by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:44 pm
by Imsogone » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:47 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:As I was having lunch with my neighbor today, we somehow got to the topic of Justin Bieber. Now to clear something up: I hate Justin Bieber. And as I tried to explain this to her, I kept running into several "road blocks" in my argument. First, I made the case that he sounds like a pubescent little bitch. She countered by saying a lot of people do. Second, he makes horrible music that sells millions. She replied that hundreds if not thousands of corporations, businesses, and individuals do this (except not always with music, sometimes it's another product, and she also sidetracked into how this shows one of the evils of capitalism -she's a damn dirty socialist).
And I began to realize something, that I really have no sound or logical argument against the guy. After all I've played black ops to hear guys sound like girls, and while I agree that his music, this product, is horrible, so what? Power to him. He managed to turn shit into gold, kind of like Steve Jobs did with Apple products (as I type this on my MacBook Pro -heh), or like Fox did with American Idol. He found something that makes him money, and he ran with it. People don't have to listen to him, they don't have to buy his products. I don't blame him, I'd do the same thing.
So I've come to three obvious conclusions:
1). The producers or those who fund these horrible, horrible people aren't to blame. The consumers are. They buy his albums, they download his songs, they attend his concerts, they watch his movies, and so on.
2). That this unadulterated hatred for him stems from the annoyance of hearing his fame and wealth due to slight jealousies we have.
3). And finally that my neighbor is a smart gal for a socialist and I, by making a full 180 as a former religious person or ex-smoker would towards their past beliefs or vices, will adopt the complete opposite position that I once held, and proclaim my never ending love of all things Bieber.
As you read this (if you read this), you may wonder, "why the fuck do I give a shit?" And I'll tell you why, nay, I'll ask:
Why do you hate Bieber? Is there a logical reason? Where is the love? Or am I merely, in my semi-druken state, dribbling on with nonsense? Is it possible to have a hot, intelligent woman whose a socialist, or is she a government agent testing my patriotism?
*As always, I apologize for the length.
by The Blaatschapen » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:49 pm
by Simon Cowell of the RR » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:50 pm
by Desperate Measures » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:56 pm
by Alyakia » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:56 pm
by The Congregationists » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:58 pm
by SaintB » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:01 pm
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:02 pm
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:03 pm
by Alyakia » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:04 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Alyakia wrote:
It's hard enough to find ANY woman in certain right-wing rallies, let alone any hot and intelligent ones. Palestine Solidarty rallies, for example, however... Well...
That's a half truth. I've gone to conservative rallies where there were a lot of attractive women, though because the Democrats dominate in my state, it's easier to find them at their functions than the GOPs. However when I worked for my county's Democratic Party, the women there were grotesque (one being the daughter of a state senator, because it sure as hell wasn't her looks that got here). However when I was sent to the state convention, yeah, some of the delegates were very attractive. So I imagine it depends where. I don't think all conservative women are ugly, at least as much as I do liberal ones.
by New Manvir » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:06 pm
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:06 pm
Alyakia wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
That's a half truth. I've gone to conservative rallies where there were a lot of attractive women, though because the Democrats dominate in my state, it's easier to find them at their functions than the GOPs. However when I worked for my county's Democratic Party, the women there were grotesque (one being the daughter of a state senator, because it sure as hell wasn't her looks that got here). However when I was sent to the state convention, yeah, some of the delegates were very attractive. So I imagine it depends where. I don't think all conservative women are ugly, at least as much as I do liberal ones.
What about libertarian ones?
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:07 pm
New Manvir wrote:I hate Bieber becauser he refused to go to North Korea and serenade Dear Leader Kim Jong-Il. His affront to glorious Juche and the worker's revolution shall not go unpunished.
by SaintB » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:08 pm
by Alyakia » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:08 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Alyakia wrote:What about libertarian ones?
Actually I have to say, libertarians party hard. When I attended a week long seminar for the IHS at Wake Forest in June, we got drunk every single freaking night, to where half of the people there were missing the morning lectures. HAHA Some of them may be batshit crazy, but they know how to have a good time.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:11 pm
by Norstal » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:11 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Why do you hate Bieber? Is there a logical reason? Where is the love? Or am I merely, in my semi-druken state, dribbling on with nonsense? Is it possible to have a hot, intelligent woman whose a socialist, or is she a government agent testing my patriotism?
*As always, I apologize for the length.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Furious Grandmothers » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:11 pm
by The USOT » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:11 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote: First, I made the case that he sounds like a pubescent little bitch. She countered by saying a lot of people do.
Whilst I agree with her critique of capitalism, her point is stupid. Those people who make horrible manifucatured untalented music ARE ALSO TERRIBLE! Just because 1 person does it, does not mean that everyone else who doesnt do it isnt irritating (in fact by that logic, her socialist argument actually falls apart completely)Second, he makes horrible music that sells millions. She replied that hundreds if not thousands of corporations, businesses, and individuals do this (except not always with music, sometimes it's another product, and she also sidetracked into how this shows one of the evils of capitalism -she's a damn dirty socialist).
Your. You had 2 apparently undeveloped arguments.And I began to realize something, that I really have no sound or logical argument against the guy.
Hitler was great at oratory and manipulating people. Should we historically praise his rule over Nazi germany and his killing of the jews because it made him happy and wealthy?while I agree that his music, this product, is horrible, so what? Power to him. He managed to turn shit into gold, kind of like Steve Jobs did with Apple products (as I type this on my MacBook Pro -heh), or like Fox did with American Idol. He found something that makes him money, and he ran with it.
Unfortunately, yes we do. The guy is everywhere, as in, I cant turn on my TV or radio without him coming up eventually unless I want to go on some music channel/station specifically dedicated to 1 style of music (but how dull is that?)People don't have to listen to him
Because they are KIDS. Any good producer worth his job knows how media can influence children. Its bad enough that children are driven to listen to his crap, but the fact that even adults have to listen to it because its everywhere is just annoyingSo I've come to three obvious conclusions:
1). The producers or those who fund these horrible, horrible people aren't to blame. The consumers are. They buy his albums, they download his songs, they attend his concerts, they watch his movies, and so on.
OR a general dislike of untalented people abusing a system to gain money? Not everyone cares about being wealthy2). That this unadulterated hatred for him stems from the annoyance of hearing his fame and wealth due to slight jealousies we have.
Well thats a given3). And finally that my neighbor is a smart gal for a socialist
by Norstal » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:13 pm
Furious Grandmothers wrote:I suppose he has been portrayed as the apotheosis of the depravity of today's music, and therefore a symbol at which creampies are thrown?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by 1000 Cats » Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:37 pm
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Immoren, Jetan, Spirit of Hope, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement