NATION

PASSWORD

Super-NATO

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

It are all belong to who?

Yes, NATO should be expanded to include other westernized democratic nations in asia, oceania, and south america.
147
50%
Yes, NATO should be expanded, but not into asia.
7
2%
Yes, NATO should be expanded, but not into south america.
7
2%
Yes, NATO should be expanded, but not into oceania.
0
No votes
No, NATO should not be expanded outside north america and europe.
83
28%
NATO should submit to Equestrian rule.
48
16%
 
Total votes : 292

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:15 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
...
I'm fine with Terran Confederation.
Or Sol Alliance :p

We'll compromise.

Sol Imperium of Mankind's Confederation.


Image
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:15 am

Immoren wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
...
I'm fine with Terran Confederation.
Or Sol Alliance :p


Earth Alliance.
Because B5. *nods*

Union of Allied Planets once we colonize other planetary bodies. *nod*

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:16 am

What about militar-izing the EU?

EDIT: Wait, they already have :lol: CSDP
Last edited by DnalweN acilbupeR on Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:18 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:What about militar-izing the EU?

EDIT: Wait, they already have :lol: CSDP


DP?
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:20 am

Blazedtown wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:What about militar-izing the EU?

EDIT: Wait, they already have :lol: CSDP


DP?


Common Security and Defence Policy

FEDIT: Interesting stuff:

Image

Purple - NATO + EU
Orange - NATO only
Blue - EU only

Image
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:21 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:(Obviously the name can be changed, but it doesn't necessarily have to be.)
Should NATO be expanded in scope to no longer merely cover North America and Europe, but also to expand westwards (to potentially include Japan, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, etc and eventually if it's feasible, India and such.) And Southwards to potentially include South American democracies?

(Essentially, an alliance of the Westerners.)
With the slight decline in US and European power following the cold war, and the seeming rise in Russia and Chinese power, i'm of the opinion that the hegenomic influence of the alliance must be expanded further to properly cover all western friendly nations.

We must face facts. The UN, while having done an admirable job in world health and such, is not the human rights guarantor that it was established to be. NATO as it currently stands is too weak to continue under that mantle.

The expansion of NATO would also help with global stability and security, as well as make our global power projection greater.

I'm also of the opinion that NATO should put more focus into standardization of equipment so as to make it's units, equipment, and armies interchangable.

Such an action at this time would also send a very clear message to the Russians about what their Crimean shenanigans won them. A vastly expanded NATO (Precisely the thing they were worried about in the first place, thus turning this into a strategic failure and defeat for the Russians if we explicitly said this was why we are forming super-nato.)

This deals with the purely military aspects of a super-NATO, even if personally i'd also throw on top of that trade agreements so as to bind our economies together.
What do you think NSG?


So... a return to the Cold War era where the West assumes the right of force projection while becoming indignant that the other world regions would respond accordingly?

I like it.

You're suggesting a return to a multipolarity in world political and economic authority. I agree with you.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

Does anyone know, to what degree are EU Battlegroups and the European Gendarmerie Force actual combat-capable , meaningful organizations as opposed to just political attempts of being friendly & courteous?
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:24 am

Dejanic wrote:I think at that point a world federation is needed.


Ew. Cosmopolitanism.

Tell me, what structure of government do you envision for this federation? If its democratic in structure, then I have to ask - who do you think will be expropriated by the greatly more populated asian nations? Why, the Western nations, of course! Is your western guilt (think "white guilt") so bad that you want to see the West destroyed?

No World Federation. Not now. Not ever.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:26 am

Dejanic wrote:
Viritica wrote:What makes you think that? Half of the nations in this world can't even get along (e.g. China and Taiwan, North and South Korea, Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Palestine, India and Pakistan, etc.)

Yeah they don't get along now. But we've more world unity now than we did 20 years ago.


By what measure?

It won't happen anytime soon, but it will happen eventually. These continental/trade blocs are just the beginning.


Or... perhaps they're in contrast to the rise of the United States and the European Union in response to the absence of the Soviet Union?

As technology increases and we get closer to a type 1 civilisation, world unity will have to happen.


Type 1 civilization? What is that?

The question isn't if world unity will happen. The question is when, and under what political form.


Preferably, an imploded one.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
The blood ravens
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9085
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The blood ravens » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:28 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Imperium of Mankind.


...
I'm fine with Terran Confederation.
Or Sol Alliance :p

The United Earth Directorate or the Terran Dominion.

:P
If at first you don't succeed try again with an equally horrible plan.
FT Nation: The Aurelian Imperium

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65560
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:29 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Immoren wrote:
Earth Alliance.
Because B5. *nods*

Union of Allied Planets once we colonize other planetary bodies. *nod*


Silly Nap. It's still EA after we colonize other planetary bodies. :P
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:30 am

Immoren wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Union of Allied Planets once we colonize other planetary bodies. *nod*


Silly Nap. It's still EA after we colonize other planetary bodies. :P


If it doesn't have a God Emperor, you're a heretic.
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:30 am

Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:31 am

Purpelia wrote:
Viritica wrote:To what?

I don't think there's any other name quite as catchy as NATO.

OTAN.

Nah.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:33 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???


They don't want to be. The EU might be too much an imposition on the Swedish culture (politically)? Of course... I'm not Sweden so I'm making an uneducated guess. Which makes my opinion on the matter about as worthless as low quality toilet paper.

As for Nato... no clue.
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:34 am

We could keep the acronym but change the name to Not Assholes Treaty Organization.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65560
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:34 am

Purpelia wrote:
Viritica wrote:To what?

I don't think there's any other name quite as catchy as NATO.

OTAN.


Which mean along lines of "I (shall) take" in Finnish.

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Finland aren't in NATO ???


Because Cold War never ended here. *nods*

Blazedtown wrote:
Immoren wrote:
Silly Nap. It's still EA after we colonize other planetary bodies. :P


If it doesn't have a God Emperor, you're a heretic.


EA is too early in history to have God-Emperor. :P
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Blazedtown
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15177
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Blazedtown » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:35 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???


Sweden isn't in NATO because any Swede with a spine either went to other countries as Vikings or later to America. Finland isn't NATO because they pledged that Finland's existence as a country would never pose a threat to Leningrad. No idea on why Norway isn't in the EU.
Go Vikings.
Sunnyvale, straight the fuck up.

User avatar
DnalweN acilbupeR
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7409
Founded: Aug 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DnalweN acilbupeR » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:38 am

Blazedtown wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???


Sweden isn't in NATO because any Swede with a spine either went to other countries as Vikings or later to America. Finland isn't NATO because they pledged that Finland's existence as a country would never pose a threat to Leningrad. No idea on why Norway isn't in the EU.


lawl who gives a fuck what they pledged. Why haven't they screwed over the Russians already?
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I award you no points, and have sent people to make sure your parents refrain from further breeding.
Lyttenburgh wrote:all this is a damning enough evidence to proove you of being an edgy butthurt 'murican teenager with the sole agenda of prooving to the uncaring bitch Web, that "You Have A Point!"
Lyttenburgh wrote:Either that, or, you were gang-raped by commi-nazi russian Spetznaz kill team, who then painted all walls in your house in hammer and sickles, and then viped their asses with the stars and stripes banner in your yard. That's the only logical explanation.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24223
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Distruzio » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:39 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Blazedtown wrote:
Sweden isn't in NATO because any Swede with a spine either went to other countries as Vikings or later to America. Finland isn't NATO because they pledged that Finland's existence as a country would never pose a threat to Leningrad. No idea on why Norway isn't in the EU.


lawl who gives a fuck what they pledged. Why haven't they screwed over the Russians already?


Maybe a look at the map will help you with that question?
Eastern Orthodox Christian
Christ is King
Glorify Him

capitalism is not natural
secularism is not neutral
liberalism is not tolerant

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65560
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:42 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
Blazedtown wrote:
Sweden isn't in NATO because any Swede with a spine either went to other countries as Vikings or later to America. Finland isn't NATO because they pledged that Finland's existence as a country would never pose a threat to Leningrad. No idea on why Norway isn't in the EU.


lawl who gives a fuck what they pledged. Why haven't they screwed over the Russians already?


"All i have in this World is my balls and my word and I don't break 'em for no one."

And easy for you there to shout things like that. :P
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Hladgos
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24628
Founded: Feb 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hladgos » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:43 am

I doubt this is going to happen any time soon, because nations want their sovereignty on the global stage.
Divair wrote:Hladcore.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're a nut. I like that.
Pro: being outside, conserving our Earth, the pursuit of happiness, universal acceptance
Anti: ignorance and intolerance
Life is suffering. Suffering is caused by craving and aversion. Suffering can be overcome and happiness can be attained. Live a moral life.

"Life would be tragic if it weren't funny." -Stephen Hawking

"The purpose of our life is to be happy." -Dali Lama

"If I had no sense of humor, I would have long ago committed suicide." -Gandhi

"Don't worry, be happy!" -Bobby McFerrin

Silly Pride

"No." -Dya

User avatar
Yanalia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Yanalia » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:45 am

I don't see NATO as the emblem of everything the world should strive to emulate, so I don't really view its continued expansion of influence as positive.
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33

Free South Califas wrote:Dammit Byzantium, stop spraying your ignorance on everyone.

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:51 am

Dejanic wrote:I think at that point a world federation is needed.

World Government is inevitable. I don't care what the nationalists say or the ethnic/cultural preservationists say; the world will be ruled by an iron fist and the borders will dissolve by the end of the century.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Soled
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1768
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soled » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:54 am

DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:Could someone explain to me why Norway isn't in the EU and Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO ???

Norway voted to become a member of the EU. Twice. Failed miserably.
Member of Tiandi and Ajax
Norwegian | they/them and she/her pronouns

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Doechland, Floofybit, The Black Forrest

Advertisement

Remove ads