Super-NATO

[Libertarian California]

If NATO were to expand (which it shouldn't), it should include more of Europe.

Similar relationships/organizations should be established for Australia, New Zealand, and Japan (and these already already exist).

However, I think that the AUSCANNZUKUS alliance should be strengthened, by a lot.

[EverywhereAndNowhere]

And he ended up inspiring millions of people to be better at everything they can be. And the world is so much better because of it.

Or countless millions of dead over the last 2000 years depending on how you look at it. Jesus was just one Jew who got martyred by the Romans and ended up famous. Do you really think he would pleased with the Crusades? or the Hundred Years War or the Thirty Years war, or the countless atrocities committed in his name over the centuries? Religion is just the world's first propaganda agency. What better way for a chieftain to secure his position than by saying that gods gave him his position?

But this is getting off track.

If you expect me to argue against that last post, well, I won't, because you are completely right. Religion is an excuse used by many people who have committed horrible atrocities to others. The crusades, along with many other "Holy Wars," were just people seeking to justify their lust for money and power.
However, I wasn't talking about any of these world leaders, people that advertise their religion as an excuse to do what they want. I'm talking about the millions of normal people you pass in your everyday life, people whose lives were changed and given new meaning by Jesus Christ, people who now have a reason to live their life the best that they can live it. People like me.

However, yes, I do believe we have gotten quite off track. So, I'll end with what I have just shared, and wish you all luck as you discuss how best to take over the world, and end all peace as we know it.

[Ereria]

Super nato would be usefull because then people wouldn't dare to start wars and shit. Might even bring stability to the middle east.

[Marcurix]

Super nato would be usefull because then people wouldn't dare to start wars and shit. Might even bring stability to the middle east.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

[DnalweN acilbupeR]

Incredibly silly comment especially if it comes from a Romanian as his name would imply. Ukraine's literally on your fucking border, loony.

Romania has historical claims to regions today inside Ukraine. The Soviets took it from them. It was then made part of Soviet Ukraine. Soviets even took some Romanian island near the Danube which ended up in Soviet Ukraine. The Soviets also made sure to have a piece of the Danube river. Romanians not happy about all this even today. Not too long ago, the Romanians and Ukrainians went to the ICJ on some territorial waters demarcation problem.

Has for the Ukrainians, they do not trust the Romanians. This will explain it all.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... rel-ro.htm

This was Romania in 1918.
http://danasboots.files.wordpress.com/2 ... n-1918.png

German, Hungarian, Bulgarian and Soviet pressure caused them to cede territory. After WW II they got parts of it back except the Soviet and it seems the Bulgarian parts.

Romania today
http://www.hotels-europe.com/info-count ... omania.jpg

I do know the Romanian government as a plan to try lure Moldova into rejoining.

I was already aware of most of the stuff you presented there. Not so relevant to the issue at hand though. What do territorial claims into Ukraine have to do with (hating) NATO?

[DnalweN acilbupeR]

Not only should NATO not be expanded, it should, in fact, be abolished. (And all US troops should return to the US.)

No, why'd we do that?

[The 93rd Coalition]

Just westernized nations? That seems awfully imperialistic. We should stick with the U.N.. I think the most i'd advocate for as far as a worldwide hegemony would be a U.N. commanded army, but that would be it.

[New switz empire]

We need to unite as there are so many benefits.

[Cyyro]

Just westernized nations? That seems awfully imperialistic. We should stick with the U.N.. I think the most i'd advocate for as far as a worldwide hegemony would be a U.N. commanded army, but that would be it.

That would take forever to organize and would be impossible to lead, and all the soldiers would have to know English like it was their first language.

[The blood ravens]

We need to unite as there are so many benefits.

Humanity does need to unite if we are to have any hope of expanding beyond earth.

[San-Silvacian]

Not only should NATO not be expanded, it should, in fact, be abolished. (And all US troops should return to the US.)

Ron Paul 2012 amirite

[Benuty]

Just westernized nations? That seems awfully imperialistic. We should stick with the U.N.. I think the most i'd advocate for as far as a worldwide hegemony would be a U.N. commanded army, but that would be it.

That would take forever to organize and would be impossible to lead, and all the soldiers would have to know English like it was their first language.

Why not a Terran language?

[The 93rd Coalition]

That would take forever to organize and would be impossible to lead, and all the soldiers would have to know English like it was their first language.

Why not a Terran language?

Ah, think about that.

[Cyyro]

That would take forever to organize and would be impossible to lead, and all the soldiers would have to know English like it was their first language.

Why not a Terran language?

That would be better, but we need to work on that however.

[Party Nation Druids]

Super nato would be usefull because then people wouldn't dare to start wars and shit. Might even bring stability to the middle east.

That was the theory that led to World War 1, the European countries believed if they built up huge armies and formed alliances with each other that no one would dare attack the other.

[The 93rd Coalition]

Super nato would be usefull because then people wouldn't dare to start wars and shit. Might even bring stability to the middle east.

That was the theory that led to World War 1, the European countries believed if they built up huge armies and formed alliances with each other that no one would dare attack the other.

http://youtu.be/G2U8yfKM9nY?t=7s

[Blazedtown]

That would take forever to organize and would be impossible to lead, and all the soldiers would have to know English like it was their first language.

Why not a Terran language?

You mean English?

[Assorted Sucrose-Based Lifeforms]

Why not a Terran language?

That would be better, but we need to work on that however.

Whatever it is, we're using the Chinese names for numbers. I hear that they're far easier to learn and use.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2011/ ... heir-words

[Blazedtown]

That would be better, but we need to work on that however.

Whatever it is, we're using the Chinese names for numbers. I hear that they're far easier to learn and use.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2011/ ... heir-words

English or nothing.

[Assorted Sucrose-Based Lifeforms]

English or nothing.

Chinese numbers with English everything else would be nice, IMO.

[Geilinor]

Super nato would be usefull because then people wouldn't dare to start wars and shit. Might even bring stability to the middle east.

That was the theory that led to World War 1, the European countries believed if they built up huge armies and formed alliances with each other that no one would dare attack the other.

Where's the counter-alliance to NATO?
EDIT: CSTO is no match for NATO.

[Blazedtown]

English or nothing.

Chinese numbers with English everything else would be nice, IMO.

No. Arabic numerals. If its not America in space, I don't want anything to do with it.

[Assorted Sucrose-Based Lifeforms]

Chinese numbers with English everything else would be nice, IMO.

No. Arabic numerals. If its not America in space, I don't want anything to do with it.

Arabic numerals, of course, I very much prefer them, but Chinese names for the numerals makes higher numbers easier to learn for kids, and makes arithmetic easier.
I'm just saying, if we have the opportunity to change things about our language, for example, whilst trying to create a universal language, then why not improve the number system when we have the chance?

[San-Silvacian]

That was the theory that led to World War 1, the European countries believed if they built up huge armies and formed alliances with each other that no one would dare attack the other.

Where's the counter-alliance to NATO?
EDIT: CSTO is no match for NATO.

Dissolved in 1991

[Geilinor]

Where's the counter-alliance to NATO?
EDIT: CSTO is no match for NATO.

Dissolved in 1991

Actually, there is a new organization, but is nothing compared to NATO. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_Security_Treaty_Organization Russia just likes to think that it's more powerful than it really is.