NATION

PASSWORD

Why does everyone hate the Jews?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25554
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:57 pm

Bolkania wrote:
Gallia- wrote:
what the fuck it's released by the IDF from a helicopter

yeah they set up rockets and shot them into their own country the bastards

bush did 911

meanwhile you just ignore the hrw link i posted about illegally targeting civilians who gives a fuck if theyre using human shields that's missing the elephant in the room

gj lad youre 10/10 so far a+++



fucking jews

clearly israel is responsible for forcing palestine to use human shields because of their helicopters nad tanks they probably jsut shot little kids and threw them on palestinian bombers for laffs

IDF serves Israel, and would release or keep any digital information only if it benefits them. It's like saying the American military would purposely realise photos or videos of the "collateral damage" caused upon Iraq after the Bagdad bombings. No military release information that would degrade their public image.

Also, please brush up your writing skills and grammar, as well as the profanity. Swearing does not make your weak argument any stronger.


IDF is a military instituion and inherently is subordinate to the civilian institution of the israeli government therefore it would be in its worse interests to concoct a conspiracy that the brave plaeistnian freedom fighters are not using human shields by shooting rockets from schoolyards

the fact that youre actually stating that israel not only falsifies human shield use by palestinian insurgents (a well documented fact) but also has the balls to do it repeatedly just shows that you have no grasp of reality at this point i suggest you read up on the arab-israeli wars from 1948 to now or so

that would be very helpful for you, since you apparently have such a limited grasp of the situation that you actually assume what i proposed (facetiously, mind) is not only plausible but actually happening

no i wont because this is the internet who gives a fuck about grammar when im right and youre not

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:58 pm

Alaizia wrote:So we shouldn't accuse Israel because others have done the same thing worse. :palm:
Please stop.

Again with the false characterizations of my points. I'm saying that we haven't treated Israel equally. We've constructed a double standard, one which punishes one group in a conflict while often ignoring the crimes of the other. This is most apparent at the level of the United Nations, where reports detailing atrocities committed by both sides are disregarded in favor of sticking it to the Zionist pig dog oppressors. That's not an accurate depiction of the events.

Alaizia wrote:Yeah Apartheid......
Good. You recognise and condemn it. We have reached an agreement at last.

I've condemned all of Israel's crimes from the beginning. I just didn't consider some of the things you cited crimes under the legal definitions. I also believe that Israel has been treated unfairly and with an obvious bias by the international community as a whole because the conflict is more of a political issue to many than an ethical one.

Alaizia wrote:It is a crime because they were kicked out of their territory. International Law my ass. And you say "may". That means you are not sure. Come back and talk me about it when you are "sure".

The crime was the ethnic cleansing that occurred on both sides more than sixty years ago. Israel has no obligation to respect the claims that the right to return are applicable until those claims have been validated in court. As a matter of course, the assertion that Palestinians have a right to return to Israel are tenuous at best, and outright laughable at worst. Look up the right of return as it relates to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It's not a simple issue.

Alaizia wrote:That's the problem. That's what I mean. No emotion.
You....suggest that the killing of civillians and children shouldn't be considered a war-crime.
Thank you for helping me clear things up to anyone who doesn't get this.
Keep "analyzing" when unarmed civillians suffer and die.

Again, you misunderstand. Look at what I typed again, and ponder it for a while. I do not support the killing of civilians. I have no problem with the elimination of armed combatants. Unfortunately, those armed combatants hide behind women and children in many cases, making civilian casualties inevitable if the Israelis decide to take action.

Alaizia wrote:I meant any pro-Israel human. Don't put words on my mouth.

So, we shouldn't prosecute Palestinian and Israeli crimes equally? Why not?

Alaizia wrote:Indeed. It mocks it.

That's a puerile response, so I suppose I'll drop the point.

Alaizia wrote:Which is wrong because The "State" of Israel was th instigator. There is no double standard if you started the issue.

That's strange. As far as I remember, the Arabs invaded Israel first. By your logic, all crimes committed by Israel should be treated as legitimate responses to unlawful aggression, right? Or we could just agree that crimes are crimes regardless of who commits them?

Alaizia wrote:More invalid points?

Plenty.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:58 pm

Gallia- wrote:
Mkuki wrote:That doesn't explain how the State of Palestine is culpable for the actions of terrorists.


maybe because the state of palestine is terrorists

o:

it's an illegitimate organisation set up to perpetuate an artificially created insurgency against a superior state

it's winning only because everyone is tired of its childishness

this isnt some huge victory (or for that matter, defeat) for the west, it's just a collective sign that they couldnt pull their heads out of their arses long enough to come to a decent, reasonable conclusion with israel and instead they have to resort to violence to solve their problem

typical religious nutjobs

Bolkania wrote:Putin has the highest approval ratings... To date:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wor ... 0-percent/

He is hardly weak. British MPs and many across the world admire him for diplomatically whitewashing the west in Ukraine. He is brilliant not tactician, a leader America has not had since JFK.

Whatever planet you live on, Russia is a key player, even in the Middle East. For example, Syria could never be dealt with without Russian inclusion in any plans.


yeah so did brezhnev was the economic stagnation of the ussr a good thing?

russians are just too ignorant and brainwashed by all the vodka it kills their grey matter and results in them voting ofr ridiculously absurd dictators (or in brezhnev's case, not voting at all because of internal political coup)

or maybe it has something to do with living under three hundred years of brutal dictatorship that has warped the russian colelctive psyche to be apathetic or even supportive of brutal totalitarian measures that result in perpetual downward spirals of living standards

putin is weak, internally

he presents a massive facade of a strongman not unlike other third world dictators while supporting his regime with a propganda engine called Russia Today and spoonfeeding russia nonsense about western imperialism in ukraine

putin's only intelligent decision so far has been realising that since he has europe by the balls with oil and gas (at least for now) he can do whatever he wants with ukraine

this is correct

europe doesnt give a fuck it wont do anything and america is too preoccupied with the pacific

he's ignoring the future threat of the prc (why should he care? he'll be way out of office by then) and the russian economy is crumbling in the mean time because he can't reform it to be sustainable

so he expands outward to crimea and eastern ukraine hoping to secure the economically vital warm water port of sevastopol and the massive factories of east ukr to prop up the economy for a bit longer until he's out of power and cant be blamed


well, you see, half of palestine stopped firing rockets (this is the palestine that everyone recognizes as the sole representative of the palestinian people btw) and yet israeli still continues to build illegal settlements. all the deals israel have given have been pretty shit, actually, and all include surrendering territory that literally no one in the world conisders as israeli except for israel themselves.) if one didn't know any better, they might conclude that israel doesn't actually want peace as much as it says as it does while basking in the boost in support it gets everytime it invades a few months before the elections.

Evraim wrote:
Alaizia wrote:Israel bombs civilians and children. How fucking hard is that to understand?

Not genocide. Illegal, but for a different reason.

Alyakia wrote:i am quite happy that you consider me that. i don't see any reason we can't both address it though. an cross-ideology double whammy.

I've done it to some extent, but the post is quite long. I grow weary of flinging myself at Zionists and Palestinian nationalists at different intervals. The discussion never actually changes. Not once in all the time I've been lurking on these forums. To be honest, Stormfront is more amusing than NS, but only because the stupidity in their remarks is less common than the stupidity which sometimes enters our own remarks. I might do a full take down later, if I don't decide to go out with friends.


yeah things are pretty static
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Cilestis
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Cilestis » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:59 pm

Gallia- wrote:
Bolkania wrote:IDF serves Israel, and would release or keep any digital information only if it benefits them. It's like saying the American military would purposely realise photos or videos of the "collateral damage" caused upon Iraq after the Bagdad bombings. No military release information that would degrade their public image.

Also, please brush up your writing skills and grammar, as well as the profanity. Swearing does not make your weak argument any stronger.


IDF is a military instituion and inherently is subordinate to the civilian institution of the israeli government therefore it would be in its worse interests to concoct a conspiracy that the brave plaeistnian freedom fighters are not using human shields by shooting rockets from schoolyards

the fact that youre actually stating that israel not only falsifies human shield use by palestinian insurgents (a well documented fact) but also has the balls to do it repeatedly just shows that you have no grasp of reality at this point i suggest you read up on the arab-israeli wars from 1948 to now or so

that would be very helpful for you, since you apparently have such a limited grasp of the situation that you actually assume what i proposed (facetiously, mind) is not only plausible but actually happening

no i wont because this is the internet who gives a fuck about grammar when im right and youre not


Okay I'm seriously considering you as borderline trolling now.

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25554
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:00 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Gallia- wrote:
fucking jews

clearly israel is responsible for forcing palestine to use human shields because of their helicopters nad tanks they probably jsut shot little kids and threw them on palestinian bombers for laffs

1. I never denied that Palestinians have used civilians as human shields. It is a deplorable course of action and should be halted immediately.
2. Did you conveniently ignore the fact that the the Israeli Defense Ministry wants to continue using Palestinians as human shield? Even after the Israeli High Court of Justice banned such practices. It's in the same article.

The IDF admitted it had used Palestinians as human shields, a practice subsequently banned by Israel's High Court of Justice.[27] The Israeli Defense Ministry appealed this decision.[28]


1. i never said you did in that quoted post
2. The Israeli military has a very prosaic attitude towards international law, much like some Westerners would say that Taliban should not be given quarter due their failure to do the same to the Western troops

Clearly the civilian government disagrees, and it's good, because the former is in charge and can tell the IDF what to do whether it likes it or not. Isn't the West great?

Cilestis wrote:
Gallia- wrote:
IDF is a military instituion and inherently is subordinate to the civilian institution of the israeli government therefore it would be in its worse interests to concoct a conspiracy that the brave plaeistnian freedom fighters are not using human shields by shooting rockets from schoolyards

the fact that youre actually stating that israel not only falsifies human shield use by palestinian insurgents (a well documented fact) but also has the balls to do it repeatedly just shows that you have no grasp of reality at this point i suggest you read up on the arab-israeli wars from 1948 to now or so

that would be very helpful for you, since you apparently have such a limited grasp of the situation that you actually assume what i proposed (facetiously, mind) is not only plausible but actually happening

no i wont because this is the internet who gives a fuck about grammar when im right and youre not


Okay I'm seriously considering you as borderline trolling now.


Isn't there a rule for using the "T" word?

This isn't trolling, this is telling the facts of the sitution and you simply cannot deal with it. Perhaps instead of plugging your ears with cotton and calling me a liar, you could perhaps take this time to reexamine your position and read the counterpoints to your arguments. That's certainly more beneficial to an open mind, and the circlejerk masturbatory fest that is NSG could definitely use a dose of counterargument on a level that is digestible by even the basest members.
Last edited by Gallia- on Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:03 pm

Gallia- wrote:
Mkuki wrote:That doesn't explain how the State of Palestine is culpable for the actions of terrorists.


maybe because the state of palestine is terrorists

o:

it's an illegitimate organisation set up to perpetuate an artificially created insurgency against a superior state

it's winning only because everyone is tired of its childishness

this isnt some huge victory (or for that matter, defeat) for the west, it's just a collective sign that they couldnt pull their heads out of their arses long enough to come to a decent, reasonable conclusion with israel and instead they have to resort to violence to solve their problem

typical religious nutjobs

Which national government designates the State of Palestine as a terrorist organization? The State Department sure as hell doesn't.

What exactly is your idea of "a decent, reasonable conclusion with israel"?
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Humantus
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Nov 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Humantus » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:03 pm

Shie wrote:
Ordia wrote:
Or what any other people who have had to deal with a genocide experienced.

There was no historical genocide that reached the magnitude of the holocaust, dismissed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_c ... e_Americas

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:04 pm

Mkuki wrote:Why should the State of Palestine be deemed culpable for the actions of Hamas?

Because Hamas is the elected government in Gaza at the moment. They may well lose if elections happen again, but they mustered enough support parading their Antisemitism and terrorism about like used car salesmen that they were able to take power, and without too much resistance from their rivals.
Last edited by Evraim on Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bolkania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 676
Founded: Oct 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bolkania » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:04 pm

Gallia- wrote:
Bolkania wrote:IDF serves Israel, and would release or keep any digital information only if it benefits them. It's like saying the American military would purposely realise photos or videos of the "collateral damage" caused upon Iraq after the Bagdad bombings. No military release information that would degrade their public image.

Also, please brush up your writing skills and grammar, as well as the profanity. Swearing does not make your weak argument any stronger.


IDF is a military instituion and inherently is subordinate to the civilian institution of the israeli government therefore it would be in its worse interests to concoct a conspiracy that the brave plaeistnian freedom fighters are not using human shields by shooting rockets from schoolyards

the fact that youre actually stating that israel not only falsifies human shield use by palestinian insurgents (a well documented fact) but also has the balls to do it repeatedly just shows that you have no grasp of reality at this point i suggest you read up on the arab-israeli wars from 1948 to now or so

that would be very helpful for you, since you apparently have such a limited grasp of the situation that you actually assume what i proposed (facetiously, mind) is not only plausible but actually happening

no i wont because this is the internet who gives a fuck about grammar when im right and youre not

Oh, don't worry... I've studied Palestine from the end of the Ottomans and the Balfour declaration, the Kibbutz age of illegal Jewish immigration, the Arab riots, Hagganah and Irgun, the bombings of the King David hotel, 1948 war, and all the way up to the Intifadda.

If anything my dear degenerate, YOU need to brush up on your history...

And for the record, I take a neural stance to the issue. I believe the Israel should be established but never in Palestine. Regardless of what there holy books say, it's illegal for Jews to surround themselves with angry Arabs. The who,argument that Israel should be where it is because of Canaan is bull shit. With this logic, I hereby claim Reptile to gain their own state, as they ruled Earth before humans.

Your like a child with the "Your wrong, Im right trololol." This only furthers makes you look like an an ignorant being, and there is flame intended. You simply are as educated about the Middle East as a Fishermen is about Anti-Matter.
Last edited by Bolkania on Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Geekos
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Geekos » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:05 pm

Shie wrote:
Ordia wrote:
Or what any other people who have had to deal with a genocide experienced.

There was no historical genocide that reached the magnitude of the holocaust, dismissed.


The size of a genocide is irrelevant to the survivors (we have no way of knowing how the dead feel about it): all that matters is that probably everyone you know is dead in a horrible way for stupid reasons. You have no right to say that victims of genocides other than the holocaust experienced lesser horror and pain, and that it exactly what you are implying here. Yes, the Holocaust was truly horrifying, and those responsible for it could never have paid enough to balance out the consequences of what they did, and I don't think we should simply forget what happened. However, I would hope that anyone who survived that, or whose ancestors experienced that, would seek to AVOID committing horrible acts against anyone else (Nor do I argue that Israel should allow itself to be obliterated). Yet the Israeli government seems to see the Holocaust as the perfect justification to treat the Palestinians like unwanted vermin, and the Palestinians were not the ones who committed the Holocaust, so no one can argue this is payback either.

Note that of the low (there are almost certainly more) estimate of 11 million people killed in the camps themselves (not including other aspects of the war), about 6 million were Jewish. The remaining five million include the Romani (also known by the G-word they hate, who were nigh wiped out in Europe, and who still are treated as vermin in most of Europe), homosexuals and other "sexual deviants," civilians and soldiers of Slavic origin (read Eastern Europe into Russian), people who have disabilities, and political dissidents. Let's face it, the Holocaust was not and NEVER was a purely antisemitic affair. The Nazis intended to cull every non-Aryan race they could find, and the Jews, like the Romani, happened to be the most immediately vulnerable.

A long-winded post to be sure, but the Holocaust argument for justifying the Israeli government's attitude towards Palestine angers me as much as do Holocaust deniers. Just accept that horrible event happened and try to make sure it stops happening to anyone! Seriously, being the victims of prejudice does not justify being horrible to others.

User avatar
The United Earth Conclave
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 110
Founded: Oct 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Earth Conclave » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:05 pm

Shie wrote:Judaism is my favorite religion, in a perfect world everyone would practice Judaism. Anti-semites are mad because they're not living good lives and hate the interests of good people.


Anti-Jews foreskin is constricting them which makes them angry and jealous. True story.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:08 pm

Evraim wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Why should the State of Palestine be deemed culpable for the actions of Hamas?

Because Hamas is the elected government in the West Bank at the moment. They may well lose if elections happen again, but they mustered enough support parading their Antisemitism and terrorism about like used car salesmen that they were able to take power, and without too much resistance from their rivals.


wait, hamas run the west bank as well now? i've been out of the loop for a while i guess.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:08 pm

Gallia- wrote:
Mkuki wrote:1. I never denied that Palestinians have used civilians as human shields. It is a deplorable course of action and should be halted immediately.
2. Did you conveniently ignore the fact that the the Israeli Defense Ministry wants to continue using Palestinians as human shield? Even after the Israeli High Court of Justice banned such practices. It's in the same article.



1. i never said you did in that quoted post
2. The Israeli military has a very prosaic attitude towards international law, much like some Westerners would say that Taliban should not be given quarter due their failure to do the same to the Western troops

Clearly the civilian government disagrees, and it's good, because the former is in charge and can tell the IDF what to do whether it likes it or not. Isn't the West great?

Given that Israel still continues to build settlements and still continues kill innocent Palestinians, not really.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Estainia
Senator
 
Posts: 4808
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Estainia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:09 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Gallia- wrote:
1. i never said you did in that quoted post
2. The Israeli military has a very prosaic attitude towards international law, much like some Westerners would say that Taliban should not be given quarter due their failure to do the same to the Western troops

Clearly the civilian government disagrees, and it's good, because the former is in charge and can tell the IDF what to do whether it likes it or not. Isn't the West great?

Given that Israel still continues to build settlements and still continues kill innocent Palestinians, not really.



Any people who support and empower irregular guerrillas are not 'innocent', Palestinian or otherwise.
The Empire of the Etai
Is a bit of magic your thing, or scientific post-modernism?
Consider joining Rostil today and help build a lasting setting!

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:09 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Evraim wrote:Because Hamas is the elected government in the West Bank at the moment. They may well lose if elections happen again, but they mustered enough support parading their Antisemitism and terrorism about like used car salesmen that they were able to take power, and without too much resistance from their rivals.


wait, hamas run the west bank as well now? i've been out of the loop for a while i guess.

Excuse me while I face palm repeatedly. I meant to type Gaza, not the West Bank. I really need to get some sleep, don't I?

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:11 pm

Evraim wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Why should the State of Palestine be deemed culpable for the actions of Hamas?

Because Hamas is the elected government in the West Bank at the moment. They may well lose if elections happen again, but they mustered enough support parading their Antisemitism and terrorism about like used car salesmen that they were able to take power, and without too much resistance from their rivals.

I don't think that is a particularly reasonable position since Hamas has almost no control over the West Bank.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:12 pm

Estainia wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Given that Israel still continues to build settlements and still continues kill innocent Palestinians, not really.



Any people who support and empower irregular guerrillas are not 'innocent', Palestinian or otherwise.

Uninvolved Palestinians have been killed by the IDF, y'know.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:12 pm

Mkuki wrote:I don't think that is a particularly reasonable position since Hamas has almost no control over the West Bank.

See above. :palm:

I deserve it, though. :unsure:

User avatar
Estainia
Senator
 
Posts: 4808
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Estainia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:13 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Estainia wrote:

Any people who support and empower irregular guerrillas are not 'innocent', Palestinian or otherwise.

Uninvolved Palestinians have been killed by the IDF, y'know.


There is no such thing as uninvolved in a war zone. Do I recognize the IDF has committed murder? Sure. I also recognize so has every armed force regular and irregular in history.
The Empire of the Etai
Is a bit of magic your thing, or scientific post-modernism?
Consider joining Rostil today and help build a lasting setting!

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:13 pm

omg, can't orient in so much text...what goin' on there?

Image

pls.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:14 pm

Evraim wrote:
Mkuki wrote:I don't think that is a particularly reasonable position since Hamas has almost no control over the West Bank.

See above. :palm:

I deserve it, though. :unsure:

Its cool. We all have off days.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:14 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:omg, can't orient in so much text...what goin' on there?

Something that's more likely to give you cancer than bathing in nuclear waste contaminated lake on Mars.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:15 pm

Estainia wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Uninvolved Palestinians have been killed by the IDF, y'know.


There is no such thing as uninvolved in a war zone. Do I recognize the IDF has committed murder? Sure. I also recognize so has every armed force regular and irregular in history.

Uninvolved as in not supporting Hamas or the IDF.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Evraim
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6148
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Evraim » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:18 pm

Mkuki wrote:Uninvolved as in not supporting Hamas or the IDF.

True, though I imagine it must be difficult to fight a war in such a confined space. Civilians are bound to wind-up in the crossfire, especially with Israel's policy of responding to threats with overwhelming force. It's not right, but I expect such casualties to continue until some kind of peace emerges.

User avatar
Humantus
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Nov 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Humantus » Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:38 pm


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hwiteard, San Lumen, Shrillland

Advertisement

Remove ads