NATION

PASSWORD

Restaurant workers stay hungry as the food industry feasts o

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Restaurant workers stay hungry as the food industry feasts o

Postby Socialist Tera » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:32 am

Here's an uncomfortable truth that supports the thriving food industry in major cities like New York: the people sending out the food at restaurants often could not afford to sit down to a meal at the same tables they serve.

That's why, yesterday, Governor Cuomo announced the formation of a Wage Board "to review and recommend any changes to the relevant regulations for food service workers and service employees in New York State".

In fact, many restaurant workers can't afford much food at all. They're not starving, but they're living a situation known as food insecurity.

A small group of 30 restaurant owners, restaurant workers and their advocates gathered this week in the kitchen of Crema, a restaurant in New York, to talk about solutions to the problem of food insecurity among New York City restaurant workers.

The key finding was the scale of the problem. What few patrons know – or ignore – is that the people who prepare our food very often struggle to feed themselves.

About 32% of restaurant workers would be considered "food insecure" by the US Department of Agriculture's definition, as a newly released report found. Food security means availability of nutritional, safe food, as well as the ability to buy that food. Unfortunately, many restaurant workers cannot afford food that would meet this definition.

Restaurant workers often eat at work, but they are usually only allowed to eat what's called a family meal, which is often prepared by the restaurant for its staff. Almost half of New York restaurant workers, at 49%, did not consider the family meal provided by their restaurant to be nutritious.

"The food is not good. It's gross," says Carolina Portillo, a 35-year-old New Yorker who works in the restaurant industry. Not only is the food lacking in nutrition, but restaurants often do not make enough to feed everybody. Trying to cut costs, restaurants often serve family meals made of leftovers and food about to expire.

Tipping as an economic force

Tips – or the lack of them – make a difference.

"What we hear from our members all the time is that living on tips is hard. It's a constant struggle," says Rahul Saksena, the policy director of the Restaurant Opportunities Center of New York, ROC-NY.

In New York, tipped workers earn $5 an hour and while minimum wage in New York is going to go up to $9 by 2016 because of a deal cut and agreed to by Governor Andrew Cuomo last year, tipped workers are being left out of that raise and will continue to earn $5 an hour.

"We found, in New York city, tipped workers were 30% were more likely than non-tipped workers to be food insecure," he said. In partnership with ROC-The Bay, the organization surveyed 286 food workers in New York and San Francisco.

Martin Sanchez, an eight-year veteran of New York's restaurant industry, says his unstable wages make it hard for his family to budget and afford food.

"Working for tips is not easy, because my wages are usually very unstable. It depends on the hours you get and the customers that come into the restaurant," says Sanchez, a father of five children who currently works as a busboy earning $80 a day.

After working at one restaurant for six years, Sanchez was let go. At his current job, he is the new guy – which means he gets fewer hours, about 35 or less a week, and worse shifts than the senior staff. He earns a tipped minimum wage of $5, plus a fraction of tips that a server would. There is no overtime or extra hours.

"The salary I earn doesn't help me support my family, my five daughters," he says. Currently, his wife does not work and the poverty level for a family of seven is $36,020 a year, twice as much as his annual income. "It's always difficult for me to eat for myself, and to make sure that my family eats well."

Chefs at work in a French restaurant … what's causing the culinary crisis?
Food prepared at restaurants is often not the same as what those restaurants make available for their own employees. Photograph: Alamy
"You have to be really organized to make sure that have enough money to buy food," says Portillo. "I work three jobs."

After having her hours cut at her full-time job, Portillo was forced to find another job to make ends meet. Currently, she works at two restaurants. At one restaurant, she is a server. At another, she is a prep-cook. On her only day off, she works at the culinary school, where she gets paid and her works also counts as school credit towards one of their programs.

While she has only herself to feed, she too struggles to make enough to maintain a health and balanced diet. According to her, about half of her coworkers are married with kids.

"A lot of the times, they are not able to feed their families at home, because they earn so little," says Diana Robinson, education coordinator of the Food Chain Workers Alliance. About 20% of restaurant workers rely on food stamps, also known as Snap, according to the ROC-NY and ROC-The Bay survey.

There is nothing special about Portillo's situation. Currently, about seven million Americans – usually those holding low-wage jobs – hold two in order to make ends meet. More than three-and-a-half million people have one full-time and one part-time job, while almost two million people have two part-time jobs; another million have two jobs of which at least one's hours vary.

