NATION

PASSWORD

Are you a realist?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Are you a realist when it comes to international relations?

Yes! Realism all the way!
21
16%
For the most part, yes
43
34%
Somewhat
14
11%
Neutral
4
3%
Not really
8
6%
For the most part, no
9
7%
Screw realism!
16
13%
Don't care
13
10%
 
Total votes : 128

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Are you a realist?

Postby Napkiraly » Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:59 pm

I've been wondering for a time how many realists NSG has when it comes to international relations. For those of you who don't know what realism is, in regards to international relations some of the core ideas it holds are: international anarchy (no actors above states can regulate other states), the rejection of injecting foreign relations with morality, relations are determined by levels of power, all nations are working towards their own self-interest, distrust of any long term alliances, overall interest is the survival of the nation and keeping the balance of power.

There are two main camps one being offensive realism (all states are inherently aggressive) or defencive realism (all states are obsessed with security). There are also different branches of realism going all the way from classical to symbiotic, but overall the theme remains the same.

As for myself, I'd say I'm predominantly a realist. I mostly adhere to the Liberal realism branch, although I believe the structural and symbiotic branches have their merits. This is because I believe it is the best way to conduct foreign affairs and it really the only way to describe the behaviour of nations on the international stage, for the most part. I guess the only time I'd put morality first is in a case of genocide, and a real one, not just a government killing off lots of people and even then it would depend on the circumstances. Overall, in my opinion realism will lessen the chances of conflicts arising due to nations understanding where the other side is coming from, and allowing issues to be solved in a pragmatic manner. If you inject morality or values into your foreign affairs, it can cause a nation to get tangled up into some messy situations and create conflicts and tensions (again for the most part) when there needn't be any.

So members of NSG, do you consider yourself a realist? If so, which branch and camp do you identify with? If you don't believe you're one or oppose realism, state why.
Poll included.
This thread is strictly about realism in international relations, not the philosophy of realism in general.
Last edited by Napkiraly on Sat Jun 16, 2012 4:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:02 pm

My philosophy is more like a majority of Idealism barely restrained by a bit of Pragmatism.
I believe its called Liberalism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internatio ... Liberalism
Last edited by Genivaria on Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cruciland
Senator
 
Posts: 4659
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Cruciland » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:04 pm

Well, looks like I'm very surreal... :rofl:
THREADS SINGLE-HANDEDLY KILLED: 29 | Beliefs IBeliefs IIBeliefs III
Crucilandians - Old Capital - New Capital | A 4.8 civilization, according to this index.
Socialdemokraterne wrote:If the absence of secularism wasn't enough to scare our people, the rate of which the doomsday button is pressed by them sure settled the matter.

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Cruciland, I just want to say, your nation is frightening.

The Inevitable Syndicate wrote:My advice to you, dear Gordano-Lysandus, is to run. Or hide. Maybe not hiding, because the Crucilandians will find you, and by their god, you will be assimilated.

User avatar
Zeppy
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10112
Founded: Oct 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeppy » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:04 pm

I support imperialism.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:06 pm

Genivaria wrote:My philosophy is more like a majority of Idealism barely restrained by a bit of Pragmatism.

Fair enough, but human nature and history has turned me somewhat into a cynic. Not to say I don't have certain ideals I would like to see come true (if I believe they will or nor is a different matter), it's just I don't think they should dictate how nations deal with one another.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204087
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:07 pm

I try to be, but am not always successful.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164166
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:07 pm

Fantasy is way more fun than reality.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:08 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Genivaria wrote:My philosophy is more like a majority of Idealism barely restrained by a bit of Pragmatism.

Fair enough, but human nature and history has turned me somewhat into a cynic. Not to say I don't have certain ideals I would like to see come true (if I believe they will or nor is a different matter), it's just I don't think they should dictate how nations deal with one another.

I fail to see how its 'human nature' that caused you to be a cynic.
More likely you saw some examples of bad humans doing bad things and mistakenly call it 'Human Nature'.
Human Nature is nothing more then an excuse to protect the status quo.

