NATION

PASSWORD

On the Topic of Race-Mixing

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21328
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:14 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Blazedtown wrote:
What is the state of the neighborhoods though? I know a few who came from Dallas and heard quiet a few horror stories.


It's an okay neighborhood. We don't have any violence and right now it's pretty quiet besides the occasional dog barking because a car or a dog is passing by. I live next to a neighbor who gets a little loud during Fridays but meh, it's Friday, and I have heavy sleep so I don't care about him.

All that's playing right now is my music in my room. Also the neighborhood is kept very clean for a Mexican neighborhood compared to the "shitholes" I keep hearing other people around the U.S. complaining about.


Some people have different standards of what constitutes a "shithole." I used to live in Chelsea, MA, which is heavily Latino, low-income, and just generally one of the more poor and run-down places in Massachusetts. It didn't bother me that much, but I had a roommate that complained non-stop about how ghetto it was. Some people just put the worst possible spin on everything when they start seeing stuff in Spanish.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:19 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:Some people have different standards of what constitutes a "shithole." I used to live in Chelsea, MA, which is heavily Latino, low-income, and just generally one of the more poor and run-down places in Massachusetts. It didn't bother me that much, but I had a roommate that complained non-stop about how ghetto it was. Some people just put the worst possible spin on everything when they start seeing stuff in Spanish.


My neighborhood is not Highland Park either but it doesn't bother me at all what I see around here. We also have white people moving in and to be fair? I go down those streets skateboarding and just greeting people as I go along. It doesn't bother me and it doesn't bother them.

I guess you're right. The entire view is subjective. :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Wikipedia and Universe
Senator
 
Posts: 3897
Founded: Jul 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikipedia and Universe » Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:28 am

I've heard the "one day we'll be so mixed up we'll all look the same" idea before, and the person promoting it is usually framing it as some utopia or (more annoyingly) the only antidote to bigotry and prejudice in the world. (Personally, I don't care if some racist idiocy persists as long as it's driven from the public sphere and relegated to a handful of miserable nutters at the margins, as with any crank idea.) I take annoyance with people who aspire to it as a utopia, as I don't see anything particularly utopian about a world without variety. (Of course, if it happens, it happens; I just don't view it as a utopia we "ought" to seek necessarily.) I hope we can still have plenty of diversity without people making a big deal of it, sort of like Star Trek.

Realistically, the mechanism by which this hypothetical uni-racial world is supposed to form (interracial reproduction on a massive scale) has limits of its own, even if we assume the complete collapse of racialist attitudes worldwide (keep in mind that in many cultures outside the west, racial prejudice remains the norm and is relatively uncontroversial). Even ignoring political boundaries such as national borders and travel restrictions (I have nothing against these per se and believe they have their place, but I'm making a hypothetical point here.), geography alone would prevent miscegenation from occurring on the scale needed to achieve any sort of global homogeneity. Even with improvements in transportation, anything approaching this outcome would require people to travel extreme distances in massive droves aboard ships, planes, or even Virgin Galactic-style commercial spacecraft with the intention of fucking each other. Such a global miscegenation program would also likely require an increase in reproduction which would run counter to actual long-term demographic transition projections. At this point, we're already forgetting that, according to most proponents of this hypothesis, this mixing of humans to the point of near homogeneity is supposed to occur by accident. As such, I'm highly skeptical of the idea, and I think the promotion of attitudes respecting diversity is a far more viable approach than expecting (or hoping) we'll all look the same one day.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get pissed, they'll be a mile away- and barefoot.
Proud Member and Co-Founder of the MDISC Alliance
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.

User avatar
Ixzara
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ixzara » Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:35 am

Wikipedia and Universe wrote:I've heard the "one day we'll be so mixed up we'll all look the same" idea before, and the person promoting it is usually framing it as some utopia or (more annoyingly) the only antidote to bigotry and prejudice in the world. (Personally, I don't care if some racist idiocy persists as long as it's driven from the public sphere and relegated to a handful of miserable nutters at the margins, as with any crank idea.) I take annoyance with people who aspire to it as a utopia, as I don't see anything particularly utopian about a world without variety. (Of course, if it happens, it happens; I just don't view it as a utopia we "ought" to seek necessarily.) I hope we can still have plenty of diversity without people making a big deal of it, sort of like Star Trek.

Realistically, the mechanism by which this hypothetical uni-racial world is supposed to form (interracial reproduction on a massive scale) has limits of its own, even if we assume the complete collapse of racialist attitudes worldwide (keep in mind that in many cultures outside the west, racial prejudice remains the norm and is relatively uncontroversial). Even ignoring political boundaries such as national borders and travel restrictions (I have nothing against these per se and believe they have their place, but I'm making a hypothetical point here.), geography alone would prevent miscegenation from occurring on the scale needed to achieve any sort of global homogeneity. Even with improvements in transportation, anything approaching this outcome would require people to travel extreme distances in massive droves aboard ships, planes, or even Virgin Galactic-style commercial spacecraft with the intention of fucking each other. Such a global miscegenation program would also likely require an increase in reproduction which would run counter to actual long-term demographic transition projections. At this point, we're already forgetting that, according to most proponents of this hypothesis, this mixing of humans to the point of near homogeneity is supposed to occur by accident. As such, I'm highly skeptical of the idea, and I think the promotion of attitudes respecting diversity is a far more viable approach than expecting (or hoping) we'll all look the same one day.

Basically, this. Latin American countries, for example, tend to have a "Marry Latin" attitude with regards to who you should or shouldn't marry. If anything, that should probably have the "White Pride" twats chill for a while.
Norstal wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Fact, the best President in history was white. Fact, that proves white people are better at being president. Duh.

But since we all came from Africa, it's a known fact that the best president is an African.
So we need a white African. And we have Obama! Har har har har.


Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:04 am

Ixzara wrote:
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:I've heard the "one day we'll be so mixed up we'll all look the same" idea before, and the person promoting it is usually framing it as some utopia or (more annoyingly) the only antidote to bigotry and prejudice in the world. (Personally, I don't care if some racist idiocy persists as long as it's driven from the public sphere and relegated to a handful of miserable nutters at the margins, as with any crank idea.) I take annoyance with people who aspire to it as a utopia, as I don't see anything particularly utopian about a world without variety. (Of course, if it happens, it happens; I just don't view it as a utopia we "ought" to seek necessarily.) I hope we can still have plenty of diversity without people making a big deal of it, sort of like Star Trek.

Realistically, the mechanism by which this hypothetical uni-racial world is supposed to form (interracial reproduction on a massive scale) has limits of its own, even if we assume the complete collapse of racialist attitudes worldwide (keep in mind that in many cultures outside the west, racial prejudice remains the norm and is relatively uncontroversial). Even ignoring political boundaries such as national borders and travel restrictions (I have nothing against these per se and believe they have their place, but I'm making a hypothetical point here.), geography alone would prevent miscegenation from occurring on the scale needed to achieve any sort of global homogeneity. Even with improvements in transportation, anything approaching this outcome would require people to travel extreme distances in massive droves aboard ships, planes, or even Virgin Galactic-style commercial spacecraft with the intention of fucking each other. Such a global miscegenation program would also likely require an increase in reproduction which would run counter to actual long-term demographic transition projections. At this point, we're already forgetting that, according to most proponents of this hypothesis, this mixing of humans to the point of near homogeneity is supposed to occur by accident. As such, I'm highly skeptical of the idea, and I think the promotion of attitudes respecting diversity is a far more viable approach than expecting (or hoping) we'll all look the same one day.

Basically, this. Latin American countries, for example, tend to have a "Marry Latin" attitude with regards to who you should or shouldn't marry. If anything, that should probably have the "White Pride" twats chill for a while.


My dad used to joke about it saying "you guys should marry Latin, unless they have money; then go for it" :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ixzara
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ixzara » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:08 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ixzara wrote:

Basically, this. Latin American countries, for example, tend to have a "Marry Latin" attitude with regards to who you should or shouldn't marry. If anything, that should probably have the "White Pride" twats chill for a while.


My dad used to joke about it saying "you guys should marry Latin, unless they have money; then go for it" :p

My mom used to say that :blink:
Norstal wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Fact, the best President in history was white. Fact, that proves white people are better at being president. Duh.

But since we all came from Africa, it's a known fact that the best president is an African.
So we need a white African. And we have Obama! Har har har har.


Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:10 am

Ixzara wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
My dad used to joke about it saying "you guys should marry Latin, unless they have money; then go for it" :p

My mom used to say that :blink:


Yes, it's very common for our parents to be preoccupied about money :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ixzara
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ixzara » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:13 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Some people have different standards of what constitutes a "shithole." I used to live in Chelsea, MA, which is heavily Latino, low-income, and just generally one of the more poor and run-down places in Massachusetts. It didn't bother me that much, but I had a roommate that complained non-stop about how ghetto it was. Some people just put the worst possible spin on everything when they start seeing stuff in Spanish.


My neighborhood is not Highland Park either but it doesn't bother me at all what I see around here. We also have white people moving in and to be fair? I go down those streets skateboarding and just greeting people as I go along. It doesn't bother me and it doesn't bother them.

I guess you're right. The entire view is subjective. :p

Hmm, I hope my neighborhood doesn't qualify for the definition of hellhole.
Last edited by Ixzara on Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Norstal wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Fact, the best President in history was white. Fact, that proves white people are better at being president. Duh.

But since we all came from Africa, it's a known fact that the best president is an African.
So we need a white African. And we have Obama! Har har har har.


Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:29 am

Ixzara wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
My neighborhood is not Highland Park either but it doesn't bother me at all what I see around here. We also have white people moving in and to be fair? I go down those streets skateboarding and just greeting people as I go along. It doesn't bother me and it doesn't bother them.

I guess you're right. The entire view is subjective. :p

Hmm, I hope my neighborhood doesn't qualify for the definition of hellhole.


And hence why people cannot stereotype :p

See, I actually think that's a really nice place to live.

This is where I live myself (my house isn't shown because reasons, but it's one part of the neighborhood):
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.727156,-96.854423,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sceEKRee7PhHjElxAMS_2RA!2e0


I would hope my place isn't categorized as a shithole either simply because it's a mixed neighborhood with predominance of Latinos.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ixzara
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ixzara » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:35 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:


And hence why people cannot stereotype :p

See, I actually think that's a really nice place to live.

This is where I live myself (my house isn't shown because reasons, but it's one part of the neighborhood):
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.727156,-96.854423,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sceEKRee7PhHjElxAMS_2RA!2e0


I would hope my place isn't categorized as a shithole either simply because it's a mixed neighborhood with predominance of Latinos.

Looks like you live in a typical, suburban, Middle-Class, American neighborhood. It'd be nice to live in a neighborhood like that. (Except for the size of the lawn. Can you say maintenance?!?!?) I live in a typical Mexican, Middle-class neighborhood. I think the problem is that people believe that diversity=ghetto, when it's really not.
Norstal wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Fact, the best President in history was white. Fact, that proves white people are better at being president. Duh.

But since we all came from Africa, it's a known fact that the best president is an African.
So we need a white African. And we have Obama! Har har har har.


Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:40 am

Ixzara wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
And hence why people cannot stereotype :p

See, I actually think that's a really nice place to live.

This is where I live myself (my house isn't shown because reasons, but it's one part of the neighborhood):
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.727156,-96.854423,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sceEKRee7PhHjElxAMS_2RA!2e0


I would hope my place isn't categorized as a shithole either simply because it's a mixed neighborhood with predominance of Latinos.

Looks like you live in a typical, suburban, Middle-Class, American neighborhood. It'd be nice to live in a neighborhood like that. (Except for the size of the lawn. Can you say maintenance?!?!?) I live in a typical Mexican, Middle-class neighborhood. I think the problem is that people believe that diversity=ghetto, when it's really not.


Indeed, and as the case has proven even diverse neighborhoods can look middle class :p

And as for maintenance of the lawn, my dad placed gravel and brick on a lot of the yard and a fence around, so I have to go and mow the lawn outside of the fence every week or so :lol:

I would honestly have confused your neighborhood with a high-class neighborhood. It looks really nice.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ixzara
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ixzara » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:02 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ixzara wrote:Looks like you live in a typical, suburban, Middle-Class, American neighborhood. It'd be nice to live in a neighborhood like that. (Except for the size of the lawn. Can you say maintenance?!?!?) I live in a typical Mexican, Middle-class neighborhood. I think the problem is that people believe that diversity=ghetto, when it's really not.


Indeed, and as the case has proven even diverse neighborhoods can look middle class :p

And as for maintenance of the lawn, my dad placed gravel and brick on a lot of the yard and a fence around, so I have to go and mow the lawn outside of the fence every week or so :lol:

I would honestly have confused your neighborhood with a high-class neighborhood. It looks really nice.

Oh no. I don't make enough money for a high-class neighborhood house. I think American culture such as TV and the news have made Mexico look like it's poorer than it is in reality. I think the belief in North America (CAN and USA) is that Mexico is a country where there is nothing but shacks and a few hyper-rich, light skinned, billionaires. The reality is that 60% of the population is in the Middle-class (US is somewhere in the neighborhood of 80-85%), except our middle-class makes less money than the US middle-class. I make like USD $36,000 per year which here, is firmly middle-class but it would be considered working-class income in the USA. But the shit about the government is true. They're a bunch of corrupt dipshits.

Here is where the rich people in my town live. If you take a satellite view, you'll see that most of the houses here have pools. this isn't even the richest part of the city. The richest part of the city is a bit further northwest of this location, but for some reason, streetview hasn't gone through those areas.
Last edited by Ixzara on Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
Norstal wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Fact, the best President in history was white. Fact, that proves white people are better at being president. Duh.

But since we all came from Africa, it's a known fact that the best president is an African.
So we need a white African. And we have Obama! Har har har har.


Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:12 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:


And hence why people cannot stereotype :p

See, I actually think that's a really nice place to live.

This is where I live myself (my house isn't shown because reasons, but it's one part of the neighborhood):
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.727156,-96.854423,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sceEKRee7PhHjElxAMS_2RA!2e0


I would hope my place isn't categorized as a shithole either simply because it's a mixed neighborhood with predominance of Latinos.


If you have bars on the windows, its the ghetto.
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

User avatar
Divair2
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6666
Founded: Feb 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair2 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:15 am

Blazedtown wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
And hence why people cannot stereotype :p

See, I actually think that's a really nice place to live.

This is where I live myself (my house isn't shown because reasons, but it's one part of the neighborhood):
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.727156,-96.854423,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sceEKRee7PhHjElxAMS_2RA!2e0


I would hope my place isn't categorized as a shithole either simply because it's a mixed neighborhood with predominance of Latinos.


If you have bars on the windows, its the ghetto.

Today I learned I lived in a ghetto.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:15 am

Blazedtown wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
And hence why people cannot stereotype :p

See, I actually think that's a really nice place to live.

This is where I live myself (my house isn't shown because reasons, but it's one part of the neighborhood):
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.727156,-96.854423,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sceEKRee7PhHjElxAMS_2RA!2e0


I would hope my place isn't categorized as a shithole either simply because it's a mixed neighborhood with predominance of Latinos.


If you have bars on the windows, its the ghetto.


I think ghetto doesn't mean what you think it means.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37359
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:17 am

Divair2 wrote:
Blazedtown wrote:
If you have bars on the windows, its the ghetto.

Today I learned I lived in a ghetto.

All we need now is the military police shooting it out with insurgents and an a black market then it would be perfect.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Ixzara
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ixzara » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:18 am

Benuty wrote:
Divair2 wrote:Today I learned I lived in a ghetto.

All we need now is the military police shooting it out with insurgents and an a black market then it would be perfect.

Don't forget the shacks and the tenements.
Norstal wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Fact, the best President in history was white. Fact, that proves white people are better at being president. Duh.

But since we all came from Africa, it's a known fact that the best president is an African.
So we need a white African. And we have Obama! Har har har har.


Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:19 am

Ixzara wrote:
Benuty wrote:All we need now is the military police shooting it out with insurgents and an a black market then it would be perfect.

Don't forget the shacks and the tenements.


I said ghetto not favelea.
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

User avatar
Ucropi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1362
Founded: Sep 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ucropi » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:20 am

I'm sorry but correct me if I'm wrong skin colour doesn't denote race. We are all human who cares who you bang?
Go home America, my country already has freedom
Things I Like:
Communism, Equality, Science, Art

Things I Hate:
Capitalism, America, Religion

User avatar
Iuronia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1070
Founded: Mar 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Iuronia » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:22 am

I don't particularly care for race-mixing, as I believe men should be free to do anything, as long as it is harms no one (but themselves, if they so will).

But, I do not anticipate brightly a world where everyone looks the same, and I think that there should be diversity.

Ixzara wrote:But the shit about the government is true. They're a bunch of corrupt dipshits.

Like pretty much everywhere else.
For: Nothing

Against: Everything

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:22 am

Blazedtown wrote:
Ixzara wrote:Don't forget the shacks and the tenements.


I said ghetto not favelea.


Ghetto has a very specific definition in my book which is historical:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... rsovie.jpg

In other words just because people have used now "ghetto" to mean anything they consider "low class" is completely arbitrary bullshit.

Given that our yards are clean and our streets look nice and we're not shooting each other nor robbing each other, or have compliance issues with the city in any form whatsoever I am compelled to dismiss this as complete bullshit.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Zaldakki
Minister
 
Posts: 2458
Founded: Oct 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaldakki » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:24 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Blazedtown wrote:1st generation immigrants where born and in all probability raised in another country. That means they may have loyalties other than to their new host country. Second generation will still hold dear a good portion of the cultural values and practices of their home country, being raised by people from that country and probably speak the language of their homeland. 3rd generation will hopefully have fully Americanized with only a few traces of their home culture and language still present, while the fourth generation will only have the recipes for the good ethnic foods and the occasional awful delicacies of the home country kept around for torturing in laws.


As a 1st generation Citizen I find that a little inaccurate. I'm sorry but if you think I hold any loyalties to the country where I was born or to the one my mother is from you are dead wrong and are completely making ignorant arguments without ever knowing an immigrant yourself. So let me enlighten you how we people in the citizenship process think (the vast majority of us anyways, I am sure there are exceptions).

We don't think "oh we're going to fuck over America"; we think "you know? We actually want to have a life and children in this land and contribute to this country which is our land now by choice." Yes, we hold our heritage and culture, but only the good values of said culture. I'm an Americanized Latino basically except for certain beliefs and cultural differences that I still have that I have found beneficial to retain because they make me a better person and gives me an advantage (such as my language and work ethics as well as racial indifference).

The truth is I have also learned how to coexist with all other cultures around me, and if that isn't what an American is supposed to do then you can kiss my ass because I learned your constitution and I know, better than you do, how I feel about America and which country I hold more loyalty to - which is the country I hold my citizenship right now. So for you to say "oh immigrants have other loyalties" is extremely dishonest and ignorant of you given that those of us who come here expect a better life and people like you just like to shit all over it by flaunting your so-called "American Heritage" at us while we prove we're much better than you and we have the self-respect not to lower ourselves to discriminate you.

^This. Immigrants are often more patriotic about their host country than even natives are.

User avatar
Ixzara
Minister
 
Posts: 2080
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ixzara » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:24 am

Blazedtown wrote:
Ixzara wrote:Don't forget the shacks and the tenements.


I said ghetto not favelea.

Well, Hooverville for Americans. Americans haven't had a real slum since the end of WW2.
Last edited by Ixzara on Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Norstal wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:Fact, the best President in history was white. Fact, that proves white people are better at being president. Duh.

But since we all came from Africa, it's a known fact that the best president is an African.
So we need a white African. And we have Obama! Har har har har.


Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:27 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Blazedtown wrote:
I said ghetto not favelea.


Ghetto has a very specific definition in my book which is historical:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... rsovie.jpg

In other words just because people have used now "ghetto" to mean anything they consider "low class" is completely arbitrary bullshit.

Given that our yards are clean and our streets look nice I am compelled to dismiss this as complete bullshit.


When I think of the ghetto, I think south side of Chicago.
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:29 am

Blazedtown wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ghetto has a very specific definition in my book which is historical:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... rsovie.jpg

In other words just because people have used now "ghetto" to mean anything they consider "low class" is completely arbitrary bullshit.

Given that our yards are clean and our streets look nice I am compelled to dismiss this as complete bullshit.


When I think of the ghetto, I think south side of Chicago.


And when I think of the ghetto I think of a slum. Again, your definition is completely arbitrary.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bovad, East Leaf Republic, Halal lands, Juristonia, Shrillland, The Apollonian Systems

Advertisement

Remove ads