What is your view on homosexual rights and why?

by **Niur** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:08 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:Explain how it makes you less. :] go.
Difference? That's a good thing. Nobody wants a world of 100% identicalness.

It cant breed a child. It isnt the natural use of those parts.

Difference is good, to an extent. Perversity isnt.

You do realize that screwing a dog can't breed a child, nor is it the natural use of those parts...

by **Umbra Ac Silentium** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:08 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:You miss my point completely. :3 I find both hot as *****. People who like to intrude where they're not needed, waving the banner of "MORALITY" "TRADITION" and "IT OFFENDS ME" are behind them being banned. ;] Aka, people like YOU.

Yes well see, when I tried not being religious, I was 'suppressed' for my views. And not only by religious people. By secularists who told me "Incest is bad and animals arent human', without presenting convincing logic for it, OR convincing beliefs for it.

Because secular = Bodily Sovereignists? Full rights activists? No. It's people who're secular. ;]

by **Draconian Races** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:09 pm

Niur wrote:
Draconian Races wrote:
It cant breed a child. It isnt the natural use of those parts.

Difference is good, to an extent. Perversity isnt.

You do realize that screwing a dog can't breed a child, nor is it the natural use of those parts...

Yes I do.

As I said, if I wasnt looking through my moral/religious glasses, I wouldnt disallow homosexuality. I wouldnt partake in it as a matter of taste, but I wouldnt stop anyone else from it.

by **Sibirsky** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:09 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
NERVUN wrote:Gang... let's simmer down the heat a bit, m'k? It's getting a bit toasty in here and I'd hate to break out the firehouses.

Yes ma'am.

It's sir.

by **Umbra Ac Silentium** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:10 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
Niur wrote:You do realize that screwing a dog can't breed a child, nor is it the natural use of those parts...

Yes I do.

As I said, if I wasnt looking through my moral/religious glasses, I wouldnt disallow homosexuality. I wouldnt partake in it as a matter of taste, but I wouldnt stop anyone else from it.

For one, you're not the one allowing or disallowing it. Sure, you can campaign either way, but it's not up to you. Second, take off the glasses. ;]

by **Mussoliniopoli** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:10 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:Wow, I just walked into the thread and I am completely lost. Can someone give me a quick fill-in as to what's going on?

Most people in thread = Pro Queer
Some people including me = Anti Queer

summarize it?

So how long have you been suppressing your homosexual desires?

by **Umbra Ac Silentium** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:10 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Yes ma'am.

It's sir.

NERVUN is not a girl. :eyebrow:

by **The Truth and Light** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:11 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
Niur wrote:You do realize that screwing a dog can't breed a child, nor is it the natural use of those parts...

Yes I do.

As I said, if I wasnt looking through my moral/religious glasses, I wouldnt disallow homosexuality. I wouldnt partake in it as a matter of taste, but I wouldnt stop anyone else from it.

*snatches your glasses and stomps them into bits*

Better now?

May I ask, why did you need those anyway?

by **Nightkill the Emperor** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:11 pm

Coffee Cakes wrote:
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:

How does that get a clap?
i stated as early as page 2 on here i support gay marriage...

It was a good change, proving his bigoted views.

by **Sibirsky** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:11 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:It's sir.

NERVUN is not a girl.

Not at all.

by **Marcheria** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:11 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
Niur wrote:You do realize that screwing a dog can't breed a child, nor is it the natural use of those parts...

Yes I do.

As I said, if I wasnt looking through my moral/religious glasses, I wouldnt disallow homosexuality. I wouldnt partake in it as a matter of taste, but I wouldnt stop anyone else from it.

So you're saying that you'd stay on the side, in silent disapproval? Ok, I'm fine with that. As long as you aren't trying to change the way people live their lives.

by **Niur** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:11 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
Niur wrote:You do realize that screwing a dog can't breed a child, nor is it the natural use of those parts...

Yes I do.

As I said, if I wasnt looking through my moral/religious glasses, I wouldnt disallow homosexuality. I wouldnt partake in it as a matter of taste, but I wouldnt stop anyone else from it.

Okay. . o. O..... ooo... ookayy..... ... whuuu....uhm.... I don't........don't even know.................

by **The Truth and Light** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:11 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:It's sir.

NERVUN is not a girl.

Ma'am = madam = woman

Sir= man

by **Buffett and Colbert** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:12 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
Niur wrote:You do realize that screwing a dog can't breed a child, nor is it the natural use of those parts...

Yes I do.

As I said, if I wasnt looking through my moral/religious glasses, I wouldnt disallow homosexuality. I wouldnt partake in it as a matter of taste, but I wouldnt stop anyone else from it.

The Bible condemns incest and bestiality, you know.

by **Draconian Races** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:12 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Draconian Races wrote:
Yes I do.

As I said, if I wasnt looking through my moral/religious glasses, I wouldnt disallow homosexuality. I wouldnt partake in it as a matter of taste, but I wouldnt stop anyone else from it.

*snatches your glasses and stomps them into bits*

Better now?

May I ask, why did you need those anyway?

Are bestiality or incest legal yet?

by **Umbra Ac Silentium** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:12 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:NERVUN is not a girl.

Ma'am = madam = woman

Sir= man

No.

by **The Truth and Light** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:14 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:*snatches your glasses and stomps them into bits*

Better now?

May I ask, why did you need those anyway?

Are bestiality or incest legal yet?

They will be if more people like you get their glasses stomped on.

by **NERVUN** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:14 pm

Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:It's sir.

NERVUN is not a girl.

Get over here a sec...

by **The Rich Port** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:14 pm

New Asgariath wrote:I'm against gay rights.

Here are my problems with gayness:
1) It goes against my religion
2) It goes against the social code
3) It destroys the value of "the family"
4) No one wants to see a bunch of gay people making out. Ever. Anywhere. I don't wanna see it. If they must be gay, then they can be so in their bedrooms. It should not be legal. In fact, some people have trouble when straight people make out. So no gay!
5) People might as well start making laws so that you can marry your cat. Why not? If you're gonna be stupid enough to marry the same sex, why not marry a different species? Soon we're going to be petitioning for bestial gay marriage. Gay cat lovers. This is what America is being reduced to.
6) It's just gay!

TROOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLL

by **Niur** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:14 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:*snatches your glasses and stomps them into bits*

Better now?

May I ask, why did you need those anyway?

Are bestiality or incest legal yet?

Only because you haven't done anything about it. You can't just sit there, expecting things to happen, all the while despising others for what they have done, which is make something that was once taboo, at least somewhat accepted. If you want bestiality and incest to be legal, you have to go out there and advocate for them.

by **Draconian Races** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:14 pm

The Truth and Light wrote:
Draconian Races wrote:
Are bestiality or incest legal yet?

They will be if more people like you get their glasses stomped on.

ALot of people already had them stomped, and actually did.
Yet Florida just outlawed bestiality.

Why should I 'tolerate' what I dislike personally, when what I like isnt 'tolerated' openly.

So, back to my religious glasses

by **Marcheria** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:15 pm

NERVUN wrote:
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:NERVUN is not a girl.

Get over here a sec...

Schlap, schlap, schlapadap all day...

by **The Nuclear Fist** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:15 pm

Draconian Races wrote:Are bestiality or incest legal yet?

You're comparing apples to assholes, comrade.

Sex between two consenting people of significant mental maturity is fine. An animal cannot consent. And incest is disgusting to me. That does not mean that siblings shouldn't be able to fuck each other if they want to.

by **Coffee Cakes** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:16 pm

Um... to the people bashing religion... not all religionists oppose gay rights the way DR is...

In this thread alone there's St. George and I that support it...

That being said, even Jesus distinguishes moral and secular authority:

Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and give to God what is God's.

I don't remember the chapter and verse, but I'm sure that's in the book of Matthew.

by **Umbra Ac Silentium** » Thu May 19, 2011 5:16 pm

Draconian Races wrote:
The Truth and Light wrote:*snatches your glasses and stomps them into bits*

Better now?

May I ask, why did you need those anyway?

Are bestiality or incest legal yet?

Alaska, Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington D.C.

All where you can marry your first cousin.
Bestiality is also legal in 18 states, maybe just 17, not sure. :]

What is your view on homosexual rights and why?

Who is online