Cynicism is the philosophy of those who have given up.
Last edited by Genivaria on Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Great Yorkshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: May 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Yorkshire » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:09 pm

Ifreann wrote:Fantasy is way more fun than reality.
This. Did you know for example that in reality... people don't have laser eyes... even in emergencies... even laser-based emergencies.
The Queen of quips, the Sultan of snickering, the President of puns, the Generalissimo of jollity, the Tsar of zingers, the Guru of guffaws, the Jam Sahib of jokes, the Maharajah of mirth, the Chhatrapati of cheer, the Poligar of punch lines, the Rao Bahadur of revelry, the Baivarapatish of bullshit, the Chief Executive of chuckles, the Managing Director of merriment, the Deputy Financial Officer of damn funny observations, the Satrap of satire, who'll never give you a flat tire, 'cos she's not that dire, she used to have testicles, she still wears spectacles, the Edith Piaf of amateur table tennis (she regrets nothing about her backhand smashes) and the self-declared inventor of the prawn burrito... The one, the only... The chunter hunter... Great Yorkshire.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:09 pm

Realism is just an excuse people use to try and get away with being dicks/monsters and causing incredible suffering while pretending that doing so makes them really smart and edgy compared to dummy hippies.

For example, see the OP, sure genocide is bad, but what about the CIRCUMSTANCES? What do I get out of this?!
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:09 pm

I consider myself neutral.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164166
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:10 pm

Great Yorkshire wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Fantasy is way more fun than reality.
This. Did you know for example that in reality... people don't have laser eyes... even in emergencies... even laser-based emergencies.

It's shameful.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:12 pm

Souseiseki wrote:Realism is just an excuse people use to try and get away with being dicks/monsters and causing incredible suffering while pretending that doing so makes them really smart and edgy compared to dummy hippies.

For example, see the OP, sure genocide is bad, but what about the CIRCUMSTANCES? What do I get out of this?!

Actually, you know on NSG, when you see a 14 year old talking about people being tortured or people starving and defending it by proclaiming "WELL THAT'S JUST THE WAY THE WORLD WORKS WHAT DO YOU EXPECT US TO DO ABOUT IT GEEZ"? Scale that up to national policy.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:13 pm

Genivaria wrote:I fail to see how its 'human nature' that caused you to be a cynic.
More likely you saw some examples of bad humans doing bad things and mistakenly call it 'Human Nature'.
Human Nature is nothing more then an excuse to protect the status quo.

Cynicism is the philosophy of those who have given up.


No it's not.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:13 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Fair enough, but human nature and history has turned me somewhat into a cynic. Not to say I don't have certain ideals I would like to see come true (if I believe they will or nor is a different matter), it's just I don't think they should dictate how nations deal with one another.

I fail to see how its 'human nature' that caused you to be a cynic.
More likely you saw some examples of bad humans doing bad things and mistakenly call it 'Human Nature'.
Human Nature is nothing more then an excuse to protect the status quo.

It's not bad people doing bad things, it's more people always looking after their own interests first and foremost. For the most part humans are not entirely altruistic, unless it is someone in dire need. This can even be explained as to why humans are more group orientated, if being part of group A allows your interests to be met, you'll join group A. People are capable of doing good things, and for the most part I believe we do try to do good, but mostly for non-altruistic purposes.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:14 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Genivaria wrote:I fail to see how its 'human nature' that caused you to be a cynic.
More likely you saw some examples of bad humans doing bad things and mistakenly call it 'Human Nature'.
Human Nature is nothing more then an excuse to protect the status quo.

Cynicism is the philosophy of those who have given up.


No it's not.

Apologies, I was referring to the common meaning of the word, not the original one.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:15 pm

Genivaria wrote:

Apologies, I was referring to the common meaning of the word, not the original one.


I'm not sure how the hell it became to mean what it means today.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:15 pm

I try to be. When I become the imperialistic dictator of Germany who gets caught in a two fronted war between Russia and America I get no illusions I can defeat them.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:17 pm

Souseiseki wrote:Realism is just an excuse people use to try and get away with being dicks/monsters and causing incredible suffering while pretending that doing so makes them really smart and edgy compared to dummy hippies.

For example, see the OP, sure genocide is bad, but what about the CIRCUMSTANCES? What do I get out of this?!

By circumstances I meant if the nation committing genocide has a shit load of nukes, then I'll let it slide grudgingly. Genocide is the one issue that I'll tell realism to go fuck itself, unless the scenario I just gave is in effect.

Also realism is not trying to get away with being a dick, it's trying not to get us into shit that isn't our problem unless the other side makes it one.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:17 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Apologies, I was referring to the common meaning of the word, not the original one.


I'm not sure how the hell it became to mean what it means today.

People trying to justify their pessimism?

User avatar
Kakistopolis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 626
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kakistopolis » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:17 pm

Kakistopolis has eliminated much political discord among its citizens and licensed chattel breeders with decades of research into neurochemical dosiometrics and manipulation administered by intra-cerebral microprocessor implants and regulated by an ultra-secure satellite and ground-based central computer communications network which can rapidly identify psychological manifestations of impending counter-government political initiatives and increase or reduce the psychotropic control doses monitored by each citizen or chattel property's implanted circuitry.

Kakistopolitan social scientists long ago discovered that such a regime of closely monitored pharmacological enticements managed by surgically implanted microchips might realistically decrease the likelihood of other nation's peoples disobeying direct orders from the Kakistopolitan government without permission, which has been a major hurdle to the noble goal of de-non-Kakistopolitanizing the planet.
My forbidden satire once earned me a 3-day vacation from the NS forums.


"Pacifist ideologues are the worst. You just want to punch them in the face and tell them to accept your culture of libertine violence and destruction." - the entry for "Pacifism" (in its entirety) in the Kakistopolitan Traveler's Encyclopedia

User avatar
Great Yorkshire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 541
Founded: May 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Yorkshire » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:17 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I try to be. When I become the imperialistic dictator of Germany who gets caught in a two fronted war between Russia and America I get no illusions I can defeat them.
You could duck. And the bullets would go over your head... and both your enemies would shoot each other! It's the perfect plan!
The Queen of quips, the Sultan of snickering, the President of puns, the Generalissimo of jollity, the Tsar of zingers, the Guru of guffaws, the Jam Sahib of jokes, the Maharajah of mirth, the Chhatrapati of cheer, the Poligar of punch lines, the Rao Bahadur of revelry, the Baivarapatish of bullshit, the Chief Executive of chuckles, the Managing Director of merriment, the Deputy Financial Officer of damn funny observations, the Satrap of satire, who'll never give you a flat tire, 'cos she's not that dire, she used to have testicles, she still wears spectacles, the Edith Piaf of amateur table tennis (she regrets nothing about her backhand smashes) and the self-declared inventor of the prawn burrito... The one, the only... The chunter hunter... Great Yorkshire.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:18 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
I'm not sure how the hell it became to mean what it means today.

People trying to justify their pessimism?


Well, let's just use that word then. :p
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Disserbia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12012
Founded: Dec 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Disserbia » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:19 pm

Constructivist
You can't spell scat fetish without catfish.
Mollary wrote:Hate and alcohol can unite most people.

Souriya Al-Assad wrote:One does not simply Mossad The Assad.

New Maldorainia wrote:Dissy likes touching my walruses.

The Blaatschapen wrote:Remember, birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you'll live.
Funniest shit on this shite
fakbuk and other random shit
PC:
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00
PS:
Right: 1.45
Libertarian: 6.22
Non-interventionist: 5.82
Cultural liberal: 2.23
PT:
democratic National Liberal
In a more sane world I'd be a moderate Republican.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:19 pm

Great Yorkshire wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:I try to be. When I become the imperialistic dictator of Germany who gets caught in a two fronted war between Russia and America I get no illusions I can defeat them.
You could duck. And the bullets would go over your head... and both your enemies would shoot each other! It's the perfect plan!

Or you could just take the easy way out via cyanide pill...you know, like a bitch.
Suck it Hitler.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Lemueria, Saiwana, Sicias, The Huskar Social Union, Tungstan, Urine Town

Advertisement

Remove ads