NATION

PASSWORD

The Confederate battle flag

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What does the Confederate battle flag mean to you?

Poll ended at Wed Oct 15, 2014 1:59 am

Racisism
375
22%
Southern Heritage
289
17%
Southern Pride
298
17%
Remembrance
163
9%
HERITAGE NOT HATE
168
10%
Slavery
342
20%
Saint Andrew's cross
91
5%
 
Total votes : 1726

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:11 am

Aurora Novus wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
41% of the black population is still enough that the flag offends large numbers of people.


This is true, but even so, a large number isn't a majorty. Nor would a majority convince me anyway. Like I said, I'm just curious for curiosities sake.

If you exclude the 45% that don't care, you find that 74.5% of black people surveyed who had an opinion on the flag think it's racist.

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:17 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
I'd be more interested in percentages of the black population in the South as opposed to blacks across the country. Of course blacks (and people from the north in general) are going to almost always have a defacto negative few of the flag. They're coming from a place of cultural bias.

Not that this would change my view of the flag one way or another. But it'd make for a more accurate and compelling case, as well as something interesting to note.


But the poll shouldn't just focus on black southerners it should include ALL southerners.
I would like to see the results from that poll. :roll:


Yumyum posted a link to the results.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:17 am

KASSRD wrote:
TheConfederate States of America wrote:
But the poll shouldn't just focus on black southerners it should include ALL southerners.
I would like to see the results from that poll. :roll:

I am willing to bet the results would still be not what you want. The south has grown up enough in some areas to not have a majority like this.


A majority of Southerners said they had no opinion.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Rabopari
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rabopari » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:25 am

it represents rememberence, like the poppy
For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him- Karl Marx
Economic Left/Right: -1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.13

I have a short temper. You have been warned

Pro: NHS,Libertarianism,Hezbollah,Hamas,Fascism,Palestine,Iran,Anti-Maiden,Houthi,Sufism,Capital Punishment.
Anti:Israel,Zionism,EU,NATO,EuroMaiden,US,Thatcher,London,German,Progressive Causes,Bankers,SJW's,LG

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:27 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
I'd be more interested in percentages of the black population in the South as opposed to blacks across the country. Of course blacks (and people from the north in general) are going to almost always have a defacto negative few of the flag. They're coming from a place of cultural bias.

Not that this would change my view of the flag one way or another. But it'd make for a more accurate and compelling case, as well as something interesting to note.


But the poll shouldn't just focus on black southerners it should include ALL southerners.


...Why? That would defeat the purpose of the poll, that is to say, to learn what the group who's historic association with the flag has been a primarily negative one thinks of the flag in our modern age.

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:28 am

Dakini wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
This is true, but even so, a large number isn't a majorty. Nor would a majority convince me anyway. Like I said, I'm just curious for curiosities sake.

If you exclude the 45% that don't care, you find that 74.5% of black people surveyed who had an opinion on the flag think it's racist.


Yes...but why would you exclude the 45% that don't care? Clearly the flag is not so offensive to these 45% that they give a damn about it. That would say something about the point you're trying to make, namely, that it's not the case that an overwhelming majority of blacks are offended by the flag.

Of course, as I said, I find it less interesting what the majority of blacks nationally think, and I'm more interested in what the majority of blacks, actually affected by the flag, think. Such a poll may actually swing in your favor, who knows? I don't. Which is why I'd be interested in seeing it.
Last edited by Aurora Novus on Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kxcd
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Kxcd » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:32 am

Racist idiots who would have me chained, whipped and worked to death on a hellish plantation.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Lincolnopolis wrote: Listen, I know something about fetishes. I am an adult baby. Yes, Paraphillic Infantilism.

Damn son, I just look at futas for my kicks.

BASED PRET
In other news...
kxcd's Eternal God-Empress: Yekaterina II Velikaya
IC: The Holy Trinitarian Empire of Russo-Vespalia and The Empire of Greater Kaleva

User avatar
The North Pacific League
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 155
Founded: May 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The North Pacific League » Sun Jul 20, 2014 3:57 am

Kxcd wrote:Racist idiots who would have me chained, whipped and worked to death on a hellish plantation.


I do hope you realize that this kind of statement makes it virtually impossible to have a discussion about the historical causes of the Civil War, its results, or what either side fought for, because it will just devolve into vitriol. You'll end up painting it as the KKK versus Black people. But it wasn't that, at all, in spite of what people may have told you.

Speaking of "lies my teacher told me".

In truth it was a war between two groups of racist White folk, with causes far beyond slavery. Slavery was one, and the sectional crisis that was in essence a result of the debate over whether newly admitted States in the Union would have legal slavery or not was perhaps the most immediate cause, I freely admit, but if you think Lincoln or other Republican politicians of the day would have been your good pals and shaken your hand as an equal rather than having preferred to deport you to the equivalent of an Indian reservation, you're flat wrong.

(Yes, I know he shook Frederick Douglass' hand. That's what we call "political theatre"; he had to "prove" that the Emancipation Proclamation was made of moral imperative rather than convenience and a desire to subdue the South. You would have been a common lower-class person and never worth his attention or concern had you lived in the 1860s.)

The fact that emancipation resulted from the Civil War was a result of the exigencies of the situation and it happening to be beneficial to the real Northern cause, which was of course to prevent secession.

If I'm wrong please tell me why the Emancipation Proclamation had a six-month delay, would have allowed the South to return to status-quo ante-bellum (i.e. kept on having slavery just as before) had it given up rebellion, and wasn't issued in 1861.
Last edited by The North Pacific League on Sun Jul 20, 2014 3:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:26 am

The North Pacific League wrote:
Kxcd wrote:Racist idiots who would have me chained, whipped and worked to death on a hellish plantation.


I do hope you realize that this kind of statement makes it virtually impossible to have a discussion about the historical causes of the Civil War, its results, or what either side fought for, because it will just devolve into vitriol. You'll end up painting it as the KKK versus Black people. But it wasn't that, at all, in spite of what people may have told you.


Wow. I was just recently discussing how difficult a concept privilege was to deal with when attempting to have a dialogue with those who saw nothing else, and how I was ready to remove myself from any conversation dealing with the topic. Thank you for reminding me of what a major issue it is.

Speaking of "lies my teacher told me".

In truth it was a war between two groups of racist White folk, with causes far beyond slavery.


Yes to the first, and "Not that far beyond" to the second.

Slavery was one, and the sectional crisis that was in essence a result of the debate over whether newly admitted States in the Union would have legal slavery or not was perhaps the most immediate cause, I freely admit,


How kind of you to be willing to admit to the truth.

but if you think Lincoln or other Republican politicians of the day would have been your good pals and shaken your hand as an equal rather than having preferred to deport you to the equivalent of an Indian reservation, you're flat wrong.


I don't recall him saying that they would.

(Yes, I know he shook Frederick Douglass' hand. That's what we call "political theatre"; he had to "prove" that the Emancipation Proclamation was made of moral imperative rather than convenience and a desire to subdue the South. You would have been a common lower-class person and never worth his attention or concern had you lived in the 1860s.)


You've proven yourself slightly more educated than other Southern apologists. Now, please source your claim regarding Lincoln's motivations. I'm not saying that you're wrong. I'm simply saying that such a bold statement requires some sort of evidence.

The fact that emancipation resulted from the Civil War was a result of the exigencies of the situation and it happening to be beneficial to the real Northern cause, which was of course to prevent secession.


Already established, nobody is arguing any other point.

If I'm wrong please tell me why the Emancipation Proclamation had a six-month delay, would have allowed the South to return to status-quo ante-bellum (i.e. kept on having slavery just as before) had it given up rebellion, and wasn't issued in 1861.


So is the Confederate Battle Flag a racist symbol or not?
Last edited by Yumyumsuppertime on Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:42 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
TheConfederate States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby TheConfederate States of America » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:45 am

Kxcd wrote:Racist idiots who would have me chained, whipped and worked to death on a hellish plantation.


Let me ask you something.
What flag did your ancestors see on the slaveship?

User avatar
TheConfederate States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby TheConfederate States of America » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:50 am

Rabopari wrote:it represents rememberence, like the poppy


Well put.

User avatar
The Floating Island of the Sleeping God
Minister
 
Posts: 2773
Founded: Oct 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Floating Island of the Sleeping God » Sun Jul 20, 2014 8:28 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:
Kxcd wrote:Racist idiots who would have me chained, whipped and worked to death on a hellish plantation.


Let me ask you something.
What flag did your ancestors see on the slaveship?

Probably the Australian flag. I hear they were big on slaving.
"When Fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in the flag and bearing the cross."
-Sinclair Lewis, It Can't Happen Here
The Blaatschapen wrote:Just to note, liberals are not sheep. Sheep are liberals ;)

Catholic Priest of Lithianity

User avatar
TheConfederate States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby TheConfederate States of America » Sun Jul 20, 2014 9:49 am

The flags of France England Spain and the US along with others.

User avatar
Lyrova
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Jul 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lyrova » Sun Jul 20, 2014 9:50 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:The flags of France England Spain and the US along with others.

therefore those flags are racist and should be condemned as such
My gender is none of your business. When referring to me, please use gender-neutral pronouns such as "xe" or "thon". Thank you.
In an RP, I will god mod. Please accept this fact before RPing with me.

IRL member of ISIS

Memell wrote:And, you know, the US need the EU more than the EU needs the US. But wait, i'd gladly accept the EU leaving NATO and forming their own defence network.

Damaged Priseis wrote:I'm against most types of democracy because it implies that everyone should have a say

User avatar
Alaizia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1736
Founded: Feb 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Alaizia » Sun Jul 20, 2014 9:58 am

Yes, it's hypocritical to close our eyes and assume that only the Confederancy had a part in the slave market ever.
Chile being more German than Germany
History of the World
Make Europe Great Again
Distruzio wrote:As a repentant "annie" I have to admit that when you're right you're right.
Glasgia wrote:Never bring up Braveheart. Never. Unless you want to be crucified by us Scots.

New haven america wrote:Someone for some unknown reason, idolizes Azula.

User avatar
TheConfederate States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby TheConfederate States of America » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:09 am

Lyrova wrote:
TheConfederate States of America wrote:The flags of France England Spain and the US along with others.

therefore those flags are racist and should be condemned as such


Exactly my point.


The confederate battle flag never flew on a slave ship so people can't say it represents slavery.
Ignorant people don't like to talk about the flags that flew on slave ships let alone know what they were.

User avatar
Alaizia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1736
Founded: Feb 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Alaizia » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:12 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:
Lyrova wrote:therefore those flags are racist and should be condemned as such


Exactly my point.


The confederate battle flag never flew on a slave ship so people can't say it represents slavery.
Ignorant people don't like to talk about the flags that flew on slave ships let alone know what they were.


But also, we should not forget that it was used to represent a state that believed in the idea of slavery and, therefore, engaged in a war about that either.
Chile being more German than Germany
History of the World
Make Europe Great Again
Distruzio wrote:As a repentant "annie" I have to admit that when you're right you're right.
Glasgia wrote:Never bring up Braveheart. Never. Unless you want to be crucified by us Scots.

New haven america wrote:Someone for some unknown reason, idolizes Azula.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:15 am

Lyrova wrote:
TheConfederate States of America wrote:The flags of France England Spain and the US along with others.

therefore those flags are racist and should be condemned as such

No they aren't and no they shouldn't.


TheConfederate States of America wrote:
Lyrova wrote:therefore those flags are racist and should be condemned as such


Exactly my point.


The confederate battle flag never flew on a slave ship so people can't say it represents slavery.

Yes, we can.
Ignorant people don't like to talk about the flags that flew on slave ships let alone know what they were.

Ignorant people like to act like it makes any difference whether Confederate flags flew on slave ships.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:22 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:The confederate battle flag never flew on a slave ship so people can't say it represents slavery.


Do you know why the Confederacy's flag never flew on a ship plying the Atlantic slave route?

Because the British, after abolishing slavery in their empire in 1807, created a fleet of ships with the explicit purpose of shutting down the Atlantic slave trade by patrolling the coasts of Africa and intercepting any ships carrying slaves. The US itself followed suit that year, but did not ban the internal trade of slaves, just the trans-Atlantic trade.

So the reason why the Confederacy never flew its flag over a slave ship was that literally every other Western power at the time had banned slavery in all its forms, and the Confederates were forced to acquire slaves from their existing populations in the CSA.

User avatar
TheConfederate States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby TheConfederate States of America » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:25 am

Image

A lot of ignorant people will tell you that the confederate battle flag is racist and stands for slavery and that the kkk uses it so it's racist.
To those people who want to play the " guilt by association" game look at this photo.


Image

This was taken in Washington D.C. in 1925



So which flag is racist and stands for slavery?


Disclaimer:I am not a racist and I would like to see the klan dismantaled also I love America I'm just showing the truth.

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:29 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:
Lyrova wrote:therefore those flags are racist and should be condemned as such


Exactly my point.


The confederate battle flag never flew on a slave ship so people can't say it represents slavery.
Ignorant people don't like to talk about the flags that flew on slave ships let alone know what they were.

are you fucking serious? Like honestly? Iffrean covered this well enough, but allow me to ask a few rhetorical questions.

So the South didn't support slavery? The south didn't have slaves? Slavery wasn't a large issue in the civil war? Southerners didn't deny blacks civil and human rights? Racism wasn't rampant in the South?

(YES, I know that racism was rampant almost everywhere, but this conversation is limited to the South. Just cause the North was racist doesn't mean the South wasnt. Just cause my favorite color is orange doesn't mean nobody else can have orange as their favorite color)

-- Sent via phone so excuse the short length and lack of breakdown.
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Alaizia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1736
Founded: Feb 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Alaizia » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:31 am

Avenio wrote:
TheConfederate States of America wrote:The confederate battle flag never flew on a slave ship so people can't say it represents slavery.


Do you know why the Confederacy's flag never flew on a ship plying the Atlantic slave route?

Because the British, after abolishing slavery in their empire in 1807, created a fleet of ships with the explicit purpose of shutting down the Atlantic slave trade by patrolling the coasts of Africa and intercepting any ships carrying slaves. The US itself followed suit that year, but did not ban the internal trade of slaves, just the trans-Atlantic trade.

So the reason why the Confederacy never flew its flag over a slave ship was that literally every other Western power at the time had banned slavery in all its forms, and the Confederates were forced to acquire slaves from their existing populations in the CSA.


Really? I wasn't aware of the full story. Could you provide me a link about that?
Chile being more German than Germany
History of the World
Make Europe Great Again
Distruzio wrote:As a repentant "annie" I have to admit that when you're right you're right.
Glasgia wrote:Never bring up Braveheart. Never. Unless you want to be crucified by us Scots.

New haven america wrote:Someone for some unknown reason, idolizes Azula.

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:38 am

Alaizia wrote:
Avenio wrote:
Do you know why the Confederacy's flag never flew on a ship plying the Atlantic slave route?

Because the British, after abolishing slavery in their empire in 1807, created a fleet of ships with the explicit purpose of shutting down the Atlantic slave trade by patrolling the coasts of Africa and intercepting any ships carrying slaves. The US itself followed suit that year, but did not ban the internal trade of slaves, just the trans-Atlantic trade.

So the reason why the Confederacy never flew its flag over a slave ship was that literally every other Western power at the time had banned slavery in all its forms, and the Confederates were forced to acquire slaves from their existing populations in the CSA.


Really? I wasn't aware of the full story. Could you provide me a link about that?


Here.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:46 am

TheConfederate States of America wrote:So which flag is racist and stands for slavery?

The Confederate flag.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
TheConfederate States of America
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Jul 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby TheConfederate States of America » Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:56 am

Avenio wrote:
TheConfederate States of America wrote:The confederate battle flag never flew on a slave ship so people can't say it represents slavery.


Do you know why the Confederacy's flag never flew on a ship plying the Atlantic slave route?

Because the British, after abolishing slavery in their empire in 1807, created a fleet of ships with the explicit purpose of shutting down the Atlantic slave trade by patrolling the coasts of Africa and intercepting any ships carrying slaves. The US itself followed suit that year, but did not ban the internal trade of slaves, just the trans-Atlantic trade.

So the reason why the Confederacy never flew its flag over a slave ship was that literally every other Western power at the time had banned slavery in all its forms, and the Confederates were forced to acquire slaves from their existing populations in the CSA.


And I am well aware of that.
Also we are talking about a flag that was never the confederate national flag.

It was a BATTLE flag never a symbol of the CSA government.
This was a flag for the army ONLY.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Celritannia, Dazchan, Dumb Ideologies, Dutch Socialist States, Hidrandia, Inner Albania, Likhinia, Philjia, The Two Jerseys

Advertisement

Remove ads