Olthar wrote:Wow, this has to be one of the stupidest laws ever passed.
I dunno, there's some damn stupid laws.
Advertisement
by Ifreann » Thu May 31, 2012 4:10 pm
Olthar wrote:Wow, this has to be one of the stupidest laws ever passed.
by Imsogone » Thu May 31, 2012 4:13 pm
Terruana wrote:Gotta do something about the obesity epidemic.
by Parpolitic Citizens » Thu May 31, 2012 4:17 pm
by Ifreann » Thu May 31, 2012 4:17 pm
Terruana wrote:Gotta do something about the obesity epidemic.
by Vetalia » Thu May 31, 2012 4:17 pm
by Samuraikoku » Thu May 31, 2012 4:18 pm
by Hallistar » Thu May 31, 2012 4:21 pm
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu May 31, 2012 4:21 pm
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:Anyone with a proper understanding of how the human brain is effected by the temptation of food stimulus should support this. Obesity is an unrelenting curse with a no greater than a 15% cure rate.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Parpolitic Citizens » Thu May 31, 2012 4:25 pm
Pope Joan wrote:"Forget about super-sizing sugary drinks in New York City starting in Spring of 2013. Mayor Michael Bloomberg, frustrated he couldn't get a 'soda tax' passed, is ordering restaurants and delis to stop selling sodas, sugared teas and other sweet high-calorie drinks, over 16 ounces, in restaurants, delis, movie theatres and sports arenas."
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/video/def ... E|featured
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/busin ... t-business
Is this a good thing? Some people actually need those calories, what about them?
There is no proof that obesity leads to higher health costs, no proven cause-and-effect relationship, so I say government should not tell us what not to drink.
THURSDAY, April 12 (HealthDay News) -- A new study finds that obesity accounts for nearly 21 percent of U.S. health care spending, which is more than twice as high as previous estimates.
The findings strengthen the case for government intervention to prevent obesity, said the researchers from Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y.
The researchers found that an obese person's medical costs are $2,741 a year higher (in 2005 dollars) than if they were not obese. That works out to $190.2 billion a year nationally, or 20.6 percent of total U.S. health spending.
by Vetalia » Thu May 31, 2012 4:27 pm
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:THURSDAY, April 12 (HealthDay News) -- A new study finds that obesity accounts for nearly 21 percent of U.S. health care spending, which is more than twice as high as previous estimates.
The findings strengthen the case for government intervention to prevent obesity, said the researchers from Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y.
The researchers found that an obese person's medical costs are $2,741 a year higher (in 2005 dollars) than if they were not obese. That works out to $190.2 billion a year nationally, or 20.6 percent of total U.S. health spending.
Stop being wrong.
by Terruana » Thu May 31, 2012 4:29 pm
by Parpolitic Citizens » Thu May 31, 2012 4:35 pm
Vetalia wrote:
Considering the healthcare industry is one of the major sources of job and economic growth in this country, I honestly don't see how this is a bad thing. Even so, it really is up to the individual to decide; if they're willing to pay more as a result of poor health choices, that should be their decision.
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu May 31, 2012 4:36 pm
Vetalia wrote:
Considering the healthcare industry is one of the major sources of job and economic growth in this country, I honestly don't see how this is a bad thing. Even so, it really is up to the individual to decide; if they're willing to pay more as a result of poor health choices, that should be their decision.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Vetalia » Thu May 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Seems akin to the broken window fallacy, besides, not not everyone's healthcare costs are borne by themselves.
by Vetalia » Thu May 31, 2012 4:46 pm
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:I would say no. Those poor health choices cost everyone else money and diverts cash away from more productive sectors. Secondly, you're acting as if obesity is a choice. No possible long term treatment has been found with a cure rate of over 15%.
by Freiheit Reich » Thu May 31, 2012 5:00 pm
by Parpolitic Citizens » Thu May 31, 2012 5:01 pm
Vetalia wrote:Parpolitic Citizens wrote:I would say no. Those poor health choices cost everyone else money and diverts cash away from more productive sectors. Secondly, you're acting as if obesity is a choice. No possible long term treatment has been found with a cure rate of over 15%.
Productive sectors like what?
That being said, obesity is a choice. People can always choose to alter their diet, exercise, and lose weight...food supply in the United States and its colonial predecessors has not only been cheap but has been more than adequate, even overabundant since the 17th century and yet obesity only exploded during the latter half of the 20th and 21st centuries. I think the problem goes much deeper than sodas.
by Parpolitic Citizens » Thu May 31, 2012 5:04 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:from Atlas Shrugged: There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted—and you create a nation of law-breakers—and then you cash in on guilt.
This is what the US govt. does time and time again. Pass laws which allow lobbyists and lawyers to get wealthy and increase govt. power. Welcome to the "Land of the Free."
by The Serbian Empire » Thu May 31, 2012 5:06 pm
Divair wrote:The utter fuck? How did this pass?
by Imsogone » Thu May 31, 2012 5:07 pm
Parpolitic Citizens wrote:Freiheit Reich wrote:from Atlas Shrugged: There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted—and you create a nation of law-breakers—and then you cash in on guilt.
This is what the US govt. does time and time again. Pass laws which allow lobbyists and lawyers to get wealthy and increase govt. power. Welcome to the "Land of the Free."
There is no such thing as innocence. All actions are inextricably linked. It would be preferable to everyone if you keep your poorly written fiction to yourself.
by Mandicoria » Thu May 31, 2012 5:08 pm
by Amacia » Thu May 31, 2012 5:09 pm
by Wamitoria » Thu May 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Mandicoria wrote:THE SON OF A BITCH AIN'T NO ONE TAKING MY SODA AWAY! Nah I don't live in NYC so I don't care about it, but yeah its a bullshit law.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Atrito, Cyptopir, El Lazaro, Forsher, Gallade, Hekp, Hrstrovokia, Mr TM, New Neeburm, Pale Dawn, Repreteop, Sarolandia, Shidei, Uiiop, Valles Marineris Mining co, Zancostan
Advertisement