Advertisement
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:16 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:20 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:21 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:(Obviously the name can be changed, but it doesn't necessarily have to be.)
Should NATO be expanded in scope to no longer merely cover North America and Europe, but also to expand westwards (to potentially include Japan, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, etc and eventually if it's feasible, India and such.) And Southwards to potentially include South American democracies?
(Essentially, an alliance of the Westerners.)
With the slight decline in US and European power following the cold war, and the seeming rise in Russia and Chinese power, i'm of the opinion that the hegenomic influence of the alliance must be expanded further to properly cover all western friendly nations.
We must face facts. The UN, while having done an admirable job in world health and such, is not the human rights guarantor that it was established to be. NATO as it currently stands is too weak to continue under that mantle.
The expansion of NATO would also help with global stability and security, as well as make our global power projection greater.
I'm also of the opinion that NATO should put more focus into standardization of equipment so as to make it's units, equipment, and armies interchangable.
Such an action at this time would also send a very clear message to the Russians about what their Crimean shenanigans won them. A vastly expanded NATO (Precisely the thing they were worried about in the first place, thus turning this into a strategic failure and defeat for the Russians if we explicitly said this was why we are forming super-nato.)
This deals with the purely military aspects of a super-NATO, even if personally i'd also throw on top of that trade agreements so as to bind our economies together.
What do you think NSG?
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:24 am
Dejanic wrote:I think at that point a world federation is needed.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:26 am
Dejanic wrote:Viritica wrote:What makes you think that? Half of the nations in this world can't even get along (e.g. China and Taiwan, North and South Korea, Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Palestine, India and Pakistan, etc.)
Yeah they don't get along now. But we've more world unity now than we did 20 years ago.
It won't happen anytime soon, but it will happen eventually. These continental/trade blocs are just the beginning.
As technology increases and we get closer to a type 1 civilisation, world unity will have to happen.
The question isn't if world unity will happen. The question is when, and under what political form.
by The blood ravens » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:28 am
by Immoren » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:29 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Blazedtown » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:30 am
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:30 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Viritica » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:31 am
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:33 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:34 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Immoren » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:34 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Finland aren't in NATO ???
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Blazedtown » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:35 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???
by DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:38 am
Blazedtown wrote:DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???
Sweden isn't in NATO because any Swede with a spine either went to other countries as Vikings or later to America. Finland isn't NATO because they pledged that Finland's existence as a country would never pose a threat to Leningrad. No idea on why Norway isn't in the EU.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.
by Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:39 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
Sweden isn't in NATO because any Swede with a spine either went to other countries as Vikings or later to America. Finland isn't NATO because they pledged that Finland's existence as a country would never pose a threat to Leningrad. No idea on why Norway isn't in the EU.
lawl who gives a fuck what they pledged. Why haven't they screwed over the Russians already?
by Immoren » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:42 am
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
Sweden isn't in NATO because any Swede with a spine either went to other countries as Vikings or later to America. Finland isn't NATO because they pledged that Finland's existence as a country would never pose a threat to Leningrad. No idea on why Norway isn't in the EU.
lawl who gives a fuck what they pledged. Why haven't they screwed over the Russians already?
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Hladgos » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:43 am
by Yanalia » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:45 am
Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.
by Terra Sector Union » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:51 am
Dejanic wrote:I think at that point a world federation is needed.
Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Doechland, Floofybit, The Black Forrest
Advertisement