NATION

PASSWORD

Ukraine Crisis II: Electric Boogaloo

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:43 pm

Baltenstein wrote:
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:The Coup Authorities have decided to relaunch their "anti-terror" operation. Conviniently timed for when the US VP is in the capital. Russian FM Lavrov warned yesterday that Russia would come in and stop attempts by the Kiev regime to impose civil war on Ukraine but it seems they no longer care what the international community thinks.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27118875


It is most strange that you would link an article that provides the actual reason of the Ukrainian government's renewed counter-separatist efforts. (Like pro-Russian separatists torturing Ukrainian politicians for example)

What's funny is that if Russia did the exact same thing as Ukraine, Nilfgaard would see it as further proof that Great Leader Putin is STRONK!

And then he complains of the West having double standards.
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:45 pm

Divair2 wrote:
Crimson Futures wrote:

Putin wants to bring back the might of the Soviet Union. That is his end goal, whatever he happens to be doing at the moment. If he sees the opportunity, he will take it.

No. About as reasonable as people claiming the Crimea is the modern Sudetenland. Putin's interested in expanding influence. That's why he took Sevastopol, but ignored eastern Ukraine. Sevastopol is an important naval base. Eastern Ukraine isn't strategically useful. Poland isn't either. And Poland is in NATO. Putin cannot, and will not, expand further. The crisis is over.

The Crimea crisis is over, but the Ukraine crisis is far from over. There's still a significant possibility that Russia invades Eastern Ukraine, not so much to absorb it, but to force the Kiev government to make concessions or face overthrow.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
Divair2
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6666
Founded: Feb 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair2 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:46 pm

Beta Test wrote:
Divair2 wrote:No. About as reasonable as people claiming the Crimea is the modern Sudetenland. Putin's interested in expanding influence. That's why he took Sevastopol, but ignored eastern Ukraine. Sevastopol is an important naval base. Eastern Ukraine isn't strategically useful. Poland isn't either. And Poland is in NATO. Putin cannot, and will not, expand further. The crisis is over.

The Crimea crisis is over, but the Ukraine crisis is far from over. There's still a significant possibility that Russia invades Eastern Ukraine, not so much to absorb it, but to force the Kiev government to make concessions or face overthrow.

Unlikely at best. Russia's economy has already stopped growing from the international outrage. An actual invasion of the country? Utter economic and political disaster. Russia would be an outcast.

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:48 pm

Divair2 wrote:
Beta Test wrote:The Crimea crisis is over, but the Ukraine crisis is far from over. There's still a significant possibility that Russia invades Eastern Ukraine, not so much to absorb it, but to force the Kiev government to make concessions or face overthrow.

Unlikely at best. Russia's economy has already stopped growing from the international outrage. An actual invasion of the country? Utter economic and political disaster. Russia would be an outcast.

As if they aren't already. The damage is done, Putin's actions have greatly reduced the trust between East and West and their willingness to cooperate.
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
Divair2
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6666
Founded: Feb 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair2 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:49 pm

Beta Test wrote:
Divair2 wrote:Unlikely at best. Russia's economy has already stopped growing from the international outrage. An actual invasion of the country? Utter economic and political disaster. Russia would be an outcast.

As if they aren't already. The damage is done, Putin's actions have greatly reduced the trust between East and West and their willingness to cooperate.

They haven't been entirely thrown under the bus yet. Once we start cutting off their gas, that's when I'd start worrying.

User avatar
Beta Test
Minister
 
Posts: 2639
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Beta Test » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:51 pm

Divair2 wrote:
Beta Test wrote:As if they aren't already. The damage is done, Putin's actions have greatly reduced the trust between East and West and their willingness to cooperate.

They haven't been entirely thrown under the bus yet. Once we start cutting off their gas, that's when I'd start worrying.

Hopefully it won't get to that. If Kerry and Lavrov can find a way to work on Syria, than they should be able to find a way to work on this. Hopefully...
Member of the Coalition of Workers and Farmers
Michael Ferreira: President of the Senate
Philip Awad: Former Secretary of Rural Development

User avatar
Lemanrussland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5078
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemanrussland » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:56 pm

Divair2 wrote:
Crimson Futures wrote:

Putin wants to bring back the might of the Soviet Union. That is his end goal, whatever he happens to be doing at the moment. If he sees the opportunity, he will take it.

