NATION

PASSWORD

Israel / Gaza / Hamas Mega-Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:04 pm

Benierra wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Getting invaded and being unable to push the IDF out is not prevailing, it looks like Gaza is getting steamrolled and I hope Israel does not stop until the ground offensive captures all of Gaza. The campaign should not stop, especially not for one missing soldier. Victory for Israel will be at hand as soon as they smash in Hamas' headquarters and round up all of them in chains.

But then every child whose parents are kills will grow up with a hatred of the 'Israeli aggressor' and will become a new Hamas.


Not if they are replaced with a pro permanent peace faction with the means to control it's own borders.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:14 pm

Oh you've got to be fucking kidding me.

This just goes to show what type of partisan hacks the UN are.

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/1/un-condemns-israel-us-not-sharing-iron-dome-hamas/
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:11 pm

Viritica wrote:Oh you've got to be fucking kidding me.

This just goes to show what type of partisan hacks the UN are.

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/1/un-condemns-israel-us-not-sharing-iron-dome-hamas/


>breitbart

they probably are kidding you yeah

Rehansu Tir wrote:
Alyakia wrote:wasn't your argument for ethnic states states with immigration laws that give advantages to people based on citizenship not actually ethnicity making it pretty meaningless really


You might be missing some punctuation, because I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

Alyakia wrote:pretty most of the modern ones don't actually declare themselves to be of one ethnicity for one ethnicity anymore because that's pretty terrible (and the ones that do should probably stop)


That's not at all true. Identifying as the nation-state of an particular ethnic group doesn't in any way mean that other ethnic groups are forbidden or discriminated against. All of the european and asian states are nation-states of particular ethnic groups - yet they all have minority populations of other ethnic groups and most of them have modern, democratic governments.

There are 50 countries in europe - 47 of them are nation-states, 2 is a city-states (one of which is also a nation-state (Monaco)), and the Vatican is the only non-nation-state.

There are also 50 countries in asia - 47 of them are nation-states (either recognized as such internationally or self-claiming to be, such as Myanmar/Burma and palestine), and the other three are not recognized as nation-states of a particular ethnic group, but all three of them are currently undergoing significant to serious internal conflicts, based on religion or ethnicity (cyprus, syrian and iraq).

Or are you going to claim that france isn't the nation-state of the french, that england isn't the nation-state of the english, that ireland isn't the nation-state of the irish, that turkey isn't the nation-state of the turks, etc?


i'm claiming that there's no "france is a french state (for the french ethnicity" declaration. frances census does not contain any information about ethnicity, so i don't think they're actually that concerned about keeping one ethnicity privileged over all others, unlike israel.

also england isn't a state. the english have a nation, but not a nation-state. the UK is considered a multinational state, not a nation-state.
Last edited by Alyakia on Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:21 pm, edited 3 times in total.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:13 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Viritica wrote:Oh you've got to be fucking kidding me.

This just goes to show what type of partisan hacks the UN are.

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/1/un-condemns-israel-us-not-sharing-iron-dome-hamas/


>breitbart

they probably are kidding you yeah

Rehansu Tir wrote:
You might be missing some punctuation, because I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.



That's not at all true. Identifying as the nation-state of an particular ethnic group doesn't in any way mean that other ethnic groups are forbidden or discriminated against. All of the european and asian states are nation-states of particular ethnic groups - yet they all have minority populations of other ethnic groups and most of them have modern, democratic governments.

There are 50 countries in europe - 47 of them are nation-states, 2 is a city-states (one of which is also a nation-state (Monaco)), and the Vatican is the only non-nation-state.

There are also 50 countries in asia - 47 of them are nation-states (either recognized as such internationally or self-claiming to be, such as Myanmar/Burma and palestine), and the other three are not recognized as nation-states of a particular ethnic group, but all three of them are currently undergoing significant to serious internal conflicts, based on religion or ethnicity (cyprus, syrian and iraq).

Or are you going to claim that france isn't the nation-state of the french, that england isn't the nation-state of the english, that ireland isn't the nation-state of the irish, that turkey isn't the nation-state of the turks, etc?


i'm claiming that there's no "france is a french state (for the french ethnicity" declaration. frances census does not contain any information about ethnicity, so i don't think they're actually that concerned about keeping one ethnicity privileged over all others, unlike israel.

also england isn't a state

Or they probably aren't.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:24 pm

Viritica wrote:Oh you've got to be fucking kidding me.

This just goes to show what type of partisan hacks the UN are.

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/1/un-condemns-israel-us-not-sharing-iron-dome-hamas/

"They have not only provided the heavy weaponry which is now being used by Israel in Gaza but they've also provided almost $1 billion in providing the 'Iron Domes' to protect the Israels from rocket attacks," she said. "But no such protection has been provided to Gazans against the shelling."

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.608237
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/pillay-israel-hamas-committing-war-crimes-24785678

Partisan, because she says that Israel and Hamas are committing war crimes, and that Israel has made no attempt to protect Palestinian civilians despite stripping them of any real sovereignty or government of their own?

So... it's partisan to believe that Palestinians are human beings? Or is it just partisan to criticize Israel when it does something terribly wrong and barbaric?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:27 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Viritica wrote:Oh you've got to be fucking kidding me.

This just goes to show what type of partisan hacks the UN are.

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/1/un-condemns-israel-us-not-sharing-iron-dome-hamas/

"They have not only provided the heavy weaponry which is now being used by Israel in Gaza but they've also provided almost $1 billion in providing the 'Iron Domes' to protect the Israels from rocket attacks," she said. "But no such protection has been provided to Gazans against the shelling."

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.608237
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/pillay-israel-hamas-committing-war-crimes-24785678

Partisan, because she says that Israel and Hamas are committing war crimes, and that Israel has made no attempt to protect Palestinian civilians despite stripping them of any real sovereignty or government of their own?

So... it's partisan to believe that Palestinians are human beings? Or is it just partisan to criticize Israel when it does something terribly wrong and barbaric?

What you don't seem to grasp here is that Hamas governs Gaza.

So... It they give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans it'll almost definitely fall into the hands of Hamas.

Hamas, in case you weren't already aware, are terrorists whose goal is to destroy Israel and slaughter Jews.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:32 pm

Viritica wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.608237
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/pillay-israel-hamas-committing-war-crimes-24785678

Partisan, because she says that Israel and Hamas are committing war crimes, and that Israel has made no attempt to protect Palestinian civilians despite stripping them of any real sovereignty or government of their own?

So... it's partisan to believe that Palestinians are human beings? Or is it just partisan to criticize Israel when it does something terribly wrong and barbaric?

What you don't seem to grasp here is that Hamas governs Gaza.

So... It they give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans it'll almost definitely fall into the hands of Hamas.

Hamas, in case you weren't already aware, are terrorists whose goal is to destroy Israel and slaughter Jews.

In what world does:
"But no such protection has been provided to Gazans against the shelling."

mean
"Give Hamas the Iron Dome blueprints."


Even were Israel only an invading force and not an occupying one, they still have a duty to protect civilians in their area of operations.

As it stands, they're both, and thus doubly responsible for their deliberate negligence.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:35 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Viritica wrote:What you don't seem to grasp here is that Hamas governs Gaza.

So... It they give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans it'll almost definitely fall into the hands of Hamas.

Hamas, in case you weren't already aware, are terrorists whose goal is to destroy Israel and slaughter Jews.

In what world does:
"But no such protection has been provided to Gazans against the shelling."

mean
"Give Hamas the Iron Dome blueprints."


Even were Israel only an invading force and not an occupying one, they still have a duty to protect civilians in their area of operations.

As it stands, they're both, and thus doubly responsible for their deliberate negligence.

So you want Israel to give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans while expecting it not to fall into the hands of Hamas?

That would be like expecting WWII America to give the atom bomb technology to the German citizens while expecting it not to fall into the hands of the Nazi government.

Do you realize how utterly stupid that is?
Last edited by Viritica on Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:38 pm

Viritica wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:In what world does:

mean


Even were Israel only an invading force and not an occupying one, they still have a duty to protect civilians in their area of operations.

As it stands, they're both, and thus doubly responsible for their deliberate negligence.

So you want Israel to give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans while expecting it not to fall into the hands of Hamas?

That would be like expecting WWII America to give the atom bomb technology to the German citizens while expecting it not to fall into the hands of the Nazi government.

Do you realize how utterly stupid that is?


iron done would not be effective against shelling, nor would is it in any comparable to an atom bomb
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:41 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Viritica wrote:So you want Israel to give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans while expecting it not to fall into the hands of Hamas?