The harsh realities of food and drink industry

The hospitality industry grows consistently but is often based on a harsh economic model: what fuels restaurants are low-wage jobs, with a limited number of hours and unpredictable schedules.

About 10.6 million Americans were employed in the food and drink industry in June, according to the Department of Labor. Usually, only about a million of these jobs are supervisory positions held by restaurant managers and owners. The other nine-and-a-half million are waiters, food runners, busboys, cooks, dishwashers and porters.

In April, on average, a typical employee in the industry made $11.05 an hour and worked under 25 hours a week. Last year, cooks earned on average $11.07 an hour and waiters earned $9.90 – including tips.

These wages are higher than the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour and the tipped minimum wage of $2.13, but are not enough to actually make a living.

The federal tipped minimum wage is $2.13, remaining unchanged since 1996. Only seven states have eliminated this sub-wage so far. A few others, like New York, have increased their hourly tipped minimum wage.

"We work nine, 10-hour long shifts and we get maybe 10 minutes to eat. It's not a real break," says Portillo.

US Money restaurant workers food security
The vast majority of the 10.6 million Americans in the food industry work as waiters, runners, busboys, cooks, dishwashers and porters. Photograph: Alamy
"When [workers] do eat at their restaurants, often times the food they are given is not the food that we as customers demand when we go to restaurants. It's not the healthy stuff, it's not the organic stuff, it's not the local stuff. Often it's old and expired," explains Saksena.

"It's sad that we, the restaurant food workers that cook and serve the food, that we are not able to eat well for ourselves," says Sanchez.

For many workers, however, staff meal is their only option. According to the ROC-NY and ROC- The Bay survey, 28% relied on the staff meal because they couldn't afford to buy enough food. Another 22% relied on it because they didn't have time to cook.

In order to improve food-security among restaurant workers, Saksena recommends increasing wages, providing staff with stable full-time positions and paid sick-days.

Unions, wage theft and undocumented workers

In addition to increasing the tipped minimum wage, there are other ways to ensure that workers are able to afford food. One of them is making sure that more restaurant workers are represented by unions.

In 2013, only 1.8% of food and drink industry workers were represented by the union. Such representation can lead to about $100 more in earning each week. Those represented by unions earned on average $535 a week, while non-union workers earned $430 a week.

A green card and/or social security number can make quite a difference as well, found ROC-NY.

Undocumented workers, vulnerable, are often more susceptible to wage theft from employers, something that should not happen to anyone, according to Sonia Lin, a general counsel at the New York City mayor's office of Immigration affairs.

"Minimum wage laws which protect against wage theft, against deprivation of overtime or tip stealing, they apply to everybody, regardless of your immigration status, regardless of whether you are here with documentation or without documentation," she said. "It's basic standards. That's the floor that all employers need to meet."

Yet, due to wage theft and being pay practices, undocumented immigration restaurant workers were 25% more likely to experience food insecurity than documented workers and US citizens, said Saksena.

"It's not a secret that this is an industry that's built on the back of immigrant workers, especially here in New York," he added.

Sources: http://www.theguardian.com/money/us-mon ... ees-hungry
http://rocny.org/foodinsecurity/
This is obvious commodities in capitalism are made not for consumption but for exchange in capitalist society.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:50 am

Here's an uncomfortable truth that supports the thriving food industry in major cities like New York: the people sending out the food at restaurants often could not afford to sit down to a meal at the same tables they serve.


..and?

I'm sorry, but I think this is rather a pointless point. New York is a major city, and so food is going to be expensive as it is, especially in restaurants. Most people can't afford to eat out on a regular basis in fancy restaurants. It's a very attractive sounding bullet point on wage poverty, but the service industry is well known for being a minimum wage industry.

Hotel cleaners are unlikely to be able to afford to stay in the rooms they clean, either.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:59 am

Lordieth wrote:
Here's an uncomfortable truth that supports the thriving food industry in major cities like New York: the people sending out the food at restaurants often could not afford to sit down to a meal at the same tables they serve.


..and?

I'm sorry, but I think this is rather a pointless point. New York is a major city, and so food is going to be expensive as it is, especially in restaurants. Most people can't afford to eat out on a regular basis in fancy restaurants. It's a very attractive sounding bullet point on wage poverty, but the service industry is well known for being a minimum wage industry.

Hotel cleaners are unlikely to be able to afford to stay in the rooms they clean, either.


This. That someone working in a car dealership could afford a car they sell isn't a given either. This should come as no surprise and is a non-issue. I'm not saying the other points may not be valid, but this one sure isn't.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:03 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
..and?

I'm sorry, but I think this is rather a pointless point. New York is a major city, and so food is going to be expensive as it is, especially in restaurants. Most people can't afford to eat out on a regular basis in fancy restaurants. It's a very attractive sounding bullet point on wage poverty, but the service industry is well known for being a minimum wage industry.

Hotel cleaners are unlikely to be able to afford to stay in the rooms they clean, either.


This. That someone working in a car dealership could afford a car they sell isn't a given either. This should come as no surprise and is a non-issue. I'm not saying the other points may not be valid, but this one sure isn't.


Not that wage poverty and the rich/poor divide aren't serious issues of course, but I don't see how being able to afford the services you offer has any relevance or bearing on the situation.

Usually the type of work you do dictates the wage, not the cost of the service.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:04 am

Lordieth wrote:
Here's an uncomfortable truth that supports the thriving food industry in major cities like New York: the people sending out the food at restaurants often could not afford to sit down to a meal at the same tables they serve.


..and?

I'm sorry, but I think this is rather a pointless point. New York is a major city, and so food is going to be expensive as it is, especially in restaurants. Most people can't afford to eat out on a regular basis in fancy restaurants. It's a very attractive sounding bullet point on wage poverty, but the service industry is well known for being a minimum wage industry.

Hotel cleaners are unlikely to be able to afford to stay in the rooms they clean, either.

That's a pretty sound point.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Hyfling
Minister
 
Posts: 2478
Founded: May 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hyfling » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:21 am

If I worked as a luxury car salesman, I likely couldn't afford the cars that I sell...is this a shocking injustice as well? Some food costs more, some costs less and it doesn't really surprise that some restaurant workers can't afford the food they sell, less so in a city like New York.

User avatar
Britannic Realms
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1807
Founded: Apr 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Britannic Realms » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:23 am

When I first saw this, I thought you were saying that people were literally going hungry. After reading the article, it's a complete non-issue. So what if they can't eat out?
British, Bisexual, Protestant

Pro: civil rights for all, Scottish unionism, electoral reform, mixed economics, NATO, Commonwealth, foreign aid, nuclear weapons
Neutral: Irish unionism, European Union
Anti: fascism, communism, neoliberalism, populism
Disclaimer: Many of my past forum posts (particularly the oldest ones) are not representative of my current views, I'm way more progressive than I was back then lol.

User avatar
Fireye
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fireye » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:32 am

:palm:

While I DO agree that restaurants should pay their fucking workers, and not rely on those of us who dine there to supplement their income (tips should be for good or exceptional service, not a nigh-guarantee), this is a non-issue.
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/235745/

Proud Member of the National Canine Association. We Defend Dogs and Dog Owners Alike

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:46 am

*Read thread*

Oh yes, how dare those unwashed peasants complain about not being paid enough to afford nutritious meals. They should be thankful they have a job in the first place. Can a hotel worker afford to stay in the hotel for a week? Of course not! Can a luxury car dealer afford to buy luxury cars? Of course not! People can survive without staying in hotels for a week or buying luxury cars, they can definitely survive without nutritious food.

Because it's obviously the little people's problems, not ours. /whole thing is sarcasm of course
Last edited by Gauthier on Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163933
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:50 am

Britannic Realms wrote:When I first saw this, I thought you were saying that people were literally going hungry. After reading the article, it's a complete non-issue. So what if they can't eat out?

Are you sure you read the article? Because that's not actually what it's saying.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129572
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ethel mermania » Fri Aug 01, 2014 5:56 am

what the article doesnt mention, this is about unionizing the restaurant workers.

unions prefer higher wages and less tips the workers so far the opposite
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Britannic Realms
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1807
Founded: Apr 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Britannic Realms » Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:04 am

Ifreann wrote:
Britannic Realms wrote:When I first saw this, I thought you were saying that people were literally going hungry. After reading the article, it's a complete non-issue. So what if they can't eat out?

Are you sure you read the article? Because that's not actually what it's saying.


Well I read the first part. It wasn't concise enough for me to read anymore.
British, Bisexual, Protestant

Pro: civil rights for all, Scottish unionism, electoral reform, mixed economics, NATO, Commonwealth, foreign aid, nuclear weapons
Neutral: Irish unionism, European Union
Anti: fascism, communism, neoliberalism, populism
Disclaimer: Many of my past forum posts (particularly the oldest ones) are not representative of my current views, I'm way more progressive than I was back then lol.

User avatar
Fireye
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1245
Founded: Mar 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fireye » Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:06 am

Gauthier wrote:*Read thread*

Oh yes, how dare those unwashed peasants complain about not being paid enough to afford nutritious meals.

*reads thread*

yes, because being unable to afford to eat at a particular restaurant means you can't have any nutritious foods at all. Because it's totally not cheaper to buy ingredients from the grocery store than it is to eat out every meal.
http://www.politicaltest.net/test/result/235745/

Proud Member of the National Canine Association. We Defend Dogs and Dog Owners Alike

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:13 am

Fireye wrote:
Gauthier wrote:*Read thread*

Oh yes, how dare those unwashed peasants complain about not being paid enough to afford nutritious meals.

*reads thread*

yes, because being unable to afford to eat at a particular restaurant means you can't have any nutritious foods at all. Because it's totally not cheaper to buy ingredients from the grocery store than it is to eat out every meal.


Because "Food Insecurity" means "Can't Afford to Eat at Restaurant" obviously. :roll:
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:46 am

Socialist Tera wrote:Here's an uncomfortable truth that supports the thriving food industry in major cities like New York: the people sending out the food at restaurants often could not afford to sit down to a meal at the same tables they serve.


Looks rather normal about everywhere. I would guess the problem is something else - like not being paid enough to eat at their own home, and to pay for a decent housing.
Last edited by Risottia on Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
.

User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:01 am

Lordieth wrote:
Here's an uncomfortable truth that supports the thriving food industry in major cities like New York: the people sending out the food at restaurants often could not afford to sit down to a meal at the same tables they serve.


..and?

I'm sorry, but I think this is rather a pointless point. New York is a major city, and so food is going to be expensive as it is, especially in restaurants. Most people can't afford to eat out on a regular basis in fancy restaurants. It's a very attractive sounding bullet point on wage poverty, but the service industry is well known for being a minimum wage industry.

Hotel cleaners are unlikely to be able to afford to stay in the rooms they clean, either.

I don't think you understand the seriousness of food insecurity.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:06 am

Socialist Tera wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
..and?

I'm sorry, but I think this is rather a pointless point. New York is a major city, and so food is going to be expensive as it is, especially in restaurants. Most people can't afford to eat out on a regular basis in fancy restaurants. It's a very attractive sounding bullet point on wage poverty, but the service industry is well known for being a minimum wage industry.

Hotel cleaners are unlikely to be able to afford to stay in the rooms they clean, either.

I don't think you understand the seriousness of food insecurity.

I don't think you understand the seriousness of homelessness.

Really, you chose the shittiest article ever to talk about poverty among wage workers.
.

User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:10 am

Risottia wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:I don't think you understand the seriousness of food insecurity.

I don't think you understand the seriousness of homelessness.

Really, you chose the shittiest article ever to talk about poverty among wage workers.

If the article pisses you off, there is always Maoist rebel news: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQeJuYd ... RYS7f_TkVA
The point is that food and homes are treated as things for exchange not things to be consumed or lived in.
Last edited by Socialist Tera on Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:27 am

Fireye wrote:
Gauthier wrote:*Read thread*

Oh yes, how dare those unwashed peasants complain about not being paid enough to afford nutritious meals.

*reads thread*

yes, because being unable to afford to eat at a particular restaurant means you can't have any nutritious foods at all. Because it's totally not cheaper to buy ingredients from the grocery store than it is to eat out every meal.


The line about workers not being able to afford the meals at the restaurants they work at was just a hook. You obviously did not read past the first line of the article, because it goes on to discuss specifically how these workers struggle to even afford to buy groceries.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:11 am

Fireye wrote:
Gauthier wrote:*Read thread*

Oh yes, how dare those unwashed peasants complain about not being paid enough to afford nutritious meals.

*reads thread*

yes, because being unable to afford to eat at a particular restaurant means you can't have any nutritious foods at all. Because it's totally not cheaper to buy ingredients from the grocery store than it is to eat out every meal.

You don't gotta lie to kick it.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Freiheit Reich
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5510
Founded: May 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Freiheit Reich » Fri Aug 01, 2014 9:30 am

Don't like it? Get a better job then. They should be grateful they have a job. If they compare their lives to the average farmers in Niger and Bangladesh, they have it made. Besides, why live in one of the most expensive cities in the world if you want to be a fast food cook or waiter? Move to a cheaper city like Pittsburgh, Indianapolis, or Louisville.

