Advertisement
by Oneracon » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:44 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Costa Fierro » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:49 pm
by Oneracon » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:51 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:It's in Russia's on interested to provide their spin on events. After all, no one wants to be implicated in an act of mass manslaughter.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by The Orson Empire » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:38 pm
by Greater Beggnig » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:25 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:39 am
The Orson Empire wrote:What is with all of these aircraft crashing?
Seriously, there have been 3 aircraft crashes in the span of just 1 week.
by Roski » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:43 am
by Limborg » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:32 am
Spirit of Hope wrote:Registug wrote:All the flights I've been on have been from Aus to Indonesia, they're hardly more than a couple hundred. >_>
I really can't say how much more it would cost, but it would be a lot.
Well A quick look up of Aviation fuel said $6 a gallon, though this was for small prop planes not big jet liners. A Boeing 777 can hold around 45,000 gallons of fuel, so $270,000 to completely fill. If the route over the Ukraine saves 10% on fuel that is $27,000 a flight, or $69 per passenger (assuming 386 passengers). And I wouldn't be surprised if the price I found for fuel was low.
Plus as mentioned one of the better alternate routs goes over Syria, which isn't that much of an improvement safety wise.
by Costa Fierro » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:35 am
Oneracon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:It's in Russia's on interested to provide their spin on events. After all, no one wants to be implicated in an act of mass manslaughter.
Oh no doubt you wouldn't want to be implicated in potential war crimes.
It's just impressive to watch the Kremlin PR machine in action, and how effective it is at controlling the opinions of the public.
by Roski » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:36 am
Limborg wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:Well A quick look up of Aviation fuel said $6 a gallon, though this was for small prop planes not big jet liners. A Boeing 777 can hold around 45,000 gallons of fuel, so $270,000 to completely fill. If the route over the Ukraine saves 10% on fuel that is $27,000 a flight, or $69 per passenger (assuming 386 passengers). And I wouldn't be surprised if the price I found for fuel was low.
Plus as mentioned one of the better alternate routs goes over Syria, which isn't that much of an improvement safety wise.
Fun fact though, all flights now avoid Ukriane, and they haven't gotten more expensive at all, at least not over here.
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:08 am
by Organized States » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:15 am
Limborg wrote:Registug wrote:they need more fuel when taking a longer route. more fuel costs more. and not by a few dollars worth.
Are a few bucks worth the loss of a plane and the loss of so many lives? I don't think so.Organized States wrote:As in hundreds of thousands of dollars, AV Gas is expensive you know. That flight would have cost them more than they would more than they would have made. The routes Limborg has stated would cost them millions of dollars more than they would have made.
1.Then why do all airliners fly those routes now?
2.Source.
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:26 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:26 am
Organized States wrote:Limborg wrote:
Are a few bucks worth the loss of a plane and the loss of so many lives? I don't think so.
1.Then why do all airliners fly those routes now?
2.Source.
1. Trying to avoid being sued for endangering passengers (only a few however, most are going over Syria now).
2. Math. Calculate fuel costs (including the total fuel cost) on top of permits to fly over the new countries, paying employees, and taxes.
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:28 am
by Roski » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:30 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Roski wrote:
And I am sure you have the source for that, and you aren't just speaking out of your ass, as you have been the whole time?
Well a ticket from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur and back is 580 euros according to Tix.nl, a major Dutch booking site. If there is a difference with before, it's not major.
It could, of course, be that the airlines are taking the extra loss on profit instead of overcharging customers. Aviation is quite a competitive market, especially with the rise of website that compare prices, and raising ticket prices could cost you more then it will gain you (simple price elasticity).
In other news (though some of it is old), the Dutch are sending 60 unarmed military police officers to the crash site and have put two air force brigades on stand-by and a Russian paper used "Forgive us, Holland" as their headline today.
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:33 am
Roski wrote:Kahlenberg wrote:
Well a ticket from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur and back is 580 euros according to Tix.nl, a major Dutch booking site. If there is a difference with before, it's not major.
It could, of course, be that the airlines are taking the extra loss on profit instead of overcharging customers. Aviation is quite a competitive market, especially with the rise of website that compare prices, and raising ticket prices could cost you more then it will gain you (simple price elasticity).
In other news (though some of it is old), the Dutch are sending 60 unarmed military police officers to the crash site and have put two air force brigades on stand-by and a Russian paper used "Forgive us, Holland" as their headline today.
So basically, its still not going up, but the prices went up?
That's really generous of the capitalist world, really
by Registug » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:34 am
Greater Beggnig wrote:Has the Netherlands submitted its UN Proposal to have a multi-national police force securing the crash site?
Or is it being drafted?
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:35 am
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:40 am
Registug wrote:I think we're also sending some Army personnel, as the AFP are unarmed
by Organized States » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:41 am
Registug wrote:I think we're also sending some Army personnel, as the AFP are unarmed
by Roski » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:41 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Registug wrote:I think we're also sending some Army personnel, as the AFP are unarmed
I heard the idea is not to send in armed men at this point in order not to provoke escalation of the conflict in the area. I guess Australia keeps some special forces or airborne units stand-by and in proximity to the crash site as well in case the unarmed policemen of either country are attacked.
by Registug » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:45 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Registug wrote:I think we're also sending some Army personnel, as the AFP are unarmed
I heard the idea is not to send in armed men at this point in order not to provoke escalation of the conflict in the area. I guess Australia keeps some special forces or airborne units stand-by and in proximity to the crash site as well in case the unarmed policemen of either country are attacked.
by Organized States » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:46 am
Roski wrote:Kahlenberg wrote:
I heard the idea is not to send in armed men at this point in order not to provoke escalation of the conflict in the area. I guess Australia keeps some special forces or airborne units stand-by and in proximity to the crash site as well in case the unarmed policemen of either country are attacked.
But what are the unarmed policemen going to do if attacked? Its not like a Leopard tank column (closest NATO country with sick tanks) is nearby? They gonna wag their fingers at them?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Galanica, Hidrandia, Rusozak, Shrillland, The Huskar Social Union, Tungstan, Unogonduria
Advertisement