That would be like expecting WWII America to give the atom bomb technology to the German citizens while expecting it not to fall into the hands of the Nazi government.

Do you realize how utterly stupid that is?


iron done would not be effective against shelling, nor would is it in any comparable to an atom bomb

People still somehow expect Israel to give Hamas the technology.

EDIT: Also, the Iron Dome can intercept mortar shells. It can surely intercept artillery shells.
Last edited by Viritica on Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:44 pm

Viritica wrote:So you want Israel to give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans while expecting it not to fall into the hands of Hamas?

That would be like expecting WWII America to give the atom bomb technology to the German citizens while expecting it not to fall into the hands of the Nazi government.

Do you realize how utterly stupid that is?

Are you really this disingenuous? Or do you genuinely not understand what I said?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Rehansu Tir
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jul 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rehansu Tir » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:45 pm

California Prime wrote:I understand that, but when Israel makes one of these errors they have a real hard time admitting it,


No they're not, it's just that they say, reasonably I think, let's investigate the incident first and then decide what happened. Investigations of incidents are one of the hallmarks of democratic society, as opposed to the summary executions employed by the palestinians.
You are a patriotic Social Democrat. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 36 percent are more extremist than you.

Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

Personal Score 95%
Economic Score 7%
Based on the above score, you are a Hard-Core Liberal .

Your Libertarian Purity Score
26
16-30 points: You are a soft-core libertarian. With effort, you may harden and become pure.

Social Democracy 92%
Anarchism 83%
Democratic Socialism 67%
Marxism 33%
Neoliberalism 25%
Republicanism 25%
Fascism 17%
American Libertarianism 17%
Totalitarianism 0%

Economics Student
54 Keynesian, 31 Chicago, 8 Austrian

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:45 pm

"Right Commissioner Navi Pillay says Hamas also violating humanitarian law by firing rockets indiscriminately"

god the U.N. is so fucking partisan ugh...

it's literally just "they gave israel billions and iron done but they''ve done fuck all to stop israel going to town on hospitals that have rockets near it maybe possibly that's if we don't upload an image of a misidentified target again" which you have translated to "give jew killers iron dome for more effective jew killing"
Last edited by Alyakia on Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:47 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Viritica wrote:So you want Israel to give the Iron Dome technology to the Gazans while expecting it not to fall into the hands of Hamas?

That would be like expecting WWII America to give the atom bomb technology to the German citizens while expecting it not to fall into the hands of the Nazi government.

Do you realize how utterly stupid that is?

Are you really this disingenuous? Or do you genuinely not understand what I said?

I did. And what you said is really stupid.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:47 pm

Alyakia wrote:"Right Commissioner Navi Pillay says Hamas also violating humanitarian law by firing rockets indiscriminately"

god the U.N. is so fucking partisan ugh...

it's literally just "they gave israel billions and iron done but they''ve done fuck all to stop israel going to town on hospitals that have rockets near it maybe possibly that's if we don't upload an image of a misidentified target again" which you have translated to "give jew killers iron dome for more effective jew killing"

"Give Iron Dome to Gaza. Never mind the fact that Hamas is the Gazan government."
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Rehansu Tir
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jul 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rehansu Tir » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:48 pm

Viritica wrote:Oh you've got to be fucking kidding me.

This just goes to show what type of partisan hacks the UN are.

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/1/un-condemns-israel-us-not-sharing-iron-dome-hamas/



I'm not at all surprised. Ms Pillay has made so many idiotic statements in the past several weeks, not only about the israeli-palestinian conflict, but also about the malaysian airliner downing in ukraine, that one has to wonder what website she ordered her law degree from and whether she's ever actually read the international laws she's supposed to be enforcing. I wonder whose poll she polished to get the job.
You are a patriotic Social Democrat. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 36 percent are more extremist than you.

Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

Personal Score 95%
Economic Score 7%
Based on the above score, you are a Hard-Core Liberal .

Your Libertarian Purity Score
26
16-30 points: You are a soft-core libertarian. With effort, you may harden and become pure.

Social Democracy 92%
Anarchism 83%
Democratic Socialism 67%
Marxism 33%
Neoliberalism 25%
Republicanism 25%
Fascism 17%
American Libertarianism 17%
Totalitarianism 0%

Economics Student
54 Keynesian, 31 Chicago, 8 Austrian

User avatar
Russian Socialist Soviet States
Senator
 
Posts: 4493
Founded: Apr 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Russian Socialist Soviet States » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:48 pm

Rehansu Tir wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Israel is like the Soviet Union of the Middle East. People move there because it is westernized.


That analogy makes no sense. How was the soviet union westernized? And why would christians move to israel or not leave israel if they're being persecuted, as you claim?

The Soviet Union was influenced by the Illuminati. Christians would go to Israel because it has the highest quality of living in the area.
_[' ]_
(-_Q) If you support Capitalism put this in your Sig.
This nation does not represent my real life views!

User avatar
Oaledonia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21487
Founded: Mar 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Oaledonia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:51 pm

Viritica wrote:
Alyakia wrote:"Right Commissioner Navi Pillay says Hamas also violating humanitarian law by firing rockets indiscriminately"

god the U.N. is so fucking partisan ugh...

it's literally just "they gave israel billions and iron done but they''ve done fuck all to stop israel going to town on hospitals that have rockets near it maybe possibly that's if we don't upload an image of a misidentified target again" which you have translated to "give jew killers iron dome for more effective jew killing"

"Give Iron Dome to Gaza. Never mind the fact that Hamas is the Gazan government."

Iron Dome won't do much against a first world military, it was designed to shoot down small rockets and artillery.
Last edited by Wikipe-tan on January 13, 2006 4:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military Info
Blackjack-and-Hookers wrote:
Oaledonia wrote:I'll go make my own genocidal galactic empire! with blackjack and hookers

You bet your ass you will!
Divair wrote:NSG summer doesn't end anymore. Climate change.
Under construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:51 pm

Viritica wrote:
Alyakia wrote:"Right Commissioner Navi Pillay says Hamas also violating humanitarian law by firing rockets indiscriminately"

god the U.N. is so fucking partisan ugh...

it's literally just "they gave israel billions and iron done but they''ve done fuck all to stop israel going to town on hospitals that have rockets near it maybe possibly that's if we don't upload an image of a misidentified target again" which you have translated to "give jew killers iron dome for more effective jew killing"

"Give Iron Dome to Gaza. Never mind the fact that Hamas is the Gazan government."


criticizing the U.S. for not reigning in israel and not caring about palestinains getting shelled while sending billions to israel to help with rockets doesn't translate to "give hamas iron dome"
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:52 pm

Viritica wrote:
Alyakia wrote:"Right Commissioner Navi Pillay says Hamas also violating humanitarian law by firing rockets indiscriminately"

god the U.N. is so fucking partisan ugh...

it's literally just "they gave israel billions and iron done but they''ve done fuck all to stop israel going to town on hospitals that have rockets near it maybe possibly that's if we don't upload an image of a misidentified target again" which you have translated to "give jew killers iron dome for more effective jew killing"

"Give Iron Dome to Gaza. Never mind the fact that Hamas is the Gazan government."


Reads like the UN demanded that Gaza also get equal protection from shelling (which the Iron Dome would do jack shit against as pointed out so many times). And so far only the Breitbart "source" spins it as "UN wants Israel to give Iron Dome to Hamas." Right. Breitbart, named after and founded after the guy who claimed he had evidence that would destroy the Obama administration. Well Andy, where was it?
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:53 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Viritica wrote:"Give Iron Dome to Gaza. Never mind the fact that Hamas is the Gazan government."


criticizing the U.S. for not reigning in israel and not caring about palestinains getting shelled while sending billions to israel to help with rockets doesn't translate to "give hamas iron dome"


It does if you're working for Breitbart or hate Palestinians in general.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Rehansu Tir
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jul 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rehansu Tir » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:02 pm

Alyakia wrote:i'm claiming that there's no "france is a french state (for the french ethnicity" declaration. frances census does not contain any information about ethnicity, so i don't think they're actually that concerned about keeping one ethnicity privileged over all others, unlike israel.


Which is just retarded. Then all these countries should change their names so as not to be identified with the ethnic groups who live there and founded the nation-states and their governments.

Alyakia wrote:also england isn't a state. the english have a nation, but not a nation-state. the UK is considered a multinational state, not a nation-state.


Yes, it is. It's the United Kingdom or Great Britain and northern ireland. they are all semi-autonomous states that are part of the greater kingdom. The various states were at various times governed jointly, to different degrees, but with the devolution of government that's been going on in the UK for the past decade, england, scotland and wales are all very much independent states, under a common monarchy with shared infrastructure, such as military. They even all have their own national sports teams at international sporting events.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution ... ed_Kingdom
You are a patriotic Social Democrat. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 36 percent are more extremist than you.

Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

Personal Score 95%
Economic Score 7%
Based on the above score, you are a Hard-Core Liberal .

Your Libertarian Purity Score
26
16-30 points: You are a soft-core libertarian. With effort, you may harden and become pure.

Social Democracy 92%
Anarchism 83%
Democratic Socialism 67%
Marxism 33%
Neoliberalism 25%
Republicanism 25%
Fascism 17%
American Libertarianism 17%
Totalitarianism 0%

Economics Student
54 Keynesian, 31 Chicago, 8 Austrian

User avatar
Rehansu Tir
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jul 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rehansu Tir » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:11 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:Partisan, because she says that Israel and Hamas are committing war crimes, and that Israel has made no attempt to protect Palestinian civilians despite stripping them of any real sovereignty or government of their own?


Not only do the palestinians have their own government, they have two - hamas and fatah, in a situation they brought on themselves.

Partisan because she isolates israel for criticism and contempt, while diminishing and dismissing war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the palestinians. SHe's already shown herself to be a bigot not only based on her comments about israel, but her various other ludicrous claims, such as her comparison of quebec with some of the worst human right abusers in the world.

Pillay expressed her opinion of the Quebec law in a single paragraph of a long speech in Geneva, during which she lamented rights violations in places such as North Korea, Zimbabwe and South Sudan.


She's seriously biased against western states and white people. Her time as the high commissioner for human rights has been one farce after another, because she can't keep from saying out loud the bigoted biased thoughts that are floating around her head.
You are a patriotic Social Democrat. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 36 percent are more extremist than you.

Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

Personal Score 95%
Economic Score 7%
Based on the above score, you are a Hard-Core Liberal .

Your Libertarian Purity Score
26
16-30 points: You are a soft-core libertarian. With effort, you may harden and become pure.

Social Democracy 92%
Anarchism 83%
Democratic Socialism 67%
Marxism 33%
Neoliberalism 25%
Republicanism 25%
Fascism 17%
American Libertarianism 17%
Totalitarianism 0%

Economics Student
54 Keynesian, 31 Chicago, 8 Austrian

User avatar
Rehansu Tir
Diplomat
 
Posts: 801
Founded: Jul 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rehansu Tir » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:13 pm

Viritica wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Are you really this disingenuous? Or do you genuinely not understand what I said?

I did. And what you said is really stupid.


here, here.
You are a patriotic Social Democrat. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 36 percent are more extremist than you.

Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

Personal Score 95%
Economic Score 7%
Based on the above score, you are a Hard-Core Liberal .

Your Libertarian Purity Score
26
16-30 points: You are a soft-core libertarian. With effort, you may harden and become pure.

Social Democracy 92%
Anarchism 83%
Democratic Socialism 67%
Marxism 33%
Neoliberalism 25%
Republicanism 25%
Fascism 17%
American Libertarianism 17%
Totalitarianism 0%

Economics Student
54 Keynesian, 31 Chicago, 8 Austrian

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:18 pm

Rehansu Tir wrote:
Alyakia wrote:i'm claiming that there's no "france is a french state (for the french ethnicity" declaration. frances census does not contain any information about ethnicity, so i don't think they're actually that concerned about keeping one ethnicity privileged over all others, unlike israel.


Which is just retarded. Then all these countries should change their names so as not to be identified with the ethnic groups who live there and founded the nation-states and their governments.

Alyakia wrote:also england isn't a state. the english have a nation, but not a nation-state. the UK is considered a multinational state, not a nation-state.


Yes, it is. It's the United Kingdom or Great Britain and northern ireland. they are all semi-autonomous states that are part of the greater kingdom. The various states were at various times governed jointly, to different degrees, but with the devolution of government that's been going on in the UK for the past decade, england, scotland and wales are all very much independent states, under a common monarchy with shared infrastructure, such as military. They even all have their own national sports teams at international sporting events.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution ... ed_Kingdom


maybe there's more to being french than ethnicity... hmm...

yes, i am quite aware. i live there. are you aware that england does not have any autonomy at all?

they are by definition not independent states.
Last edited by Alyakia on Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Changjo, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Raskana, The Holy Therns

Advertisement

Remove ads