by HeresJohnny » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:10 pm
by Gauthier » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:12 pm
by Hatsunia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:14 pm
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:14 pm
Hatsunia wrote:Maybe it's the fear of government control leading to corruption?
by Gauthier » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:16 pm
Hatsunia wrote:Maybe it's the fear of more government control (of production) leading to corruption?
by Hatsunia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:17 pm
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:17 pm
by Ethel mermania » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:19 pm
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:20 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:i always though socialism meant government direction of capital.
the question then becomes what is socialism, is there a common definition of it?
i thought marx said socialism was a step on the way to communism.
by Shnercropolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:21 pm
by Shnercropolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:22 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:i always though socialism meant government direction of capital.
the question then becomes what is socialism, is there a common definition of it?
i thought marx said socialism was a step on the way to communism.
Socialism is worker (or community) ownage of the means of production. That's it.
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:23 pm
by Shnercropolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:23 pm
by Poni » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:24 pm
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:27 pm
Poni wrote:2: Socialism, is very, very close in ways to communism, only perhaps less radical and definitely less violent. Even so, socialism is still a dangerous slope in those regards.
Poni wrote:3: Socialism can actually hurt business. While its true capitalism can get out of hand, socialism is just the same and too much of it can create an unbalanced scale.
Poni wrote:4: The Soviet Union and the Cold War obviously got Americans alert about the potential dangers of communism, and even socialists were considered potential communists. All the socialists really need were a little incentive.
Poni wrote:5: The best way for socialism to work is to have a large government, and large governments will always try shoving their noses into everything. Americans for the most part don't feel comfortable being watched all the time. Protected, yes. Babysitted, not really.
Poni wrote:6 (Just my opinion at this point.): Michael Moore; Need I say Moore?
by Kakistopolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:27 pm
by Hatsunia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:28 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:i always though socialism meant government direction of capital.
the question then becomes what is socialism, is there a common definition of it?
i thought marx said socialism was a step on the way to communism.
Socialism is worker (or community) ownage of the means of production. That's it.
by Shnercropolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:28 pm
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:28 pm
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:29 pm
Kakistopolis wrote:I believe people are the means of production. Who wants to own people?
by Shnercropolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:30 pm
by Miss Defied » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:34 pm
Gauthier wrote:It's an ages old distortion that's been perpetuated by Republicans. By tying socialism to Stalinism in the minds of the American public, they can use it as a convenient scare word to discourage anything from increasing the tax rates of the 1% to increasing regulations on ethically and financially shaky industries.
by Kakistopolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:35 pm
by Shnercropolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:35 pm
Miss Defied wrote:Gauthier wrote:It's an ages old distortion that's been perpetuated by Republicans. By tying socialism to Stalinism in the minds of the American public, they can use it as a convenient scare word to discourage anything from increasing the tax rates of the 1% to increasing regulations on ethically and financially shaky industries.
*deep inhalation*
well, that's not really how ...
*exhalation*
Oh who am I kidding, this is exactly why.
/thread
by Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:36 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], Shrillland, Statesburg
Advertisement