No. About as reasonable as people claiming the Crimea is the modern Sudetenland. Putin's interested in expanding influence. That's why he took Sevastopol, but ignored eastern Ukraine. Sevastopol is an important naval base. Eastern Ukraine isn't strategically useful. Poland isn't either. And Poland is in NATO. Putin cannot, and will not, expand further. The crisis is over.

"East Ukraine is not strategically useful".

Yes it is, it's home to a lot of heavy industry and coal mining. It's basically eastern Europe's equivalent of the Ruhr valley. Not to mention Russia wants to maintain it's system of (at least neutral) buffer states for reasons we talked about earlier in the thread.

It doesn't necessarily need to annex east Ukraine to accomplish that (keeping Ukraine neutral at a minimum), it just needs federalization.
Last edited by Lemanrussland on Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Divair2
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6666
Founded: Feb 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair2 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:58 pm

Beta Test wrote:
Divair2 wrote:They haven't been entirely thrown under the bus yet. Once we start cutting off their gas, that's when I'd start worrying.

Hopefully it won't get to that. If Kerry and Lavrov can find a way to work on Syria, than they should be able to find a way to work on this. Hopefully...

Status quo. That's pretty much it.

Lemanrussland wrote:
Divair2 wrote:No. About as reasonable as people claiming the Crimea is the modern Sudetenland. Putin's interested in expanding influence. That's why he took Sevastopol, but ignored eastern Ukraine. Sevastopol is an important naval base. Eastern Ukraine isn't strategically useful. Poland isn't either. And Poland is in NATO. Putin cannot, and will not, expand further. The crisis is over.

"East Ukraine is not strategically useful".

Yes it is, it's home to a lot of heavy industry and coal mining. It's basically eastern Europe's equivalent of the Ruhr valley. Not to mention Russia wants to maintain it's system of (at least neutral) buffer states for reasons we talked about earlier in the thread.

Ukraine is the buffer state. The overthrow doesn't change that. The next election cycle will see everything return to normal. And no, eastern Ukraine is not important. It's a shithole.

User avatar
Lemanrussland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5078
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemanrussland » Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:01 pm

Divair2 wrote:
Beta Test wrote:Hopefully it won't get to that. If Kerry and Lavrov can find a way to work on Syria, than they should be able to find a way to work on this. Hopefully...

Status quo. That's pretty much it.

Lemanrussland wrote:"East Ukraine is not strategically useful".

Yes it is, it's home to a lot of heavy industry and coal mining. It's basically eastern Europe's equivalent of the Ruhr valley. Not to mention Russia wants to maintain it's system of (at least neutral) buffer states for reasons we talked about earlier in the thread.

Ukraine is the buffer state. The overthrow doesn't change that. The next election cycle will see everything return to normal. And no, eastern Ukraine is not important. It's a shithole.

Lots of strategically important places are shitholes, though. Afghanistan, for example, is not the nicest place in the world, but it is important as a strategic hub in Central Asia.

User avatar
Divair2
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6666
Founded: Feb 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair2 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:03 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
Divair2 wrote:Status quo. That's pretty much it.


Ukraine is the buffer state. The overthrow doesn't change that. The next election cycle will see everything return to normal. And no, eastern Ukraine is not important. It's a shithole.

Lots of strategically important places are shitholes, though. Afghanistan, for example, is not the nicest place in the world, but it is important as a strategic hub in Central Asia.

If your goal is to, say, establish a huge forward operating base to pressure nearby countries like Iran, yes.

But eastern Europe isn't Putin's focus. It can't be. Too much NATO influence.

User avatar
Imperial Nilfgaard
Senator
 
Posts: 3716
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Nilfgaard » Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:04 pm

European Socialist Republic wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:
It is most strange that you would link an article that provides the actual reason of the Ukrainian government's renewed counter-separatist efforts. (Like pro-Russian separatists torturing Ukrainian politicians for example)

What's funny is that if Russia did the exact same thing as Ukraine, Nilfgaard would see it as further proof that Great Leader Putin is STRONK!

And then he complains of the West having double standards.


The West thinks it can have its cake and eat it too. They think they can flagrantly interfere in the internal affairs of neighboring nations and then they expect Russia to be a good sport about it.

Fuck. THAT.

Even if this crisis is resolved tomorrow I think the West has learned a useful lesson not to fuck with shit it doesn't understand. Don't sponsor revolutions and expect everyone to look the other way.
Down with the Banderovists!
Remember Odessa!
Крым
это часть России. Россия Своих Не Бросает!