Moving is not expensive-you pack everything you can in a suitcase, sell what you can't carry, and get a bus ticket. Your savings from 1 month of rent will cover all the moving costs to the new and cheaper city. NYC rents are ridiculous.
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.87

User avatar
Ralkovian Grand Island
Minister
 
Posts: 2124
Founded: Dec 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ralkovian Grand Island » Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:12 am

Socialist Tera wrote:This is obvious commodities in capitalism are made not for consumption but for exchange in capitalist society.


Commodities are made for consumption and exchange everywhere. Literally the only economic system that exists where commodities are not made for exchange would be based on subsidence where you can't exchange them.

A farmer doesn't farm just so he has a fuck ton of wheat, because he really loves wheat. He grows it to exchange for something else, like a toaster. The guy who makes toasters doesn't really want a fuck ton of toasters, but he doesn't want a fuck ton of wheat either. It doesn't matter if the Government said "Hey Farm Guy, we'll give you your daily ration of toasters if you give us your daily wheat" or if some fuckwad says "Hey toaster guy, I'll give you a this paper with cool writing on it, give me some toasters, I'm going to go sell it to the wheat guy."

In both cases, there is an exchange.

If you think Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, or any other form of economic system doesn't exchange commodities, then you really need a fucking lesson, because this is literally elementary school shit that you're fucking up on.
Lyras:You know, you're a sick fuck, yes?
Ralk: I have stacks on stacks and racks on racks of slaves.
BlueHorizons: It sounds like you're doing a commercial for the most morbid children's board game ever, Ralk.

Estainia: The countless genocides...So many countless genocides.


Old Tyrannia wrote:You've never met Ralk before, have you? Ralk doesn't have friends.
He only respects the strong, and preys on the weak.
He might act polite and smile all the time, but always remember...
The day will come when you'll wake up to find him looming over your bed,
knife in hand, and he'll still be smiling.

Constaniana wrote:Ralk is evil incarnate, shouldn't you know this by now?

Seriong wrote:Ralk isn't a troll, he's just despicable.

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:15 am

OP, I find it rather silly that you're blaming this on the food industry. Some people simply can't afford to buy fancy meals, and the people working in the food industry cannot because they're being payed lower wages than the "higher-ups" in the food industry. There is nothing inherently wrong with that.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:43 am

Ralkovian Grand Island wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:This is obvious commodities in capitalism are made not for consumption but for exchange in capitalist society.


Commodities are made for consumption and exchange everywhere. Literally the only economic system that exists where commodities are not made for exchange would be based on subsidence where you can't exchange them.

A farmer doesn't farm just so he has a fuck ton of wheat, because he really loves wheat. He grows it to exchange for something else, like a toaster. The guy who makes toasters doesn't really want a fuck ton of toasters, but he doesn't want a fuck ton of wheat either. It doesn't matter if the Government said "Hey Farm Guy, we'll give you your daily ration of toasters if you give us your daily wheat" or if some fuckwad says "Hey toaster guy, I'll give you a this paper with cool writing on it, give me some toasters, I'm going to go sell it to the wheat guy."

In both cases, there is an exchange.

If you think Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, or any other form of economic system doesn't exchange commodities, then you really need a fucking lesson, because this is literally elementary school shit that you're fucking up on.

Then, why are million of food produced if they just chuck it out because it is not bought?

Freiheit Reich wrote:Don't like it? Get a better job then. They should be grateful they have a job. If they compare their lives to the average farmers in Niger and Bangladesh, they have it made. Besides, why live in one of the most expensive cities in the world if you want to be a fast food cook or waiter? Move to a cheaper city like Pittsburgh, Indianapolis, or Louisville.

Moving is not expensive-you pack everything you can in a suitcase, sell what you can't carry, and get a bus ticket. Your savings from 1 month of rent will cover all the moving costs to the new and cheaper city. NYC rents are ridiculous.

It's a national problem. Hence the federal minimum wage is $2.13/hour. Not all workers can get good jobs, why do you hate the lower class?
Last edited by Socialist Tera on Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Fri Aug 01, 2014 10:56 am

Minimum wage should apply to everyone, including waitstaff. It would fix this.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerula, Kostane, Spirit of Hope, The Two Jerseys

Advertisement

Remove ads