NATION

PASSWORD

Obama Trolls Senate Republicans: Progressives Delighted

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:39 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
Tekania wrote:LOL@ "unprecedented". I'd suggest the one senator in that story to check out a copy of the US Constitution... recess appointments are quite precedented and, their boy "Dubya" made no less than 6 when he was in office.
It's "unprecedented" because they thought that banging the gavel for 60 seconds every three days made it "not a recess."


Yes, they were surely standing behind the concrete rule of a non-binding brief from an administrative department. They might as well made a tank out of toilet tissue.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Hippostania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8826
Founded: Nov 23, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Hippostania » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:39 pm

Nationstatelandsville wrote:The only people you have something against this are his immediate political rivals. You know, the guys who want to keep him from doing anything?

You mean the guys who are trying to keep this country in check before Obama gets kicked out in November..?
Factbook - New Embassy Program
Economic Right: 10.00 - Social Authoritarian: 2.87 - Foreign Policy Neoconservative: 9.54 - Cultural Liberal: -1.14
For: market liberalism, capitalism, eurofederalism, neoconservatism, British unionism, atlanticism, LGB rights, abortion rights, Greater Israel, Pan-Western federalism, NATO, USA, EU
Against: communism, socialism, anarchism, eurosceptism, agrarianism, Swiss/Irish/Scottish/Welsh independence, cultural relativism, all things Russian, aboriginal/native American special rights

Hippo's Political Party Rankings (updated 21/7/2013)

User avatar
Nationstatelandsville
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 70969
Founded: Apr 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationstatelandsville » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:40 pm

Hippostania wrote:
Nationstatelandsville wrote:The only people you have something against this are his immediate political rivals. You know, the guys who want to keep him from doing anything?

You mean the guys who are trying to keep this country in check before Obama gets kicked out in November..?


No, I mean the crazy ones pulling bipartisan bullshit.

Why do you have anything against this? It happens all the time.
"Then I was fertilized and grew wise;
From a word to a word I was led to a word,
From a work to a work I was led to a work."
- Odin, Hávamál 138-141, the Poetic Edda, as translated by Dan McCoy.

I enjoy meta-humor and self-deprecation. Annoying, right?

Goodbye.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:41 pm

Nationstatelandsville wrote:[
What exactly is the difference between ebil democrats and us normal hippie bastard democrats?


I haven't figured it out personally. Seems to depend on which side was winning in what-ever conflict.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:41 pm

Finally, he's willing to skirt the bounds to win. I've been waiting a while for Obama to roll up his sleeves and start playing dirty. He is, after all, against the dirtiest sons of bitches in Washington today. I hope he keeps this up, because he might actually start winning back the people who've been ambivalent toward him as of late.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Bluth Corporation
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6849
Founded: Apr 15, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Bluth Corporation » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:41 pm

Tekania wrote:
Bluth Corporation wrote:
That's the "short soundbite" version. The reality is much more nuanced.


IOW, you're pro-Obama simply to piss them off.... I can respect that.


More like, when they opened their mouths I realized how absurd their positions were, which forced me to reconsider.

But sure, that's part of it too :)
Last edited by Bluth Corporation on Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Huge Mistake of Bluth Corporation
Capital: Newport Beach, Shostakovich | Starting Quarterback: Peyton Manning #18 | Company President: Michael Bluth

Champions of: World Bowl X


You should really be using Slackware

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21671
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:42 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
Tekania wrote:
It's okay, there is little chance their voter-base knows what is in the constitution anyway and will just assume what they say is true. And that this is an unconstitutional move by the ebil democrats.

If we're lucky, the House will try to impeach him over this.


Yes, I would like to see republican congressmen flopping on the floor and foaming at the mouth.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
THE NEW NEWLY UNITED STATES
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 383
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby THE NEW NEWLY UNITED STATES » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:43 pm

sadly this wont do anything since Obama just pissed off most of the country while making the smaller percent happier
national anthem http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kGuftnYHnQ

Those mean, evil mods say I can't troll in my sig. :(
communism may fail but my country's socialism doesn't
O PARTY OF LENIN
say this if you support Communism (or at least liberalism) IC

User avatar
New Conglomerate
Minister
 
Posts: 3467
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Conglomerate » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:43 pm

Tekania wrote:
New Conglomerate wrote:If we're lucky, the House will try to impeach him over this.


Yes, I would like to see republican congressmen flopping on the floor and foaming at the mouth.

We might be able to get Cantor and Boehner to do just that.
Current WA Delegate of The NationStates Community.

User avatar
Nationstatelandsville
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 70969
Founded: Apr 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationstatelandsville » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:43 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:Finally, he's willing to skirt the bounds to win. I've been waiting a while for Obama to roll up his sleeves and start playing dirty. He is, after all, against the dirtiest sons of bitches in Washington today. I hope he keeps this up, because he might actually start winning back the people who've been ambivalent toward him as of late.


Shhh... don't let him know he did something right. He'll get scared and run back to the White House to sulk.
"Then I was fertilized and grew wise;
From a word to a word I was led to a word,
From a work to a work I was led to a work."
- Odin, Hávamál 138-141, the Poetic Edda, as translated by Dan McCoy.

I enjoy meta-humor and self-deprecation. Annoying, right?

Goodbye.

User avatar
New Conglomerate
Minister
 
Posts: 3467
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Conglomerate » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:44 pm

THE NEW NEWLY UNITED STATES wrote:sadly this wont do anything since Obama just pissed off most of the country

Pissed off who? The Republicans? Most certainly, but they're only about 30% of the electorate.

The independents? They don't pay attention.

The Democrats? 100% of them must be REALLY happy about this, and they're about 40% of the electorate.
Current WA Delegate of The NationStates Community.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:45 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
Tekania wrote:
Yes, I would like to see republican congressmen flopping on the floor and foaming at the mouth.

We might be able to get Cantor and Boehner to do just that.


If you can get them to stop masturbating to the FOX Coverage of their attempt long enough to take the floor, that is.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
New Conglomerate
Minister
 
Posts: 3467
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Conglomerate » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:46 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
New Conglomerate wrote:We might be able to get Cantor and Boehner to do just that.


If you can get them to stop masturbating to the FOX Coverage of their attempt long enough to take the floor, that is.

They would look so petty and insane that they might as well give up on getting the Senate.
Current WA Delegate of The NationStates Community.

User avatar
The Republic of Lanos
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17727
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Lanos » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:46 pm

For once I'd like to think that things aren't getting any worse when it came to politics but that would have to wait until after the election when the hard and controversial decisions are made to avoid alienating the base. This is one of those times where the base is more important than the rest of us Americans especially during election season. At least Bush's weren't made in such a controversial manner and during a break that didn't last for three days as once determined in the Clinton Justice Department.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:47 pm

I'll say here what I said on Yahoo.
It seems that Obama has finally relocated his balls.

User avatar
New Conglomerate
Minister
 
Posts: 3467
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Conglomerate » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:47 pm

The Republic of Lanos wrote:For once I'd like to think that things aren't getting any worse when it came to politics but that would have to wait until after the election when the hard and controversial decisions are made to avoid alienating the base. This is one of those times where the base is more important than the rest of us Americans especially during election season. At least Bush's weren't made in such a controversial manner and during a break that didn't last for three days as once determined in the Clinton Justice Department.

Exactly. It's only OK when Bush did it. Just not when the black guy does it.
Current WA Delegate of The NationStates Community.

User avatar
The Republic of Lanos
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17727
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Lanos » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:49 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:For once I'd like to think that things aren't getting any worse when it came to politics but that would have to wait until after the election when the hard and controversial decisions are made to avoid alienating the base. This is one of those times where the base is more important than the rest of us Americans especially during election season. At least Bush's weren't made in such a controversial manner and during a break that didn't last for three days as once determined in the Clinton Justice Department.

Exactly. It's only OK when Bush did it. Just not when the black guy does it.


I'm sorry. I'm not racist. I don't know where you got that idea. Just pointing out the last guy who did these sorts of things.

User avatar
JuNii
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13517
Founded: Aug 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby JuNii » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:50 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
WASHINGTON (CNNMoney) - In a move that has angered Republicans, President Obama is expected on Wednesday to make a recess appointment of Richard Cordray to be the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, sidestepping the Senate confirmation process, a senior administration official tells CNN.

The president is expected to make the official announcement at a 1:15 p.m. ET speech in Ohio, where Cordray served as attorney general.

Last month, the Senate failed to muster enough votes to take up confirmation of Cordray to run the consumer bureau, with all but one Republican voting against the move. At the time, President Obama hinted that was considering such a recess appointment.

News of the impending recess appointment spurred a flurry of angry statements from GOP leaders who have been trying to block a recess appointment for more than seven months.

"President Obama, in an unprecedented move, has arrogantly circumvented the American people by 'recess' appointing Richard Cordray as director of the new CFPB," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in a statement.

At stake are vast new powers the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau can't wield without a director. For example, the bureau can't regulate financial products from non-banks, including student loan providers, debt collectors, payday lenders and check cashers.

Without a chief, the bureau also can't regulate mortgage originators and servicers, which played a big role in the financial crisis by providing subprime mortgages to families who couldn't afford them.

The move has sharpened tension between the White House and Republicans, who have vowed since May to block confirmation of any director unless they get structural changes to the bureau, which was formed as part of the Wall Street reform law passed last year.

Republicans had been using a little-known procedure to keep the Senate in session - even as it wasn't really conducting any business - in order to stop the president from making recess appointments. Their basis for the move comes from a non-binding Department of Justice brief from 1993 that states Congress should be in recess for more than three days before the president makes an official recess appointment.

Until now, Obama has not tried to challenge the GOP's effort to block his recess appointments. However, legal experts have said they believed Obama had the authority to make such a recess appointment despite Congressional attempts to block him.

GOP leaders say they don't think Obama has the power to make a recess appointment, given their moves. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Cordray's appointment is on "uncertain legal territory," in a statement.

And House Speaker John Boehner went a step further stating he expects "courts will find the appointment to be illegitimate," in a statement.

Republicans say their objection to Cordray's nomination has nothing to do with the nominee.

Instead, they want three big changes to how the bureau is overseen. They want to replace the director with a board; make the bureau ask Congress for money each year; and gain more power to overrule the bureau.

–CNN's Adam Aigner-Treworgy contributed to this report.

Source

Fuck yeah. Obama has apparently stolen someone's spine and he looks ready to beat the Republicans over the head with it. More info to follow.

What do you think of this developement?


Yeah... if he can't get what he wants, find a way that won't require you working with the other side... good work President Obama! :clap:
on the other hand... I have another set of fingers.

Unscramble these words...1) PNEIS. 2)HTIELR 3) NGGERI 4) BUTTSXE
1) SPINE. 2) LITHER 3)GINGER 4)SUBTEXT

User avatar
West Vandengaarde
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1717
Founded: Jan 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby West Vandengaarde » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:50 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:For once I'd like to think that things aren't getting any worse when it came to politics but that would have to wait until after the election when the hard and controversial decisions are made to avoid alienating the base. This is one of those times where the base is more important than the rest of us Americans especially during election season. At least Bush's weren't made in such a controversial manner and during a break that didn't last for three days as once determined in the Clinton Justice Department.

Exactly. It's only OK when Bush did it. Just not when the black guy does it.

*democrat
It's not racism, it's petty partisanship.
"Conscious of my own weakness, I can only seek fervently the guidance of the Ruler of the Universe, and, relying on His all-powerful aid, do my best to restore Union and peace to a suffering people, and to establish and guard their liberties and rights." - George B. McClellan

User avatar
Nationstatelandsville
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 70969
Founded: Apr 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationstatelandsville » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:51 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:For once I'd like to think that things aren't getting any worse when it came to politics but that would have to wait until after the election when the hard and controversial decisions are made to avoid alienating the base. This is one of those times where the base is more important than the rest of us Americans especially during election season. At least Bush's weren't made in such a controversial manner and during a break that didn't last for three days as once determined in the Clinton Justice Department.

Exactly. It's only OK when Bush did it. Just not when the black guy does it.


Basically, it boils down to this: We've reached a secret agreement with minorities. They can be president now, but they can't do any thing a normal president would, like have a spine or buy an actual dog.
"Then I was fertilized and grew wise;
From a word to a word I was led to a word,
From a work to a work I was led to a work."
- Odin, Hávamál 138-141, the Poetic Edda, as translated by Dan McCoy.

I enjoy meta-humor and self-deprecation. Annoying, right?

Goodbye.

User avatar
West Vandengaarde
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1717
Founded: Jan 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby West Vandengaarde » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:52 pm

Nationstatelandsville wrote:
New Conglomerate wrote:Exactly. It's only OK when Bush did it. Just not when the black guy does it.


Basically, it boils down to this: We've reached a secret agreement with minorities. They can be president now, but they can't do any thing a normal president would, like have a spine or buy an actual dog.

Except as I just said up there it's not at all racism, or having anything to do with race. It's the political parties, not the skin colors. Is everything about race now?
"Conscious of my own weakness, I can only seek fervently the guidance of the Ruler of the Universe, and, relying on His all-powerful aid, do my best to restore Union and peace to a suffering people, and to establish and guard their liberties and rights." - George B. McClellan

User avatar
Nationstatelandsville
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 70969
Founded: Apr 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nationstatelandsville » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:53 pm

West Vandengaarde wrote:
Nationstatelandsville wrote:
Basically, it boils down to this: We've reached a secret agreement with minorities. They can be president now, but they can't do any thing a normal president would, like have a spine or buy an actual dog.

Except as I just said up there it's not at all racism, or having anything to do with race. It's the political parties, not the skin colors. Is everything about race now?


Is there something against jokes now?
"Then I was fertilized and grew wise;
From a word to a word I was led to a word,
From a work to a work I was led to a work."
- Odin, Hávamál 138-141, the Poetic Edda, as translated by Dan McCoy.

I enjoy meta-humor and self-deprecation. Annoying, right?

Goodbye.

User avatar
JuNii
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13517
Founded: Aug 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby JuNii » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:53 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:For once I'd like to think that things aren't getting any worse when it came to politics but that would have to wait until after the election when the hard and controversial decisions are made to avoid alienating the base. This is one of those times where the base is more important than the rest of us Americans especially during election season. At least Bush's weren't made in such a controversial manner and during a break that didn't last for three days as once determined in the Clinton Justice Department.

Exactly. It's only OK when Bush did it. Just not when the black guy does it.

and because someone else did it, that makes it perfectly ok for anyone else to do it. :clap:
on the other hand... I have another set of fingers.

Unscramble these words...1) PNEIS. 2)HTIELR 3) NGGERI 4) BUTTSXE
1) SPINE. 2) LITHER 3)GINGER 4)SUBTEXT

User avatar
West Vandengaarde
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1717
Founded: Jan 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby West Vandengaarde » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:53 pm

Nationstatelandsville wrote:
West Vandengaarde wrote:Except as I just said up there it's not at all racism, or having anything to do with race. It's the political parties, not the skin colors. Is everything about race now?


Is there something against jokes now?

When they make false implications that amount to slander, sure.
"Conscious of my own weakness, I can only seek fervently the guidance of the Ruler of the Universe, and, relying on His all-powerful aid, do my best to restore Union and peace to a suffering people, and to establish and guard their liberties and rights." - George B. McClellan

User avatar
THE NEW NEWLY UNITED STATES
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 383
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby THE NEW NEWLY UNITED STATES » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:53 pm

New Conglomerate wrote:
The Republic of Lanos wrote:For once I'd like to think that things aren't getting any worse when it came to politics but that would have to wait until after the election when the hard and controversial decisions are made to avoid alienating the base. This is one of those times where the base is more important than the rest of us Americans especially during election season. At least Bush's weren't made in such a controversial manner and during a break that didn't last for three days as once determined in the Clinton Justice Department.

Exactly. It's only OK when Bush did it. Just not when the black guy does it.

What did you expect? They are still many racists in the USA since most tend to be *cough*republican*cough.

lol anti obama ad at the bottom

then again Bush did act well....... disturbing
Last edited by THE NEW NEWLY UNITED STATES on Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
national anthem http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kGuftnYHnQ

Those mean, evil mods say I can't troll in my sig. :(
communism may fail but my country's socialism doesn't
O PARTY OF LENIN
say this if you support Communism (or at least liberalism) IC

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Attestaltarragaby, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bovad, Cerula, Corporate Collective Salvation, Decapoleis, El Lazaro, ImperialRussia, Pale Dawn, Philjia, Poliski, Shrillland, Sodor and Seljaryssk, Tungstan, United Islamic Emirat, Uvolla, Valdez Islands, Welskerland, Zetaopalatopia, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads