Should Sex be illegal?

[Zutroy]

If sex were illegal that would make me happy.

I don't care. Either you have no intention of persuading others, or you're just very bad at it. In either case your opinion is uninteresting without that. Your unhappiness with others having sex while you don't is, to be blunt, your problem.

See. I done told you. He wants to go all the way. Well... not in the sense that the rest of us are familiar with....

[AiliailiA]

I don't care. Either you have no intention of persuading others, or you're just very bad at it. In either case your opinion is uninteresting without that. Your unhappiness with others having sex while you don't is, to be blunt, your problem.

See. I done told you. He wants to go all the way. Well... not in the sense that the rest of us are familiar with....

I was a bit too harsh there. I had the same "problem" once, though I was a bit younger than Raeyh.

Purberty wasn't welcome, it was like a guffawing belching farting jackass moved into my brain. Anything that reminded me of sex was like thirty seconds of not following the coherent and poetic train of though I'd been on, but listening to the jackass hooting and swearing instead. The jackass pretty much moved in permanently, though his manners have improved.

Making sex illegal didn't occur to me, but I'd never been anywhere like NSG where someone might actually suggest it. I just wished there was no such thing as sex. That lasted a few weeks and for that time I probably would have been happier if sex had always been illegal. It would still be there but people would make more effort to conceal it.

[Norstal]

Sounds like a personal problem.

It's society's problem.

Seeing as how no one else wants to ban sex, it's your personal problem that you're trying to enforce on other people.

Or in other words, you are a hatiater; one who radiates hate.

[1000 Cats]

you are a hatiater; one who radiates hate.

Quoting.

[Jafas United]

If conservatives wanted to ban sex, Newt Gingrich would be a goner.

Same with Herman Cain and Rudy Giuliani.

[Samuraikoku]

Where's the NS Ordo Logica when you need it?

You rang?

It's society's problem.

All my "why?" questions directed to you so far have been unfruitful, but for the sake of determination I'll ask one more.

Why should it be society's problem seeing as you're the only one here that poses such a statement?

[Kamany]

Sounds like a personal problem.

It's society's problem.

Why? When a person has sex, does it hurt you? I must say no. Is it dangerous? no, of course. Is it immoral? certainly not, it's love. is it anti-religious? one more time no, God never forbid sex, in the majority of the religions clergy can have sex.
It's a stupid question, I must be to since I answer but less than the person who thinks it must be illegal.

[Raeyh]

It's society's problem.

Why? When a person has sex, does it hurt you? I must say no. Is it dangerous? no, of course. Is it immoral? certainly not, it's love. is it anti-religious? one more time no, God never forbid sex, in the majority of the religions clergy can have sex.
It's a stupid question, I must be to since I answer but less than the person who thinks it must be illegal.

Because humanity refuses to give up sex, now everyone has to deal with a sex drive. If society gave up sex, then humanity would evolve and become less sexual over time. In time, we would have no compulsion to have sex at all and the sex crimes committed throughout the world would be a thing of the past.

[Ifreann]

Sounds like a personal problem.

It's society's problem.

Your unhappiness is not society's problem.

---

Why? When a person has sex, does it hurt you? I must say no. Is it dangerous? no, of course. Is it immoral? certainly not, it's love. is it anti-religious? one more time no, God never forbid sex, in the majority of the religions clergy can have sex.
It's a stupid question, I must be to since I answer but less than the person who thinks it must be illegal.

Because humanity refuses to give up sex, now everyone has to deal with a sex drive. If society gave up sex, then humanity would evolve and become less sexual over time.

Evolution does not work that way. Not even a little bit.

In time, we would have no compulsion to have sex at all and the sex crimes committed throughout the world would be a thing of the past.

Except no, people would still want to have sex just as much. You can't eliminate people's sex drive by making having sex a crime.

[Djang]

Ban sex!?!! Why not ban beer while you're at it?

[Popcornpopper]

It should not be illegal that is against creating children Never

[Raeyh]

Evolution does not work that way. Not even a little bit.

If sexual intercourse arose through evolution, why can't it go away through evolution?

[Norstal]

Evolution does not work that way. Not even a little bit.

If sexual intercourse arose through evolution, why can't it go away through evolution?

Errr, how do you pass off genes then?

[Kamany]

Why? When a person has sex, does it hurt you? I must say no. Is it dangerous? no, of course. Is it immoral? certainly not, it's love. is it anti-religious? one more time no, God never forbid sex, in the majority of the religions clergy can have sex.
It's a stupid question, I must be to since I answer but less than the person who thinks it must be illegal.

Because humanity refuses to give up sex, now everyone has to deal with a sex drive. If society gave up sex, then humanity would evolve and become less sexual over time. In time, we would have no compulsion to have sex at all and the sex crimes committed throughout the world would be a thing of the past.

And why not put illegal money to don't be stolen, and cars illegal too, to stop road accidents. Society can't live without sex. It influences our behaviors, a family without sex can't exist. Maybe you never it, you're frustrated. You want to punish everyone for your fails.
Ah ah, it's very easy to have this judgement about you. But for *** like you I can't offer more.

[The Thorn Birds]

Absolutely not!

But it SHOULD be between a man and wife.

[Raeyh]

If sexual intercourse arose through evolution, why can't it go away through evolution?

Errr, how do you pass off genes then?

We can reproduce without sex.

[Kamany]

Absolutely not!

But it SHOULD be between a man and wife.

No, between two humans, and that's all.

[Djang]

Sex isn't just for reproduction, it is used to strengthen bonds within groups, this allows them to work together more readily and develop larger brains to process complex emotions caused by social interactions. This is also seen in chimpanzees and bonobos. That's why it won't "go away".

[Samuraikoku]

Because humanity refuses to give up sex, now everyone has to deal with a sex drive.

And how is that a bad thing, again?

If society gave up sex, then humanity would evolve and become less sexual over time. In time, we would have no compulsion to have sex at all and the sex crimes committed throughout the world would be a thing of the past.

The same way you want to implement communism by banning money, right?

How did that work out before 1989?

[Norstal]

Errr, how do you pass off genes then?

We can reproduce without sex.

No, you need to pass off genes to evolve. You can reproduce and evolve through in-vitro as well...which requires masturbation on the man's part, so I'm guessing you want cloning, which doesn't pass off genes.

[Raeyh]

Sex isn't just for reproduction, it is used to strengthen bonds within groups, this allows them to work together more readily and develop larger brains to process complex emotions caused by social interactions. This is also seen in chimpanzees and bonobos. That's why it won't "go away".

There are plenty of ways to strength bonds in groups and socialize that don't involve sex.

which requires masturbation on the man's part

I don't think being touched during a hernia check is sexual, there is no reason sperm collection could also not be divorced of sexuality.

[Ifreann]

Evolution does not work that way. Not even a little bit.

If sexual intercourse arose through evolution, why can't it go away through evolution?

Because it remains evolutionarily advantageous, no matter what laws you pass.

---

Errr, how do you pass off genes then?

We can reproduce without sex.

But the traditional method is easier.

[The Thorn Birds]

Absolutely not!

But it SHOULD be between a man and wife.

No, between two humans, and that's all.

Well, that's my opinion! I won't be peeking in your windows as long as you don't peek in mine!

[Raeyh]

Because it remains evolutionarily advantageous, no matter what laws you pass.

Your blind conservatism is holding society back. We can move beyond sex, perhaps to something better.

[Kamany]

No, between two humans, and that's all.

Well, that's my opinion! I won't be peeking in your windows as long as you don't peek in mine!

I just an answer, don't cry. I had my point of view, it's a debate, accept neighbor's cases. And I can't let it written, I can't accept homophobia.