NATION

PASSWORD

What are your political beliefs?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

(pick whatever's closest to what you identify as) and you are a(n)

Communist
72
10%
Socialist
136
18%
Capitalist
83
11%
Liberal
96
13%
Moderate
64
9%
Conservative
75
10%
Anarchist
43
6%
Fascist
49
7%
Libertarian
73
10%
Other (explain pls)
48
6%
 
Total votes : 739

User avatar
Liberaxia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1824
Founded: Aug 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberaxia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:30 pm

One question: Why the fuck are there so many socialists on this website?
Favors: Civil Libertarianism, Constitutional Democratic Republicanism, Multilateralism, Freedom of Commerce, Popular Sovereignty, Intellectual Property, Fiat Currency, Competition Law, Intergovernmentalism, Privacy Rights
Opposes: The Security State, The Police State, Mob Rule, Traditionalism, Theocracy, Monarchism, Paternalism, Religious Law, Debt
Your friendly pro-commerce, anti-market nation.
On libertarians: The ideology whose major problem is the existence of other people with different views.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:33 pm

Liberaxia wrote:One question: Why the fuck are there so many socialists on this website?

My hypothesis:
Because some of the socialists have managed to convince others here to become socialists, and because the world isn't socialist - hence a lot of socialists are dissatisfied with the world and search the internet for nation simulation games because the idea of creating an ideal nation sounds fun. Google sends them to NS. (The second reason probably also explains the disproportion numbers of an-caps, fascists, etc. - people who identify with ideologies and policies that are not mainstream.)
Last edited by Conscentia on Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kumuri
Diplomat
 
Posts: 845
Founded: Mar 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kumuri » Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:41 pm

Conscentia wrote:
Liberaxia wrote:One question: Why the fuck are there so many socialists on this website?

My hypothesis:
Because some of the socialists have managed to convince others here to become socialists, and because the world isn't socialist - hence a lot of socialists are dissatisfied with the world and search the internet for nation simulation games because the idea of creating an ideal nation sounds fun. Google sends them to NS. (The second reason probably also explains the disproportion numbers of an-caps, fascists, etc. - people who identify with ideologies and policies that are not mainstream.)

Yeah, that, and also for me I find that simulations and RP-type things help me imagine my philosophy a little more. (Not that Kumuri as represented by the game is all that accurate. The only way to change it is by issues, and those don't usually even have my proposed solution as a possible choice.)
As much as political groups may trash each other about creating "fairy tales" about their ideal world, it's not too horrible an idea to imagine how your system would actually play out.
Last edited by Kumuri on Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
╔═════════════════════════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ═════════════════════════════════════╗
dead
╚═════════════════════════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ═════════════════════════════════════╝

User avatar
Ashyaria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 457
Founded: Jun 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Ashyaria » Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:42 pm

Anarchism is a confusing topic:

I like these ideals:
>People can associate with whoever they like and do whatever they want without any interference
>people working together in their group/tribe for the benefit of their group collectively

If you've ever played, for say, minecraft factions raiding, that's the general idea.


I guess you could call me an anarcho-survivalist of sorts
Federal Commonwealth of Ashyaria

Centrism, Party Abolitionism, Regionalism, Pipelines, Socialised Health & Education,
GSAs, Space Exploration, Meat & Synthmeat
Conservatism, Fascism, Veganism, Pit Bulls, Cannabis Prohibition

---------------------------------------------| A type 6 civilization. |---------------------------------------------


User avatar
Sol Nascente
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 155
Founded: Mar 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sol Nascente » Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:50 pm

Commie.

User avatar
Urran
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14434
Founded: Jan 22, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Urran » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:17 am

Moderate.

Pro capitalism, pro gun, pro life, small government, no national healthcare, ect.

I used to not be, but, after mulling it over and a few things happening in my personal life, both with family and friends, and general life experience, I'm for gay rights. Unfortunately, I have a bit of a reputation as a homophobe, that needs to change.
A lie doesn't become truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it's accepted by a majority.
Proud Coastie
The Blood Ravens wrote: How wonderful. Its like Japan, and 1950''s America had a baby. All the racism of the 50s, and everything else Japanese.

I <3 James May

I wear teal, blue & pink for Swith
❤BITTEN BY THE VAMPIRE QUEEN OF COOKIES❤

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:50 pm

Lalaki wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:well, I'm big on rights, freedom, and all the jazz mostly in the liberal/libertarian camp. I would say capitalist to a point from what I understand best described as the Nordic model, or at least capitalist with a welfare state in there. I think everything takes time, so I guess that makes me progressive (apparently "ultra-progressive"), and support various forms of Egalitarianism (equality of opportunity, equality of persons' rights).

Think that's about it?


Well, we would certainly agree on a lot.


That's probably true from what I saw from the libertarian Thread, though you be truthful I'm not as knowledgeable as you seem to be on these subjects. Though I do wish to listen and possibly learn from others about these sorts of things:3
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:38 am

I'm an egalitarian cosmopolitan social democrat who struggles every day with his inner left-wing civic nationalist.

I envision a transition into socialism when humanity as a whole is far more advanced technologically than it is now, but I don't tend to concern myself with things that will only happen in any realistic and working manner in another two centuries at least.
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:32 am

Kiruri wrote:I'm a neoliberal democrat.. it would seem...

I had that result 2 months ago. Now it slightly changed (really not that much) according to politicaltest.net, and I am a neoconservative.

User avatar
Magna Libero
Minister
 
Posts: 2864
Founded: Jun 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Magna Libero » Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:01 am

Anarchism and capitalism (free market more importantly).
hi

User avatar
Lalaki
Senator
 
Posts: 3676
Founded: May 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lalaki » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:30 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Lalaki wrote:
Well, we would certainly agree on a lot.


That's probably true from what I saw from the libertarian Thread, though you be truthful I'm not as knowledgeable as you seem to be on these subjects. Though I do wish to listen and possibly learn from others about these sorts of things:3


I thank you for that compliment. Although Arkolon and Atlanticatia are probably that main drivers of that thread, the the former in favor of libertarianism and the latter in favor of social democracy. I side with the latter, but both of them are very smart debaters.
Born again free market capitalist.

User avatar
The Abbadids
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Abbadids » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:34 pm

I consider myself a far leftist, though I am not utterly convinced that a country without capitalism can succeed without returning to state capitalism and the state taking full control of all aspects of society, including voting. If a Socialist state manages to fulfill their promises, while maintaining the freedom we fought for, I would become a socialist in a heartbeat.
I am not actually a crazy nationalistic moralist, I live in Norway :). I just want to roleplay something completely opposite of my political spectrum :) See ya!

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:39 pm

Magna Libero wrote:Anarchism and capitalism (free market more importantly).
Anarchism is not compatible with capitalism.
The Abbadids wrote:I consider myself a far leftist, though I am not utterly convinced that a country without capitalism can succeed without returning to state capitalism and the state taking full control of all aspects of society, including voting. If a Socialist state manages to fulfill their promises, while maintaining the freedom we fought for, I would become a socialist in a heartbeat.
What you just described is authoritarian state capitalism, not socialism.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3441
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korouse » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:43 pm

I'm starting to lean to the centre-right.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3441
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korouse » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:44 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Magna Libero wrote:Anarchism and capitalism (free market more importantly).
Anarchism is not compatible with capitalism.
The Abbadids wrote:I consider myself a far leftist, though I am not utterly convinced that a country without capitalism can succeed without returning to state capitalism and the state taking full control of all aspects of society, including voting. If a Socialist state manages to fulfill their promises, while maintaining the freedom we fought for, I would become a socialist in a heartbeat.
What you just described is authoritarian state capitalism, not socialism.

Anarchism is actually compatible with Capitalism, Anarchism simply means no state.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:47 pm

Korouse wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:Anarchism is not compatible with capitalism.
What you just described is authoritarian state capitalism, not socialism.

Anarchism is actually compatible with Capitalism, Anarchism simply means no state.

No, anarchism indicates a society devoid of social hierarchies. Anarchism is a type of stateless society, but not all stateless societies are anarchies. Capitalism not only creates hierarchies, but requires the state in order to exist.
Last edited by Threlizdun on Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3441
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korouse » Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:52 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Korouse wrote:Anarchism is actually compatible with Capitalism, Anarchism simply means no state.

No, anarchism indicates a society devoid of social hierarchies. Anarchism is a type of stateless society, but not all stateless societies are anarchies. Capitalism not only creates hierarchies, but requires the state in order to exist.

Communism = The Anarchism You're Talking About.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:11 pm

Korouse wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:No, anarchism indicates a society devoid of social hierarchies. Anarchism is a type of stateless society, but not all stateless societies are anarchies. Capitalism not only creates hierarchies, but requires the state in order to exist.

Communism = The Anarchism You're Talking About.

No, communism exhibits a lack of the market and currency. All anarchism is socialist, as socialism is the only economic system that ensures a classless society, but not all anarchism is communist. Both mutualism and collectivism for example are common economic systems endorsed by anarchists.
She/they

Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Great Kievan Rus
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Mar 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kievan Rus » Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:13 pm

I'm part of the The Regressive Party. This page should explain

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net ... regressive

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:56 pm

Lalaki wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
That's probably true from what I saw from the libertarian Thread, though you be truthful I'm not as knowledgeable as you seem to be on these subjects. Though I do wish to listen and possibly learn from others about these sorts of things:3


I thank you for that compliment. Although Arkolon and Atlanticatia are probably that main drivers of that thread, the the former in favor of libertarianism and the latter in favor of social democracy. I side with the latter, but both of them are very smart debaters.


no prob dude.

yes they both seem very knowledgeable about the topic at hand. Wish I could be a smart debater too, but I'm just a spectator with some questions. XD
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:48 pm

Liberaxia wrote:One question: Why the fuck are there so many socialists on this website?


I think it's because NS is a political game so it brings out the people that are very interesting politics/economics etc, which means more radical viewpoints are represented.

I mean, in real life, there aren't really a huge amount of socialists, communists, anarcho-capitalists, and fascists.. :lol2:
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:54 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Korouse wrote:Anarchism is actually compatible with Capitalism, Anarchism simply means no state.

No, anarchism indicates a society devoid of social hierarchies. Anarchism is a type of stateless society, but not all stateless societies are anarchies. Capitalism not only creates hierarchies, but requires the state in order to exist.

No, most do use the word to refer to advocacy of a stateless society.

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:55 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Korouse wrote:Communism = The Anarchism You're Talking About.

No, communism exhibits a lack of the market and currency. All anarchism is socialist, as socialism is the only economic system that ensures a classless society, but not all anarchism is communist. Both mutualism and collectivism for example are common economic systems endorsed by anarchists.

Collectivism does not refer to a specific economic system.

User avatar
Kumuri
Diplomat
 
Posts: 845
Founded: Mar 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kumuri » Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:58 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Liberaxia wrote:One question: Why the fuck are there so many socialists on this website?


I think it's because NS is a political game so it brings out the people that are very interesting politics/economics etc, which means more radical viewpoints are represented.

I mean, in real life, there aren't really a huge amount of socialists, communists, anarcho-capitalists, and fascists.. :lol2:

If only there were this many communists in real life!
╔═════════════════════════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ═════════════════════════════════════╗
dead
╚═════════════════════════════════════ ೋღ☃ღೋ ═════════════════════════════════════╝

User avatar
Persivis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 993
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Persivis » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:04 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Korouse wrote:Anarchism is actually compatible with Capitalism, Anarchism simply means no state.

No, anarchism indicates a society devoid of social hierarchies. Anarchism is a type of stateless society, but not all stateless societies are anarchies. Capitalism not only creates hierarchies, but requires the state in order to exist.

What have you been smoking? The very definition of an anarchist society is a stateless one.
As should be expected, my nation does not at all represent my political views.
Member of the -Civic--Union- the choice for change!
Pro: Representative Democracy - Social Liberalism - Mixed Market Capitalism - Interventionism - Religious Freedom - Gender Equality - Welfare State
Against: Monarchism - Dictatorship - Forced Socialism - Communism - Anarchism - Fascism - Theocracy - Isolationism - Imperialism - Classism - Racism - Sexism - Direct Democracy - Libertarianism

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Eahland, Google [Bot], Ineva, M-x B-rry, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, The Two Jerseys, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Verkhoyanska, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads