by The Novian Union » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:16 pm
by Christmahanikwanzikah » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:17 pm
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:18 pm
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:[redacted]
by Nazi Flower Power » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:26 pm
by Lilistrea » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:35 pm
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:38 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:We need to censor Nazis to prevent them from spreading their hateful views.
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Siorafrica » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:42 pm
Lilistrea wrote:As far as I know, everything worth censoring is already illegal. For example; It's illegal to breach national security, it's illegal to trade in corporate secrets, it's illegal to produce or distribute child pornography, it's illegal to publish libellous and slanderous material, and so on.
As such I don't think censorship really needs to exist.
by Bitchkitten » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:43 pm
by Lackadaisical2 » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:45 pm
Bitchkitten wrote:Certain things should be unavailable to children. Other than that, no holds barred. Even stuff like child porn, if it doesn't feature actual kids, should not be censored. If a couple of pervs want to draw pornograpic pistures of kids and write pornographic stories about them- well, just as long as I don't have to see it.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:46 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Maurepas » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:47 pm
Sorratsin wrote:Some things have to be censored in order for the state to function effectively, troop movements comes to mind. But in general, censorship should practiced as little as possible.
by Mike the Progressive » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:47 pm
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:Anyways, my opinion on the subject is this; nothing, and I mean nothing should be censored.
by Nazi Flower Power » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:55 pm
by Caninope » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:58 pm
Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.
Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.
by Bitchkitten » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:59 pm
by Kubra » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:04 pm
if u can't take the heat get out of the oven, Sylvia PlathLackadaisical2 wrote:Bitchkitten wrote:Certain things should be unavailable to children. Other than that, no holds barred. Even stuff like child porn, if it doesn't feature actual kids, should not be censored. If a couple of pervs want to draw pornograpic pistures of kids and write pornographic stories about them- well, just as long as I don't have to see it.
Quite right. Although I rather like slander and libel to be punishable with civil suits, not sure thats the same as censorship though.
by Norstal » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:07 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Bitchkitten wrote:Certain things should be unavailable to children. Other than that, no holds barred. Even stuff like child porn, if it doesn't feature actual kids, should not be censored. If a couple of pervs want to draw pornograpic pistures of kids and write pornographic stories about them- well, just as long as I don't have to see it.
Quite right. Although I rather like slander and libel to be punishable with civil suits, not sure thats the same as censorship though.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Make up your own mind » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:18 pm
Norstal wrote:Lackadaisical2 wrote:Quite right. Although I rather like slander and libel to be punishable with civil suits, not sure thats the same as censorship though.
It's not. Because publishing "Microsoft loses billions of dollars after partnership with Apple" as a journalistic article is flat out lying.
Sociobiology wrote:yes because such people always want to believe they have a clue about psychology, come to think of it everyone does, must be a fluke caused by wiring us to model other peoples brains in ours.
by Lackadaisical2 » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:19 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Kubra » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:37 pm
But if she DID turn it on shit woulda went down.Lackadaisical2 wrote:Kubra wrote: if u can't take the heat get out of the oven, Sylvia Plath
I kinda doubt anyone would go so far as to publish anything about me, so I'm not worried too much about it personally, but those acts can in fact cause damages for someone, something they'd be entitled reparations for.
Also, Plath didn't have the oven on, but funny none the less.
by Hathradic States » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:26 pm
by The Parkus Empire » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:29 pm
Hathradic States wrote:That, during times of national strife, the State should use it in order to secure unity in the nation, and avoid division.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Infected Mushroom, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement