do this but not a shocker.

What's immoral about it?

Besides, a 16 year old should be allowed to drink alcohol. After all, he can be charged as an adult in a criminal court so the state considers him an adult (but only when it is convenient for them it seems). If you are old enough to be convicted as an adult than you are old enough to smoke and drink alcohol.

Being tried as an adult is a misleading term. It's a retronym, a new name for some existing thing coined to distinguish it from a new version of that thing. They used to just be guitars, but then we invented electric guitars, so now we call them acoustic guitars. Being tried as an adult is just being tried, and relatively recently we came up with the concept of trying people as juveniles.


Freiheit Reich wrote:
Police can check bars and arrest the people drinking underage, they are the ones that know they are breaking the law. Punish the offender, not the seller. Also, it should be legal to buy alcohol if you are under 21 if you are not drinking it. You might be buying it for your parents. Buying it doesn't harm you, drinking it does.

The retailer is an offender. It is against the law to sell alcohol to minors. This is a law that alcohol retailers would have explicitly agreed to when they applied for their license to sell alcohol.


Technically the police are encouraging somebody to commit a crime when they tell a teenager to buy beer. They are just giving him permission to commit a crime. Also, I don't want to live in a place where police try to trick people into committing crimes. The police need to focus on crimes that have victims. Buying alcohol, gambling, and prostitution are vicimless crimes.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:44 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What's immoral about it?


Being tried as an adult is a misleading term. It's a retronym, a new name for some existing thing coined to distinguish it from a new version of that thing. They used to just be guitars, but then we invented electric guitars, so now we call them acoustic guitars. Being tried as an adult is just being tried, and relatively recently we came up with the concept of trying people as juveniles.



The retailer is an offender. It is against the law to sell alcohol to minors. This is a law that alcohol retailers would have explicitly agreed to when they applied for their license to sell alcohol.


Technically the police are encouraging somebody to commit a crime when they tell a teenager to buy beer. They are just giving him permission to commit a crime.

Yes, I suppose they are. So what?
Also, I don't want to live in a place where police try to trick people into committing crimes.

They aren't tricking people into committing crimes. They're tricking people into getting caught, maybe, but what's wrong with that?
The police need to focus on crimes that have victims. Buying alcohol, gambling, and prostitution are vicimless crimes.

I'm sure they do focus on more serious crimes. That doesn't mean they ignore other crimes.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:50 am

The dairy down the road (and for those outside of NZ, dairy is local lingo for convenience store) was stung twice for these kinds of things, although the person at the counter at the time didn't actually ask for ID or something along those lines. Personally I don't have any issues with this, as it shows that you should pay attention to your line of work, even one as mundane as this.

They do stings here for cigarettes and alcohol, both of which are freely sold here to people over 18 years of age.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:47 am

Costa Fierro wrote:The dairy down the road (and for those outside of NZ, dairy is local lingo for convenience store) was stung twice for these kinds of things, although the person at the counter at the time didn't actually ask for ID or something along those lines. Personally I don't have any issues with this, as it shows that you should pay attention to your line of work, even one as mundane as this.

They do stings here for cigarettes and alcohol, both of which are freely sold here to people over 18 years of age.

They do them here too, though I've never been stung, as it were. I'm given to understand that it involves one plain clothes officer in the store to be a witness, and one outside to confiscate the ill-gotten alcohol from the teenager, so I suspect I'd see it coming.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Fri Aug 29, 2014 6:17 am

Gas station clerks are expected to spot fake IDs? What next, check customers' stuff for pipe bombs?
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Fri Aug 29, 2014 6:22 am

Pope Joan wrote:I wish sting operations were not allowed.

Did you know that if you are a public official and I pretend to offer you a bribe, and you do not promptly tell the authorities, you can be charged with extortion even though you never touched or accepted the bribe?

These stings would not be crimes at all but for the police element. It's fantasy, a make believe offense.

The police is not your friend. You, as a citizen, are a neutral factor at best and almost the enemy by default. Just ask the inhabitants of Ferguson.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:16 am

Ayreonia wrote:Gas station clerks are expected to spot fake IDs?

When they're selling alcohol, tobacco, or anything else that's restricted to people above a certain age, yes, up to a point.
What next, check customers' stuff for pipe bombs?

No, that would be completely outside their purview.
Last edited by Ifreann on Fri Aug 29, 2014 7:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Entmonton
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 63
Founded: Jul 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Entmonton » Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:40 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

To be perfectly honest, there is absolutely 0% chance of us ever being able to believe OP's story without a photo of the ID card and minor in question.


Good point. If it is true than it is great the OP lives in a place where cops don't need to worry about rapes, murders, thefts, assaults, drunk drivers, drug dealers, etc. He must live in Mayberry since cops have so much time to focus on victimless crimes.

Hey OP: can you tell us your town location? Some people might enjoy living in such a safe place (even if it is totalitarian).

Emporia, Kansas. Nearly everyone who I know in person says it sucks and that when they get their degrees they plan on bolting without a second thought, and as a gay man, I have to agree; Kansas won't recognize same-sex marriages even if they're done out of state AND there's no clause protecting LGBTs from being fired just for their individuality.
By all means, DON'T come to Kansas; it's not all Yellow Brick Roads and Emerald Cities here. It's more like a Blackhole of Oppression (unless you are white, male, heterosexual and at least middle-class).

Costa Fierro wrote:The dairy down the road (and for those outside of NZ, dairy is local lingo for convenience store) was stung twice for these kinds of things, although the person at the counter at the time didn't actually ask for ID or something along those lines. Personally I don't have any issues with this, as it shows that you should pay attention to your line of work, even one as mundane as this.

They do stings here for cigarettes and alcohol, both of which are freely sold here to people over 18 years of age.

I agree with your statement on paying attention to whatever your job may be, even as something as simple as a clerk. However, she truly did the best she possibly could and yet she gets fired for it. I don't see how this situation is any way, shape or form fair.
SUPPORT +
Capital punishment, environmental protection, euthanasia, laissez-faire policies, LGBT equality, marijuana legalization, 2nd Amendment
NEUTRAL =

OPPOSE -
Caste systems, totalitarianism

UNDECIDED ?
Abortion

Generation 35 (The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.)

User avatar
Entmonton
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 63
Founded: Jul 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Entmonton » Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:41 am

Good Lord, I'm gone for only a day and the topic goes haywire. =/
SUPPORT +
Capital punishment, environmental protection, euthanasia, laissez-faire policies, LGBT equality, marijuana legalization, 2nd Amendment
NEUTRAL =

OPPOSE -
Caste systems, totalitarianism

UNDECIDED ?
Abortion

Generation 35 (The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.)

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:12 am

Entmonton wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
Good point. If it is true than it is great the OP lives in a place where cops don't need to worry about rapes, murders, thefts, assaults, drunk drivers, drug dealers, etc. He must live in Mayberry since cops have so much time to focus on victimless crimes.

Hey OP: can you tell us your town location? Some people might enjoy living in such a safe place (even if it is totalitarian).

Emporia, Kansas. Nearly everyone who I know in person says it sucks and that when they get their degrees they plan on bolting without a second thought, and as a gay man, I have to agree; Kansas won't recognize same-sex marriages even if they're done out of state AND there's no clause protecting LGBTs from being fired just for their individuality.
By all means, DON'T come to Kansas; it's not all Yellow Brick Roads and Emerald Cities here. It's more like a Blackhole of Oppression (unless you are white, male, heterosexual and at least middle-class).

Costa Fierro wrote:The dairy down the road (and for those outside of NZ, dairy is local lingo for convenience store) was stung twice for these kinds of things, although the person at the counter at the time didn't actually ask for ID or something along those lines. Personally I don't have any issues with this, as it shows that you should pay attention to your line of work, even one as mundane as this.

They do stings here for cigarettes and alcohol, both of which are freely sold here to people over 18 years of age.

I agree with your statement on paying attention to whatever your job may be, even as something as simple as a clerk. However, she truly did the best she possibly could and yet she gets fired for it. I don't see how this situation is any way, shape or form fair.


I have heard of that town. Cheap houses and crappy weather but there are worse places to live. Does the town have any crimes involving victims or are all crimes victimless there (ex. people buying tobacco and alcohol underage, gambling, prostitution)? It seems the police don';t have much to do there. Are there any rapes, robberies, murders?

According to this chart there were crimes with victims. It seems the police need to refocus their priorities a bit in that town, sad that so many people on this forum think buying alcohol is more a more serious crime than rape (based on the fact some people on this forum support the police on this matter). Until the rapes and assaults drop to 0 than the police need to focus on those crimes first:

http://www.cityrating.com/crime-statist ... poria.html
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:14 am

Freiheit Reich wrote:
Entmonton wrote:Emporia, Kansas. Nearly everyone who I know in person says it sucks and that when they get their degrees they plan on bolting without a second thought, and as a gay man, I have to agree; Kansas won't recognize same-sex marriages even if they're done out of state AND there's no clause protecting LGBTs from being fired just for their individuality.
By all means, DON'T come to Kansas; it's not all Yellow Brick Roads and Emerald Cities here. It's more like a Blackhole of Oppression (unless you are white, male, heterosexual and at least middle-class).


I agree with your statement on paying attention to whatever your job may be, even as something as simple as a clerk. However, she truly did the best she possibly could and yet she gets fired for it. I don't see how this situation is any way, shape or form fair.


I have heard of that town. Cheap houses and crappy weather but there are worse places to live. Does the town have any crimes involving victims or are all crimes victimless there (ex. people buying tobacco and alcohol underage, gambling, prostitution)? It seems the police don';t have much to do there. Are there any rapes, robberies, murders?

According to this chart there were crimes with victims. It seems the police need to refocus their priorities a bit in that town, sad that so many people on this forum think buying alcohol is more a more serious crime than rape (based on the fact some people on this forum support the police on this matter). Until the rapes and assaults drop to 0 than the police need to focus on those crimes first:

http://www.cityrating.com/crime-statist ... poria.html

What makes you think that this sting took any time away from investigations into rapes and assaults?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112567
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:15 am

Ifreann wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
I have heard of that town. Cheap houses and crappy weather but there are worse places to live. Does the town have any crimes involving victims or are all crimes victimless there (ex. people buying tobacco and alcohol underage, gambling, prostitution)? It seems the police don';t have much to do there. Are there any rapes, robberies, murders?

According to this chart there were crimes with victims. It seems the police need to refocus their priorities a bit in that town, sad that so many people on this forum think buying alcohol is more a more serious crime than rape (based on the fact some people on this forum support the police on this matter). Until the rapes and assaults drop to 0 than the police need to focus on those crimes first:

http://www.cityrating.com/crime-statist ... poria.html

What makes you think that this sting took any time away from investigations into rapes and assaults?

It is a well-known fact - I heard two schoolchildren discussing it just the other day - that the police, indeed, the entire government, is incapable of walking and chewing gum at the same time. In the case of the police, for "gum" read "donuts."
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:53 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Freiheit Reich wrote:
I have heard of that town. Cheap houses and crappy weather but there are worse places to live. Does the town have any crimes involving victims or are all crimes victimless there (ex. people buying tobacco and alcohol underage, gambling, prostitution)? It seems the police don';t have much to do there. Are there any rapes, robberies, murders?

According to this chart there were crimes with victims. It seems the police need to refocus their priorities a bit in that town, sad that so many people on this forum think buying alcohol is more a more serious crime than rape (based on the fact some people on this forum support the police on this matter). Until the rapes and assaults drop to 0 than the police need to focus on those crimes first:

http://www.cityrating.com/crime-statist ... poria.html

What makes you think that this sting took any time away from investigations into rapes and assaults?


Police Comissionar:"Okay, I need everyone in all the precincts to stop what they are doing, Detective smith is sending a boy out on a sting for underage alcohol sales; and I need all the local police assets assistance with this."
Last edited by Tekania on Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:28 am

Ifreann wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:Gas station clerks are expected to spot fake IDs?

When they're selling alcohol, tobacco, or anything else that's restricted to people above a certain age, yes, up to a point.
What next, check customers' stuff for pipe bombs?

No, that would be completely outside their purview.

Contrary to popular belief, spotting a fake ID is not easy, especially if it's well done. Besides, the difference between an 8 and a 9 could easily be mistaken for wear, dirt or a scratch. Gas station clerks are not trained or equipped properly enough to see through a forgery; it would be unreasonable to expect them to do so in every case.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Autumn Wind, Bovad, Great Eternal Taldorei, Trump Almighty, World Anarchic Union, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads