Advertisement
by European Socialist Republic » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:52 am
by The USOT » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:55 am
by Mkuki » Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:56 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
by The USOT » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:00 am
European Socialist Republic wrote:Science is a tool of the Devil to turn us into godless heathens!
by Usual Rubbish » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:13 am
by Benuty » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:14 am
ALMF wrote:Usual Rubbish wrote:no he just showed scientific data that the universe is over 6,500 years old.
I'm sure there is also evidence of how 2 people could not populate a planet.
Or how a boat could not hold 2 of every species.
etc....
Yet faith beats reason.....
Hence faith and it's adherents are evil.
by Tekania » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:44 am
Dejanic wrote:When people say "creationism" they typically mean the whole American evangelican "world 6000 years old" creationism. Honestly though, I wish a smart guy like Neil deGrasse would talk about more pressing issues like the economy, instead of ripping into these dumb creationists who have been battered and disproven a trillion times.
by Dejanic » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:51 am
Tekania wrote:Dejanic wrote:When people say "creationism" they typically mean the whole American evangelican "world 6000 years old" creationism. Honestly though, I wish a smart guy like Neil deGrasse would talk about more pressing issues like the economy, instead of ripping into these dumb creationists who have been battered and disproven a trillion times.
He's an astrophysicist hosting a space-centric science program/documentary. Why in the fuck would he be discussing the economy?
by Mkuki » Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:59 am
Dejanic wrote:Tekania wrote:
He's an astrophysicist hosting a space-centric science program/documentary. Why in the fuck would he be discussing the economy?
Are you telling me that scientific funding doesn't depend on the economy? There are many reasons as to why an astro-physicist could discuss the economy. And I'm Sorry, but discussing the economy Is a hell of a lot more important than discussing the beliefs of loons.
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
by Greater-London » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:02 pm
by Farnhamia » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:03 pm
ALMF wrote:Usual Rubbish wrote:no he just showed scientific data that the universe is over 6,500 years old.
I'm sure there is also evidence of how 2 people could not populate a planet.
Or how a boat could not hold 2 of every species.
etc....
Yet faith beats reason.....
Hence faith and it's adherents are evil.
by Estormo » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:15 pm
European Socialist Republic wrote:Science is a tool of the Devil to turn us into godless heathens!
by Tekania » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:44 pm
Dejanic wrote:Tekania wrote:
He's an astrophysicist hosting a space-centric science program/documentary. Why in the fuck would he be discussing the economy?
Are you telling me that scientific funding doesn't depend on the economy? There are many reasons as to why an astro-physicist could discuss the economy. And I'm Sorry, but discussing the economy Is a hell of a lot more important than discussing the beliefs of loons.
by Farnhamia » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:45 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:45 pm
Dejanic wrote:Tekania wrote:
He's an astrophysicist hosting a space-centric science program/documentary. Why in the fuck would he be discussing the economy?
Are you telling me that scientific funding doesn't depend on the economy? There are many reasons as to why an astro-physicist could discuss the economy. And I'm Sorry, but discussing the economy Is a hell of a lot more important than discussing the beliefs of loons.
by Farnhamia » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:46 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Dejanic wrote:Are you telling me that scientific funding doesn't depend on the economy? There are many reasons as to why an astro-physicist could discuss the economy. And I'm Sorry, but discussing the economy Is a hell of a lot more important than discussing the beliefs of loons.
And why doesn't Steven Reich ever talk about the climate?
by Benuty » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:57 pm
by Olthar » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:11 pm
Divair2 wrote:You don't need to disprove that which has no proof. Tyson simply hit another nail in the coffin. There are already millions of nails, but another is good.
by Tekania » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:22 pm
by Estormo » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:51 pm
by Libertarian California » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:03 pm
Dejanic wrote:Nekronia wrote:This disproves New Earth creationism, which is silly because there's trees older than 6.5k years old. This doesn't disprove a deity creating the universe earlier in time, such as being the cause of the Big Bang or somesuch. I'm an atheist but Tyson was just disproving New Earth creationism, which should be blatantly false to even many religious people. I'm an atheist, and accept the evidence for a purely scientific origin, but this specific article isn't really disproving all forms of creationism. Such as Old Earth creationism.
When people say "creationism" they typically mean the whole American evangelican "world 6000 years old" creationism. Honestly though, I wish a smart guy like Neil deGrasse would talk about more pressing issues like the economy, instead of ripping into these dumb creationists who have been battered and disproven a trillion times.
by Margno » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:47 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:53 pm
by Constantinopolis » Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:00 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Angevin-Romanov Crimea, Cyptopir, Einaro, Floofybit, Freezerville, HISPIDA, Infected Mushroom, Likhinia, Nu Elysium, Port Carverton, Saint Kanye, Shrillland, Statesburg, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Trump Almighty
Advertisement