We are the Great Souled Men of NS.
General-Secretary of the American Compartmentalist Party. ComPart for short.
Great Souled Idols: Vladimir Putin, Aleksandr Dugin, Nigel Farage, Marine Le Pen, Eric Zemmour
Manifesto - A Treatise on Souls

Proud Supporter of Bashar al-Assad's fight against terrorism

User avatar
Breadknife
Minister
 
Posts: 2803
Founded: Jul 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Breadknife » Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:19 pm

Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:The West thinks it can have its cake and eat it too. They think they can flagrantly interfere in the internal affairs of neighboring nations and then they expect Russia to be a good sport about it.

Fuck. THAT.

Even if this crisis is resolved tomorrow I think the West has learned a useful lesson not to fuck with shit it doesn't understand. Don't sponsor revolutions and expect everyone to look the other way.

The only thing wrong with switching round "The West" and "Russia" and re-reading what you just wrote is the unlikelihood of 'The West' having as coherent an attitude as Russia's top-down directed policies can be assumed to have. I'd say Russia is far more likely to get away with its ambitions than any (perhaps real, perhaps mythical) ones possessed by Europe/NATO/whatever. That doesn't make it any more acceptable, so don't feel happy about that.
Ceci n'est pas une griffe.

User avatar
Imperial Nilfgaard
Senator
 
Posts: 3716
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Nilfgaard » Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:57 pm

Is anyone here a fan of Vice News?

It seems their main reporter in Eastern Ukraine, Simon Ostrovsky has been arrested.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/2 ... 92590.html
Last edited by Imperial Nilfgaard on Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Down with the Banderovists!
Remember Odessa!
Крым
это часть России. Россия Своих Не Бросает!

We are the Great Souled Men of NS.
General-Secretary of the American Compartmentalist Party. ComPart for short.
Great Souled Idols: Vladimir Putin, Aleksandr Dugin, Nigel Farage, Marine Le Pen, Eric Zemmour
Manifesto - A Treatise on Souls

Proud Supporter of Bashar al-Assad's fight against terrorism

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:01 pm

Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:Is anyone here a fan of Vice News?

It seems their main reporter in Eastern Ukraine, Simon Ostrovsky has been arrested.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/2 ... 92590.html

I am.

Fuck! That's not good.

User avatar
Independent Canterbury
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 406
Founded: Dec 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Independent Canterbury » Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:24 pm

Simon has been in custody since last night, was not allowed to leave press conference.

https://twitter.com/GrahamWP_UK

follow this journalist for updates he is trying to secure his release right now.
Supporter of the Free Donetsk Republic

OOC: Political views
For:Conservatism,Nationalism,Capitalism,socialized medicine.
Neutral:Socialism,Social welfare.
Against:Liberalism,Communism.

User avatar
Lyttenburgh
Diplomat
 
Posts: 523
Founded: Sep 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lyttenburgh » Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:40 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:"East Ukraine is not strategically useful".

Yes it is, it's home to a lot of heavy industry and coal mining. It's basically eastern Europe's equivalent of the Ruhr valley. Not to mention Russia wants to maintain it's system of (at least neutral) buffer states for reasons we talked about earlier in the thread.

It doesn't necessarily need to annex east Ukraine to accomplish that (keeping Ukraine neutral at a minimum), it just needs federalization.


And how, may I ask, is the Rurh valley is faring nowadays in the united Germany, hmm? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's pretty much grim-dark rusting, decaying industrial wasteland with lots and lots of old, abandoned mines in the area. So, why should Russia have another Chelyabinsk?
“In an hour of Darkness, a blind man is the best guide. In an age of Insanity, look to the madman to show the way.”

Fight for Peace. Live for War. Die for Nothing

I wholeheartedly support the Great Ukraine from Lviv to Ternopil!


User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10826
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:01 pm

Lemanrussland wrote:
Divair2 wrote:Status quo. That's pretty much it.


Ukraine is the buffer state. The overthrow doesn't change that. The next election cycle will see everything return to normal. And no, eastern Ukraine is not important. It's a shithole.

Lots of strategically important places are shitholes, though. Afghanistan, for example, is not the nicest place in the world, but it is important as a strategic hub in Central Asia.


Seems you have not seen the Mansions of Afghanistan.
Short video of the Mansions of Afghanistan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEu_-Jods5g
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Independent Canterbury
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 406
Founded: Dec 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Independent Canterbury » Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:12 pm

GrahamWPhillips ‏@GrahamWP_UK 6m

Mayor has just told me Simon is ok, sleeping, told me to get some sleep. Hopefully release in morning.

