Advertisement
by Pandeeria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:38 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Skenderos » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:39 pm
by Conserative Morality » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:39 pm
by New Educandi » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:40 pm
Libervida wrote:I was having an argument with a friend who is a leftist. She argues that socialism and nationalism cannot exist together. However I feel that they can. She is going from a marxist perspective and definition of socialism which is explicitly against the bourguoise idea of nationalism, however I would simply define socialism in more pragmatic real terms: state ownership of production. (I realise the term is rather void of meaning over the last century) Our crux of difference was that she defined national socialism for example as corporatism rather than socialsm.)
I argued that ideologies using both have existed: IRA, Ba'thism, Mugabe, Ideologies of national liberation, some leftist palestinian organisations, pan-arabism etc. (It could be argued that one should not accept the self definition of such ideologies, but rather take a pragmatic analysis)
What say ye? Can nationalism and socialism exist side by side.
(pardon my English, it is not my first language.)
Carbon based lifeforms wrote:So your idea is to reduce taxes?
That's a great idea! Why has no one else ever thought of that? You must be an exceptional genius.
Mefpan wrote:Comparing "My I.Q. is one of the highest" Donald "I'm starting to wonder myself whether he was born in this country" Trump to a fart in order to ruin his reputation is like attempting to raise the temperature of a volcano by throwing a lit match into it.
by Pandeeria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:40 pm
The United Communist Solar Republic wrote:I am a Democratic Socialist and a nationalist, I love America with all my heart and would die for it, and I believe that Socialism is the best way to go for America. I don't misunderstand either of the concepts of Nationalism or Socialism. I am literally living proof that they can co-exist.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Dejanic » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:40 pm
Skenderos wrote:Every heard of Yugoslavia
by Baiynistan » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:41 pm
by Dejanic » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:42 pm
Pandeeria wrote:The United Communist Solar Republic wrote:I am a Democratic Socialist and a nationalist, I love America with all my heart and would die for it, and I believe that Socialism is the best way to go for America. I don't misunderstand either of the concepts of Nationalism or Socialism. I am literally living proof that they can co-exist.
No you're not.
America also doesn't need Socialism.
by Dejanic » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:43 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Yes. See: Josip Broz Tito
by Arab Republic of Syria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:44 pm
by Kuzbeckistan » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:44 pm
by Pandeeria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:45 pm
Dejanic wrote:
Yo, a bit off topic, but I generally agree with most things you say, and I understand your dislike for Socialism. So I wish, I wish so so much, that you would just call yourself a Social Democrat instead of a Liberal Socialist.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Dejanic » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:46 pm
Arab Republic of Syria wrote:Countries need nationalism, its the only reasonable way for a human to run things.
Nationalism and Socialism can co-exist, the idea of International Communism, Globalism, and Globalization/International Capitalism are pure evil.
Only Jesus goes past borders.
by Arab Republic of Syria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:46 pm
Dejanic wrote:Arab Republic of Syria wrote:Countries need nationalism, its the only reasonable way for a human to run things.
Nationalism and Socialism can co-exist, the idea of International Communism, Globalism, and Globalization/International Capitalism are pure evil.
Only Jesus goes past borders.
Syria is an artificial nation, it's borders were drawn up by colonial powers.
Oh, how's that Nationalism working out for the Syrian people, by the way?
by Dejanic » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:47 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Dejanic wrote:Yo, a bit off topic, but I generally agree with most things you say, and I understand your dislike for Socialism. So I wish, I wish so so much, that you would just call yourself a Social Democrat instead of a Liberal Socialist.
Well I like to call myself a Liberal Socialist just to screw with others.
And the term "Social Democrat" is a bit too vague.
by Dejanic » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:48 pm
Arab Republic of Syria wrote:Dejanic wrote:Syria is an artificial nation, it's borders were drawn up by colonial powers.
Oh, how's that Nationalism working out for the Syrian people, by the way?
Takfiri rats such as the FSA are trying to destroy the Syrian nation.
These are Syria’s natural borders.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Syria
by Nickel Empire » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:48 pm
by The New Sea Territory » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:48 pm
| Ⓐ ☭ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᚨ ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore
by Arab Republic of Syria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:49 pm
Dejanic wrote:Arab Republic of Syria wrote:
Takfiri rats such as the FSA are trying to destroy the Syrian nation.
These are Syria’s natural borders.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Syria
Na sorry, most of that land is going to be part of the future Greater Serbian Kingdom, led by me and the ghost of Milosevic, try again.
by Dejanic » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:51 pm
by Great Britain and Austrasia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:52 pm
by Liberaxia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:52 pm
Arkolon wrote:Kumuri wrote:"In my writings on the national question I have already said that an abstract presentation of the question of nationalism in general is of no use at all. A distinction must necessarily be made between the nationalism of an oppressor nation and that of an oppressed nation, the nationalism of a big nation and that of a small nation."
-V. I. Lenin
Basically, a huge capitalist empire would be a no, but a small nation trying to get out of the clutches of said empire would be a yes.
Obviously, this would be the Leninist perspective. As for other types of socialist ideologies, I'm not sure.
Doesn't this totally-cohesive logic fall into the same strand of logic as "it's OK to be racist as long as you're not white"-- "it's OK to be a nationalist as long as you're not the dominant country". Pretty faulty if you ask me.
And [tru] capitalism and the modern state, and even less so an imperialist institution, cannot coexist.
by Conserative Morality » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:52 pm
Dejanic wrote:See: Poverty, unemployment, death, deportations, me.
by Arab Republic of Syria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:52 pm
Dejanic wrote:I think it's probably best that your nation tries to sort out it's horrific civil war before you start talking about territorial expansionism, your claims are as legitimate at the moment as Greece's claims over Constantinople.
by Arab Republic of Syria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:53 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Philjia
Advertisement