The threat of homosexuality

[Abatael]

*ahem* trust me, there is some personal harm that comes from being a sexually-active homosexual male.
Speaking from experience, here.

Being lovesick isn't exactly a worrying personal harm, buster. Grow a skin! Claiming it is would be SOOO gay... oh... wait...

You can experience bodily harm from participating in homosexual acts.

For example, by participating in anal sex, one can experience anodyspareunia, diseases such as HIV, HPV, amoebiasis, chlamydia, cryptosporidiosis, E. coli infections, giardiasis, gonorrhea, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, herpes simplex, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (HHV-8), lymphogranuloma venereum, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium, pubic lice, salmonellosis, shigella; syphilis, tuberculosis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum, the chances of anal cancer, a relatively rare cancer, drastically increases, and physical damage to the rectum, and anus can manifest as generalized ano-rectal trauma, anal fissures, rectal prolapse, and exacerbating hemorrhoids.

Edit: Or, rather, the chances of contracting such diseases are increased.

[The Neo Soviet Empire]

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=201348

This thread is a perfect example of how the admins must have been out of their minds when they created that rule.

There are legitimate times and subjects where calling troll is beneficial. An across-the-board ban on it can only encourage troll behavior, since no one can call them out on it.

Since I can't call troll, I suppose I'll just link to a clip of a movie I really like:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zP8vZSkhro

[Risottia]

Being lovesick isn't exactly a worrying personal harm, buster. Grow a skin! Claiming it is would be SOOO gay... oh... wait...

You can experience bodily harm from participating in homosexual acts.

For example, by participating in anal sex, one can experience anodyspareunia, diseases such as HIV, HPV, amoebiasis, chlamydia, cryptosporidiosis, E. coli infections, giardiasis, gonorrhea, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, herpes simplex, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (HHV-8), lymphogranuloma venereum, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium, pubic lice, salmonellosis, shigella; syphilis, tuberculosis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum, the chances of anal cancer, a relatively rare cancer, drastically increases, and physical damage to the rectum, and anus can manifest as generalized ano-rectal trauma, anal fissures, rectal prolapse, and exacerbating hemorrhoids.

Edit: Or, rather, the chances of contracting such diseases are increased.

Are you aware that anal sex isn't exclusively restricted to homosexual intercourses?

[CTALNH]

Ban this homophobe now

Why? Just because he has retarded views doesn't warrant a ban.

Slander against the LGBT community is more than enough reason to ban him

[Rocopurr]

FYI, you can experience bodily harm through heterosexual acts too. Some heterosexual couples do anal, BDSM, etc.

[Abatael]

You can experience bodily harm from participating in homosexual acts.

For example, by participating in anal sex, one can experience anodyspareunia, diseases such as HIV, HPV, amoebiasis, chlamydia, cryptosporidiosis, E. coli infections, giardiasis, gonorrhea, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, herpes simplex, Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (HHV-8), lymphogranuloma venereum, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium, pubic lice, salmonellosis, shigella; syphilis, tuberculosis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum, the chances of anal cancer, a relatively rare cancer, drastically increases, and physical damage to the rectum, and anus can manifest as generalized ano-rectal trauma, anal fissures, rectal prolapse, and exacerbating hemorrhoids.

Edit: Or, rather, the chances of contracting such diseases are increased.

Are you aware that anal sex isn't exclusively restricted to homosexual intercourses?
I guess not.

I never said anal sex is exclusive to homosexuals. I was aware.

You guessed incorrectly.

[Abatael]

Why? Just because he has retarded views doesn't warrant a ban.

Slander against the LGBT community is more than enough reason to ban him

No, it's not.

[Nazi States of Europe]

Why? Just because he has retarded views doesn't warrant a ban.

Slander against the LGBT community is more than enough reason to ban him

Maybe to you.

[Risottia]

Are you aware that anal sex isn't exclusively restricted to homosexual intercourses?
I guess not.

I never said anal sex is exclusive to homosexuals. I was aware.

You guessed incorrectly.

And (shocker!) maybe you know that homosexual intercourses do not REQUIRE anal sex.

Then you would also know your point has absolutely no meaning. Hence, you must be missing some link.

[Turan Federasyonu]

Which threat of homosexuality is this? 115th?

[United States of Natan]

Now don't get me wrong I am actually pretty liberal although I just so happen to disagree with most liberals on the issue of LGBT rights. I don't believe that homosexuality is a good thing. In fact I believe that the evidence that homosexuality and lesbianism are dangerous to society is overwhelming. HIV/AIDS rates and other STD rates are much higher among the LGBT community than the straight community and LGBT people are much more likely to sexual promiscuous and domestic violence is much higher among same-sex couples. I just don't understand why we should consider homosexuality okay and normal. As for it happening among animals well rape, theft, and murder have been observed among animals so should be consider those to be okay too? I think it is time for people to stand up for the truth and fight against homosexuality and find a cure for it to help the people struggling with it. If we keep on thinking it is okay then we are on a slippery slope to where we would soon be thinking that zoophilia, pedophilia, and heck even necrophilia are okay. In the early 90's in San Fransisco there was an LGBT riot outside a church were the LGBT people performed sexual acts outside the church and even reportedly shouted "give us your children" to the church members and they harassed the church members. Here are a few of my sources.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/Newsroom/msm ... lease.html

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/291357

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838474

there is nothing wrong with homosexuality. and also, don't even think about saying that it says that it is wrong in the christian bible, because I am not christian.

[Demen 2]

if your talking about women its o.k. but its wrong with guys

No it isn't. It's perfectly normal.
It's fine for both genders.

[Abatael]

I never said anal sex is exclusive to homosexuals. I was aware.

You guessed incorrectly.

And (shocker!) maybe you know that homosexual intercourses do not REQUIRE anal sex.

Then you would also know your point has absolutely no meaning. Hence, you must be missing some link.

I never said homosexual intercourse requires anal sex, and I used anal sex as an example, hence the word "example" being there.

The point is that homosexual acts do have potential to harm the body; something the person I quoted suggested was not there.

Maybe you should read before you run your mouth.

Edit: A précis of what happened:

Condunum said that being homosexually active is personally harmful.
You said that being "lovesick" is not a form of worrying personal harm.
I pointed out that other forms besides being "lovesick" can happen, and gave examples.

[Unified Provinces]

Now don't get me wrong I am actually pretty liberal although I just so happen to disagree with most liberals on the issue of LGBT rights. I don't believe that homosexuality is a good thing. In fact I believe that the evidence that homosexuality and lesbianism are dangerous to society is overwhelming. HIV/AIDS rates and other STD rates are much higher among the LGBT community than the straight community and LGBT people are much more likely to sexual promiscuous and domestic violence is much higher among same-sex couples. I just don't understand why we should consider homosexuality okay and normal. As for it happening among animals well rape, theft, and murder have been observed among animals so should be consider those to be okay too? I think it is time for people to stand up for the truth and fight against homosexuality and find a cure for it to help the people struggling with it. If we keep on thinking it is okay then we are on a slippery slope to where we would soon be thinking that zoophilia, pedophilia, and heck even necrophilia are okay. In the early 90's in San Fransisco there was an LGBT riot outside a church were the LGBT people performed sexual acts outside the church and even reportedly shouted "give us your children" to the church members and they harassed the church members. Here are a few of my sources.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/Newsroom/msm ... lease.html

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/291357

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838474

Oh slippery slope argument how I've missed you!

[Cold Coast]

And (shocker!) maybe you know that homosexual intercourses do not REQUIRE anal sex.

Then you would also know your point has absolutely no meaning. Hence, you must be missing some link.

I never said homosexual intercourse requires anal sex, and I used anal sex as an example, hence the word "example" being there.

The point is that homosexual acts do have potential to harm the body; something the person I quoted suggested was not there.

Maybe you should read before you run your mouth.

With that ridiculous point of view, all sex should be banned then and not just homosexual. Heterosexual can cause bodily harm too.

[Vettrera]

if your talking about women its o.k. but its wrong with guys

And how did you come to that conclusion?

[Condunum]

*ahem* trust me, there is some personal harm that comes from being a sexually-active homosexual male.
Speaking from experience, here.

Being lovesick isn't exactly a worrying personal harm, buster. Grow a skin! Claiming it is would be SOOO gay... oh... wait...

Not what I mean, but... Hey, wait a second! That is so a worrying personal harm! Your comment has russtled my jimmes.

*ahem* trust me, there is some personal harm that comes from being a sexually-active homosexual male.
Speaking from experience, here.

Okay, assuming your boyfriend isn't hung like a telephone pole there's no personal harm. Bigger is only better in porn stories, in reality it's just uncomfortable.

He wouldn't have to be "hung like a telephone pole" to hurt.

[Unified Provinces]

And (shocker!) maybe you know that homosexual intercourses do not REQUIRE anal sex.

Then you would also know your point has absolutely no meaning. Hence, you must be missing some link.

I never said homosexual intercourse requires anal sex, and I used anal sex as an example, hence the word "example" being there.

The point is that homosexual acts do have potential to harm the body; something the person I quoted suggested was not there.

Maybe you should read before you run your mouth.

Heterosexual sex can also be harmful as someone else pointed out. AIDS isn't limited to only homosexuals.

[Abatael]

I never said homosexual intercourse requires anal sex, and I used anal sex as an example, hence the word "example" being there.

The point is that homosexual acts do have potential to harm the body; something the person I quoted suggested was not there.

Maybe you should read before you run your mouth.

With that ridiculous point of view, all sex should be banned then and not just homosexual. Heterosexual can cause bodily harm too.

I don't believe I ever said heterosexual sex cannot cause harm, or that homosexual sex should be banned, because of the harm it can cause.

[Vettrera]

And for the sake of suggestion:

Gays and Straights can both be abstinent

If they then enter into a monogamous relationship, the threat of AIDS isn't really there, now is i?

Are suggesting that gays are more horny is BS as well

[Abatael]

I never said homosexual intercourse requires anal sex, and I used anal sex as an example, hence the word "example" being there.

The point is that homosexual acts do have potential to harm the body; something the person I quoted suggested was not there.

Maybe you should read before you run your mouth.

Heterosexual sex can also be harmful as someone else pointed out. AIDS isn't limited to only homosexuals.

Have I said otherwise?

[Condunum]

Which threat of homosexuality is this? 115th?

It's threat number 66.

[Condunum]

And (shocker!) maybe you know that homosexual intercourses do not REQUIRE anal sex.

Then you would also know your point has absolutely no meaning. Hence, you must be missing some link.

I never said homosexual intercourse requires anal sex, and I used anal sex as an example, hence the word "example" being there.

The point is that homosexual acts do have potential to harm the body; something the person I quoted suggested was not there.

Maybe you should read before you run your mouth.

Edit: A précis of what happened:

Condunum said that being homosexually active is personally harmful.
You said that being "lovesick" is not a form of worrying personal harm.
I pointed out that other forms besides being "lovesick" can happen, and gave examples.

I said it jokingly. I was referencing the superficial harm that can arise from first experiencing anal sex.

The harm you have presented is not necessarily any reason to not be active, it just means you shouldn't be careless.

[Unified Provinces]

Then what are you trying to argue then?

[Condunum]

Then what are you trying to argue then?

He's saying be careful.