Stonewalling him.

Not a good sign.
Supporter of the Free Donetsk Republic

OOC: Political views
For:Conservatism,Nationalism,Capitalism,socialized medicine.
Neutral:Socialism,Social welfare.
Against:Liberalism,Communism.

User avatar
Independent Canterbury
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 406
Founded: Dec 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Independent Canterbury » Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:36 pm

GrahamWPhillips ‏@GrahamWP_UK

Ok, seems no chance of release tonight, mayor tells me they are expecting attack on building, no one leaves.
Supporter of the Free Donetsk Republic

OOC: Political views
For:Conservatism,Nationalism,Capitalism,socialized medicine.
Neutral:Socialism,Social welfare.
Against:Liberalism,Communism.

User avatar
Limborg
Senator
 
Posts: 4335
Founded: Nov 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Limborg » Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:49 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNig07RtWxA

So far Ukraine's counter terrorism plan... It seems they plan on disarming themselves rather then the so called "terrorists" :P

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:40 pm

Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:The West Russia thinks it can have its cake and eat it too.


Fixed for accuracy.

They think they can flagrantly interfere in the internal affairs of neighboring nations and then they expect Russia "The West" to be a good sport about it.


Also fixed for accuracy. You know, people would take you seriously if you didn't keep spouting pathetic bullshit such as this. Everyone knows that Russia is in the wrong here. It made a bad situation much much worse and it's push Ukraine increasingly towards the EU, which is entirely the opposite of what Moscow wants.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Respawn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1091
Founded: Jun 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Respawn » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:04 pm

Divair2 wrote:Ukraine is the buffer state. The overthrow doesn't change that. The next election cycle will see everything return to normal. And no, eastern Ukraine is not important. It's a shithole.

Eastern Ukraine is home to some of the best soil in Europe (if not the world), and a large number of the Soviet Union's industry, including motor-plants and refineries are located in Eastern Ukraine.

It's probably more important to Ukraine than it is to Russia, but it certainly does hold importance to the latter. Why do you think Putin referred to it as Novorossiya?

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:04 pm

European Socialist Republic wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:
It is most strange that you would link an article that provides the actual reason of the Ukrainian government's renewed counter-separatist efforts. (Like pro-Russian separatists torturing Ukrainian politicians for example)

What's funny is that if Russia did the exact same thing as Ukraine, Nilfgaard would see it as further proof that Great Leader Putin is STRONK!

And then he complains of the West having double standards.


The "if you can't attack the argument, attack the person" trend proudly continues...


Divair2 wrote:
Crimson Futures wrote:

This is completely true. I'm not suggesting that the U.S. is going to do anything, but there are dozens of nations all over Europe who might, if someone else made a move first. Putin does have the balls to do something is he sees the opportunity. I doubt Poland would look forward to being occupied again. Alliances and fear drag more into the conflict. Not necessarily likely, but possible.

No.. not possible at all. If you think Poland is going to be invaded, you really don't know or don't care about Putin's motives.


Poland stronk! :P


Lemanrussland wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
My point was that after Chechnya seceded from the RFSFR, or Russia, it had no issues letting Ingushetia remain a part of Russia, if that was the wish of Ingushetia. Similarly, had the ASSRs and AOs been allowed to secede, if they wanted to, because Dagestan never did, we could've prevented a fuck ton of bloodshed. My other point was that it's unfair to the Abkhaz that the sole reason they lost their SSR was Stalin's paranoia. There's simply no other reason for it. Georgia joined the Russian Empire in 1801, Abkhazia in 1822. Over the decades their systems merged, eventually merging into the TSFSR, but they retained their independent streak. Abkhazia is so fiercely independent, that the being a pro-Russian candidate is considered a negative, unless you served in the military. This isn't like Ossetia, where the major parties are allied with Commies, UR, or my fave, RuNet party. Very cool people.

If you take a group of people who are fiercely independent, who lost a good chunk of that independence due to a Georgian, and they're being subjected to being a part of Georgia, I mean this conflict wasn't hard to predict. When you have a major break up, new states are going to form, i.e. West Virginia. And they're not going to understand why they can't! And quite frankly, it's downright unfair. If the only reason for an action is Stalin's paranoia, it's time to undo the action.

