NATION

PASSWORD

Do gays get "easy" sex easier...than straights? If so...nice

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do gays get laid in the shade easier than straights in the...straits?

Yes
65
21%
No
66
21%
Never been studied.
57
19%
I am studying that.
21
7%
I am the other person studying that.
14
5%
There is no Brony Porn, because when Brony's do it, it's always porn. They're horses.
85
28%
 
Total votes : 308

User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:58 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:Seven years?

Seven fucking years?

The idea is that you repress it enough to like guys too, rather than just develooping the perfectly straight side taste for pre-op/non-op transgirls and non-Western third genders (such as the Latin American travesti).


Christ, are there people who get Post Doctoral Fellowship Grants to Yale to study this classification system?
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:58 pm

Luveria wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
Isn't there this whole "straight-acting" gay thing? That's a thing, right?

I feel this may be verging on the stereotypical. To a certain social crowd, yes, but I'm sure there are many out and proud "normal" (for want of a better word) gay men.


I've met a few I didn't know were gay until long after I met them, and I was surprised. Either my gaydar doesn't work, or gay people can be as normal as anyone else.


People are sometimes surprised to find out I'm bisexual. It's not something I shout about, though. I think gay people can be pretty normal. I think too many people hear gay and think "gay extrovert".
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:59 pm

Luveria wrote:
Condunum wrote:...Yea... Futa porn is not an okay thing.


Any porn is not an okay thing.

You say that now...
password scrambled

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:59 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
greed and death wrote:Provided they have an area where gays tend to congregate, yes. Because the major risk of sex pregnancy is not applicable to them.

However I have read that lesbians have the most difficulty getting into sexual relationships, however this was in maxim so take with a grain of salt when they discuss lesbians.


On Maxim, I think you're caveat is caveegreat.

I'm just realizing what a dick I am as a human being for never having really thought of pregnancy as the major risk, not because I love children, but I'd rather have a bastard child than AIDS.

Your risk for HIV is significantly lower.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html 1.1 million Americans have HIV. That is roughly 1/3 of a percentage point.
Now factor in a low transmission rate.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/risk.html

The risk of HIV is far lower than pregnancy.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:00 pm

Mistelemr wrote:
Luveria wrote:
No can do.



You can't do that in a TG? Well that blows.. and not in any manner that makes the situation any better.


The rules are there for a reason. The insurance doesn't cover the damage from the Mistelemr Effect, so everybody just has to stay calm.

Stay. Calm.



CALM THE FUCK DOWN!!!!!!
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:01 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
Mistelemr wrote:
You can't do that in a TG? Well that blows.. and not in any manner that makes the situation any better.


The rules are there for a reason. The insurance doesn't cover the damage from the Mistelemr Effect, so everybody just has to stay calm.

Stay. Calm.



CALM THE FUCK DOWN!!!!!!

God dammit it's one of these threads again.
password scrambled

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:01 pm

Lordieth wrote:
Oneracon wrote:Doesn't change the fact that socially gay men are expected to be either slim and effeminate twinks or toned musclemen, and if you deviate from that...


Isn't there this whole "straight-acting" gay thing? That's a thing, right?

I feel this may be verging on the stereotypical. To a certain social crowd, yes, but I'm sure there are many out and proud "normal" (for want of a better word) gay men.

The only thing that makes a guy gay is that he wants to do sexy things with other guys... that's it. Unfortunately societal expectations (which as you stated are stereotypes) are that gay men have to be slim and effeminate or buff gym-users, always impeccably dressed, drink fancy drinks, and love to go shopping with their "girlfraaaaaaaaaaaands".

It's not correct, or acceptable, but that's the archetype that remains in the western societal mindset.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Lemon Cheese
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 190
Founded: Oct 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemon Cheese » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:01 pm

Bah, getting laid isn't that hard.
What pumpkin?
Astrolinium wrote:Because this is NS. NS is fully of lonely, horny people, an inordinately large number of whom look amazing.

Socialist Ecuador wrote:
Olthar wrote:Is there any better way to die?

Yes. I could also be eating sausage wrapped in bacon and covered with butter.

Mesoland wrote:This won't stop me from, upon becoming legal, getting laid. I don't care about the human race in 5,000 generations, because I'll be too dead to care.

User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:01 pm

greed and death wrote:Your risk for HIV is significantly lower.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html 1.1 million Americans have HIV. That is roughly 1/3 of a percentage point.
Now factor in a low transmission rate.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/risk.html

The risk of HIV is far lower than pregnancy.


In risk, I factor not just likelihood of occurrence, but a coefficient of the scalar of how bad the situation would be if it happened.

If I get a girl pregnant, that's 18% of my income and trying to relearn how to relate to another human being.

If I get AIDS, I might die.
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:02 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:The idea is that you repress it enough to like guys too, rather than just develooping the perfectly straight side taste for pre-op/non-op transgirls and non-Western third genders (such as the Latin American travesti).


Christ, are there people who get Post Doctoral Fellowship Grants to Yale to study this classification system?


Probably.

Condunum wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Any porn is not an okay thing.

You say that now...


It's important to clarify, just so people aren't misled into thinking all porn but X is okay.

Lordieth wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I've met a few I didn't know were gay until long after I met them, and I was surprised. Either my gaydar doesn't work, or gay people can be as normal as anyone else.


People are sometimes surprised to find out I'm bisexual. It's not something I shout about, though. I think gay people can be pretty normal. I think too many people hear gay and think "gay extrovert".


Whenever I encounter someone who is all like "omg look at me, I'm BISEXUAL! (or any other sexual orientation)", before anyone brought it up at all, I automatically assume one of two options;

1) They are making it very obvious they want to get laid.

2) They have never been laid.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:02 pm

Hmmm, a guy braging about his sexual exploits to other guys. OF course it's all true.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:04 pm

No, Auctually it's quite a bit harder
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:04 pm

Luveria wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
People are sometimes surprised to find out I'm bisexual. It's not something I shout about, though. I think gay people can be pretty normal. I think too many people hear gay and think "gay extrovert".


Whenever I encounter someone who is all like "omg look at me, I'm BISEXUAL! (or any other sexual orientation)", before anyone brought it up at all, I automatically assume one of two options;

1) They are making it very obvious they want to get laid.

2) They have never been laid.


I only ever see the need to mention it when it seems pertinent to the conversations. Sometimes it doesn't need to be said, really. When you like someone and they like you, the writing is kind of on the wall, so to speak. There's also the argument of it being "trendy", although I can't say I've ever quite understood that.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:05 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:The idea is that you repress it enough to like guys too, rather than just develooping the perfectly straight side taste for pre-op/non-op transgirls and non-Western third genders (such as the Latin American travesti).

Christ, are there people who get Post Doctoral Fellowship Grants to Yale to study this classification system?

I'm mostly just guessing.

I know about trans* people because I went deep to discover this winter (summer for you) I'm one.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:06 pm

Tekania wrote:Hmmm, a guy braging about his sexual exploits to other guys. OF course it's all true.


This makes scary good sense to explain this thing.
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:06 pm

Tekania wrote:Hmmm, a guy braging about his sexual exploits to other guys. OF course it's all true.


I rarely ever encounter gay or bisexual people bragging about their sexual exploits. Usually they are quite tight-lipped about it and won't bring it up unless directly asked. But I've come across no shortage of heterosexual men and women bragging about their sexual exploits when no one asked.

Maybe it's because gay and bisexual males are so accustomed to everyone looking down upon it they say nothing, or they know how it looks constantly hearing about it from heterosexuals.

Lordieth wrote:
Luveria wrote:

Whenever I encounter someone who is all like "omg look at me, I'm BISEXUAL! (or any other sexual orientation)", before anyone brought it up at all, I automatically assume one of two options;

1) They are making it very obvious they want to get laid.

2) They have never been laid.


I only ever see the need to mention it when it seems pertinent to the conversations. Sometimes it doesn't need to be said, really. When you like someone and they like you, the writing is kind of on the wall, so to speak. There's also the argument of it being "trendy", although I can't say I've ever quite understood that.


My main reasoning is, if they are very eager to have you know their sexual orientation without you ever bringing it up, doesn't it indicate they are looking for sex? Why else would someone need to know the sexual orientation of someone they just met? :unsure:

User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:09 pm

Luveria wrote:

Whenever I encounter someone who is all like "omg look at me, I'm BISEXUAL! (or any other sexual orientation)", before anyone brought it up at all, I automatically assume one of two options;

1) They are making it very obvious they want to get laid.

2) They have never been laid.


You know who's never been laid? The enemies of the Trans Hit Squad fans who voted Brony Porn.

Okay, so seriously...I'm hearing...no? Gay guys don't get laid more?
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:10 pm

Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:Okay, so seriously...I'm hearing...no? Gay guys don't get laid more?

Correct.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:10 pm

Luveria wrote:
Lordieth wrote:
I only ever see the need to mention it when it seems pertinent to the conversations. Sometimes it doesn't need to be said, really. When you like someone and they like you, the writing is kind of on the wall, so to speak. There's also the argument of it being "trendy", although I can't say I've ever quite understood that.


My main reasoning is, if they are very eager to have you know their sexual orientation without you ever bringing it up, doesn't it indicate they are looking for sex? Why else would someone need to know the sexual orientation of someone they just met? :unsure:


I see your reasoning. You could argue though that heterosexuality being more common, that a lot of people make the default assumption that you are heterosexual until they have any indication otherwise. Maybe sex is a strong part of it, but from an orientation point of view it's probably hard to casually meet someone and drop subtle hints.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:10 pm

Luveria wrote:
Tekania wrote:Hmmm, a guy braging about his sexual exploits to other guys. OF course it's all true.


I rarely ever encounter gay or bisexual people bragging about their sexual exploits. Usually they are quite tight-lipped about it and won't bring it up unless directly asked. But I've come across no shortage of heterosexual men and women bragging about their sexual exploits when no one asked.

Maybe it's because gay and bisexual males are so accustomed to everyone looking down upon it they say nothing, or they know how it looks constantly hearing about it from heterosexuals.


True, in a strange environment they are unlikely to bring it up or discuss it as much a straight person would due to perceived potential threat. But I imagine they would act just like their heterosexual counterparts in an environment where there is no perceived threat.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:11 pm

Well this is certainly an......original question.

Depends on your local "scene" I guess. I don't see any particular reason to think gay people have it any easier.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Holy Ascension
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Nov 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Ascension » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:11 pm

Well... if you were to go by demographics, then no.

However, purely speculatively, there might be an increased correlation of successful flirtation-coitus amongst gays as opposed to the more common flirtation-rejection amongst straights. Perhaps the lack of potential sexual partners has increased the chances of sexual encounters.

Or, maybe it's just easier to get in men's pants.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:12 pm

Luveria wrote:My main reasoning is, if they are very eager to have you know their sexual orientation without you ever bringing it up, doesn't it indicate they are looking for sex? Why else would someone need to know the sexual orientation of someone they just met? :unsure:

I probably scared my childhood friends when I came out to them without a necessity at age 13, then? :P
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:12 pm

Tekania wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I rarely ever encounter gay or bisexual people bragging about their sexual exploits. Usually they are quite tight-lipped about it and won't bring it up unless directly asked. But I've come across no shortage of heterosexual men and women bragging about their sexual exploits when no one asked.

Maybe it's because gay and bisexual males are so accustomed to everyone looking down upon it they say nothing, or they know how it looks constantly hearing about it from heterosexuals.


True, in a strange environment they are unlikely to bring it up or discuss it as much a straight person would due to perceived potential threat. But I imagine they would act just like their heterosexual counterparts in an environment where there is no perceived threat.

Or it could be that some people are more comfortable discussing their sexual exploits than others?
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Especially Dirty Hippies
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1940
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Especially Dirty Hippies » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:12 pm

Oneracon wrote:
Especially Dirty Hippies wrote:Okay, so seriously...I'm hearing...no? Gay guys don't get laid more?

Correct.


Okay, that's easy to remember.
In sixteenth-century Europe, the disease of virgins, or green sickness, was seen as a common disorder affecting young unmarried girls. Its symptoms included weakness, dietary disturbance, lack of menstruation and most significantly, a change in skin colour. Understanding of the condition turned puberty and virginity into medical problems, and proposed to cure them by bloodletting, diet, exercise, and marriage. - The Disease of Virgins, a book I saw a promo for while trying to learn how babies are made.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Enormous Gentiles, Holy Marsh, Ifreann, Jibjibistan, Liberal Malaysia, Libertarian Negev, Nuova Schiava, Pale Dawn, Repreteop, Sarduri, Tarsonis, Tur Monkadzii, Valrifall, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads