Wolfmanne wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:He made huge advances in women's rights, increased the life expectancy immensely, and brought the literacy rate from under 20% to near Western levels.
So? Any basic social reforms could do that. You can't attribute those to communism. You can attribute the mass deaths, the immense poverty, his failed autarky programs, <add more typical Communist things here>.
If basic social reforms can do those things, why do so many countries continue to struggle with them?