Stalin's actions may have been unjustified, but I don't see that justifying Russia using the Abkhazia issue to further it's national interests. Abkhazia is basically a Russian client state at this point, about 70 percent of their state budget comes from Russian aid, and 90 percent of Abkazians hold Russian passports. Not to mention, Abkhazia plays host to the Russian 131st motorized rifle brigade at the Bombora air base.

If Russia had no strategic interest in Abkhazia after the breakup of the USSR, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't' go about trying to right historic wrongs and so on.


Russia's interest in Abkhazia is the same as Russia's interest in the Caucasus as a whole. In 1988, a war that could've been prevented, caused decades of wars and tens thousands of casualties, with hundreds of thousands people fleeing their homes and becoming refugees in Russia. Putin doesn't want a war in the Caucasus. Recognizing Abkhazia and South Ossetia, as well as placing soldiers there, ensures peace. Russia doesn't have a national interest in Abkhazia. Russia just doesn't want others invading Abkhazia. And one needs to rectify Stalin's wrongs in order for the Caucasus to be stable, since Stalin was (inadvertently or deliberately,) using British Gamesmanship, i.e. "make tribe A hate tribe B, and profit from intertribal warfare." That's been the case with Nagorno-Karabakh. That's been the case with South Ossetia. That's been the case with Abkhazia.

How to explain this to a Westerner... ok you know how a river flows from the mountain to the sea or ocean? Let's say you have tribe A and tribe B fighting over the start of the river. While tribe C uses the river to farm, and is located downriver from A & B. As a result of war, the river ends up being polluted. As thus, in order to keep the river from being polluted and usable for their farms, tribe C will deliver a smack down to either tribe A or tribe B for starting the war.

In Russia's case, it's the river of people. If war hits the Caucasus, where are the refugees going to go? Right, straight into Russia. To their tribe in the Russian North Caucasus. And then their tribe will ask "Russia, what the fuck, why aren't you protecting our people? Do you not want our dedication to peace?" Shortly after Saakashvili attacked South Ossetia and caused 30,000 refugees to flee from South Ossetia, the Ingush-Ossetian tensions, which Putin has been working his ass off to calm, almost flared up. Again. An action taken in another country, caused an almost immediate reaction in Russia. They were directly linked. It's not a matter of Russia looking weak or strong. It's a matter of preventing violence within Russia.

And some might shout, "well, Russia's big, move them to Siberia!" Are the elderly going to move? Nope, young ones might. But if too many young people move, who's going to stay back and care for the elderly? Donald and Daisy? Or are we shipping off elderly Caucasian Refugees who are used to the Caucasian Climate straight to Siberia? Fixing Stalin's idiocy isn't the best solution cause it's awesome. It's the best cause it's the only one that can prevent massive bloodshed or massive refugee crisis.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:12 pm

Respawn wrote:
Divair2 wrote:Ukraine is the buffer state. The overthrow doesn't change that. The next election cycle will see everything return to normal. And no, eastern Ukraine is not important. It's a shithole.

Eastern Ukraine is home to some of the best soil in Europe (if not the world), and a large number of the Soviet Union's industry, including motor-plants and refineries are located in Eastern Ukraine.

It's probably more important to Ukraine than it is to Russia, but it certainly does hold importance to the latter. Why do you think Putin referred to it as Novorossiya?


Because it was previously called Novorossiya and he was making a historical appeal.

Image



Costa Fierro wrote:
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:The West Russia thinks it can have its cake and eat it too.


Fixed for accuracy.

They think they can flagrantly interfere in the internal affairs of neighboring nations and then they expect Russia "The West" to be a good sport about it.


Also fixed for accuracy. You know, people would take you seriously if you didn't keep spouting pathetic bullshit such as this. Everyone knows that Russia is in the wrong here. It made a bad situation much much worse and it's push Ukraine increasingly towards the EU, which is entirely the opposite of what Moscow wants.


Did you think about why it was a bad situation to begin with? Or is everything Russia's fault by default with you?
Last edited by Shofercia on Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Respawn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1091
Founded: Jun 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Respawn » Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:20 pm

Shofercia wrote:Because it was previously called Novorossiya, and he was making a historical appeal.

I know. It's an archaic term, which implies that Russia is the legitimate ruler of that area.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Dumb Ideologies, Dutch Socialist States, Eahland, Experina, Floofybit, Hidrandia, Kreigsreich of Iron, Lycom, Nova Zueratopia, Pale Dawn, Parnassus, Perishna, Ravemath, Spirit of Hope, Stellar Colonies, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan, Valrifall, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads