Advertisement
by Militia Alliance » Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:57 pm
by Namabia » Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:58 pm
Socialist Xlyvania wrote:As a Democrat, Paul is different than most republicans and he's the only Republican that I think will put the people first. Unfortunately, the media won't let him win.
by Kwasbeccastan » Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:58 pm
by Wienholdland » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:00 pm
You really believe that getting the federal government out of education will result in no education?Kwasbeccastan wrote:I agree with him on some points. But getting rid of the EPA and the Dept. of Education without a clear idea of how we'd supplant their purposes? Strict Constitutionalism with a pooly educated electorate, that is ridiculously polarized? If Ron Paul was elected we'd need an immediate Constitutional convention.
by Kwasbeccastan » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:02 pm
Wienholdland wrote:You really believe that getting the federal government out of education will result in no education?Kwasbeccastan wrote:I agree with him on some points. But getting rid of the EPA and the Dept. of Education without a clear idea of how we'd supplant their purposes? Strict Constitutionalism with a pooly educated electorate, that is ridiculously polarized? If Ron Paul was elected we'd need an immediate Constitutional convention.
by Bavin » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:02 pm
by Lost ones tribesmen » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:02 pm
by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:03 pm
by Terra Agora » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:05 pm
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:social democrats and democratic socialists are different things...i disagree with them (social democrats) on value added taxation, bailouts (which they usually support), democratic control of workplace (which they oppose), maximum wage, nationalization (which i oppose)...i could go on and on...
by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:07 pm
by Terra Agora » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:12 pm
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:We'll just have to agree to disagree...i guess...
by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:18 pm
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:20 pm
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:No, most left-libertarians oppose what would be called a free market...they support worker-control of enterprises and of their own social structures...social democrats have lost much of their left-libertarian values they used to have...im not a social democrat...
by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:22 pm
by Terra Agora » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:22 pm
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:Many, if not most, left-libertarians envision a more decentralized human scale economy and a more egalitarian organization of society taking shape upon the removal of the myriad forms of state privilege promoting centralization, exploitation, and the unsustainable, cancerous forms of growth resulting from artificial economies of scale.
This here is not really against me or democratic socialism (this is from left libertarian.org)...this is pretty much the same thing....
by The Black Forrest » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:24 pm
Terra Agora wrote:The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:Many, if not most, left-libertarians envision a more decentralized human scale economy and a more egalitarian organization of society taking shape upon the removal of the myriad forms of state privilege promoting centralization, exploitation, and the unsustainable, cancerous forms of growth resulting from artificial economies of scale.
This here is not really against me or democratic socialism (this is from left libertarian.org)...this is pretty much the same thing....
Which is a free market. No minimum wage, no regulation, etc. All libertarians support this.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:24 pm
Kwasbeccastan wrote:I agree with him on some points. But getting rid of the EPA and the Dept. of Education without a clear idea of how we'd supplant their purposes? Strict Constitutionalism with a pooly educated electorate, that is ridiculously polarized? If Ron Paul was elected we'd need an immediate Constitutional convention.
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:45 pm
H-Alba wrote:I am not voting (I can't vote; i'm not a US citizen), but if I were I would vote for Stewart Alexander.
by Melkor Unchained » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:04 pm
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:16 pm
by The Black Forrest » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:22 pm
by Simon Cowell of the RR » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:22 pm
by Sibirsky » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:35 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:
He changes his statements a little too much.
I saw another interview were he mentioned having them compete against paper but of course gold would win.
Isn't that basically saying bring back the gold standard......
by Sucrati » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:37 pm
Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:I don't usually say serious stuff, but don't vote for this guy. Seriously. Anyone who reads Ayn Rand without laughing needs to run 100 yards off a 50 yard pier.
Besides, you cannot 'fix the US dollar' without controlling inflation. If you let it go by market value it will plummet into nonexistence. Unless you want to start practicing your Mandarin, he is not a good idea.
You see, social darwinism works when you are at the top of the pack. Bad news kids, we're not.
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Hwiteard, Ineva, Liberal Malaysia, Nu Elysium, Perishna, Rediora, Shazbotdom, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tuskenica, Vanuzgard
Advertisement